{"id":361196,"date":"2025-09-22T16:00:22","date_gmt":"2025-09-22T10:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=361196"},"modified":"2025-09-25T09:36:51","modified_gmt":"2025-09-25T04:06:51","slug":"supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Advocate to account for FIR in 1971 Forgery Case; Stays arrest of 71-year-old woman"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a special leave petition filed against the judgment of Allahabad High Court, wherein the Court rejected a 71-year-old woman application for anticipatory bail in a forgery case, the three-judge bench of <span style=\"color: #00000a;\">Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, JJ.<\/span> took strong exception to the conduct of respondent 2, a practicing advocate, who was found to be evading service in a case pertaining to an FIR lodged at his instance. The FIR alleged forgery of a sale deed dated 21-08-1971, and was registered in 2023, leading to the initiation of criminal proceedings against a 71-year-old woman.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Taking note of the situation, the Court issued bailable warrants in the sum of &#8377;10,000 with equal surety to secure the presence of respondent 2 on 08-10-2025, and directed the Commissioner of Police, Lucknow, to execute the same. The Court further made it clear that if the respondent showed reluctance in accepting the notice, his presence would be secured through non-bailable warrants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Additionally, the Court directed respondent 2 to show cause as to why exemplary costs should not be imposed upon him for lodging the belated FIR regarding a transaction dating back over five decades.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench expressed its disappointment with the Allahabad High Court&#8217;s decision to reject the petitioner&#8217;s application for anticipatory bail, observing that the petitioner, a 71-year-old woman, was neither the seller, purchaser, witness, nor a beneficiary of the impugned sale deed. The Court noted that the High Court&#8217;s casual approach in passing the impugned order warranted serious introspection, though it refrained from commenting further at that stage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter was directed to be listed on 08-10-2025, and in the interim, the arrest of the petitioner was stayed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also clarified that no counter affidavit was required from the State. However, the SHO of the police station concerned was directed to produce the original records leading to the registration of FIR and to show cause why the proceedings, prima facie appearing to be an abuse of process of law should not be quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Usha Mishra v. State of UP, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qpa38Zpv\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 2023<\/a>, decided on 17-09-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. Amit Sangwan, Adv., Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, AOR, Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv., Mr. Ashu Bhindwar, Adv., Mr. Jai Inder Sharma, Adv., Mr. Jay Veer Yadav, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;It is quite unfortunate that the Allahabad High Court has illogically turned down the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner who is a 71-year-old woman, and when she is neither seller nor purchaser nor a witness or the beneficiary of the sale deed dated.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":361202,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[89621,89622,2656,89623,54430,3067,43066,5363],"class_list":["post-361196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-1971-forgery-case","tag-71-year-old-woman","tag-advocate","tag-arrest-stay","tag-bailable-warrants","tag-FIR","tag-legal-proceedings","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC issues bailable warrants against advocate over 1971 forgery case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against advocate to account for FIR filed in a 1971 forgery case and stays arrest of a 71-year-old woman involved in the matter;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Advocate to account for FIR in 1971 Forgery Case; Stays arrest of 71-year-old woman\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against advocate to account for FIR filed in a 1971 forgery case and stays arrest of a 71-year-old woman involved in the matter;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-22T10:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-25T04:06:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Advocate to account for FIR in 1971 Forgery Case; Stays arrest of 71-year-old woman\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/\",\"name\":\"SC issues bailable warrants against advocate over 1971 forgery case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-22T10:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-25T04:06:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against advocate to account for FIR filed in a 1971 forgery case and stays arrest of a 71-year-old woman involved in the matter;\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"1971 forgery case\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Advocate to account for FIR in 1971 Forgery Case; Stays arrest of 71-year-old woman\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC issues bailable warrants against advocate over 1971 forgery case | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against advocate to account for FIR filed in a 1971 forgery case and stays arrest of a 71-year-old woman involved in the matter;","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Advocate to account for FIR in 1971 Forgery Case; Stays arrest of 71-year-old woman","og_description":"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against advocate to account for FIR filed in a 1971 forgery case and stays arrest of a 71-year-old woman involved in the matter;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-22T10:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-25T04:06:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Advocate to account for FIR in 1971 Forgery Case; Stays arrest of 71-year-old woman","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/","name":"SC issues bailable warrants against advocate over 1971 forgery case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-22T10:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-25T04:06:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against advocate to account for FIR filed in a 1971 forgery case and stays arrest of a 71-year-old woman involved in the matter;","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"1971 forgery case"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/supreme-court-bailable-warrants-advocate-fir-1971-forgery-stay-arrest-71-year-old\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court issues bailable warrants against Advocate to account for FIR in 1971 Forgery Case; Stays arrest of 71-year-old woman"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1971-forgery-case.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":29301,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/16\/court-cannot-issue-warrants-of-arrest-against-directors-of-a-company-if-notice-has-not-been-issued-against-them-in-a-contempt-matter\/","url_meta":{"origin":361196,"position":0},"title":"Court cannot issue warrants of arrest against Directors of a Company if notice has not been issued against them in a Contempt matter","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 16, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In the present cases, the order dated 02.12.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in CCP No.71\/2015 in CS(OS) 442\/2013 is assailed. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) (Respondent 1 in both the appeals) sought permanent injunction against Mercury Electronics Limited and Micromax Informatics Limited restraining them from infringing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/02\/del-hc-offences-like-rape-forgery-having-a-bearing-on-vital-societal-interest-cannot-be-construed-to-be-merely-private-or-civil-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":361196,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Offences like rape &#038; forgery having a bearing on vital societal interest cannot be construed to be merely private or civil disputes","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., with regard to the settlement of disputes stated that: \u201cIn crimes which seriously endangers the well being of the society, it is not safe to leave the crime doer only because he and the victim have settled the dispute amicably. \u201c The instant petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223641,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/","url_meta":{"origin":361196,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J., addressed an application that sought to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 468, 471 of Penal Code, 1860 and Section 66(D) of Information Technology Act pending in Judicial Magistrate Court. In the present matter, a complaint was lodged against the applicant that he\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/17\/pat-hc-accused-obtained-employment-on-the-basis-of-forged-tet-certificate-court-declines-to-grant-bail-rules-that-there-can-be-no-presumption-of-the-accused-being-unaware-of-forgery\/","url_meta":{"origin":361196,"position":3},"title":"Pat HC | Accused obtained employment on basis of forged TET certificate; Court declines to grant bail, rules that there can be no presumption of accused being unaware of forgery","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J., rejected the bail application of the applicant-accused in connection with the FIR registered for offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Penal Code, 1860. The present case arises from the allegations that have been levelled against the applicant that she\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":361196,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents considering amicable settlement between parties","author":"Arushi","date":"May 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Petitioner has shown remorse for his conduct and undertakes not to repeat the same in future. Respondent 2 also states that he has settled the disputes with the petitioner out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357305,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/21\/all-hc-woman-granted-relief-in-21-year-old-dowry-case-delayed-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":361196,"position":5},"title":"\u201cRegrettable that Trial Court failed to conduct any effective proceedings\u201d: Allahabad HC grants relief to woman in dowry case pending since 2004","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis prolonged and unexplained inaction by the Trial Court constitutes not only a denial of timely justice, but also a serious erosion of the rule of law and a violation of the wife\u2019s fundamental right to a fair and expeditious trial.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"relief in 21 -year- old dowry case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/relief-in-21-year-old-dowry-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/relief-in-21-year-old-dowry-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/relief-in-21-year-old-dowry-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/relief-in-21-year-old-dowry-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=361196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361196\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/361202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=361196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=361196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=361196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}