{"id":362407,"date":"2025-10-03T15:30:14","date_gmt":"2025-10-03T10:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=362407"},"modified":"2025-10-09T09:49:59","modified_gmt":"2025-10-09T04:19:59","slug":"rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/","title":{"rendered":"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Rajasthan High Court<\/span>: In a civil miscellaneous appeal filed by the appellants, challenging the affirmation of an arbitral award by the Arbitrator and the Court, a Division Bench of Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Sanjeet Purohit, JJ.<\/span>, while dismissing the appeal held that the challenge to the existence of an arbitration clause was concluded by the Arbitrator and the Court under Section 11<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (‘1996 Act’), and thus, could not be re-examined under Sections 34<\/a> or 37<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>. Further, the Court stressed that the scope of judicial intervention in arbitral matters under Section 37 is limited within the strict confines of Section 34<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The appellant filed the appeal under Section 37<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>, against the Arbitral Award dated 08-06-2024 and the amended award dated 12-07-2024, which had been affirmed by the Commercial Court vide an order dated 13-06-2025. The Commercial Court had rejected the appellant’s application raising objections under Section 34<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>. The appellant argued that there was no arbitration agreement between the parties and there was a gross delay in raising the claim by the Respondent as the period of limitation had allegedly expired in 2015.<\/p>\n

Analysis And Decision<\/h3>\n

On the Existence of Arbitration Clause<\/p>\n

The Court considered the objection regarding the non-existence of an arbitration clause. The Court observed that the Arbitrator had already examined this issue and had conclusively held that an arbitration clause existed between the parties. The Court further noted that the Court, at the stage of the appointment of the Arbitrator under Section 11<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>, had also examined the said aspect and had reached the same conclusion that an inter se arbitration clause existed, which governed both the parties.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the challenge to the issue of the existence of the arbitration agreement, having been decided by the Arbitrator and the Court during the Section 11 proceedings, would not lie in terms of Section 34<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>. The Court referred to the provision of Section 34<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>, which limits the recourse against an arbitral award to specific grounds, such as the invalidity of the arbitration agreement or the arbitral award dealing with a dispute not contemplated by the terms of submission.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that in Punjab State Civil Supplies Corpn. Ltd. v. Sanman Rice Mills<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2632<\/a>, the Supreme Court held that, “the scope of the intervention of the court in arbitral matters is virtually prohibited, if not absolutely barred. Interference is confined only to the extent envisaged under Section 34<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>. The appellate power of Section 37<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a> is limited within the domain of Section 34. The appellate court has no authority of law to consider the matter in dispute on merits to find out whether the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal is right or wrong upon reappraisal of evidence, as if it is sitting in an ordinary court of appeal. The Arbitral Award is not liable to be interfered unless a case for interference as set out in the decision is made out.”<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court observed that the question regarding the existence of the arbitration clause was finally concluded at the stage of the Arbitrator himself, and further, having been decided by the Court while appointing the Arbitrator under Section 11, the Commercial Court had no jurisdiction to re-examine the same, and consequently, the challenge under Section 37 was not maintainable.<\/p>\n

On the Ground of Limitation<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the respondent was engaged in providing software and improvements which were continuously demanded by the appellant from time to time. Furthermore, the appellant had also directed the respondent to renew its performance bank guarantee from time to time, but the payments for the work performed were not released. The notices demanding the amount for the work performed, which was ongoing up to the year 2021, were issued on 09-11-2021. The Court concluded that the question of limitation did not arise at all in the present case, nor was it raised at any stage. Hence, the Court did not find any reason to entertain the objections under Section 37<\/a> of the 1996 Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court dismissed the appeal.<\/p>\n

[Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited v. Compucon Software Ltd., 2025 SCC OnLine Raj 4996<\/a>, decided on 15-09-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Appellant(s):<\/span> Sarvesh Jain, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent(s):<\/span> James Bedi and Aditya Maheshwari, Advocates<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The scope of the intervention of the court in arbitral matters is virtually prohibited, if not absolutely barred.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":362420,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2633,40741,23324,47046,3655,2575,90241,45421,27524,47804],"class_list":["post-362407","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitral_award","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-arbitration-clause","tag-commercial-court","tag-limitation","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-scope-of-judicial-intervention","tag-section-11","tag-section-34","tag-section-37"],"yoast_head":"\nRajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"“The scope of the intervention of the court in arbitral matters is virtually prohibited, if not absolutely barred.”\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-03T10:00:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-09T04:19:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/\",\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-03T10:00:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-09T04:19:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Appellate power under Section 37\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act","og_description":"“The scope of the intervention of the court in arbitral matters is virtually prohibited, if not absolutely barred.”","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-03T10:00:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-09T04:19:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/","name":"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-03T10:00:14+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-09T04:19:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Appellate power under Section 37"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/delhi-high-court-upholds-arbitral-award-as-reappreciation-of-evidence-is-beyond-the-scope-of-section-37-arbitration-act-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":362407,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court finds no ground for interference as reappreciation of evidence is beyond the scope of Section 37 Arbitration Act","author":"Editor","date":"February 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The scope of a challenge under Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 is limited to the grounds stipulated in Section 34 Arbitration Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":257196,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/17\/decreeing-a-claim-while-exercising-jurisdiction-under-section-37-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-impermissible-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":362407,"position":1},"title":"Decreeing a claim while exercising jurisdiction under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 impermissible: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Punjab and Haryana High Court not only set aside the judgment of the District Judge rejecting the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, but also awarded the claim of the respondents, together with interest, the bench of Dr.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269950,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/12\/rajasthan-high-court-no-award-can-be-remitted-to-the-arbitrator-where-there-are-no-findings-in-the-contentious-issues-of-the-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":362407,"position":2},"title":"Rajasthan High Court | No award can be remitted to the arbitrator where there are no findings in the contentious issues of the award","author":"Editor","date":"July 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. found that the writ petition by the petitioner lacks merit and dismissed it stating that no award can be remitted back to the arbitrator where there are no findings on the contentious issues of the award. The petitioner filed a writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268941,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/23\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-lack-of-immediate-remedy-under-arbitration-act-not-a-ground-to-challenge-an-arbitral-order-passed-on-miscellaneous-application-before-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":362407,"position":3},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court | Lack of immediate remedy under Arbitration Act not a ground to challenge an arbitral order passed on miscellaneous application before High Court","author":"Editor","date":"June 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: In the case where it was argued before the Court that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short \u201c1996 Act\u201d) does not provide for any remedy to challenge an arbitral order and was hence, against the \u201cpublic policy of India\u201d, Satyen Vaidya J. observed that,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/01\/aggrieved-by-an-order-refusing-condonation-of-delay-in-filing-application-under-section-34-of-the-arbitration-act-1996-appeal-lies-holds-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":362407,"position":4},"title":"Aggrieved by an order refusing condonation of delay in filing application under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996? Appeal lies, holds Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cUndoubtedly, a limited right of appeal is given under section 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1996. But it is not the province or duty of this Court to further limit such right by excluding appeals which are in fact provided for, given the language of the provision.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325330,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/29\/what-is-scope-of-hcs-power-under-section-37-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-ori-hc-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":362407,"position":5},"title":"Orissa High Court explains scope of High Court\u2019s power under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act","author":"Ritu","date":"June 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court held that the court\u2019s intervention is limited and emphasised on the autonomy of the arbitral process and the finality of the arbitral award.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362407","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=362407"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362407\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/362420"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362407"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=362407"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=362407"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}