{"id":362108,"date":"2025-09-30T13:00:24","date_gmt":"2025-09-30T07:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=362108"},"modified":"2025-10-06T09:38:20","modified_gmt":"2025-10-06T04:08:20","slug":"jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018This is attack on entire judiciary\u2019: Jharkhand High Court condemns hooliganism made in open Court by advocate upon rejection of anticipatory bail"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jharkhand High Court:<\/span> While dealing with an anticipatory bail application, filed by the petitioners, in which allegations with respect to grabbing land of an 80-year-old informant were concerned, a Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., observed that such types of crime were very rampant in the State of Jharkhand and thus, rejected the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court stated that when the above-mentioned order was being passed, the petitioners&#8217; counsel argued in loud speech threatening to go to the Supreme Court. Thus, the Court criticized the hooliganism made in open Court, which was witnessed by all the advocates present there. The Court on the request of the Members of the Bar, took a lenient view, and referred the matter to the Chairman, Jharkhand State Bar Council to look into it accordingly.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the petitioners were apprehending their arrest in connection with offence registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 308(4), 324(4), 333, 304, 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (&#8216;BNS&#8217;) which was pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioners were landowners of the land in question and scuffles took place due to land dispute between the parties. He further stated that the mobile tower location of the petitioners and informant were not found at the spot on the date of occurrence. Further, in the Circle Office Report, the land in question was said to be of the petitioners, thus they should be granted anticipatory bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The State counsel contended that allegations of grabbing the land of the informant, made against the petitioners were serious in nature and they even had criminal antecedent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The informant contended that regarding the land in question, earlier the petitioners interfered for which an FIR was lodged and thereafter the petitioners were granted bail in that case. The petitioners threatened the informant on the gun point to vacate the land and transfer the land in favour of the petitioners. He further submitted that informant was aged about 80 years old and petitioners were having criminal antecedent and in view of that, the petitioners might not be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court expressed that such types of crime were very rampant in the State of Jharkhand and held that anticipatory bail would not be granted to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for the same was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court emphasized that when it dictated the order rejecting the anticipatory bail, the counsel for the petitioners started arguing in loud speech, which was witnessed by all the lawyers present in the Court. The advocate concerned had threatened the Court that he would go to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found this case as a fit one to initiate the criminal contempt proceeding against the advocate concerned. Further, the Court opined that a Single Judge of the High Court had the fullest jurisdiction to initiate proceedings for contempt against a contemner and issue notice in furtherance of it. Not only that, but a Single Judge was also entitled to adjudicate thereon and punish the contemner, if necessary. However, the Contempt Act, 1971 had not placed any blanket bar on the exercise of contempt jurisdiction by a Single Judge altogether. It was not as if hereafter the contempt jurisdiction of the High Court was to be exercised at all stages and in each and every case by a Bench of two or more Judges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that if the advocate concerned would be allowed to go scot free, message would go in the society that anything could be stopped to be delivered by a Judge for if such type of hooliganism was made in the open Court. The Court stated that it was a case where attempt was made to hinder or obstruct the due administration of justice in Court and such type of interference amounted to scandalizing the Court itself, this scandalizing could manifest itself in various ways but in substance it was an attack on Judge, causing unwarranted and defamatory aspersion. Thus, the Court specified that such conduct ought to be punished as contempt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that the foundation of the judiciary was the trust and the confidence of the people in its ability to deliver fearless and impartial justice; it was not a question of a particular Single Judge but was an attack on the entire judiciary by a practicing advocate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering that many members of the Bar including President and Secretary of the Advocate Association requested the Court to give one chance to the advocate concerned and not to initiate criminal contempt case against him taking a lenient view assuring he would not do such type of things in future, the Court did not proceed in criminal contempt. However, the Court held that the Jharkhand State Bar Council should take care of his conduct. The Court, thus, referred the matter to the Chairman, Jharkhand State Bar Council to look into it accordingly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Anil Kumar v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/T56779Cb\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Jhar 3245<\/a>, decided on 25-9-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioners:<\/span> Rakesh Kumar, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Opposite Party:<\/span> Lily Sahay, A.P.P, Rahul Lamba, Advocate, Anish Kamal, Advocate and Aditya M. Khandelwal, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;If he will be allowed to go scot free, message will go in the society that anything can be stopped to be delivered by a Judge for if such type of hooliganism is made in the open Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":362120,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[90061,13011,72599,90059,3456,90062,5791,90060,7741,70881,34481],"class_list":["post-362108","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advocate-association","tag-anticipatory-bail","tag-bns-2023","tag-contempt-act-1971","tag-criminal_contempt","tag-hooliganism-by-advocate","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-jharkhand-state-bar-council","tag-judiciary","tag-justice-sanjay-kumar-dwivedi","tag-land-dispute"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jhar HC on hooliganism in court by advocate over anticipatory bail rejection|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court criticized hooliganism in court by advocate in open court over rejection of anticipatory bail application made by him; referred matter to Jharkhand State Bar Council.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018This is attack on entire judiciary\u2019: Jharkhand High Court condemns hooliganism made in open Court by advocate upon rejection of anticipatory bail\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court criticized hooliganism in court by advocate in open court over rejection of anticipatory bail application made by him; referred matter to Jharkhand State Bar Council.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-30T07:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-06T04:08:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018This is attack on entire judiciary\u2019: Jharkhand High Court condemns hooliganism made in open Court by advocate upon rejection of anticipatory bail\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC on hooliganism in court by advocate over anticipatory bail rejection|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-30T07:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-06T04:08:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand High Court criticized hooliganism in court by advocate in open court over rejection of anticipatory bail application made by him; referred matter to Jharkhand State Bar Council.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"hooliganism in court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018This is attack on entire judiciary\u2019: Jharkhand High Court condemns hooliganism made in open Court by advocate upon rejection of anticipatory bail\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC on hooliganism in court by advocate over anticipatory bail rejection|SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand High Court criticized hooliganism in court by advocate in open court over rejection of anticipatory bail application made by him; referred matter to Jharkhand State Bar Council.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018This is attack on entire judiciary\u2019: Jharkhand High Court condemns hooliganism made in open Court by advocate upon rejection of anticipatory bail","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court criticized hooliganism in court by advocate in open court over rejection of anticipatory bail application made by him; referred matter to Jharkhand State Bar Council.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-30T07:30:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-06T04:08:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018This is attack on entire judiciary\u2019: Jharkhand High Court condemns hooliganism made in open Court by advocate upon rejection of anticipatory bail","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/","name":"Jhar HC on hooliganism in court by advocate over anticipatory bail rejection|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-30T07:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-06T04:08:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Jharkhand High Court criticized hooliganism in court by advocate in open court over rejection of anticipatory bail application made by him; referred matter to Jharkhand State Bar Council.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"hooliganism in court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/30\/jhar-hc-on-hooliganism-in-court-by-advocate-over-anticipatory-bail-rejection\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018This is attack on entire judiciary\u2019: Jharkhand High Court condemns hooliganism made in open Court by advocate upon rejection of anticipatory bail"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/hooliganism-in-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":364585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/24\/jhar-hc-expunges-contempt-remarks-against-advocate-over-hooliganism-in-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":362108,"position":0},"title":"\u201cApology is accepted; he deserves a chance\u201d: Jharkhand High Court expunges contempt remarks against advocate over hooliganism in open Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cApology made by the petitioner in person has got no doubt in mind that contemner in the present case has given or tendered a sincere apology and has satisfied the Court of his undertaking to never repeat such an act again.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"advocate over hooliganism","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/advocate-over-hooliganism.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/advocate-over-hooliganism.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/advocate-over-hooliganism.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/advocate-over-hooliganism.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/jharkhand-hc-orders-extensive-training-for-magistrate-who-ignored-supreme-courts-bail-guidelines\/","url_meta":{"origin":362108,"position":1},"title":"Know why Jharkhand HC directed State Judicial Academy to impart extensive training to a Magistrate in bail matters","author":"Editor","date":"June 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThese are the cases where personal liberty of the citizen is at stake. The Magistrate should very well be sensitized in these types of issues, especially about the judgments which relate and deal with personal liberty.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Training Magistrate on Bail guidelines","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/498A-complaint-by-trans-woman.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/498A-complaint-by-trans-woman.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/498A-complaint-by-trans-woman.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/498A-complaint-by-trans-woman.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/appeal-against-sessions-court-rejecting-anticipatory-bail-in-scheduled-offence-under-nia-act-maintainable-before-db-of-hc-jhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":362108,"position":2},"title":"Appeal against Sessions Court order rejecting anticipatory bail in scheduled offences under NIA Act is maintainable before Division Bench of High Court: Jharkhand HC","author":"Arushi","date":"August 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The intention of the legislature is derived by considering the meaning of the words used in the statute, with a view to understand the purpose or object of the enactment, the mischief, and its corresponding remedy that the enactment is designed to actualise.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378964,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/","url_meta":{"origin":362108,"position":3},"title":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case","author":"Editor","date":"March 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Madhya Pradesh High Court examined whether anticipatory bail could stand when additional, more serious offences had already been taken cognizance of by the Magistrate.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"cancellation of anticipatory bail","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/16\/jhar-hc-%e2%94%82-government-employee-denied-anticipatory-bail-for-posting-derogatory-remarks-against-malaysian-woman-regarding-spreading-coronavirus\/","url_meta":{"origin":362108,"position":4},"title":"Jhar HC | Government employee denied anticipatory bail for posting derogatory remarks against Malaysian woman regarding spreading coronavirus","author":"Editor","date":"September 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rongon Mukhopadhyay J., rejected anticipatory bail to the ground in light of facts and submissions in the instant case. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner who is a government employee wrote derogatory remarks in a Facebook post regarding a woman of Malaysian origin\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":378763,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/toll-plaza-advocate-assault-case-hooliganism-condemned-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":362108,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Tarnishing the Profession\u2019: SC condemns Barabanki Bar Members for Attacking Advocate Representing Accused in Toll Plaza Advocate Assault Case","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 18, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court grimly noted that hooliganism shown by the members of Barabanki Bar Association, stating that Bar Council of India is expected to take appropriate action. The Court also transferred the case to Tis Hazari Courts to ensure fair trial.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"toll plaza advocate assault case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/toll-plaza-advocate-assault-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/toll-plaza-advocate-assault-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/toll-plaza-advocate-assault-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/toll-plaza-advocate-assault-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=362108"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362108\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/362120"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=362108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=362108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}