{"id":360987,"date":"2025-09-20T15:00:04","date_gmt":"2025-09-20T09:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=360987"},"modified":"2025-09-20T16:16:59","modified_gmt":"2025-09-20T10:46:59","slug":"india-hague-service-convention-challenges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/","title":{"rendered":"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Introduction<\/h2>\n

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters, 19651<\/sup><\/a> (Convention) is a multilateral treaty designed to streamline cross-border service of legal documents. Its primary objective is ensuring that litigants receive prompt and effective notice of proceedings against them, thereby safeguarding procedural fairness.<\/p>\n

The Convention has 83 contracting States and establishes a structured framework for cross-border document service. Article 52<\/sup><\/a> requires each State to designate a Central Authority responsible for receiving and executing service requests under domestic law. Upon completion, the Central Authority issues a certificate detailing the service under Article 63<\/sup><\/a>. The Convention permits various service methods: postal channels, diplomatic channels, judicial officers, diplomatic or consular agents and private individuals. However, the receiving State may object to any of these methods.<\/p>\n

In this context, the \u201crequesting State\u201d refers to the jurisdiction where the request for service originates and the \u201creceiving State\u201d is where the documents are to be served. For example, if an action is initiated in the US against a party based in India, the US would be the requesting State and India would be the receiving State.<\/p>\n

India’s position under the Convention<\/h2>\n

India acceded to the Convention on 23-11-2006, with the treaty entering into force on 1-8-2007. Further, on 12-1-2009, the Central Government declared that provisions of Section 29<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a>4<\/sup><\/a> (CPC) would 5<\/sup><\/a>. The Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, serves as India’s designated Central Authority for processing service requests.<\/p>\n

Despite the Convention’s intent to promote flexibility in cross-border service, India adopted a restrictive approach. India categorically objects to all Article 106<\/sup><\/a> provisions, prohibiting service via post, judicial officers and private individuals. Additionally, under Article 87<\/sup><\/a>, India restricts service through diplomatic or consular agents unless the addressee is a national of the requesting State. Consequently, India recognises no direct service methods that bypass its Central Authority mechanism.<\/p>\n

Challenges in implementation<\/h2>\n

While this centralised model ensures uniformity and governmental oversight, it creates significant practical friction. Service requests typically require six months to over a year for execution and confirmation.<\/p>\n

Foreign parties must affect service exclusively through India’s Central Authority. While the Convention prescribes procedural details, Indian courts execute service requests under domestic law. The Department of Legal Affairs transmits documents to the appropriate District Courts for service execution per the CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

After service completion, courts return proof of service to the Central Authority, which then issues a certificate. Administrative backlogs often delay this process. Moreover, no digital infrastructure exists for submitting or tracking service requests. In Charuvila Philippose Sundaran Pillai<\/span> v. P.N. Sivadasan<\/span>8<\/sup><\/a>, the Kerala High Court recognised this deficiency and recommended creating a dedicated online portal. The Court observed this would enable document submission per the Convention while monitoring service steps and integrating with domestic law, enhancing transparency and efficiency.<\/p>\n

For outbound services from India, India is bound by the declarations made by the receiving State. If the destination State has not objected to Article 109<\/sup><\/a>, Indian parties may serve through such alternative methods or use the Article 510<\/sup><\/a> route through the Foreign Central Authority.<\/p>\n

Indian judicial interpretation has evolved through key decisions. The trajectory of Indian judicial interpretation on this issue can be traced through two important cases. In Mollykutty<\/span> v. Nicey Jacob<\/span>11<\/sup><\/a>, the Kerala High Court adopted a stricter approach, and held that service of documents had to be carried out by the mechanism laid down in Article 512<\/sup><\/a>. The Court disregarded recourse under Order 5 Rule 25<\/a> CPC<\/a>13<\/sup><\/a> i.e. service via post or e-mail, or Order 5 Rule 26-A14<\/sup><\/a> which allows service via diplomatic channels. This decision depicted treaty conformity but at the cost of procedural flexibility. Later, in 2024, in Charuvila Philippose case<\/span>15<\/sup><\/a>, the Court held that India has a dualistic model, therefore, by way of Article 253 of the Indian Constitution16<\/sup><\/a>, unless implemented by domestic law, conventions do not have direct enforceability, rather they are persuasive in nature.<\/p>\n

Consequently, the Full Bench17<\/sup><\/a> overruled Mollykutty case<\/span>18<\/sup><\/a> to the extent that services must be affected through Article 519<\/sup><\/a> exclusively. The Court clarified that Order 5 Rule 25<\/a> CPC<\/a>20<\/sup><\/a> is a valid mechanism if the receiving State does not object to the mode established in Article 1021<\/sup><\/a>. This position was further reaffirmed in Charuvila Philippose Sundaran Pillai<\/span> v. P.N. Sivadasan<\/span>22<\/sup><\/a>, wherein the Kerala High Court reiterated that while service via Central Authority is the preferred route, courts may permit other viable methods of service if accepted by the receiving State. This marked a shift from formalism to procedural pragmatism, reflecting compliance with international treaties while also safeguarding domestic laws.<\/p>\n

Comparative analysis: India’s approach versus other jurisdictions<\/h2>\n

(A) United Kingdom<\/span><\/p>\n

The United Kingdom23<\/sup><\/a> does not object to Article 1024<\/sup><\/a> of the Convention and allows service via postal channels, judicial officers or private individuals. Therefore, Indian parties can serve UK defendants by methods under Article 10. However, litigants in the UK are obliged to use India’s Central Authority route as mentioned in Article 525<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

(B) United States<\/span><\/p>\n

The United States allows all forms of services authorised under Article 1026<\/sup><\/a>. In Water Splash Inc.<\/span> v. Menon<\/span>27<\/sup><\/a>, the US Supreme Court held that Article 10(a<\/span>)28<\/sup><\/a> is a viable and efficient method to service documents unless the receiving country objects to it. This is in line with the international standards and harmonises the transnational legal processes.<\/p>\n

However, inbound services into India have proven to be far more difficult. Several US Federal District Courts have highlighted the substantial delays experienced when serving documents into India via the Central Authority. In Richmond Technologies, Inc<\/span> v. Aumtech Business Solutions<\/span>29<\/sup><\/a>, the Court noted that as India objected to all methods under Article 1030<\/sup><\/a>, a delay is inevitable. Therefore, the Court unilaterally allowed service of document through an e-mail under the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 2024, Rule 4(f<\/span>)(3)31<\/sup><\/a> as it was also consistent with the international law.<\/p>\n

In FTC<\/span> v. PCCare247 Inc.<\/span>32<\/sup><\/a>, wherein the enforcement action by the Federal Trade Commission involved defendants from India, the Court stated that waiting for approval by the Central Authority of India is not feasible and they will have to resort to serving documents through an e-mail. The Court held that as the parties had been communicating over e-mail from before, the due process requirement was satisfied, and the Convention need not be followed in every instance.<\/p>\n

These rulings reflect a consistent judicial sentiment that Indian litigants benefit from procedural flexibility when serving US citizens. However, US litigants face procedural rigidity when serving Indian defendants, as they can proceed solely through Central Authority, with a bar on any other alternative channels. This leads to a procedural asymmetry in favour of outbound service from India.<\/p>\n

(C) Singapore<\/span><\/p>\n

On the other hand, Singapore, which acceded to the Convention in May 202333<\/sup><\/a>, has lodged a full objection to Article 1034<\/sup><\/a>, disallowing services via mail, judicial officers or private agents. Thus, any litigant who wishes to serve a document into Singapore has to do it through Central Authority under Article 535<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Potential solutions and reforms<\/h2>\n

To address these implementation challenges, several reform measures merit consideration. First, India should establish a comprehensive digital infrastructure for Central Authority operations,36<\/sup><\/a> including an online portal for submitting service requests, real-time tracking capabilities, and automated status updates. As recommended by the Kerala High Court in Charuvila Philippose case<\/span>37<\/sup><\/a>, such digitisation would enhance transparency and efficiency while maintaining governmental oversight.<\/p>\n

Second, India should reconsider its blanket objection to all Article 1038<\/sup><\/a> provisions. A selective approach could permit certain alternative service methods while maintaining control over sensitive cases. For instance, India could allow postal service for commercial disputes while requiring Central Authority processing for matters involving sovereign immunity or national security concerns.<\/p>\n

Third, the Department of Legal Affairs should issue comprehensive guidelines to District Courts regarding Convention procedures. These guidelines should standardise processing timelines, establish quality control measures, and create accountability mechanisms for delayed service execution. Clear protocols would reduce administrative backlogs and ensure consistent application of both Convention requirements and domestic law under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a>39<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Fourth, Indian courts should recognise contractual waivers of Convention procedures where parties have explicitly agreed to alternative service methods. Following the approach in Rockefeller Technology Investments<\/span> case<\/span>40<\/sup><\/a>, courts could uphold agreements for service via electronic means or courier services, provided such arrangements satisfy due process requirements and do not contravene public policy.<\/p>\n

Finally, India should engage in bilateral negotiations with major trading partners to establish reciprocal service arrangements. Such agreements could create fast-track procedures for commercial disputes while maintaining the Convention’s due process protections. This approach would address the current procedural asymmetry and promote more balanced cross-border litigation practices.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

The Convention establishes a structured framework for cross-border service of judicial and extra-judicial documents, but implementation varies significantly across jurisdictions. India’s control-oriented approach, with categorical objection to Article 1041<\/sup><\/a>, creates a mechanism that appears procedurally sound but proves inefficient in practice.<\/p>\n

Structural improvements are essential, including digitisation of Central Authority operations, clear guidelines for trial courts, and reconsideration of the blanket Article 1042<\/sup><\/a> objection. These reforms are imperative to fulfil the Convention’s purpose of ensuring timely and effective cross-border service.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

*Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

**Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965.<\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 5.<\/p>\n

3.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 6.<\/p>\n

4.<\/a> Civil Procedure Code, 1908.<\/a><\/p>\n

5.<\/a> Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Legal Affairs, India \u2014 Central Authority and Practical Information available at https:\/\/legalaffairs.gov.in\/hague-conference\/gsr24e-hague-convention-service-abroad-judicial-or-extra-judicial-documents-civil<\/span><\/a> (Last visited on September 19, 2025).<\/p>\n

6.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

7.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 8.<\/p>\n

8.<\/a> 2024 SCC OnLine Ker 6724.<\/a><\/p>\n

9.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

10.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 5.<\/p>\n

11.<\/a> 2018 SCC OnLine Ker 20657<\/a>.<\/p>\n

12.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 5.<\/p>\n

13.<\/a> Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or. 5 R. 25.<\/a><\/p>\n

14.<\/a> Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or. 5 R. 26-A.<\/a><\/p>\n

15.<\/a> 2024 SCC OnLine Ker 6724.<\/a><\/p>\n

16.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 253.<\/a><\/p>\n

17.<\/a> 2024 SCC OnLine Ker 6724.<\/a><\/p>\n

18.<\/a> 2018 SCC OnLine Ker 20657<\/a>.<\/p>\n

19.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 5.<\/p>\n

20.<\/a> Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or. 5 R. 25.<\/a><\/p>\n

21.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

22.<\/a> 2024 SCC OnLine Ker 6724.<\/a><\/p>\n

23.<\/a> Declaration\/reservation\/notification available at https:\/\/www.hcch.net\/en\/instruments\/conventions\/status-table\/notifications\/?csid=1255&disp=resdn<\/a> (Last visited on September 19, 2025).<\/p>\n

24.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

25.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 5.<\/p>\n

26.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

27.<\/a> 2017 SCC OnLine US SC 53 : 581 US ___ (2017).<\/a><\/p>\n

28.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10(a).<\/p>\n

29.<\/a> Richmond Technologies, Inc<\/span> v. Aumtech Business Solutions<\/span>, 11-CV-02460-LHK, dated 6-6-2011.<\/p>\n

30.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

31.<\/a> Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 2024, R. 4(f<\/span>)(3).<\/p>\n

32.<\/a> Federal Trade Commission v. PCCare247 Inc., 2014 SCC OnLine Dis Crt US 4<\/a>.<\/p>\n

33.<\/a> Singapore \u2014 Central Authority & Practical Information available at https:\/\/www.hcch.net\/en\/states\/authorities\/details3\/?aid=1200 (Last visited on September 19, 2025).<\/p>\n

34.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

35.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 5.<\/p>\n

36.<\/a> Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft<\/span> v. Herwig<\/span> J. Schlunk<\/span>, 1988 SCC OnLine US SC 124 : 100 L Ed 2d 722 : 486 US 694 (1988).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

37.<\/a> 2024 SCC OnLine Ker 6724<\/a>; Rockefeller Technology Investments<\/span> v. Changzhou Sinotype<\/span> Technology Co. Ltd.<\/span>, 9 Cal 5th 125, 459 P 3d 665 (2020), dated 2-4-2020.<\/p>\n

38.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

39.<\/a> Civil Procedure Code, 1908.<\/a><\/p>\n

40.<\/a> Rockefeller Technology Investments<\/span> case<\/span>, dated 2-4-2020.<\/p>\n

41.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n

42.<\/a> Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965, Art. 10.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Nikhil Varshney* and Ishu Gupta**<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":360988,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30936,20271],"tags":[66212,89527,8331,89525,47088,89524,89526,6571,33443],"class_list":["post-360987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cam","category-experts_corner","tag-66212","tag-article-5-of-hague-convention-on-service-abroad","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-cross-border-litigation","tag-hague-convention","tag-hague-convention-on-the-service-abroad-of-judicial-and-extrajudicial-documents-in-civil-and-commercial-matters","tag-hague-service-convention-article-10","tag-india","tag-international-law"],"yoast_head":"\nServing Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This article is an analysis of India's implementation of the Hague Service Convention and highlights the challenges posed by its restrictive approach, the judicial evolution in interpreting the treaty, and potential reforms to address delays in cross-border service of documents.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This article is an analysis of India's implementation of the Hague Service Convention and highlights the challenges posed by its restrictive approach, the judicial evolution in interpreting the treaty, and potential reforms to address delays in cross-border service of documents.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-20T09:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-20T10:46:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-20T09:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-20T10:46:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2017,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"1965\",\"Article 5 of Hague Convention on service abroad\",\"civil procedure code\",\"Cross-border litigation\",\"Hague Convention\",\"Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters\",\"Hague Service Convention Article 10\",\"India\",\"International Law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas\",\"Experts Corner\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/\",\"name\":\"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-20T09:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-20T10:46:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"This article is an analysis of India's implementation of the Hague Service Convention and highlights the challenges posed by its restrictive approach, the judicial evolution in interpreting the treaty, and potential reforms to address delays in cross-border service of documents.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"Hague Service Convention India\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/20\\\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention | SCC Times","description":"This article is an analysis of India's implementation of the Hague Service Convention and highlights the challenges posed by its restrictive approach, the judicial evolution in interpreting the treaty, and potential reforms to address delays in cross-border service of documents.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention","og_description":"This article is an analysis of India's implementation of the Hague Service Convention and highlights the challenges posed by its restrictive approach, the judicial evolution in interpreting the treaty, and potential reforms to address delays in cross-border service of documents.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-20T09:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-20T10:46:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention","datePublished":"2025-09-20T09:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-20T10:46:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/"},"wordCount":2017,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp","keywords":["1965","Article 5 of Hague Convention on service abroad","civil procedure code","Cross-border litigation","Hague Convention","Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters","Hague Service Convention Article 10","India","International Law"],"articleSection":["Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","Experts Corner"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/","name":"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-20T09:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-20T10:46:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"This article is an analysis of India's implementation of the Hague Service Convention and highlights the challenges posed by its restrictive approach, the judicial evolution in interpreting the treaty, and potential reforms to address delays in cross-border service of documents.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"Hague Service Convention India"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/20\/india-hague-service-convention-challenges\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Hague-Service-Convention-India.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281483,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/exploration-of-extraterritorial-service-of-summons-under-customs-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":360987,"position":0},"title":"Exploration of Extraterritorial Service of Summons under Customs Law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Nupur Maheshwari\u2020, Harshdeep Khurana\u2020\u2020 and Siddhant Indrajit\u2020\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 2","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Customs Law","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-59-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":35372,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/indian-courts-and-public-authorities-bound-to-recognise-public-documents-executed-and-authenticated-abroad-in-terms-of-apostille-certification\/","url_meta":{"origin":360987,"position":1},"title":"Indian courts and public authorities bound to recognise public documents executed and authenticated abroad in terms of Apostille certification","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: While deciding upon the challenge to the order of the Marriage Officer in not accepting the notice of intended marriage, \u00a0Muhamed Mustaque, J has held that Indian courts and public authorities are bound to recognise certification of the notaries in case of foreign public documents, which have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":85851,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/23\/263rd-law-commission-report-on-the-protection-of-children-inter-country-removal-and-retention-bill-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":360987,"position":2},"title":"263rd Law Commission Report on The Protection of Children (Inter-Country Removal and Retention) Bill, 2016","author":"Saba","date":"November 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Recently, the Law Commission of India headed by Dr Justice B.S Chauhan submitted its 263rd Report to Law minister Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad.\u00a0In this report, the Law Commission has recommended the Protection of Children (Inter-Country Removal and Retention) Bill, 2016. It is pertinent to note that the High Court of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/29\/cross-border-adoption-indian-laws-citizens-uganda-child-adopted-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":360987,"position":3},"title":"Cross-Border Adoption situation not envisaged by Indian adoption laws; Karnataka HC directs CARA to consider issuing NOC to child adopted in Uganda.","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court stated that rights of child adopted by Indian Citizens in Uganda, which is a non-signatory to Hague Convention, cannot be left marooned.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254450,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/20\/adoption-amendment-regulations-2021-notified-to-make-inter-country-adoptions-easier\/","url_meta":{"origin":360987,"position":4},"title":"Adoption (Amendment) Regulations, 2021 notified to ease the process of inter-country adoptions","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Government notifies the Adoption (Amendment) Regulations, 2021 to amend the Adoption Regulations, 2017 in order to make inter-country adoptions easier. Key Amendments: A new chapter is inserted on Procedure for Children Adopted under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, by Parents who desire to relocate child abroad.\u00a0\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/17\/should-courts-categorically-examine-all-possible-ameliorative-measures-before-denying-a-hague-convention-petition-for-return-of-a-child-to-a-foreign-country-scotus-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":360987,"position":5},"title":"Should courts categorically examine all possible ameliorative measures, before denying a Hague Convention petition for return of a child to a foreign country? SCOTUS answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United States: While deciding the instant matter related to the international custody of a child which further involved the reading and interpretation of the concerned provisions of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; the full bench of the Court comprising of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=360987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360987\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/360988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=360987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=360987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=360987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}