{"id":361656,"date":"2025-09-25T16:00:27","date_gmt":"2025-09-25T10:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=361656"},"modified":"2025-09-26T16:58:53","modified_gmt":"2025-09-26T11:28:53","slug":"supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court emphasises on caution and consideration of pragmatic realities by courts while dealing with matrimonial cases"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the present appeal challenging the refusal to quash proceedings against the accused persons (appellant) for offences under Sections 323<\/a> and 498A<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (“IPC”) and Sections 3<\/a> and 4<\/a> of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a> (“Dowry Act”); the Division Bench of B.V. Nagarathna*<\/span> and R. Mahadevan, JJ., emphasised that Courts have to be careful and cautious in dealing with matrimonial complaints and must take pragmatic realities into consideration while dealing with matrimonial disputes where the allegations have to be scrutinized with great care and circumspection in order to prevent miscarriage of justice and abuse of process of law.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The complainant got married to the appellant’s brother on 01-05-2014. After a few months into the marriage, due to marital discord, the complainant left her matrimonial home and started residing at her parental home. Thereafter, both the parties initiated multiple matrimonial proceedings against each other.<\/p>\n

On 09-11-2023, the complainant lodged an FIR with Police Station Civil Lines, Meerut under Sections 323<\/a> and 498A<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> and Sections 3<\/a> and 4<\/a> of the Dowry Act<\/a> against her husband, mother-in-law and the appellant. The allegations revolved around dowry harassment, physical cruelty which allegedly rendered the complainant’s right hand and right leg paralyzed.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved by the FIR, the appellant and his family members approached the Allahabad High Court seeking quashment of the proceedings arising out of the FIR. However, the High Court declined to quash the proceedings stating that although the prayer made in the said Writ Petition was to quash the FIR, the appellant sought the relief of grant of protection under Section 41A<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (“CrPC”) only; and that on perusal of the said FIR, a prima facie case of commission of a cognizable offence was made out.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved with the refusal, the appellant approached the Supreme Court via the present appeal.<\/p>\n

Court’s Assessment:<\/h3>\n

The Court had to examine whether the High Court was right in refusing to quash the criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n

Perusing the facts and allegations stated in the FIR, the Court delved into the provisions under which the complainant had filed charged against the appellant and his family. The Court noted that an offence is punishable under Section 323<\/a> of IPC<\/a> when a person commits an act with an intention to cause or with knowledge that the said act is likely to cause bodily pain, disease or infirmity to another person.<\/p>\n

An offence is punishable under Section 498A<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> when a husband or his relative subjects a woman to cruelty. The Explanation under Section 498A<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> defines “cruelty”<\/span> for the purpose of Section 498A<\/a> of the IPC<\/a>. The first limb of clause (a)<\/span> of the Explanation to Section 498A<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> states that “cruelty” means any wilful conduct that is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide. The second limb of clause (a)<\/span> of the Explanation to Section 498A<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> states that cruelty means any wilful conduct that is of such a nature as to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Further, clause (b) of the Explanation to Section 498A<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> states that cruelty would also include harassment of the woman where such harassment is to coerce her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that Section 3<\/a> of the Dowry Act<\/a> states that any person who gives, takes, or abets the giving or taking of dowry shall face a punishment of imprisonment for a minimum term of five years and a fine not less than fifteen thousand rupees or the value of the dowry, whichever is greater. While Section 4<\/a> of the Dowry Act<\/a> talks about the penalty for demanding dowry.<\/p>\n

Examining the FIR, the Court pointed out that the allegations against the appellant were vague and omnibus. The Court pointed out that the FIR lacked concrete and precise allegations<\/span> against the appellant and his family. The Court further pointed out that the complainant failed to impress the Court as to how the alleged harassment has any proximate relationship to the injury which allegedly resulting in paralysing her right hand and leg.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, merely stating that the appellant has mentally harassed the complainant with respect to a demand for dowry does not fulfil the ingredients of Section 498A<\/a> of IPC<\/a> specially in absence of any cogent material or evidence on record to substantiate<\/span> the allegations.<\/p>\n

The Court explained that “cruelty” cannot be established without specific instances<\/span>. Invoking the aforesaid provisions, without mentioning any specific detail, weakened the case of the prosecution and cast serious aspersions on the probability of the version of the complainant. Therefore, the Court cannot ignore the missing specifics in the FIR which was the basic premise for invoking the criminal machinery of the State.<\/span> In such cases involving allegations of cruelty and harassment, there would normally be a series of offending acts, which would be required to be spelt out by the complainant against perpetrators in specific terms to initiate criminal proceedings against them. Therefore, mere general allegations of harassment without pointing out the specific details would not be sufficient to continue criminal proceedings against any person.<\/p>\n

Relying on the tests laid down in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal<\/span>, 1992 Suppl (1) SCC 335, the Court found that that none of the offences alleged against the appellant herein were made out. The allegations of cruelty, mental harassment and voluntarily causing hurt against the appellant herein were vague and general in nature and therefore, the Court applied Bhajan<\/span> Lal (supra)<\/span> on the facts of this case. Therefore, the Court opined that it is neither expedient nor in the interest of justice to permit the present prosecution emanating from the FIR to continue. The Court further quoted the observations made in Dara Lakshmi Narayana v. State of Bihar<\/span>, (2025) 3 SCC 735<\/a>, wherein it was emphasised that, “Making vague and generalised allegations during matrimonial conflicts, if not scrutinized, will lead to the misuse of legal processes and an encouragement for use of arm-twisting tactics by a wife and\/or her family<\/span>”.<\/p>\n

Therefore, with the afore-stated assessment, the Court quashed the proceedings initiated only with regard to the appellant.<\/p>\n

[Shobhit Kumar Mittal v. State of UP, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2059<\/a>, decided on 24-9-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice BV Nagarathna<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. Saurabh Soni, Adv. Mr. Maneesh Saxena, Adv. Mr. Anupam Singh, AOR Ms. Mannat Singh, Adv.<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span> Dr. Vijendra Singh, AOR Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Ms. Apurva Singh, Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar Mishra, AOR Mr. Vasasntha Kumar, Adv.<\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The Court explained that mere general allegations of harassment and cruelty without pointing out the specific details would not be sufficient to continue criminal proceedings against any person”.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":361660,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[89827,2570,33559,83577,47295,36921,13271,73565],"class_list":["post-361656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-allegations-against-husbands-relatives","tag-Cruelty","tag-dowry-demand","tag-false-dowry-allegations","tag-justice-bv-nagarathna","tag-matrimonial-cases","tag-matrimonial-disputes","tag-vague-allegations"],"yoast_head":"\nCourts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court emphasised that courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases and consider pragmatic realities.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court emphasises on caution and consideration of pragmatic realities by courts while dealing with matrimonial cases\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court emphasised that courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases and consider pragmatic realities.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-25T10:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-26T11:28:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court emphasises on caution and consideration of pragmatic realities by courts while dealing with matrimonial cases\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/\",\"name\":\"Courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-25T10:30:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-26T11:28:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court emphasised that courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases and consider pragmatic realities.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court emphasises on caution and consideration of pragmatic realities by courts while dealing with matrimonial cases\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases: SC | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court emphasised that courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases and consider pragmatic realities.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court emphasises on caution and consideration of pragmatic realities by courts while dealing with matrimonial cases","og_description":"Supreme Court emphasised that courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases and consider pragmatic realities.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-25T10:30:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-26T11:28:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court emphasises on caution and consideration of pragmatic realities by courts while dealing with matrimonial cases","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/","name":"Courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-25T10:30:27+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-26T11:28:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Supreme Court emphasised that courts must exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases and consider pragmatic realities.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"exercise caution in considering matrimonial cases"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-caution-and-consideration-of-pragmatic-realities-by-courts-while-dealing-with-matrimonial-cases\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court emphasises on caution and consideration of pragmatic realities by courts while dealing with matrimonial cases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/exercise-caution-in-considering-matrimonial-cases.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":337083,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/11\/supreme-court-quashes-false-dowry-case-misuse-section-498a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":361656,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court quashes false dowry case; highlights growing misuse of Section 498A IPC against husband and his family for personal vendetta","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMaking vague and generalised allegations during matrimonial conflicts, if not scrutinized, will lead to the misuse of legal processes and an encouragement for use of arm-twisting tactics by a wife and\/or her family.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Misuse of Section 498A IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/15\/section-498a-ipc-husbands-relatives-cannot-be-forced-to-undergo-trial-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-of-dowry-demand\/","url_meta":{"origin":361656,"position":1},"title":"Section 498A IPC| Husband\u2019s relatives cannot be forced to undergo trial in absence of specific allegations of dowry demand","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA criminal trial leading to an eventual acquittal also inflicts severe scars upon the accused.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/14\/supreme-court-cruelty-498a-ipc-misuse-acquittal\/","url_meta":{"origin":361656,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court acquits husband in 498A IPC case, expresses concern over misuse of dowry and cruelty provisions","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The term \u201ccruelty\u201d is subject to rather cruel misuse by the parties, and cannot be established simpliciter without specific instances, to say the least. The tendency of roping these sections, without mentioning any specific dates, time or incident, weakens the case of the prosecutions, and casts serious suspicion on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Misuse of Section 498A IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/gujarat-high-court-quashes-fir-in-dowry-matter-against-husbands-distant-relative-finding-the-allegations-to-be-of-general-nature\/","url_meta":{"origin":361656,"position":3},"title":"Gujarat High Court quashes FIR in Dowry matter against husband’s distant relative finding the allegations to be of ‘general nature’","author":"Editor","date":"August 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Nirzar S. Desai, J. quashed an FIR and its consequential proceedings which were registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 114 and 506(2) of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Respondent 2 (original complainant) had filed the above FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322677,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/mental-cruelty-can-continue-even-after-leaving-matrimonial-house-and-while-residing-at-parental-home-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":361656,"position":4},"title":"Mental cruelty can continue even after leaving matrimonial house and while residing at parental home: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"MP High Court asserted that while physical cruelty ceased after leaving the matrimonial house, the psychological impact of separation and the trauma induced by dowry demands persisted.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295012,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/20\/non-consummation-marriage-cruelty-hindu-marriage-act-498-a-penal-code-karnataka-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":361656,"position":5},"title":"Non-consummation of marriage due to husband’s spiritual inclinations is cruelty under Hindu Marriage Act and not S. 498-A of IPC: Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Noting the husband's interest in watching videos by Sisters of Brahmakumari, which eventually led to non-consummation of his marriage, the Court was of the view that this situation does not fall under the scheme of S. 498-A, IPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=361656"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361656\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/361660"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=361656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=361656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=361656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}