{"id":362689,"date":"2025-10-06T13:00:12","date_gmt":"2025-10-06T07:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=362689"},"modified":"2025-10-13T09:45:55","modified_gmt":"2025-10-13T04:15:55","slug":"del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants relief to Mattel over \u2018BARBIE\u2019 trade mark dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In an application under Order 39, Rules 1<\/a> and 2<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (‘CPC’) filed by Mattel Inc. for grant of a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing upon the trade mark ‘BARBIE’, the Single Judge Bench of Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J, held that the defendant’s marks were visually, phonetically and conceptually identical to that of the plaintiff’s and amounted to infringement of the plaintiff’s trade mark. Accordingly, the Court restrained the defendants from using the ‘BARBIE’ trade mark till further notice.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The plaintiff company, Mattel Inc., founded in 1945, revolutionized the toy market through several of its globally recognized brands like Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price, Uno and Scrabble. Mattel had coined and adopted the trade mark ‘BARBIE’ in 1959 which has since evolved into a multifaceted brand symbolizing imagination, aspiration and inspiration for generations. With widespread media coverage, high-profile collaborations, and massive advertising campaigns, ‘BARBIE’ trade mark has built colossal goodwill globally.<\/p>\n

Mattel had introduced the ‘BARBIE’ doll in India as early as 1987 and has since been continuously and extensively using the trademark BARBIE across a wide range of goods and services, not limited to toys. The word\/logo BARBIE \/ \"\" has been registered in multiple classes since 1985.<\/p>\n

The BARBIE brand enjoys immense goodwill and consumer recognition. Its products, ranging from dolls to apparel, cosmetics, accessories, and electronics, bottles, lunch boxes etc. are widely available across leading Indian e-commerce platforms.<\/p>\n

Defendant 1 was using the impugned BARBIE\/ \"\" marks in connection with commercial kitchen equipment by the name BARBIE KITCHEN MART\/ \"\", event management through BARBIE HOSPITALITY\/ \"\" and catering services by BARBIE CATERING\/ \"\".<\/p>\n

Mattel had contended that by using pink stylization and a similar logo, Defendant 1 was deliberately attempting to ride on Mattel’s goodwill and reputation. According to Mattel, such use amounted to trade mark infringement and passing off, as it created a strong likelihood of confusion, dilution, and false association with its brand.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court noted that BARBIE is the dominant prefix in the impugned marks and visually, phonetically and conceptually identical and the adoption of the same by Defendant 1 was without any reasonable explanation.<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that the Defendant 1 had adopted this famous mark so as to create an initial interest in the mind of the consumer with respect to the products of the defendant and to capture the customer’s attention. The Court further stated that he initial interest confusion test as deliberated upon in Under Armour Inc<\/span> v. Anish Agarwal<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3784<\/a> by a Division Bench of the Court is squarely attracted in the facts of this case.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court held that Mattel had made out a prima facie case in its favour, the balance of convenience is its favour and it was likely to suffer grave and irreparable harm in case an ad-interim injunction was not granted.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the court restrained Defendant 1 and all persons action on its behalf from using the impugned marks or any other marks deceptively similar to Mattel’s registered BARBIE trade mark. Defendant 1 was further directed to remove and takedown all their social media pages, profiles and accounts and websites containing the impugned marks.<\/p>\n

[Mattel Inc. v. Padum Borah, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 6312<\/a>, decided on 8-9-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Plaintiff:<\/span> Shwetasree Majumder, Prithvi Singh, Prithvi Gulati, Ritwik Marwaha, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Since 2011, through campaigns like ‘You Can Be Anything’ and initiatives such as the Shero program and Fashionistas collections, Mattel has promoted inclusivity, diversity, and women’s empowerment. With a vibrant online presence, scholarly attention, and millions of fans worldwide, the trademark BARBIE has evolved into a multifaceted brand symbolizing imagination, aspiration, and inspiration for generations.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":362710,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[90369,2543,14321,68839,90370,46158],"class_list":["post-362689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-barbie","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-interim-injunction","tag-justice-manmeet-pritam-singh-arora","tag-mattel","tag-trade-mark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC grants interim relief to Mattel in Barbie trade mark case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Mattel protecting the 'BARBIE' trade mark.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants relief to Mattel over \u2018BARBIE\u2019 trade mark dispute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Mattel protecting the 'BARBIE' trade mark.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-06T07:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-13T04:15:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants relief to Mattel over \u2018BARBIE\u2019 trade mark dispute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC grants interim relief to Mattel in Barbie trade mark case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-06T07:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-13T04:15:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Mattel protecting the 'BARBIE' trade mark.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Barbie trade mark case\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants relief to Mattel over \u2018BARBIE\u2019 trade mark dispute\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC grants interim relief to Mattel in Barbie trade mark case | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Mattel protecting the 'BARBIE' trade mark.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants relief to Mattel over \u2018BARBIE\u2019 trade mark dispute","og_description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Mattel protecting the 'BARBIE' trade mark.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-06T07:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-13T04:15:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants relief to Mattel over \u2018BARBIE\u2019 trade mark dispute","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/","name":"Del HC grants interim relief to Mattel in Barbie trade mark case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-06T07:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-13T04:15:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Mattel protecting the 'BARBIE' trade mark.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Barbie trade mark case"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-barbie-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants relief to Mattel over \u2018BARBIE\u2019 trade mark dispute"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Barbie-trade-mark-case.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":365789,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/05\/legal-roundup-ipr-october-2025-copyright-trademark-personality-rights-patent-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":362689,"position":0},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights October 2025: A monthly digest of key IPR developments","author":"Editor","date":"November 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Bringing together the most important IPR decisions from High Courts across India, this roundup offers an overview of October\u2019s major developments in copyright, trade mark, and personality rights, along with notable updates from related legal domains.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights October 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-to-itc-in-bukhara-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":362689,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction in favour of ITC restraining defendants from using well-known mark ‘BUKHARA’.","author":"Editor","date":"November 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The defendants were operating an 11-room hotel by the name of \u2018Bukhara Inn\u2019 and had refused to comply with the cease and desist notice sent by ITC Ltd.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bukhara trade mark","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Bukhara-trade-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Bukhara-trade-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Bukhara-trade-mark.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Bukhara-trade-mark.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-mattel-inc-for-word-mark-kickand-play-for-baby-gym-products-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":362689,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC grants permanent injunction to Mattel Inc. for \u2018Rainforest Family\u2019 characters and word mark \u2018KICK AND PLAY\u2019 for its baby gym products","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe plaintiff\u2019s baby gym product is quite a distinctive product which is designed in a particular form along with depiction of characters which are known loosely as a \u2018Rainforest Family\u2019 characters.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357484,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/22\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-to-premji-invest-in-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":362689,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Premji Invest, orders blocking of fake Apps and websites misusing its trade mark","author":"Editor","date":"August 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Defendants were operating several websites and applications to trick the general public into believing that they were associated with Premji Invest so as to scam them into illegal and fraudulent investments.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Premji Invest trade mark infringement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Premji-Invest-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Premji-Invest-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Premji-Invest-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Premji-Invest-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277907,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/23\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-along-with-2-lakhs-damages-in-favour-of-ebay-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":362689,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction along with 2 lakhs damages in favour of eBay in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark \u2018Shopibay\u2019 which was similar to the plaintiff's mark \u2018eBay\/EBAY\u2019, the Single Judge Bench of Navin Chawla, J. granted permanent injunction to \u2018eBay\u2019 and held that the adoption of mark by the defendant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/04\/legal-roundup-ipr-november-2025-copyright-trademark-personality-rights-patent-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":362689,"position":5},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights November 2025: Key IPR rulings of the Month","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Compiling key judgments from High Courts across India, this roundup presents November\u2019s significant developments in copyright, trade mark, trade dress, and personality rights, reflecting evolving trends in IP protection and enforcement.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights November 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=362689"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362689\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/362710"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=362689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=362689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}