{"id":362114,"date":"2025-09-30T13:30:53","date_gmt":"2025-09-30T08:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=362114"},"modified":"2025-10-03T17:33:36","modified_gmt":"2025-10-03T12:03:36","slug":"sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/","title":{"rendered":"All partners have unlimited liability for acts of partnership firm irrespective of their role or profit share: SEBI"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI):<\/span> The principle issue for determination in the present case was whether the Noticee was liable as a partner of Prowise Capital for the violation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534278\" target=\"_blank\">12(1)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002768476\" target=\"_blank\">Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992<\/a> (&#8216;SEBI Act&#8217;) read with Regulation 3(1) of the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (&#8216;2013 Regulation&#8217;), and Regulation 4(2)(k) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market), 2003 (&#8216;PFUTP Regulations&#8217;), and if so, what was the quantum of monies that she would be jointly and severally liable to refund the investors.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Ananth Narayan G (Whole Time Member) stated that since Prowise Capital is a partnership firm and all partners have unlimited liability for the acts of firm, regardless of the amount of profit or loss they individually derive. Accordingly, irrespective of their role or the extent of profit earned, every partner, including the Noticee, was liable for the acts of the firm. Thus, SEBI directed the Noticee to refund the monies monies received during her partnership period jointly and severally, with Prowise Capital and its other partners.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, SEBI had passed an Interim Order cum Show Cause Notice dated 27-07-2020, alleging illegal and unregistered investment advisory activities carried out by Prowise Capital (partnership firm) and its partners, including the Noticee. Further, the Noticee, as a partner, was held liable for violation of Section 12(1) of SEBI Act read with Regulation 3(1) of the 2013 Regulation, and Regulation 4(2)(k) of PFUTP Regulations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Final Order issued directions against the Noticee and other entities to refund the money received from investors as fees in respect of unregistered investment advisory activities. Additionally, the Noticee was debarred from accessing the securities market for period of 2 years from the date of completion of refund to investors.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Noticee challenged the Final Order before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), on the grounds that neither the Interim Order nor the Final Order was served on her and that she came to know of the Final Order only when her husband conducted an internet search. The SAT vide order dated 15-01-2025, had set aside the Final Order in respect of the Noticee and remitted the matter back to SEBI for fresh consideration in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the issue addressed in this matter was whether the Noticee was liable as partner of the partnership firm for the violation of the aforesaid provisions of the SEBI Act, 2013 Regulations, and 2003 Regulations, and whether she was liable to refund the investors. The Noticee contented that she had resigned within a short span of time and that registering the partnership firm with SEBI was beyond her scope and ability. Further, it was contended that she was not involved in decision-making or daily affairs of the firm, and that she did not receive any remuneration or profit from the partnership.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">SEBI held that Interim and Final Orders did not record the exact period during which the Noticee was a partner. However, on perusal of the Partnership Deed, Resignation Letter, and Affidavit, it was found that the Noticee had been partner only for the two-month period between 15-01-2016 and 15-03-2016.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">SEBI emphasised that the proceedings against the Noticee had been initiated under Sections 11(1), 11(4), and 11-B(1) of the SEBI Act and were quasi-judicial in nature, meaning that criminal law principles did not apply. Since Prowise Capital is a partnership firm and all partners have unlimited liability for the acts of firm, regardless of the amount of profit or loss they individually derive. Accordingly, irrespective of their role or the extent of profit earned, every partner, including the Noticee, was liable for the acts of the firm. Firm had carried out unregistered investment advisory activities from 30-01-2016 to 20-02-2020, but the Noticee was partner only for a short two-month period. Based on SEBI&#8217;s established practice, the total credits received by the firm during her partnership period, was Rs. 2,23,404.10. Therefore, the Noticee&#8217;s refund liability, along with the other noticees to the Final Order, was limited to that amount.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">SEBI directed the Noticee to refund the monies received during her partnership period, amounting to Rs. 2,23,404.10, jointly and severally with partnership firm and its other partners. Alternatively, instead of directly complying with the refund directions, the Noticee was given the option to open fixed deposit account in a Scheduled Commercial Bank, deposit the said amount, and mark a lien in favour of SEBI, which would then be utilized for the ongoing recovery and refund proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further SEBI directed that, in the event of failure to comply with these directions, SEBI could initiate proceedings under Section 28-A of the SEBI Act and take any further action as per law. As the Noticee had already undergone debarment for more than 3.5 years as per the Final Order dated 14-6-2021, it was concluded that no further debarment directions were warranted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">In the matter of Prowise Capital, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/AnwkCI42\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SEBI-OCM 17<\/a>, decided on 19-08-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">With respect to noticee&#8217;s liability as a partner, the noticee submitted that she resigned within short span of time and did not receive any remuneration or profit from the firm. Further, she was not a part of decisions or involved in day-to-day affairs of the firm.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67529,"featured_media":362127,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[90063,90064,90065,43128,34543,2563,21534],"class_list":["post-362114","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-partner-liability","tag-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm","tag-partners-liability-irrespective-of-their-role","tag-partnership-firm","tag-quasi-judicial-proceedings","tag-SEBI","tag-sebi-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SEBI on partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case related to partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm, SEBI stated that all partners have unlimited liability for acts of firm irrespective of their role or profit share\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All partners have unlimited liability for acts of partnership firm irrespective of their role or profit share: SEBI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case related to partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm, SEBI stated that all partners have unlimited liability for acts of firm irrespective of their role or profit share\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-30T08:00:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-03T12:03:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nikita\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"All partners have unlimited liability for acts of partnership firm irrespective of their role or profit share: SEBI\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nikita\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/\",\"name\":\"SEBI on partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-30T08:00:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-03T12:03:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de038ad7e203d6dc647d81499b0fa078\"},\"description\":\"In a case related to partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm, SEBI stated that all partners have unlimited liability for acts of firm irrespective of their role or profit share\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"partners liability in partnership firm\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All partners have unlimited liability for acts of partnership firm irrespective of their role or profit share: SEBI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de038ad7e203d6dc647d81499b0fa078\",\"name\":\"Nikita\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6a4ce3e1a8971ffc96034eefd446b681c115b26237f876d068808a8fc47f5000?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6a4ce3e1a8971ffc96034eefd446b681c115b26237f876d068808a8fc47f5000?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nikita\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/nikita\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SEBI on partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm| SCC Times","description":"In a case related to partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm, SEBI stated that all partners have unlimited liability for acts of firm irrespective of their role or profit share","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All partners have unlimited liability for acts of partnership firm irrespective of their role or profit share: SEBI","og_description":"In a case related to partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm, SEBI stated that all partners have unlimited liability for acts of firm irrespective of their role or profit share","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-30T08:00:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-03T12:03:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nikita","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"All partners have unlimited liability for acts of partnership firm irrespective of their role or profit share: SEBI","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nikita","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/","name":"SEBI on partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-30T08:00:53+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-03T12:03:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de038ad7e203d6dc647d81499b0fa078"},"description":"In a case related to partner\u2019s liability in partnership firm, SEBI stated that all partners have unlimited liability for acts of firm irrespective of their role or profit share","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"partners liability in partnership firm"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/sebi-on-partners-liability-in-partnership-firm\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All partners have unlimited liability for acts of partnership firm irrespective of their role or profit share: SEBI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de038ad7e203d6dc647d81499b0fa078","name":"Nikita","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6a4ce3e1a8971ffc96034eefd446b681c115b26237f876d068808a8fc47f5000?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6a4ce3e1a8971ffc96034eefd446b681c115b26237f876d068808a8fc47f5000?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nikita"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/nikita\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/partners-liability-in-partnership-firm.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/19\/mutual-funds\/","url_meta":{"origin":362114,"position":0},"title":"SEBI | Carrying out mutual funds with DGP scheme and an Investment Adviser but with no registration | Orders to pay the amount along with several other restrictions","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI): G Mahalingam, Whole Time Member, considering the factual chain and evidences directed the Noticees to cease and desist from sponsoring and\/ or carrying out activities of a mutual fund and as investment advisers, including the activity of representing through any media (physical or digital)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":270796,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/28\/sebi-inserts-definition-of-social-impact-fund-vide-sebi-alternative-investment-funds-third-amendment-regulations-2022\/","url_meta":{"origin":362114,"position":1},"title":"SEBI inserts definition of Social Impact Fund vide SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2022","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 On 25-07-2022, the Securities Exchange Board of India(\u2018SEBI') has issued SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2022 to amend the SEBI (Alternative Investment Fund) Regulations, 2012 The amendment: Insertion of definitions: 1. \u201cSocial impact fund\u201d means an Alternative Investment Fund which invests primarily in securities, units or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281326,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/10\/company-law-board-rectificatory-jurisdiction-cannot-be-invoked-for-vioaltion-of-sebi-regulations-supreme-court-nclt-nclat-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":362114,"position":2},"title":"Rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 111A of the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be invoked for violation of SEBI Regulations: Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that the important role of the Regulator cannot be circumvented by simply asking for rectification under Section 111A of the Companies Act, 1956.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":226478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/03\/sebi-infrastructure-investment-trusts-amendment-regulations-2020-notified\/","url_meta":{"origin":362114,"position":3},"title":"SEBI (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 &#8212; Notified","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 No. SEBI\/LAD-NRO\/GN\/2020\/05.\u2014In exercise of the powers conferred under section 30 read with sections 11 and 12 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Board hereby makes the following regulations to amend\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":237710,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/19\/bom-hc-situations-where-principles-of-natural-justice-require-an-opportunity-of-hearing-would-it-mean-a-mandatory-personal-hearing-hc-explains-its-position-in-light-of-sebi-regulations\/","url_meta":{"origin":362114,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | Situations where principles of natural justice require an opportunity of hearing, would it mean a mandatory personal hearing? HC explains it&#8217;s position in light of SEBI Regulations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division bench of Nitin Jamdar and Milind Jadhav, JJ., observed that there is no duty on the SEBI Board while considering an exemption application under Regulation 29 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014, to give a personal hearing. Petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256695,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/sebi-assuring-profits-in-a-market-already-subjected-to-risk-debarred-from-the-market-for-subjecting-others-to-risk\/","url_meta":{"origin":362114,"position":5},"title":"SEBI | Assuring profits in a market already subjected to risk- Debarred from the market for subjecting others to risk","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): G. Mahalingam, Whole Time Member, while deciding an order was of the opinion that the Noticee, Samrat Trader and its proprietor Altamash Sheikh did not act honestly, fairly and in the best interests of its clients and in the interest of integrity of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362114","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67529"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=362114"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362114\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/362127"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=362114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=362114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}