{"id":363366,"date":"2025-10-11T09:00:06","date_gmt":"2025-10-11T03:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=363366"},"modified":"2025-10-14T09:52:48","modified_gmt":"2025-10-14T04:22:48","slug":"railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the present appeal challenging Madhya Pradesh High Court&#8217;s dismissal of the claim petition seeking compensation on account of the death of the appellant&#8217;s husband in an alleged railway accident; the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span> and N.V. Anjaria, JJ., held that where an official railway inquiry or evidentiary record verifies the issuance of a ticket corresponding to the date and route of an untoward incident, such verification shall constitute <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> proof of bona fide travel, shifting the evidentiary burden on the Railway Administration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court explained that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">absence of a seizure memo, or the inability of the police to preserve physical evidence<\/span>, cannot by itself defeat a legitimate claim when the totality of circumstances supports the claimant&#8217;s version. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">This principle shall guide all future tribunals and High Courts in construing<\/span> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543234\" target=\"_blank\">124-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act, 1989<\/a>, so that the statutory right to compensation remains real, accessible, and consonant with the humanitarian purpose of the enactment.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant&#8217;s husband purchased a second-class ticket at Indore Railway Junction for travel to Ujjain by Ranthambore Express. It was alleged that due to overcrowding, he was pushed out of the running train, within the jurisdiction of Police Station Narwar, District Ujjain, resulting in fatal head injuries. An inquest under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519415\" target=\"_blank\">174<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> was registered and was closed as an accidental fall. Post-mortem report opined death due to profuse haemorrhage and shock consequent to head injury.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant being the widow and her minor son filed claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhopal (Tribunal), seeking compensation of &#8377;12,00,000. The Tribunal dismissed the claim petition on the ground that claimants had failed to prove deceased was a bonafide passenger. No ticket was recovered from his person or belongings, and the photocopy of tickets was considered doubtful as there was no seizure memo and the investigating officer was not examined. The Tribunal also noticed inconsistencies in the record regarding the place of incident.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellants then approached the High Court. Court. While accepting that the incident constituted an &#8220;untoward incident&#8221; under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543232\" target=\"_blank\">123(c)(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act<\/a>, the High Court nonetheless concurred with the Tribunal&#8217;s finding that deceased was not proved to be a bonafide passenger. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved with High Court&#8217;s verdict, the appellants approached the Supreme Court contending that High Court erred in dismissing their claim. Relying on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India v. Rina Devi<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/awPesCqm\" target=\"_blank\">(2019) 3 SCC 572<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kamukayi v. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/q0vQEt0u\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 642<\/a>, the appellants contended that mere non-recovery of ticket is not fatal, and once prima facie proof is given, the burden shifts on the Railways to disprove the said fact.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Per contra, the respondents argued that there existed no cogent primary evidence to establish that deceased was holding a valid ticket for the fateful journey. The photocopy of the alleged ticket produced was neither recovered at the spot nor proved through a seizure memo or testimony of witness establish that deceased had purchased the ticket; the concerned officer was not examined; and there is no contemporaneous record of an alarm or report of a fall from the running train in that sector.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the matter, the Court firstly delved into the legal position applicable in the case. It was stated that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543234\" target=\"_blank\">124-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act<\/a> embodies a no-fault regime for &#8220;untoward incidents&#8221;<\/span>, but <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">compensation remains predicated on the victim being a &#8220;passenger&#8221;<\/span>. In <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rina Devi (supra)<\/span>, therein the Court compensation under Sections 124\/124-A is payable &#8220;whether or not there has been wrongful act, neglect or fault&#8221; and clarified two facets namely: (i) the regime is one of strict (no-fault) liability, with exceptions confined to the proviso to Section 124-A; and (ii) mere non-recovery of a ticket from the victim&#8217;s person is not ipso facto fatal where the claimant lays a credible prima facie foundation, upon which the onus may shift to the Railways.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that appellants&#8217; case solely rests on the affidavit dated 10-02-2020 filed before the Railway Claims Tribunal wherein it was unequivocally stated that her deceased husband travelling from Indore to Ujjain by Ranthambore Express with ticket in second class. The appellant had further deposed that the ticket has been seized by the Police Narwar, District Ujjain and that on previous night before the travel, she was told by the deceased that he was going out with some work and asked for his Aadhar Card and ID proof and thereafter he left the house with his luggage. Before the Tribunal as well as before the High Court the appellants had placed reliance on Divisional Railway Manager (DRM) note to contend that Police Station Narwar while forwarding the documents to the railway authorities had forwarded a railway ticket.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the initial burden which was cast on the claimants stood discharged. The High Court while examining the issue as to whether appellants had proved deceased was a bonafide passenger, same was held in the negative on the premise that the railway ticket was not found along with the body of the deceased or along with the articles found near the body of the deceased.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court was not convinced with the respondents&#8217; contention vis-a-vis suspicious circumstances of the railway tickets as the appellants had discharged the initial burden which was cast on them to prove that the deceased had travelled in the train; secondly High Court by relying upon the report of DRM report, had arrived at a conclusion that the death of appellant&#8217;s husband would fall within the purview of expression &#8216;untoward incident&#8217; and thirdly, ticket which formed part of the police report stood unrebutted; Fourthly, the very same report also disclosed the Chief Booking Supervisor, Indore had verified the ticket produced along with the report of the police and certified that ticket had been issued from Indore Station.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court opined that High Court made an error in affirming the finding of the Railways Claims Tribunal whereunder the claimants petition had been rejected for nonproduction of a seizure memo of the ticket and for non-examination of the investigating officer, which is and was the main thrust of argument canvassed by the learned Counsel appearing for the Railways.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that mere technical irregularities or lapses in procedure should not defeat a legitimate claim under a welfare statue, like the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act, 1989<\/a>. Particularly Chapter XIII which deals with liability of railway administration for death and injury to passenger due to accident. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">A hyper technical approach which would frustrate the object of providing relief to victims of railway accidents should be eschewed.<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">The insistence on a formal seizure memo would amount to importing standard of proof which normally is sought for in a criminal trial<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reaffirmed that proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543234\" target=\"_blank\">124-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act<\/a> are not criminal trials demanding proof beyond reasonable doubt, but welfare statues are governed by the principles of preponderance and probabilities. Once the foundational facts of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">(i)<\/span> possession or issuance of a valid ticket, and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">(ii)<\/span> occurrence of an accidental fall from a train, are established through credible material, the statutory presumption of bona fide travel must operate in favour of the claimant. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Railways, as an instrumentality of the State, cannot defeat such claims by pointing to procedural imperfections in investigation or non-examination of formal witnesses. To hold otherwise would erode the beneficial character of the legislation and convert a social-justice remedy into a forensic obstacle race<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court held that findings of the Railway Claims Tribunal and the High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Cannot be sustainable and would warrant interference. Hence, the Judgments by the Railway Claims Tribunal Bhopal Bench and the Order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur were set aside and the claim petition was allowed in part and the Respondents were directed to pay a compensation of Rs.8,00,000\/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs) to the appellants-applicant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rajni v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/xHc3byqM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 2182<\/a>, decided on 8-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by Justice Aravind Kumar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. N.k. Mody, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ishita M Puranik, Adv. Ms. Jigisha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Prabuddha Singh Gour, Adv. Ms. Aniya, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G. Mr. Saransh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Pandey, Adv. Mr. Yashraj Bundela, Adv. Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Adv. Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court reaffirmed that proceedings under Section 124-A of the Railways Act are not criminal trials demanding proof beyond reasonable doubt, but welfare statues are governed by the principles of preponderance and probabilities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":363390,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[56504,90701,90700,90702,90703,90704,52446],"class_list":["post-363366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-justice-aravind-kumar","tag-proof-of-bona-fide-travel","tag-railway-accident-claims","tag-train-accident","tag-train-accident-deaths","tag-train-ticket","tag-untoward-incident"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Railway Accident Claims: SC on proof of bona fide travel in an untoward incident| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel for Railway Accident Claims: SC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel for Railway Accident Claims: SC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-11T03:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-14T04:22:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel: SC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Railway Accident Claims: SC on proof of bona fide travel in an untoward incident| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-11T03:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-14T04:22:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel for Railway Accident Claims: SC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Railway Accident Claims\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Railway Accident Claims: SC on proof of bona fide travel in an untoward incident| SCC Times","description":"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel for Railway Accident Claims: SC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel: SC","og_description":"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel for Railway Accident Claims: SC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-11T03:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-14T04:22:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel: SC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/","name":"Railway Accident Claims: SC on proof of bona fide travel in an untoward incident| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-11T03:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-14T04:22:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel for Railway Accident Claims: SC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Railway Accident Claims"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/railway-accident-claims-proof-of-bona-fide-travel-untoward-incident-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Verification of ticket issuance corresponding the date\/route of untoward incident by official railway inquiry can be a proof of bona fide travel: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Railway-Accident-Claims.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/27\/bombay-hc-set-aside-railway-tribunal-judgment-deceased-death-held-to-be-untoward-incident\/","url_meta":{"origin":363366,"position":0},"title":"[Train Accidents] | \u201cInjury sustained while deboarding from the wrong train cannot be termed as self-inflicted injury\u201d: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Setting aside the decision of the Railway Claims Tribunal and awarding compensation to legal representatives of the deceased the Court stated that a rash and negligent act cannot be equated with a criminal act resulting in self-inflicted injury and held that the injury sustained by the deceased was an \u2018untoward\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/02\/railways-act-circumstantial-evidence-sufficient-to-prove-untoward-incident-bom-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":363366,"position":1},"title":"Circumstantial evidence sufficient to prove &#8216;untoward incident&#8217; under Railways Act: Bombay HC grants compensation to deceased&#8217;s parents","author":"Editor","date":"December 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Railways Act is a beneficial legislation, and even in criminal matters, circumstantial evidence is taken into consideration for deciding whether the offence was committed or not.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Railways Act circumstantial evidence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Railways-Act-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Railways-Act-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Railways-Act-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Railways-Act-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/22\/ph-hc-merely-not-finding-a-ticket-from-the-body-of-a-person-who-died-in-railway-accident-does-not-prove-that-deceased-was-a-ticket-less-passenger\/","url_meta":{"origin":363366,"position":2},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Merely not finding a ticket from the body of a person who died in railway accident does not prove that deceased was a ticket less passenger","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Dr Ravi Ranjan, J. allowed the appeal filed by legal heirs of a person who died in a \u2018railway untoward accident\u2019, under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The claimants herein were the sons of the deceased person who died in an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":332600,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/07\/jhc-grants-rs8-lakh-compensation-to-wife-whose-husband-died-after-accidentally-falling-from-running-train\/","url_meta":{"origin":363366,"position":3},"title":"\u2018No evidence to show that deceased was not bona fide passenger\u2019; Jharkhand HC grants Rs. 8 lakh compensation to wife whose husband died after accidentally falling from running train","author":"Arushi","date":"October 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Even if the ticket was not recovered from his person while preparing the inquest report of the deceased, mere filing of the affidavit on behalf of the appellant was sufficient to raise the presumption that the deceased was bona fide passenger.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296352,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/09\/train-accidents-a-guide-to-claim-compensation-from-railways\/","url_meta":{"origin":363366,"position":4},"title":"Train Accidents: A Guide to Claim Compensation from Railways","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Around 22 benches of the Railway claims Tribunal have been set up at different parts of the country to decide the application for compensation","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"train accidents","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/train-accidents.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/train-accidents.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/train-accidents.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/train-accidents.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/24\/bom-hc-railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger\/","url_meta":{"origin":363366,"position":5},"title":"Railway employee travelling on Privilege Pass held bona fide passenger; Bombay HC grants Rs 3 lakh compensation despite missing journey entries","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely because an employee holding a valid pass fails to mention details himself, it cannot be held that he was travelling without a valid pass.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Railway employee travelling on pass held bona fide passenger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=363366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363366\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/363390"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=363366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=363366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=363366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}