{"id":361568,"date":"2025-09-25T10:00:20","date_gmt":"2025-09-25T04:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=361568"},"modified":"2025-09-30T10:16:47","modified_gmt":"2025-09-30T04:46:47","slug":"sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In an appeal filed by a man convicted under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\">6<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (&#8216;POCSO Act&#8217;) for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on his 11-year-old niece, the division bench of Aravind Kumar and NV Anjaria, JJ. upheld the 20-year rigorous imprisonment sentence awarded by the Special POCSO Court and affirmed by the Gauhati High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further emphasised that courts must remain vigilant to ensure that procedural submissions are not misused as tactics for harassment. In strong terms, it held that requests to recall a child victim after the conclusion of trial and concurrent findings of guilt raise serious concerns, particularly when there is no manifest illegality or perversity in the appreciation of evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The convict, who was the maternal uncle of the victim, was originally convicted in POCSO Case registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550489\" target=\"_blank\">12<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The main contention raised by the convict was that he was denied effective legal assistance during trial, as his defence counsel had failed to cross-examine the prosecutrix. Based on this, he sought a fresh opportunity to test her testimony.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Court found no merit in the appeal. It noted that the victim, then a minor, had given a consistent and coherent statement under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\" target=\"_blank\">164<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;), which she reiterated before the Trial Court. Her version was corroborated by contemporaneous medical evidence confirming recent forcible sexual intercourse. Her age was conclusively established through her birth certificate, placing her below 12 years at the time of the incident.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the mere failure of the defence to cross-examine the prosecutrix did not vitiate the proceedings, especially in the absence of any objection or protest from the accused during the trial. No application for recall of the witness had been filed either on the day of her testimony or immediately thereafter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Rejecting the contention regarding the delayed CFSL report, the Court noted that its findings did not exonerate the convict or contradict the consistent medical and oral evidence. To satisfy itself, the Court had called for the medical report, which clearly opined that the victim had been subjected to recent forceful sexual intercourse.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court strongly deprecated attempts to reopen the trial based on technical objections, especially in cases involving child sexual abuse. It emphasised that procedural lapses cannot be used as tactics for harassment and that recalling the child victim after the conclusion of a full-fledged trial would amount to secondary victimization.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court sternly cautioned against allowing technical pleas in cases involving grave offences such as child sexual abuse. It held that entertaining such pleas after the guilt has been established through a full-fledged trial and affirmed in appeal risks undermining public confidence in the administration of justice.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Courts have a duty to ensure that survivors of child abuse are not re-traumatized by the very justice system they turn for protection&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Noting that both the Trial Court and the High Court had rendered concurrent findings based on cogent evidence, the Court held that no interference was warranted under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574865\" target=\"_blank\">136<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the legal process could not be allowed to become a means of perpetuating injustice under the guise of procedural lacunae. In matters involving sexual violence against children, the Court held that the paramount consideration was not the convenience of the accused, but rather the integrity of the victim&#8217;s testimony, the finality of lawful findings, and the need to prevent secondary victimisation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It emphasised that once the trial had concluded and the victim&#8217;s testimony had been lawfully recorded, any attempt to recall the victim for re-examination had to be treated with extreme caution. In the absence of any compelling legal necessity, such requests could not be allowed. The Court further observed that such attempts must be discouraged, and where necessary, nipped in the bud, especially when they posed a risk of re-traumatising the victim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Importantly, the Court expressed anguish over the fact that no compensation had been awarded to the victim by the lower courts. Invoking the constitutional obligation to provide meaningful redress, the Court directed the State of Arunachal Pradesh to pay &#8377;10,50,000\/- as compensation to the victim. To safeguard her future interest, the amount was directed to be deposited in a fixed deposit for a period of five years in any nationalised bank, with the victim entitled to withdraw quarterly interest. The Member Secretary, Arunachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority, was directed to monitor the process.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reiterated that justice must go beyond conviction and include restitution wherever possible. It reaffirmed the judiciary&#8217;s constitutional commitment to protect the dignity and rights of child survivors.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed, with the Court finding no perversity or illegality in the concurrent findings of the courts below.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Arjun Sonar v. State of Arunachal Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/gNWB0aEh\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 2065<\/a>, decided on 09-09-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR, Mr. Rajasmit Mondal, Adv., Ms. Sagun Srivastava, Adv., Mr. Saaransh Shukla, Adv.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;To grant relief in case of this nature after the guilt has been proved and affirmed, would not merely undermine the majesty of the law, it would amount to betrayal of the constitutional promise made to every child in this country.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":361584,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[89778,89780,25464,89781,89779,89777],"class_list":["post-361568","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-child-abuse-survivors-protection","tag-child-victim-cross-examination-ban","tag-gauhati-high-court","tag-legal-process-misuse-child-abuse","tag-pocso-conviction-recall-plea-rejected","tag-supreme-court-pocso-verdict"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court rejects recall of child victim in POCSO case for cross exam | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court upheld conviction of a man under POCSO Act and rejected recall of child victim for cross-examination, emphasising that legal process must not be misused to re-traumatize child abuse survivors.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court upheld conviction of a man under POCSO Act and rejected recall of child victim for cross-examination, emphasising that legal process must not be misused to re-traumatize child abuse survivors.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-25T04:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-30T04:46:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court rejects recall of child victim in POCSO case for cross exam | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-25T04:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-30T04:46:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court upheld conviction of a man under POCSO Act and rejected recall of child victim for cross-examination, emphasising that legal process must not be misused to re-traumatize child abuse survivors.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court rejects recall of child victim in POCSO case for cross exam | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court upheld conviction of a man under POCSO Act and rejected recall of child victim for cross-examination, emphasising that legal process must not be misused to re-traumatize child abuse survivors.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination","og_description":"Supreme Court upheld conviction of a man under POCSO Act and rejected recall of child victim for cross-examination, emphasising that legal process must not be misused to re-traumatize child abuse survivors.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-25T04:30:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-30T04:46:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/","name":"Supreme Court rejects recall of child victim in POCSO case for cross exam | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-25T04:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-30T04:46:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Supreme Court upheld conviction of a man under POCSO Act and rejected recall of child victim for cross-examination, emphasising that legal process must not be misused to re-traumatize child abuse survivors.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/25\/sc-rejects-recall-child-victim-pocso-cross-exam\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cLegal process cannot be misused to re-traumatise child abuse survivors\u201d: SC rejects POCSO convict\u2019s plea to recall 11-year-old niece for cross-examination"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/recall-of-child-victim.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":268987,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":361568,"position":0},"title":"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"June 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M Nagaprasanna, J. allowed the petition filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has now attained 18 years of age and the rigour given under S. 33(5) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (\u2018POCSO Act' ) is not applicable now.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280015,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/legal-update-legal-news-c-hild-witness-can-be-recalled\/","url_meta":{"origin":361568,"position":1},"title":"Bar under Section 33(5) of POCSO Act is not absolute; Kerala High Court allows recalling of child witness for examination for the just decision of the case","author":"Editor","date":"December 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court held that child witness can be recalled for examination; bar under Section 33(5) of POCSO Act is not absolute.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":279496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/12\/legal-update-legal-news-no-leniency-to-person-committing-offence-under-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":361568,"position":2},"title":"No leniency to be shown to a person committing offence under POCSO Act; Gujarat High Court rejects bail plea","author":"Editor","date":"December 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court denied showing any leniency while deciding bail application of accused charged with offences under POCSO Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image10.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":299056,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/delhi-hc-dismisses-petition-to-recall-seven-year-old-sexual-assault-victim-to-be-cross-examined\/","url_meta":{"origin":361568,"position":3},"title":"POCSO| Delhi High Court dismisses petition to recall 7-year-old victim for cross examination; says repeated opportunities do not necessarily indicate fair trial","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile balancing the right of the accused to a fair trial and upholding the intent of the legislation, the courts are duty bound to remain sensitive to the plight of the seven-year-old sexual assault victim.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/del-hc-sexual-assault-of-10-year-old-minor-boy-variations-in-childs-statement-at-stages-of-investigation-trial-doesnt-retract-veracity-of-allegations-against-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":361568,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | [Sexual Assault of 10-year old minor boy] Variations in child&#8217;s statement at stages of investigation &#038; trial doesn\u2019t retract veracity of allegations against accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Anu Malhotra, J., while upholding the decision of the trial court in a case where a 10-year-old minor was sexually assaulted, issued directions for the Jail Superintendent to consider an appropriate programme for the appellant ensuring the following: appropriate correctional courses through meditational therapy educational opportunity, vocational\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291690,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/10\/mandatory-reporting-under-pocso-act-overrides-restrictions-under-section-198-crpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":361568,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court| Mandatory Reporting under POCSO Act shall override the restrictions imposed under S. 198(1) &#038; (3) CrPC","author":"Arunima","date":"May 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that there is no distinct category within child victims of rape as those who are married and those who are not.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361568","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=361568"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361568\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/361584"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=361568"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=361568"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=361568"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}