{"id":363230,"date":"2025-10-10T10:00:15","date_gmt":"2025-10-10T04:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=363230"},"modified":"2025-10-13T10:26:22","modified_gmt":"2025-10-13T04:56:22","slug":"ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> The present appeal and revision petition was preferred against the common judgment passed by the Family Court, by which the husband&#8217;s petition for dissolution of marriage and the wife&#8217;s case for maintenance were allowed. The Division Bench of Sathish Ninan and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">P. Krishna Kumar*<\/span>, JJ., while allowing the divorce, observed that mistreating children amounted to mental cruelty against the husband under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001521264\" target=\"_blank\">10(1)(x)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808044\" target=\"_blank\">Divorce Act, 1869<\/a> (&#8216;Divorce Act&#8217;). However, after considering the nature of husband&#8217;s job, the Court enhanced the amount of maintenance from Rs 6000 to Rs 15,000.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The marriage was solemnized on 20-04-2006 under Christian law. The husband stated that on his first wife&#8217;s death he was left with two minor children, and since he was employed in Afghanistan, he married the second wife (&#8216;wife&#8217;), to ensure their care. However, the wife was neither attending to his children nor caring for his ailing father. When his father died, the husband shifted his daughter to a hostel because she was harassed by the wife. She also portrayed the younger son as a problematic ward, compelling the teachers to give him counselling, and even attempted to resort to sorcery on the child to remove him from the house resulting in grave mental agony for the child and the husband.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The wife also attempted to commit suicide without any cause by consuming an excessive number of tablets, but it was averted by timely medical care. At last, the husband had to send the child to his brother in Kuwait. Later, when he returned home on leave, the wife picked up a quarrel with him and left his company. These circumstances led the husband to seek a remedy for the dissolution of marriage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the wife denied all these allegations and contended that she had attended to her father-in-law and took care of the children, and it was the husband and his son who tortured her to such an extent that she swallowed the tablets. She filed the maintenance case submitting that she was unable to maintain herself, while the husband, being a Technician in the US military base in Afghanistan, received a monthly salary of more than Rs 2 lakh. Thus, she claimed Rs 50,000 as monthly maintenance. The husband contended that he was sending her Rs 10,000 to Rs 15,000 every month for the household expenses and her maintenance. The wife also did tailoring work and earned more than Rs 5000 per month. He also alleged that the wife deserted him without any justification and hence she was not entitled to get any maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Family Court tried both the divorce and maintenance cases together and concluded that the wife ill-treated the children which agonized their father, and hence he was entitled to get divorce. The Family Court also ordered the husband to pay Rs 6000 per month for maintenance, as there was no material to prove that the wife left the husband&#8217;s company on her own.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The wife&#8217;s counsel contended that the husband had claimed the dissolution of their marriage under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001521264\" target=\"_blank\">10(1)(x)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808044\" target=\"_blank\">Divorce Act<\/a> which could only be granted if the husband succeeded in proving the element of cruelty in the exact terms of the statute but none of the contentions raised by him amounted to cruelty within that section. He further submitted that the amount of maintenance was too low considering the husband&#8217;s status and income. However, the husband contended that the children&#8217;s ill-treatment amounted to mental cruelty against him.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">A. Husband<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">B. Wife<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ghrtKwMo\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">2010 SCC OnLine Ker 4925<\/span><\/a>, wherein it was held that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Judges were bound to interpret the concept of matrimonial cruelty in different personal laws in such a manner as to usher in identical standards of matrimonial cruelty for all citizens. It must shock the judicial conscience that a citizen belonging to any religious denomination ought to be compelled to endure greater or graver matrimonial cruelty merely based on his religious faith&#8221;<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that statutory provisions should be construed in conformity with the constitutional scheme and the mandate of equality. The Court found no justification in the wife&#8217;s attempt to challenge the judgment because if the wife ill-treated the children, it would certainly cause an apprehension in the husband&#8217;s mind that it would be harmful or injurious for him to live with her, where the expression &#8216;harmful or injurious&#8217; was not confined to physical acts alone but extended to mental torture as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the husband proved his allegations through his testimony and by examining his daughter, son and a few people who were personally acquainted with the wife&#8217;s alleged ill-treatment. The wife&#8217;s assertions were also not supported by sufficient evidence. The Court further noted that the wife tried to justify her attempt to commit suicide because of the ill-treatment by her husband and his son, but upon cross-examination, she stated that it was because she had a cold that she took an excessive number of pills. The Court held that it was a settled law that making such suicide attempts or threats amounted to cruelty on the spouse.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court decided not to interfere with the Family Court&#8217;s judgment to the extent of granting the decree of divorce. But, based on the husband&#8217;s income, and relying on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jasbir Kaur Sehgal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Distt. Judge, Dehradun<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NBZ66RCF\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(1997) 7 SCC 7<\/span><\/a>, and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rakhi Sadhukhan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Raja Sadhukhan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/GlpQhE6n\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1259<\/span><\/a>, the Court enhanced the maintenance amount to Rs 15,000 per month.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. Y, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/aG2JTfZ0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Ker 9454<\/a>, decided on 06-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice P. Krishna Kumar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> D.G. Vipin, Karol Mathews Sebastian Alencherry, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Abraham George Jacob, Jibu P Thomas, C. Muralikrishnan (Payyanur), Advocates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;If the wife ill-treated the children, it would certainly cause an apprehension in the husband&#8217;s mind that it would be harmful or injurious for him to live with her where the expression &#8216;harmful or injurious&#8217; was not confined to physical acts alone, but extended to mental torture as well.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":363252,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[20061,2846,90634,90513,90514,2523,2863,8391,90632,90633],"class_list":["post-363230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-dissolution-of-marriage","tag-divorce","tag-ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty","tag-justice-p-krishna-kumar","tag-justice-sathish-ninan","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-maintenance","tag-mental-cruelty","tag-section-101x-divorce-act-1869","tag-suicide-attempts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband:Kerala HC|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court upholds divorce observing that ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act, 1869.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court upholds divorce observing that ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act, 1869.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-10T04:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-13T04:56:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-10T04:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-13T04:56:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":981,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"dissolution of marriage\",\"divorce\",\"ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty\",\"Justice P. Krishna Kumar\",\"Justice Sathish Ninan\",\"Kerala High Court\",\"maintenance\",\"mental cruelty\",\"Section 10(1)(x) Divorce Act 1869\",\"suicide attempts\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband:Kerala HC|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-10T04:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-13T04:56:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court upholds divorce observing that ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act, 1869.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/10\\\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband:Kerala HC|SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court upholds divorce observing that ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act, 1869.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce","og_description":"Kerala High Court upholds divorce observing that ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act, 1869.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-10T04:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-13T04:56:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce","datePublished":"2025-10-10T04:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-13T04:56:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/"},"wordCount":981,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp","keywords":["dissolution of marriage","divorce","ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty","Justice P. Krishna Kumar","Justice Sathish Ninan","Kerala High Court","maintenance","mental cruelty","Section 10(1)(x) Divorce Act 1869","suicide attempts"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/","name":"Ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband:Kerala HC|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-10T04:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-13T04:56:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Kerala High Court upholds divorce observing that ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty against husband under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act, 1869.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"ill-treating stepchildren is cruelty"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty-against-husband-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Wife ill-treating stepchildren constitutes mental cruelty against husband under S. 10(1)(x) Divorce Act: Kerala HC upholds divorce"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ill-treating-stepchildren-is-cruelty.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":64371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/29\/past-acts-of-cruelty-after-condonation-are-not-a-ground-to-seek-divorce-unless-revived-by-later-acts-of-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":363230,"position":0},"title":"Past acts of cruelty after condonation, are not a ground to seek divorce, unless revived by later acts of cruelty","author":"Saba","date":"August 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Hearing an appeal against the Family Court's order dismissing the appellant husband's petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty, the Court observed that the law pertaining to cruelty is if by resuming cohabitation the spouse claiming victim of cruelty forgives the other spouse who commits\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/28\/flashback-ker-hc-if-a-husband-imputes-infidelity-and-immorality-on-the-part-of-his-wife-would-that-amount-to-cruelty-read-how-hc-discusses-applicability-of-s-27-of-special-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":363230,"position":1},"title":"[Flashback] Ker HC | If a husband imputes infidelity and immorality on the part of his wife, would that amount to cruelty? Read How HC discusses applicability of S. 27 of Special Marriage Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"To marry or not to marry and if so whom, may well be a private affair. But, the freedom to break a matrimonial tie is not. (N.G. Dastane v. S. Dastane: (1975) 2 SCC 326). Kerala High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ., while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235875,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/16\/tripura-hc-what-amounts-to-irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage-hc-discusses-in-case-where-the-couple-lived-apart-for-13-continuous-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":363230,"position":2},"title":"Tripura HC | What amounts to irretrievable breakdown of marriage? HC discusses in a case where the couple lived apart for 13 continuous years","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S. Talapatra and S.G. Chattopadhyay, JJ., upheld the decision of the trial court and stated that the present matter is a case of an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage in light of cruelty and desertion. Cruelty & Desertion | Dissolution of Marriage Allegations of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215522,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/10\/utt-hc-non-disclosure-of-major-ailments-before-marriage-amounts-to-cruelty-although-the-aliments-itself-are-no-grounds-for-divorce-dissolution-of-marriage-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":363230,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Non-disclosure of major ailments before marriage amounts to \u2018cruelty\u2019 although the aliments itself are no grounds for divorce; dissolution of marriage upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ. entertained an appeal by the appellant-wife under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 against the impugned judgment granting divorce passed by Principal Judge of Family Court. Facts giving rise to this appeal were, the respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":293221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/26\/denying-sexual-intercourse-to-spouse-without-sufficient-reason-amounts-to-mental-cruelty-allahabad-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":363230,"position":4},"title":"Denying sexual intercourse to spouse, without sufficient reason amounts to mental cruelty: Allahabad High Court grants divorce","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the Court below has adopted a hyper technical approach and passed the dismissal of the husband\u2019s divorce petition","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249385,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/07\/cruelty-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":363230,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Malevolent intention is not essential to cruelty; HC grants divorce on the ground of cruelty for making false allegation of impotency","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Kauser Edappagath, JJ., held that false allegation of impotency amounts to mental cruelty, hence, is a valid ground for dissolution of marriage. The appellant and the respondent were husband and wife, both doctors by profession. Both of them had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=363230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363230\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/363252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=363230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=363230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=363230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}