{"id":360158,"date":"2025-09-15T13:30:59","date_gmt":"2025-09-15T08:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=360158"},"modified":"2025-09-17T16:42:39","modified_gmt":"2025-09-17T11:12:39","slug":"itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/","title":{"rendered":"Assessee\u2019s income for tax assessment cannot be clubbed with minor daughter\u2019s share of sale proceeds, deposited as per Court\u2019s order: ITAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Income Tax Appellate Tribunal:<\/span> In the present appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (&#8216;Commissioner&#8217;), whereby the Assessing Officer&#8217;s decision to club the income arising from the share of assessee&#8217;s minor daughter&#8217;s with the assessee&#8217;s income was upheld, S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member, allowed the appeal and stated that the assessee could not decide the utilization of his minor daughter&#8217;s share of sale proceeds, as it was deposited as per Court&#8217;s order and it is impossible to club the same with the assessee&#8217;s income. The Tribunal stated that the addition made in the income of the assessee with reference to assessee&#8217;s minor daughter&#8217;s share was not justified and thus, it was deleted. The Tribunal also deleted the disallowance of brokerage expenses, recognizing the standard industry practice and accepting the assessee&#8217;s explanation.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the matter in hand, the assessee, inherited a property jointly with his minor daughter through his spouse after her death. The assessee sold the said property with the permission of City Civil Court, Chennai and as per direction, deposited 50% minor daughter&#8217;s share in the nationalized bank, that cannot be used until she attains majority, in the name of the Registrar, City Civil Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The assessee filed return of income declaring his total income, in response to the notice under section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\">148<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;). The Assessing Officer asked the assessee to furnish details in support of the deduction claimed in the return of income. The Assessing Officer stated that the assessee had not declared income of his minor daughter on the received sale consideration. The assessee stated that he accounted his 50% share in the capital gains and claimed deduction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559853\" target=\"_blank\">54<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a> by filing valuation report given by the Chartered Engineer and registered valuer. However, the Assessing Officer assessed that the income arising from the daughter&#8217;s share must be clubbed with the assessee&#8217;s income and accordingly made additions to the assessee&#8217;s total income.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Assessing Officer determined capital gains with reference to assessee&#8217;s minor daughter&#8217;s share at 50% by giving benefit under section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559853\" target=\"_blank\">54<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a> only with reference to assessee&#8217;s share. The Commissioner upheld the additions to the assessee&#8217;s total income and thus, aggrieved by the same, present appeal has been filed.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Tribunal observed that the only issue in the present case, was whether the assessee should have included the share of assessee&#8217;s minor daughter also in his income in offering long term capital gain. Admittedly, the said 50% share of assessee&#8217;s minor daughter was deposited in the name of Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai under section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549981\" target=\"_blank\">8(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002810435\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956<\/a>, the receipt of which reflected in the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Tribunal noted that on perusal of the order of the City Civil Court, Chennai, the assessee filed a petition seeking the Court&#8217;s permission to alienate property standing in the name of his deceased wife, to facilitate better education and welfare of their minor daughter. Considering the same, the City Civil Court permitted the assessee to sell his minor daughter&#8217;s interest in the property and deposit her share in any of the nationalized bank in the name of Registrar, City Civil Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Tribunal stated that the assessee could not decide the utilization of his minor daughter&#8217;s share as it was deposited as per Court&#8217;s order and it is impossible to club the same with the assessee&#8217;s income. Therefore, the addition made in the hands of the assessee with reference to assessee&#8217;s minor daughter&#8217;s share was not justified and thus, it is deleted. Further regarding the brokerage charges, which is of 1% of the sale consideration, as it is usual practice across real estate sector, the Tribunal disallowed it for want of evidence, and thus, it is also deleted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Pradeep Jeyavelu v. CIT, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/91P8YywP\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine ITAT 9828<\/a>, decided on 3-9-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> R.S. Hithesh, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> V. Aswathy, JCIT<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The assessee deposited 50% minor daughter&#8217;s share in the nationalized bank. Further, the assessee accounted his 50% share and offered the same as capital gain with the deduction of claim under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67527,"featured_media":360163,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[89099,89100,89098,89101],"class_list":["post-360158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share","tag-assessment-of-tax-on-minor-daughter-share","tag-club-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share","tag-clubbing-income-with-minor-daughters-share"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>ITAT on clubbing assessee&#039;s income with minor daughter&#039;s share| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"ITAT stated that clubbing assessee&#039;s income with minor daughter&#039;s share of sale proceeds was not justified, thus deleted such addition in the income.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Assessee\u2019s income for tax assessment cannot be clubbed with minor daughter\u2019s share of sale proceeds, deposited as per Court\u2019s order: ITAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ITAT stated that clubbing assessee&#039;s income with minor daughter&#039;s share of sale proceeds was not justified, thus deleted such addition in the income.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-15T08:00:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-17T11:12:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ekta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Assessee\u2019s income for tax assessment cannot be clubbed with minor daughter\u2019s share of sale proceeds, deposited as per Court\u2019s order: ITAT\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ekta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/\",\"name\":\"ITAT on clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-15T08:00:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-17T11:12:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f5ac6ccbea82152843ab973e3601f6a7\"},\"description\":\"ITAT stated that clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share of sale proceeds was not justified, thus deleted such addition in the income.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Assessee\u2019s income for tax assessment cannot be clubbed with minor daughter\u2019s share of sale proceeds, deposited as per Court\u2019s order: ITAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f5ac6ccbea82152843ab973e3601f6a7\",\"name\":\"Ekta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8765401b35337b105769bf80bae758d1a8823981032b9cc9c2ebc2bd32cb4fb6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8765401b35337b105769bf80bae758d1a8823981032b9cc9c2ebc2bd32cb4fb6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ekta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/ekta\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ITAT on clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share| SCC Times","description":"ITAT stated that clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share of sale proceeds was not justified, thus deleted such addition in the income.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Assessee\u2019s income for tax assessment cannot be clubbed with minor daughter\u2019s share of sale proceeds, deposited as per Court\u2019s order: ITAT","og_description":"ITAT stated that clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share of sale proceeds was not justified, thus deleted such addition in the income.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-15T08:00:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-17T11:12:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ekta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Assessee\u2019s income for tax assessment cannot be clubbed with minor daughter\u2019s share of sale proceeds, deposited as per Court\u2019s order: ITAT","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ekta","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/","name":"ITAT on clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-15T08:00:59+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-17T11:12:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f5ac6ccbea82152843ab973e3601f6a7"},"description":"ITAT stated that clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share of sale proceeds was not justified, thus deleted such addition in the income.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"clubbing assessee's income with minor daughter's share"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/itat-on-clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Assessee\u2019s income for tax assessment cannot be clubbed with minor daughter\u2019s share of sale proceeds, deposited as per Court\u2019s order: ITAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f5ac6ccbea82152843ab973e3601f6a7","name":"Ekta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8765401b35337b105769bf80bae758d1a8823981032b9cc9c2ebc2bd32cb4fb6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8765401b35337b105769bf80bae758d1a8823981032b9cc9c2ebc2bd32cb4fb6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ekta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/ekta\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/clubbing-assessees-income-with-minor-daughters-share.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":362229,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/01\/tribunal-and-commissions-september-2025-roundup-hyd-airport-case-epfo-stakeholder-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":360158,"position":0},"title":"Tribunals and Commissions September 2025| EPFO stakeholder claims; Food safety standards violation; Education Society\u2019s service tax exemption; &amp; More","author":"Editor","date":"October 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the key legal developments of September 2025, featuring the CCI\u2019S abuse of dominance case against GMR Hyderabad Airport, CESTAT\u2019S exemption of service tax for Education Welfare Society, SEBI on liability in partnership, EPFO stakeholder claims.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tribunals and Commissions September 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-September-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-September-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-September-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-September-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/","url_meta":{"origin":360158,"position":1},"title":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 269-SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has a specific bar on receiving a sum more than 20,000\/- from any other persons by way of loan or deposit.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358323,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/latest-cases-on-income-tax-laws-itr\/","url_meta":{"origin":360158,"position":2},"title":"Cases Reported in ITR | Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","author":"Shikha","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest cases reported in SCC\u2019s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Exemptions, Revision, Deductions, Limitation, Appeal, Reassessment, Legacy Dispute Resolution, Faceless assessment and much more.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/21\/itat-quashes-reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation-s-148\/","url_meta":{"origin":360158,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Escaped income is below Rs 50 lakhs\u2019; ITAT quashes reassessment notice under S.148 Income Tax Act issued beyond prescribed limitation of 3 years","author":"Ekta","date":"October 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A notice under Section 148-A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued to the assessee, stating that income had escaped assessment under the provisions of Section 147, regarding sale, purchase of properties and contractual receipts.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"reassessment notice barred by limitation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/16\/assessing-officer-to-record-dissatisfaction-cogent-reasons-for-correctness-claim-assessee-bombay-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":360158,"position":4},"title":"Assessing Officer to record dissatisfaction with correctness of claim of Assessee in respect of expenditure with cogent reasons: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"April 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal of Income Tax Commissioner to disallow expenditure amounting to 94 Crore u\/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338821,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/himachal-pradesh-hc-grants-relief-assessee-non-compliance-with-twin-conditions-under-s-127\/","url_meta":{"origin":360158,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Twin Conditions under S. 127 of Income Tax Act was not complied with\u2019; Himachal Pradesh HC grants relief to assessee whose tax assessment was wrongly transferred","author":"Editor","date":"January 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA valuable right of assessee is clearly involved in the matter, when he objected to jurisdiction of the assessing officer and transfer of his case, which obviously could not have been adjudicated upon without affording an opportunity of hearing and disclosing to him the reasons for not accepting his point\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67527"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=360158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/360158\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/360163"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=360158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=360158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=360158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}