{"id":362035,"date":"2025-09-29T17:30:56","date_gmt":"2025-09-29T12:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=362035"},"modified":"2025-10-06T09:35:16","modified_gmt":"2025-10-06T04:05:16","slug":"del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by Crocs under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563698\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563709\" target=\"_blank\">57<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;) seeking cancellation of the registration of the trade mark &#8216;CROOSE&#8217; (&#8216;impugned mark&#8217;) in Class 25, the Single Judge Bench of Tejas Kataria, J, held that the impugned mark was deceptively similar to the plaintiff&#8217;s trade mark &#8216;CROCS&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court directed the Registrar to cancel the registration of the impugned mark and delete it from the Register of Trade Marks.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner company, Crocs Inc. is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling a wide variety of footwear and allied goods and is the registered proprietor of the trade mark &#8216;CROCS&#8217;. The trade mark &#8216;CROCS&#8217; was originally adopted in 2002 in the United States of America, but with the passage of time, it has been used and registered in multiple jurisdictions of the world including India. The petitioner&#8217;s products bearing the said trade mark are sold all across India through various retail stores and online on multiple e-commerce platforms, including the petitioner&#8217;s own website.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The present petition was filed seeking cancellation of registration of the mark &#8216;CROOSE&#8217; claiming that it was deceptively similar to the petitioner&#8217;s trade name &#8216;CROCS&#8217; and was being used for sale of goods similar to the petitioners.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the petitioner being the owner of the mark &#8216;CROCS&#8217; was clearly a &#8216;person aggrieved&#8217; and could maintain a cancellation petition under Section 57 of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court compared the products under the two marks and observed that the placement of the mark on the products as well as the overall visual appearance of the impugned mark was deceptively similar to the petitioner&#8217;s marks and since they were being used for identical goods under the same class, it was likely to cause confusion amongst consumers and members of the trade.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court thus directed cancellation and removal of the impugned mark from the Register of Trade Marks. The Registrar was directed to rectify and update the same on their website within a period of four weeks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Crocs Inc. v. Registrar, Trademarks, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RVTiwDat\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 6276<\/a>, decided on 26-9-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Ajay Amitabh Suman, Shravan Kumar Bansal, Rishi Bansal, Deepak Srivastava, Shruti Manchanda, D. Mehra, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Ashish K. Dixit, Shivam Tiwari, Umar Hashmi, Harshit Jain, Rahul Kumar, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The petitioner company Crocs is a popular footwear brand with a widespread range of more than 300 styled for men, women and children which are popular both in India and abroad.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":362052,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[10861,90025,90026,52955,2543,90024,90027],"class_list":["post-362035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cancellation-of-registration","tag-crocs-inc","tag-crocs-trade-mark","tag-deceptively-similar","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-tejas-kataria","tag-section-57-of-the-trade-marks-act-1999"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC grants relief to Crocs in trade mark case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted relief to Crocs in trade mark case and held the mark &#039;CROOSE&#039; to be deceptively similar to the trade mark &#039;CROCS&#039;.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted relief to Crocs in trade mark case and held the mark &#039;CROOSE&#039; to be deceptively similar to the trade mark &#039;CROCS&#039;.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-29T12:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-06T04:05:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC grants relief to Crocs in trade mark case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-29T12:00:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-06T04:05:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court granted relief to Crocs in trade mark case and held the mark 'CROOSE' to be deceptively similar to the trade mark 'CROCS'.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"relief to Crocs case\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC grants relief to Crocs in trade mark case | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court granted relief to Crocs in trade mark case and held the mark 'CROOSE' to be deceptively similar to the trade mark 'CROCS'.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark","og_description":"Delhi High Court granted relief to Crocs in trade mark case and held the mark 'CROOSE' to be deceptively similar to the trade mark 'CROCS'.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-29T12:00:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-06T04:05:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/","name":"Del HC grants relief to Crocs in trade mark case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-29T12:00:56+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-06T04:05:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court granted relief to Crocs in trade mark case and held the mark 'CROOSE' to be deceptively similar to the trade mark 'CROCS'.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"relief to Crocs case"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":336972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/10\/dhc-upholds-trade-mark-rights-of-ganesh-grains-over-its-ganesh-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":362035,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds trade mark rights of Ganesh Grains over its \u2018GANESH\u2019 marks; directs cancellation of \u2018GANESH HARA MATAR\u2019 mark","author":"Arushi","date":"December 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPetitioner has established that that it was the prior registered proprietor and prior user of the mark \u2018GANESH\u2019 and its other formative marks since 1936. The adoption and use of the mark \u2018GANESH HARA MATAR\u2019 by Respondent 1, is likely to create confusion in the market.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344939,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":362035,"position":1},"title":"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks","author":"Arushi","date":"April 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Despite Respondent 1\u2019s endeavour to create distinctions, it is crystal clear that the marks are confusingly\/deceptively similar to the petitioner\u2019s registered trade mark. Such use of a similar mark would invariably mislead consumers and members into believing that the goods under the impugned mark were sourced from the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/22\/dhc-grants-relief-in-favour-of-rapido-in-trade-mark-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":362035,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Identical marks, identical goods\/services and identical target consumers\u2019: Delhi HC grants relief in favour of Rapido in trade mark dispute","author":"Arushi","date":"January 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is clear that the impugned mark has been adopted by Respondent 1 dishonestly to trade upon the goodwill and reputation of the petitioner under the RAPIDO marks and to associate itself with the petitioner.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305066,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/17\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-stay-the-registration-for-the-mark-schezwan-chutney-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":362035,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses to stay the registration for the mark \u2018SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"October 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis Court is not inclined to stay the impugned trade mark registration for the mark \u2018SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY\u2019. Moreover, the issue of jurisdiction of this Court would have to be considered first.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/delhi-hc-upholds-registration-of-harpic-drainxpert-trade-mark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":362035,"position":4},"title":"Treating \u2018HARPIC DRAIN XPERT\u2019 similar to \u2018XPERT\u2019 would be stretching the principle of similarity to an unreasonable extent: Delhi High Court upholds registration","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo hold that a customer would be confused, because the word \u2018XPERT\u2019 forms the second part of the second word of the impugned mark, would be consigning reality to oblivion.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/09\/delhi-hc-rectification-petition-can-be-filed-where-the-dynamic-effect-of-the-registration-is-felt-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":362035,"position":5},"title":"Rectification petition in a trade mark suit can be filed where the dynamic effect of the registration of impugned mark is felt: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWith the expansion of the internet, and access to goods and services that may originate from some distant site, a litigant is free to file an infringement, or passing off, suit, before any Court within whose jurisdiction use of the impugned mark takes place.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362035","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=362035"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362035\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/362052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=362035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=362035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}