{"id":359909,"date":"2025-09-12T11:30:57","date_gmt":"2025-09-12T06:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=359909"},"modified":"2025-09-15T17:56:28","modified_gmt":"2025-09-15T12:26:28","slug":"no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018No fire safety NOC needed for educational buildings under 15 metres\u2019; Supreme Court quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal filed against the judgment passed by Andhra Pradesh High Court, whereby the High Court refused to quash criminal proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\">420<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) against the Chairman of JVRR Education Society, who was accused of using a forged fire safety No Objection Certificate (&#8216;NOC&#8217;), to obtain recognition for his college, the division bench of B.V. Nagarathna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Joymalya Bagchi<\/span>, JJ. held that the essential ingredients of the offences of cheating and forgery were not satisfied, as per the facts of the case. Referring to the National Building Code, 2016, the Court noted that no fire safety NOC was required for educational institutions operating from buildings below 15 metres in height. Since the accused&#8217;s building stood at 14.20 metres, the Court found no material to establish the requisite mens rea or wrongful gain\/loss necessary to constitute the offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\">420<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561807\" target=\"_blank\">465<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561810\" target=\"_blank\">468<\/a>, or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561814\" target=\"_blank\">471<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The accused&#8217;s society, namely JVRR Education Society, had been running a college since 2016 in a non-multi-storeyed building comprising a ground floor and three upper floors, with a total height of 14.20 metres. On 13-07-2018, the District Fire Officer, Kurnool, submitted a written complaint alleging that the college had obtained a recognition certificate from the School Education Department by submitting a forged NOC, purportedly issued by the Assistant District Fire Officer, Kurnool. Based on this complaint, a First Information Report was registered for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\">420<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561807\" target=\"_blank\">465<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561810\" target=\"_blank\">468<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561814\" target=\"_blank\">471<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. The Andhra Pradesh High Court refused to quash proceedings, holding that the necessity of an NOC could not be gone into at the preliminary stage.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that, admittedly, under the National Building Code of India, 2016, a NOC from the Fire Department was not required for educational buildings below 15 metres in height. The accused&#8217;s society was operating the educational institution from a building with a height of 14.20 metres, thus falling outside the purview of the NOC requirement. In view of this, the accused&#8217;s society, along with other similarly placed institutions, had instituted Writ Petition before the High Court, seeking renewal of affiliation without the mandatory requirement of furnishing a fire safety NOC from the State Disaster Response and Fire Services Department.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">By order dated 25-04-2018, the High Court allowed the writ petition and issued directions to the Education Department to renew the affiliation without insisting on the fire NOC. However, upon non-compliance with this order, a contempt notice was issued on 01-07-2019 against officials of both the Education Department and the Fire Department.<\/p>\n<p>The Court clarified that the ingredients of the offence of cheating are as follows:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Deception of a person by making a false representation, which the maker knows or has reason to believe to be false, and thereby:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>(a) Fraudulently or dishonestly induces such person:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(i) to deliver any property to any person, or<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">(ii) to consent that any person shall retain any property; or<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">(b) Intentionally induces that person to do or omit to do anything which they would not do or omit if they were not so deceived, and such act or omission causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to that person in body, mind, reputation, or property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the terms &#8216;dishonestly&#8217; and &#8216;fraudulently&#8217; are critical to understanding the mental element required under the offence of cheating.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Reading the ingredients of the offence in light of the above definitions, the Court highlighted that to attract the offence of cheating, a person must knowingly make a false statement with the intention to deceive, which induces another person either to part with property or to do or omit to do something that they would not have done or omitted but for the deception, thereby causing or likely causing damage or harm to the person&#8217;s body, mind, reputation, or property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court concluded that there was nothing on record to show that the accused had manufactured the alleged forged document, which is a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">sine qua non<\/span> for attracting the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561807\" target=\"_blank\">465<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. In fact, the original fabricated document had not been recovered.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Relying on the decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sheila Sebastian<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">R. Jawaharaj <\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8SQB96AB\" target=\"_blank\">(2018) 7 SCC 581<\/a>, the Court reiterated that to attract Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561806\" target=\"_blank\">464<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> (which defines the making of a false document), the prosecution must establish that the accused actually made the forged document. In the present case, no material connecting the accused to the creation of the forged document had been adduced in the chargesheet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Similarly, offences under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561810\" target=\"_blank\">468<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> (forgery for the purpose of cheating) and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561814\" target=\"_blank\">471<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> (using as genuine a forged document) were also found to be inapplicable, as the requisite <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">mens rea<\/span>, i.e., dishonest intention to cause wrongful loss to the Education Department and wrongful gain to the appellant, had not been demonstrated. The Court further noted that the issuance of the recognition certificate was not contingent upon the production of the alleged forged NOC, thereby negating the element of inducement or harm.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the High Court failed to consider these crucial aspects, and that the uncontroverted allegations in the chargesheet, when read in light of the order dated 25-04-2018 did not disclose the essential ingredients of the offences of cheating or forgery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court set aside the impugned order of the High Court, quashed the proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\">420<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, and allowed the appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Jupally Lakshmikantha Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/h6SMUdPB\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1950<\/a>, decided on 10-09-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant(s):<\/span> Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohit Bharadwaj, Adv. Mr. B. Shravanth Shanker, AOR Ms. Prerna Robin, Adv. Ms. Grahita Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Lalit Mohan, Adv. Mr. B. Yeshwanth Raj, Adv.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AOR Mr. Dhruv Yadav, Adv.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The High Court failed to consider these relevant issues which clearly demonstrate that the uncontroverted allegations in the chargesheet, in the teeth of order dated 25-04-2018 do not disclose essential ingredients of cheating or forgery.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":359915,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[88974,88972,88970,88975,88973,88971,75448],"class_list":["post-359909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-cheating-case-quashed","tag-educational-buildings-fire-safety","tag-fire-safety-noc","tag-forgery-case-quashed","tag-jvrr-education-society","tag-national-building-code-2016","tag-supreme-court-ruling"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC quashes cheating and forgery case against Education Society Chairman | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court rules no fire safety NOC is required for educational buildings under 15 metres and quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018No fire safety NOC needed for educational buildings under 15 metres\u2019; Supreme Court quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court rules no fire safety NOC is required for educational buildings under 15 metres and quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-12T06:00:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-15T12:26:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018No fire safety NOC needed for educational buildings under 15 metres\u2019; Supreme Court quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/\",\"name\":\"SC quashes cheating and forgery case against Education Society Chairman | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-12T06:00:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-15T12:26:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court rules no fire safety NOC is required for educational buildings under 15 metres and quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"cheating and forgery case against Education Society Chairman\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018No fire safety NOC needed for educational buildings under 15 metres\u2019; Supreme Court quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC quashes cheating and forgery case against Education Society Chairman | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court rules no fire safety NOC is required for educational buildings under 15 metres and quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018No fire safety NOC needed for educational buildings under 15 metres\u2019; Supreme Court quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman","og_description":"Supreme Court rules no fire safety NOC is required for educational buildings under 15 metres and quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-12T06:00:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-15T12:26:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018No fire safety NOC needed for educational buildings under 15 metres\u2019; Supreme Court quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/","name":"SC quashes cheating and forgery case against Education Society Chairman | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-12T06:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-15T12:26:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Supreme Court rules no fire safety NOC is required for educational buildings under 15 metres and quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"cheating and forgery case against Education Society Chairman"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/no-fire-safety-noc-educational-buildings-under-15m-sc-quashes-jvrr-cheating-and-forgery-case-against-education-society-chairman\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018No fire safety NOC needed for educational buildings under 15 metres\u2019; Supreme Court quashes cheating and forgery case against JVRR Education Society Chairman"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cheating-and-forgery-case-against-Education-Society-Chairman.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":291068,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/01\/supreme-court-quashes-cheating-forgery-case-against-prakash-singh-badal-sukhbir-singh-badal-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":359909,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Why Supreme Court quashed forgery, cheating case against late Prakash Singh Badal and son Sukhbir","author":"Editor","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court's decision shall not affect the pending proceedings before the High Court of Delhi against the order of the ECI as the Court did not express anything on the Constitution of the Shiromani Akali Dal","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"prakash singh badal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/prakash-singh-badal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/prakash-singh-badal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/prakash-singh-badal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/prakash-singh-badal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320372,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/sc-clears-chairman-secretary-sunshine-society-cheating-conspiracy-false-information-for-aicte-approval-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":359909,"position":1},"title":"SC clears Chairman &amp; Secretary of Sunshine Educational and Development Society of cheating and conspiracy in false information for AICTE approval case","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that AICTE itself never claimed that it was dishonestly induced to grant such approvals and that essential link is altogether missing, whereby any such criminal charge of cheating can be sustained against the accused persons.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AICTE approval case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/AICTE-approval-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/AICTE-approval-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/AICTE-approval-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/AICTE-approval-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312123,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/sc-quashes-cheating-case-against-wife-forging-husband-signature-on-minor-passport-application-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":359909,"position":2},"title":"SC quashes cheating case against wife for forging husband\u2019s signature on minor\u2019s passport application; Imposes 1 Lakh costs on Husband","author":"Editor","date":"January 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the absence of any new evidence in further investigation to substantiate the conclusions drawn by the investigating officer in the supplementary report, a Judicial Magistrate is not compelled to take cognizance, as such a report lacks investigative rigour and fails to satisfy the requisites of Section 173(8) of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Wife Forges Husband's signature","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Wife-Forges-Husbands-signature.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Wife-Forges-Husbands-signature.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Wife-Forges-Husbands-signature.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Wife-Forges-Husbands-signature.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376108,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/19\/bom-hc-retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction-protection\/","url_meta":{"origin":359909,"position":3},"title":"Sanction under S. 19 Prevention of Corruption Act not required after retirement of public servant: Bombay High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe offences alleged to have been committed by the applicant under the IPC cannot be regarded as acts done or purported to be done in furtherance of his official duties.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Retired public servant cannot claim sanction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/02\/del-hc-offences-like-rape-forgery-having-a-bearing-on-vital-societal-interest-cannot-be-construed-to-be-merely-private-or-civil-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":359909,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Offences like rape &#038; forgery having a bearing on vital societal interest cannot be construed to be merely private or civil disputes","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., with regard to the settlement of disputes stated that: \u201cIn crimes which seriously endangers the well being of the society, it is not safe to leave the crime doer only because he and the victim have settled the dispute amicably. \u201c The instant petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":362398,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/know-your-judge-sc-justice-bagchi-profile\/","url_meta":{"origin":359909,"position":5},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Joymalya Bagchi\u2019s stellar career and notable judgments","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Joymalya Bagchi formerly serving as Judge of Calcutta High Court was appointed to the Supreme Court on 10-3-2025 and is in line to become the CJI in 2031.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice bagchi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/justice-bagchi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/justice-bagchi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/justice-bagchi.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/justice-bagchi.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=359909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359909\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/359915"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=359909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=359909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=359909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}