{"id":363635,"date":"2025-10-13T14:00:54","date_gmt":"2025-10-13T08:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=363635"},"modified":"2025-10-14T14:37:35","modified_gmt":"2025-10-14T09:07:35","slug":"landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Landlord not required to disclose exact nature of use of premise in eviction petition: Delhi HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a revision petition challenging the order dated 3-11-2017 (‘impugned order’), wherein the Additional Rent Controller (‘ARC’) had dismissed the eviction petition stating that the landlord had failed to disclose the exact nature of use of the premises, the Single Judge Bench, Saurabh Banerjee, J<\/span>, held that as long as the landlord had a bona fide requirement of the premise, he was not required to disclose the exact nature of use of the premises in an eviction petition.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The petitioner-landlord had filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e)<\/a> of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958<\/a> (‘the Act’) against the respondent-tenant seeking eviction as there was a bona fide requirement of his own for commencing business. The ARC vide the impugned order had rejected the eviction petition stating that since the landlord had not specified the exact nature and kind of business he intended to run, the tenant’s application for leave to defend was allowed.<\/p>\n

The impugned judgement was challenged in the instant revision application.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court noted that even through the ARC had dismissed the eviction petition of the landlord after a full-fledged trial, it had done so in a summarily manner and without considering the issue of bona fide requirement of the landlord. The ARC had relied on the vagueness regarding use of the property by the landlord to hold that the landlord had failed to objectively justify his need for the premises.<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that the Act does not require the landlord to divulge anything regarding the new business he intends to set up in his own premises. The landlord is not required to prove the precise nature of the business he intends to commence from the shop in question. Hence, the Court opined that the sole basis of the ARC for dismissing the eviction petition was against the very tenets of the Act, was fundamentally wrong and had no foundation to stand on<\/p>\n

The Court further opined that keeping in mind the fast-changing nature of the economy, the requirement of disclosure of new business may be fluid. The landlord is not required to spell out the exact nature or purpose of the said new business and be bound by it, taking the risk of inviting an application under Section 19 of the Act.<\/p>\n

The Court therefore, held that since all the requisites for satisfaction by a landlord in an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act had been met, there was an error apparent on the face of record. The ARC had erred in following a procedure against the very tenets of the Act.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Court considered it a fit case for interference by the Court under the revisionary jurisdiction and set aside the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n

[H.S. Banka v. Mohan Lal, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 6372<\/a>, decided on 8-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Ajaya Bhardwaj, Harshit Bhardwaj, Shubham, Advocates<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Gaurav Bhardwaj, Garima Bhardwaj, Advocates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 is silent about any requirement of the landlord giving the details\/ divulging anything qua the nature\/ purpose\/ disclosure of the proposed new business by the landlord.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":363639,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[69312,2543,69315,57201,68814,90791],"class_list":["post-363635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bona-fide-requirement","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-delhi-rent-control-act-1958","tag-eviction-petition","tag-justice-saurabh-banerjee","tag-tenancy-dispute"],"yoast_head":"\nLandlord not required to show exact use in eviction petition: Del HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that a landlord seeking to evict a tenant is not required to disclose the exact nature of use of premises.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Landlord not required to disclose exact nature of use of premise in eviction petition: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that a landlord seeking to evict a tenant is not required to disclose the exact nature of use of premises.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-13T08:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-14T09:07:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Landlord not required to disclose exact nature of use of premise in eviction petition: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Landlord not required to show exact use in eviction petition: Del HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-13T08:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-14T09:07:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that a landlord seeking to evict a tenant is not required to disclose the exact nature of use of premises.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"landlord not required to disclose exact use\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Landlord not required to disclose exact nature of use of premise in eviction petition: Delhi HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Landlord not required to show exact use in eviction petition: Del HC | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court held that a landlord seeking to evict a tenant is not required to disclose the exact nature of use of premises.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Landlord not required to disclose exact nature of use of premise in eviction petition: Delhi HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that a landlord seeking to evict a tenant is not required to disclose the exact nature of use of premises.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-13T08:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-14T09:07:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Landlord not required to disclose exact nature of use of premise in eviction petition: Delhi HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/","name":"Landlord not required to show exact use in eviction petition: Del HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-13T08:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-14T09:07:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that a landlord seeking to evict a tenant is not required to disclose the exact nature of use of premises.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"landlord not required to disclose exact use"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Landlord not required to disclose exact nature of use of premise in eviction petition: Delhi HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":363765,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/14\/purchase-of-other-properties-is-no-impediment-for-eviction-proceeding-by-landlord-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":363635,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court: Sale, purchase or lease of other properties by landlord not an impediment to file eviction proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWith respect to the bona fide requirement of the landlord, the landlord was only to make out a legitimate case setting out the plausible reason which are not fanciful and unreasonable to establish a bona fide requirement of the subject premises.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"eviction proceeding by landlord","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/eviction-proceeding-by-landlord.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/eviction-proceeding-by-landlord.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/eviction-proceeding-by-landlord.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/eviction-proceeding-by-landlord.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372572,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/14\/del-hc-tenant-cannot-dispute-landlord-tenant-relationship-oral-sale\/","url_meta":{"origin":363635,"position":1},"title":"Tenant can’t dispute admitted tenant-landlord relationship by plea of oral sale; Delhi HC upholds eviction on Bona fide requirement","author":"Ritu","date":"January 14, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Landlord\u2019s bona fide requirement for himself or for his dependent family members, founded on age, medical condition and need for financial independence of his children, constitutes a genuine and valid ground for eviction.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tenant cannot dispute landlord-tenant relationship by oral sale","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/tenant-cannot-dispute-landlord-tenant-relationship-by-oral-sale.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/tenant-cannot-dispute-landlord-tenant-relationship-by-oral-sale.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/tenant-cannot-dispute-landlord-tenant-relationship-by-oral-sale.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/tenant-cannot-dispute-landlord-tenant-relationship-by-oral-sale.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353208,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/del-hc-landlord-tenant-financial-status-eviction-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":363635,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC: Landlord\u2019s financial well-being or tenant\u2019s financial ill-health not relevant to decide eviction petition under Delhi Rent Control Act","author":"Editor","date":"July 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court highlighted the egregious misuse of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 and observed that there are huge number of cases, where very well-off tenants enjoying financial prosperity, unjustly occupy premises for decades on-end, paying pittance for rent. While in the process, their landlords are forced into impecunious and desperate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"landlord financial status eviction petition","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delhi-249-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delhi-249-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delhi-249-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delhi-249-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217152,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/hp-hc-requirement-by-landlords-family-member-is-considered-a-requirement-by-landlord-for-his-own-use-eviction-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":363635,"position":3},"title":"HP HC | Requirement by landlord\u2019s family member is considered a requirement by landlord for \u2018his own use\u2019; eviction upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: The instant petition involved a question that whether the eviction of tenant could be ordered for settling married son of the landlord under Section 14(3)(a)(i) of H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, even the same was not covered by Section 14(3)(d) of the Act. The same\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205236,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/presumption-of-bona-fide-requirement-to-be-drawn-in-favour-of-landlord-order-of-arc-evicting-the-tenant-under-drc-act-upheld-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":363635,"position":4},"title":"Presumption of bona fide requirement to be drawn in favour of landlord; order of ARC evicting the tenant under DRC Act upheld: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of the Additional Rent Controller whereby he allowed the eviction petition filed by the respondent-landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The petitioner was a tenant of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/31\/dhc-financial-affluence-has-no-bearing-on-proceedings-under-s-141e-of-delhi-rent-control-act-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":363635,"position":5},"title":"\u201cFinancial affluence of landlord has no bearing on the proceedings under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958\u201d; Delhi HC upholds Additional Rent Controller\u2019s order","author":"Editor","date":"May 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court opined that there is no law that states that requirement of a rich man must be presumed to be devoid of \u2018bona fide\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=363635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363635\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/363639"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=363635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=363635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=363635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}