{"id":361486,"date":"2025-09-24T15:00:37","date_gmt":"2025-09-24T09:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=361486"},"modified":"2025-09-30T09:46:01","modified_gmt":"2025-09-30T04:16:01","slug":"ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Such apathetic approach is antithesis to rule of law\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years\u2019 delay in presenting final report in criminal case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> A petition was filed by the petitioner under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804270\" target=\"_blank\">528<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (&#8216;BNSS&#8217;) to issue directions to the respondents to present cancellation report in FIR under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561654\" target=\"_blank\">341<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) as the matter had already been compromised between the parties in 2007. A Single Judge Bench of Sumeet Goel, J., held that this case illustrated lack of due diligence and reflected apathetic approach which could only be curbed if the Courts, across the system, adopted an institutional approach which penalized such comportment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition by imposing a cost of Rs 1,00,000 on Punjab for a delay of 15 years in presenting the final report.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, an FIR was registered in 2007 against the petitioner under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561654\" target=\"_blank\">341<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. Later, the misunderstanding between the parties was resolved with the intervention of the elders of the family. The complainant of the FIR had submitted an affidavit in this respect to the police station concerned. Accordingly, a cancellation report was prepared by the Police in 2007\/2009 but the same was not yet presented before the Court concerned despite a gap of about 15 years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that though there was no fixed and mandatory time frame for the Police to file a final report, the same ought to have been done within a reasonable time. Hea, further, stated that he made various representations to the Police authorities concerned, including Commissioner of Police of Jalandhar, but it was to no avail. Thus, the petitioner reached this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent stated that the Director General of Police, Punjab (&#8216;DGP&#8217;) had issued a circular in September 2025 for preparation, submissions and follow up of cancellation, untraced report to the competent Court. Further, it iterated that the issuance of the said circular reflected that requisite corrective measures had been taken to ensure that such lapses do not recur in future.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that to initiate and pursue prosecution was an inherent and inalienable element of the sovereign power of the State and such power was not a mere privilege but a solemn public trust, which should be exercised with utmost diligence and transparency, so as to uphold the foundational principles of the rule of law. Further, the Court specified that failure to discharge this solemn duty promptly could undermine the faith of citizenry in the efficacy and fairness of the justice. While it was indubitable that the legislature in its considered wisdom, had intentionally abstained from prescribing a mandatory time limit for the presentation of final report allowing the investigating agency a measure of discretion, however, this discretion was neither absolute nor uncontrolled.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasized that the grant of discretion carried a corresponding imperative for reasoned and diligent exercise, and it should be grounded in reasonableness and directed towards the ends of justice. The Court opined that when such discretion was permitted to translate within an unjustifiable and inordinate delay, such as the protracted period of 15 years as in the present case, constituted an antithesis to the rule of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court specified that the non-application of mind or lack of diligence in this context effectively amounted to abdication of a statutory and constitutional duty and such inaction converted a necessary element of procedural flexibility into an instrument of arbitrariness, defeating the very purpose of timely justice and eroding the procedural safeguards guaranteed to both the accused and the victim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering the facts of the present case, the Court held that it appeared to be careless and not just apathetic conduct that was undertaken by the Police officials concerned while dealing with the FIR in question. The affidavit filed by the DGP, Punjab did reflect that the punitive actions were initiated against the delinquent official(s) concerned and corrective measures were reflected to be undertaken by way of issuance of the said circular. Further, the final report for the FIR in question had been presented before the Court concerned and the same was accepted by the said Court which was after filing of the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that in discharging its sovereign constituent of prosecution, the State and its instrumentalities should act with dispatch and diligence. Further, the Court emphasized that it was due to the slumber on part of the investigating agency that it found itself compelled, to deprecate the protracted official&#8217;s inaction and its discernible unwillingness to discharge its solemn responsibilities in a timely and conscientious manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the present case was not a soothing illustration of lack of due diligence, which demonstrated an apathetic approach. Further, the Court stated that such lethargic conduct could be curbed only if the Courts, across the system, adopted an institutional approach which penalized such comportment. The Court opined that the imposition of costs was a necessary instrument, which had to be deployed to weed out such unscrupulous conduct. Thus, the Court deemed it appropriate to saddle the State with costs, which indubitably ought to be veritable and real time in nature.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court observed that since the final report was filed by the Police for the FIR in question and was accepted by the Court concerned, the grievance raised in the present petition was effectively redressed and thus, no further orders were called for in this regard.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court saddled the State of Punjab with costs of Rs 1,00,000 out of which Rs 25,000 would be paid to the petitioner and Rs 75,000 would be paid to the Punjab State Legal Services Authority-Disaster Relief Fund. Further the Court ordered that the State should deposit the aforesaid costs within 15 days and should be at liberty to recover the same from the salary of the delinquent officials, in accordance with law. The Court stated that it hoped and expected that the departmental proceedings initiated against the delinquent officials should be concluded expeditiously.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further expected that the circular issued by the DGP, Punjab, should be scrupulously adhered to and implemented in its true letter and spirit as the said circular could not be permitted to remain a trivial formality or a mere paper directive but should be effectuated in a manner that ensured its intended purpose was achieved in substance as well as form.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court directed the DGP, Punjab to file a compliance-affidavit with the Registrar General of this Court within 90 days and failure would invite punitive consequences for officer(s) concerned. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kimti Lal v. State of Punjab, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/F5kj9q85\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine P&#038;H 8998<\/a>, decided on 22-9-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Ashwani Kumar Katter, Advocate, L.M. Gulati, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Amit K. Goyal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The FIR in question was registered in 2007, but the cancellation report was prepared in 2007\/2009 but the same has not been presented till the intervention of this Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":361499,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[68319,51051,12571,51389,77748,2670,16091,89746],"class_list":["post-361486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bnss-2023","tag-final-report","tag-inordinate-delay","tag-ipc-1860","tag-justice-sumeet-goel","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-rule-of-law","tag-sovereign-duty"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>P&amp;H HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years&#039; delay in presenting final report in criminal case| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court imposed cost of Rs 1,00,000 on State for a delay of 15 years in presenting final report and stated that it was a case of an apathetic approach.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Such apathetic approach is antithesis to rule of law\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years\u2019 delay in presenting final report in criminal case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court imposed cost of Rs 1,00,000 on State for a delay of 15 years in presenting final report and stated that it was a case of an apathetic approach.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-24T09:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-30T04:16:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Such apathetic approach is antithesis to rule of law\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years\u2019 delay in presenting final report in criminal case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years' delay in presenting final report in criminal case| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-24T09:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-30T04:16:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court imposed cost of Rs 1,00,000 on State for a delay of 15 years in presenting final report and stated that it was a case of an apathetic approach.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Rs 1 Lakh cost on State\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Such apathetic approach is antithesis to rule of law\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years\u2019 delay in presenting final report in criminal case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years' delay in presenting final report in criminal case| SCC Times","description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court imposed cost of Rs 1,00,000 on State for a delay of 15 years in presenting final report and stated that it was a case of an apathetic approach.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Such apathetic approach is antithesis to rule of law\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years\u2019 delay in presenting final report in criminal case","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court imposed cost of Rs 1,00,000 on State for a delay of 15 years in presenting final report and stated that it was a case of an apathetic approach.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-24T09:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-30T04:16:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Such apathetic approach is antithesis to rule of law\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years\u2019 delay in presenting final report in criminal case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/","name":"P&H HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years' delay in presenting final report in criminal case| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-24T09:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-30T04:16:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court imposed cost of Rs 1,00,000 on State for a delay of 15 years in presenting final report and stated that it was a case of an apathetic approach.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Rs 1 Lakh cost on State"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/ph-hc-imposes-1-lakh-cost-15-years-delay-ipresenting-final-report\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Such apathetic approach is antithesis to rule of law\u2019: Punjab and Haryana HC imposes Rs 1 Lakh cost on State for 15 years\u2019 delay in presenting final report in criminal case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Rs-1-Lakh-cost-on-State.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296379,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/10\/punjab-haryana-high-court-quashes-fir-against-makers-ram-siya-ke-luv-kush\/","url_meta":{"origin":361486,"position":0},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court quashes FIR against makers of Colors TV serial \u2018Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush\u2019","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court was dealing with a matter involving allegations made by certain members of the Valmiki community regarding the role of Bhagwan Valmiki Ji being incorrectly depicted and telecast in Colors TV serial.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/28\/swayamvar-in-holy-books-enforced-as-fundamental-right-by-article-21-of-constitution-punjab-and-haryana-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":361486,"position":1},"title":"Swayamvar in holy books enforced as fundamental right by Article 21 of Constitution: Punjab and Haryana High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed quashing of FIR against the petitioner, while upholding the right to marry by one's own choice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266960,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/17\/abetment-of-suicide-by-wife-and-mother-in-law-of-deceased\/","url_meta":{"origin":361486,"position":2},"title":"Abetment of suicide by wife and mother-in-law of deceased? P&#038;H HC finds out","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Vikas Bahl, J., granted bail to mother-in-law and wife alleged to have incited husband to commit suicide. Regular bail for the petitioners was sought in an FIR under Sections 306 and 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 (Section 506 IPC has been added later on).\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206725,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/completion-of-investigation-without-considering-outcome-of-forensic-science-laboratory-cannot-be-considered-a-fair-investigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":361486,"position":3},"title":"Completion of investigation without considering outcome of Forensic Science Laboratory cannot be considered a fair investigation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Daya Chaudhary, J., under Section 482 CrPC for transfer of investigation of an FIR registered under Section 306 IPC. Facts of the case were such that petitioner was the mother of deceased who filed an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":295633,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/suicide-matrimonial-home-husband-family-liablility-s-306-ipc-p-and-h-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":361486,"position":4},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Woman committing suicide in matrimonial home does not itself make husband and in-laws liable under Section 306 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"June 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that without a positive act on the part of the accused to instigate or aid in committing suicide, conviction cannot be sustained.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296088,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/05\/father-killed-2003-punjab-haryana-high-court-acquits-daughter-extending-benefit-of-doubt\/","url_meta":{"origin":361486,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Trial Court got swayed by crime of patricide\u2019; Punjab and Haryana High Court acquits daughter in 20-year-old case","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The daughter was 16 years and 4 months old studying in class 11 when she allegedly witnessed her father being shot with a gun by two people, then herself being fastened with the charges of killing her father.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=361486"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361486\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/361499"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=361486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=361486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=361486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}