{"id":361671,"date":"2025-09-25T17:00:05","date_gmt":"2025-09-25T11:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=361671"},"modified":"2025-10-10T10:21:34","modified_gmt":"2025-10-10T04:51:34","slug":"service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Customs, Excise &amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata:<\/span> In an appeal filed against order of confirmation of the service tax demand b<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">y<\/span> Commissioner (Appeals), <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">K. Anpazhakan (Technical Member)<\/span> stated that the demand confirmed in the order, solely relying on the data received from Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), without adducing corroborative evidence in support, could not be sustained. Such mechanical reliance on income tax data, without verification of the nature of receipts of proof of taxable services rendered, was impermissible in law. Thus, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant-Tabassum Enterprise was engaged in the business of providing service of arranging goods transportation. The appellant did not issue consignment notes but had taken registration with the Department under the category of Goods Transport Agency Service. The information received from CBDT revealed that the value of &#8216;Sale of Service&#8217; in Income Tax Return shown to them was Rs. 51,47,648 and Rs. 94,10,352 for the Financial Years 2015-16 and 2016-17 respectively. For the period from April 2017 to June 2017, the Department did not have any taxable value on pro-rata basis. Thus, the gross value declared for the entire financial year 2017-18 has been taken into account as the taxable value for the three months from April 2017 to June 2017.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the officers observed that in the ST-3 Returns for service tax, filed by the appellant during the relevant period, their gross taxable value was shown as NIL. The department had considered the gross value declared in the Income Tax Returns as the value of taxable for the period 2015-16 to June and calculated the gross suppressed taxable value as Rs. 1,69,10,588.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Show Cause Notice was issued to the appellant demanding service tax of Rs. 25, 10, 850 along with interest and equal amount of penalty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550230\" target=\"_blank\">78<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000065759\" target=\"_blank\">Finance Act, 1994<\/a> (&#8216;Finance Act&#8217;). The Adjudication Authority confirmed the demand of service tax. The Commissioner (Appeals) did not confirm the calculation on pro-rata basis and confirmed the service tax demand to the extent of Rs. 21,57,962. Thus, the current filed by the appellant challenging order of Commissioner (Appeals).<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Tribunal observed that the present demand had been raised and confirmed based on data provided by CBDT and the demand was confirmed without the support of any independent or corroborative evidence from the Service Tax records. Such mechanical reliance on Income Tax data, without verification of the nature of receipts of proof of taxable services rendered, was impermissible in law. The Tribunal further observed that mere entries in income tax returns or Form 26AS could not establish liability under the Finance Act, unless corroborated by evidence demonstrating rendition of taxable service. The Tribunal relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Indian Machine Tools Manufacturers Assn. v. CCE<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Q9pfevme\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine CESTAT 769<\/a> and held that demand of service tax confirmed in the impugned order, solely relying on the data received from CBDT, without adducing corroborative evidence in support, could not be sustained, thus, liable to be set aside. The Tribunal noted that the appellant was rendering service of arranging transportation of goods and they did not issue any consignment note. The Tribunal observed that service of transportation of goods by road was liable to service tax under category Goods Transport Agency Service, only when the service provider issues &#8216;consignment notes&#8217;. Further, since the appellant had not issued any &#8216;consignment notes&#8217;, thus, the service rendered by them were clearly excluded, as it was covered in the &#8216;Negative list&#8217; Entry under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550207\" target=\"_blank\">66-D(P)(i)(A)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000065759\" target=\"_blank\">Finance Act<\/a>. The Tribunal relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CCE v. Chartered Logistics Ltd.<\/span>, (2024) 128 GSTR 400 and held that the demand confirmed in the impugned order was not sustainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the invocation of extended period of limitation to confirm demand, the Tribunal observed that the demand was raised and confirmed in the impugned order based on data received from CBDT which were always available with the department. Therefore, the Tribunal observed that suppression of the facts with intention to evade tax was not established. The Tribunal held that extended period could not be invoked in the case and the demand confirmed by invoking extended period of limitation was not sustainable. Thus, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Tabassum Enterprises v. Commr. (CGST), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/06nG9sTu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine CESTAT 3166<\/a>, decided on 19-9-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant(s):<\/span> Aditya Dutta, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> S. K. Jha, Authorised Representative<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Mere entries in income tax returns or Form 26AS cannot, by themselves, establish liability under the Finance Act, 1994, unless corroborated by evidence demonstrating rendition of taxable service.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67528,"featured_media":361677,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[29414,15151,6651,35215,34483,89835,89833,89831,89834,86802,89832],"class_list":["post-361671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cbdt","tag-central-board-of-direct-taxes","tag-cestat","tag-corroborative-evidence","tag-finance-act-1994","tag-goods-transport-agency-service","tag-invocation-of-limitation","tag-k-anpazhakan-technical-member","tag-negative-list","tag-service-tax-demand","tag-service-tax-without-evidence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence: CESTAT |SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"CESTAT stated that the mechanical reliance on income tax data was impermissible and the demand of service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence in support.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"CESTAT stated that the mechanical reliance on income tax data was impermissible and the demand of service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence in support.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-25T11:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-10T04:51:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bharti\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bharti\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/\",\"name\":\"Service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence: CESTAT |SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-25T11:30:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-10T04:51:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c6cc268a9b9ddd8dd8418036a2e8bf02\"},\"description\":\"CESTAT stated that the mechanical reliance on income tax data was impermissible and the demand of service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence in support.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c6cc268a9b9ddd8dd8418036a2e8bf02\",\"name\":\"Bharti\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/06a70501db2ab8ab6d5dfd29559c29382270917d7bb0c1a5153790c34d56cafb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/06a70501db2ab8ab6d5dfd29559c29382270917d7bb0c1a5153790c34d56cafb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bharti\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/bharti\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence: CESTAT |SCC Times","description":"CESTAT stated that the mechanical reliance on income tax data was impermissible and the demand of service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence in support.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence","og_description":"CESTAT stated that the mechanical reliance on income tax data was impermissible and the demand of service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence in support.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-25T11:30:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-10T04:51:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bharti","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bharti","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/","name":"Service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence: CESTAT |SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-25T11:30:05+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-10T04:51:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c6cc268a9b9ddd8dd8418036a2e8bf02"},"description":"CESTAT stated that the mechanical reliance on income tax data was impermissible and the demand of service tax cannot be confirmed without evidence in support.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence-cestat\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Mechanical reliance on income tax data impermissible\u2019: CESTAT sets aside service tax demand confirmed without corroborative evidence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c6cc268a9b9ddd8dd8418036a2e8bf02","name":"Bharti","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/06a70501db2ab8ab6d5dfd29559c29382270917d7bb0c1a5153790c34d56cafb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/06a70501db2ab8ab6d5dfd29559c29382270917d7bb0c1a5153790c34d56cafb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bharti"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/bharti\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/service-tax-cannot-be-confirmed-without-evidence.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214317,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/cestat-clandestine-removal-sustainable-in-respect-of-duplicate-invoices-maintained-by-the-assessee\/","url_meta":{"origin":361671,"position":0},"title":"CESTAT | Clandestine removal sustainable in respect of duplicate invoices maintained by the assessee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): This appeal was filed by Revenue before a Coram of Madhu Mohan Damodhar (Technical Member) and P. Dinesha (Judicial Member) being aggrieved by the impugned order where appeal of assessee was allowed on the ground that unwarranted removal were based on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362229,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/01\/tribunal-and-commissions-september-2025-roundup-hyd-airport-case-epfo-stakeholder-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":361671,"position":1},"title":"Tribunals and Commissions September 2025| EPFO stakeholder claims; Food safety standards violation; Education Society\u2019s service tax exemption; &amp; More","author":"Editor","date":"October 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the key legal developments of September 2025, featuring the CCI\u2019S abuse of dominance case against GMR Hyderabad Airport, CESTAT\u2019S exemption of service tax for Education Welfare Society, SEBI on liability in partnership, EPFO stakeholder claims.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tribunals and Commissions September 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-September-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-September-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-September-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-September-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331032,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/jharkhand-state-cricket-association-renders-bundled-services-related-to-promoting-cricket-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":361671,"position":2},"title":"Jharkhand State Cricket Association renders \u2018bundled services\u2019 related to promoting cricket; not liable to pay service tax for services rendered in connection with sports: CESTAT","author":"Arushi","date":"September 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"All the activities rendered by the appellant are undertaken during hosting the cricket matches alone and if there were no cricket matches played, then all these services become irrelevant.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/23\/cestat-loose-sheets-as-complete-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":361671,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Mere tallying of certain entries does not make loose sheets as complete evidence of purchases and sales\u2019: CESTAT sets aside excise duty demand","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Even if the figures in the document are hypothetically taken to be correct figures, still the same must be proved with corroborative evidence otherwise the document becomes irrelevant.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"loose sheets as complete evidence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/loose-sheets-as-complete-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/loose-sheets-as-complete-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/loose-sheets-as-complete-evidence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/loose-sheets-as-complete-evidence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/30\/mark-up-earned-by-purchasing-selling-cargo-space-from-shipping-lines-not-liable-to-service-tax-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":361671,"position":4},"title":"Mark-up earned by purchasing &amp; selling cargo space from shipping lines not liable to service tax: CESTAT","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The assessee-appellant contended that they acted on principal-to-principal with both the customers (shipper) and the shipping line\/airline. A freight forwarder may act as principal and raise invoice to the exporter on his own account, providing transportation of goods and is not acting as \u201cintermediary\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/reimbursement-expenses-and-rent-free-accomodation-not-part-of-total-consideration-for-arriving-at-service-tax-payable-cestat-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":361671,"position":5},"title":"Reimbursement expenses &amp; rent-free accommodation not part of total consideration for calculating Service Tax: CESTAT","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Tribunal opined that both service provider and service recipient were government undertakings and cannot be said to have any intention to evade the tax payment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67528"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=361671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361671\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/361677"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=361671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=361671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=361671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}