{"id":359665,"date":"2025-09-10T15:30:25","date_gmt":"2025-09-10T10:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=359665"},"modified":"2025-09-10T15:58:57","modified_gmt":"2025-09-10T10:28:57","slug":"khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/","title":{"rendered":"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law and the Impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<h2>Introduction<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The law of succession governing the Khoja Community in India represents a striking intersection of custom, statute, and identity. The Khojas, largely Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims of Western India, were originally Hindus who converted to Islam centuries ago. Yet, in matters of inheritance, they retained Hindu practices even when these diverged sharply from Islamic norms.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Before 1937, courts consistently treated Hindu law as the governing framework for Khoja succession. This meant that daughters were excluded from intestate inheritance if sons survived, and widows received at best limited rights. At the same time, Khoja testators enjoyed complete testamentary freedom, as they could dispose of their entire estate by will, unlike Muslims under Islamic law, who are restricted to one-third without heir&#8217;s consent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002935518\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937<\/a> (Shariat Act)<a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> sought to reform this imbalance. Section 2<a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2.\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a> mandated that the Muslim law governs intestate succession, gifts, trusts, wakfs, and related subjects, notwithstanding any custom or usage to the contrary. Yet, it conspicuously left out wills. The result was a dual regime that continues today: intestacy follows Shariat, while wills are still interpreted according to Hindu-based Khoja custom unless a testator voluntarily opts into Shariat.<\/p>\n<h2>Historical overview of Khoja succession customs<\/h2>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(236, 198, 198));\">Colonial recognition of custom<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the 19th century, British colonial courts consistently recognised that Khojas followed the Hindu law of succession. In <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shivji Hasam<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Datu Mavji Khoja<\/span> (1874), the Bombay High Court applied Hindu rules of inheritance to a Khoja family dispute.<a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\" title=\"3. (1874) 12 BHC 281 : (1875) 12 BHCR (ACJ) 281.\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a> Shortly after, in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hirbai<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gorbai<\/span> (1875), Sargent, J., reiterated that &#8220;the Khojas are governed by Hindu law on the ground of long usage&#8221;.<a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\" title=\"4. (1875) 12 BHC 294 : (1875) 12 BHCR (ACJ) 294.\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Mulla&#8217;s <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Principles of Mahomedan Law<\/span> summarised the prevailing view: &#8220;In the absence of proof of special usage to the contrary, Khojas and Cutchi Memons in the Bombay Presidency are governed in matters of succession and inheritance, not by Mahomedan, but by Hindu law.&#8221;<a id=\"fnref5\" href=\"#fn5\" title=\"5. Sir Dinshaw Fardunji Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law (12th Edn., 1940) p. 19.\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hirbai v. Sonabae (1853)<\/span> cemented this position. Chief Justice Perry held that daughters could not inherit under Mahomedan law because the custom of the community disallowed it.<a id=\"fnref6\" href=\"#fn6\" title=\"6. Hirbai v. Sonabae, (1853) Perry's Oriental Cases 110\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a> This decision, along with later authorities, made Hindu law the default governing succession for Khojas across the Bombay Presidency. By the early 20th century, courts took judicial notice of this presumption. A Khoja asserting that Islamic law applied had to affirmatively prove it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(236, 198, 198));\">Intestate succession<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Under this customary regime, intestate succession among Khojas mirrored Hindu Mitakshara principles. Sons inherited to the exclusion of daughters, and widows, if they inherited at all, took only a limited estate akin to that of a Hindu widow. The effect was the systematic disinheritance of women, who under Shariat would have received defined shares as Quranic heirs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(236, 198, 198));\">Testamentary succession<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Khojas also retained Hindu testamentary capacity. A Khoja could dispose of his entire estate by will. This contrasts with Islamic law, which limits bequests to one-third unless the heir&#8217;s consent. InBy the 1930s, the rule was so entrenched that unless a contrary usage was proven, Khoja wills were presumed to be governed by Hindu law. In <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Fidahusein Pirmahomedalli<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bai Monghibai<\/span><a id=\"fnref7\" href=\"#fn7\" title=\"7. 1935 SCC OnLine Bom 103\"><sup>7<\/sup><\/a>, the Bombay High Court, while relying on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Advocate-General<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Karmali<\/span><a id=\"fnref8\" href=\"#fn8\" title=\"8. (1903) 29 Bom 133 : 6 Bom LR 601\"><sup>8<\/sup><\/a>, held that the question of a Khoja&#8217;s testamentary capacity was conclusively settled. The Court observed that a Khoja of the Shia Ishna Ashari sect could dispose of the whole of his property by a testamentary disposition, reaffirming that Khojas enjoyed full testamentary freedom. The result was complete testamentary freedom, even to the extent of disinheriting Quranic heirs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Illustration<\/span>: A Khoja patriarch dies in 1930, leaving a son and a daughter but no will. The son takes the estate, the daughter receives nothing. If the same patriarch leaves a will giving everything to the daughter, the will is upheld in full. Under Shariat, this would be impossible, since the widow and son have fixed entitlements.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">This dual pattern, women excluded in intestacy but wills upheld in full, was the backdrop against which the Shariat Act<a id=\"fnref9\" href=\"#fn9\" title=\"9. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.\"><sup>9<\/sup><\/a> was introduced.<\/p>\n<h2>The Shariat Act and Section 2<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Shariat Act<a id=\"fnref10\" href=\"#fn10\" title=\"10. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.\"><sup>10<\/sup><\/a> was introduced to curb customs that denied Muslims their Quranic rights. Muslim leaders and organisations pressed for reform, particularly for women who had been deprived of inheritance by community practices. The Shariat Act declared that in key areas of family and succession law, Muslim personal law would apply notwithstanding any custom or usage to the contrary.<\/p>\n<p>Section 2<a id=\"fnref11\" href=\"#fn11\" title=\"11. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2.\"><sup>11<\/sup><\/a> of the Shariat Act provides:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">2. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Application of personal law to Muslims.&#8212;<\/span>Notwithstanding any custom or usage to the contrary, in all questions (save questions relating to agricultural land) regarding intestate succession, special property of females, including personal property inherited or obtained under contract or gift or any other provision of personal law, marriage, dissolution of marriage, including talaq, ila, zihar, lian, khula and mubaraat, maintenance, dower, guardianship, gifts, trusts and trust properties, and wakfs (other than charities and charitable institutions and charitable and religious endowments), the rule of decision in cases where the parties are Muslims shall be the Muslim personal law (Shariat).<a id=\"fnref12\" href=\"#fn12\" title=\"12. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2.\"><sup>12<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">By including intestate succession, the legislature directly struck at the Hindu-based customs of Khojas and Cutchi Memons. From 1937 onwards, intestacy had to follow Shariat, ensuring that women received their Quranic shares. The inclusion of &#8220;special property of females&#8221; further guaranteed women control over property they acquired by inheritance, gift, or contract.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The opening words, &#8220;notwithstanding any custom or usage to the contrary&#8221;, gave the provision overriding force. Courts consistently rejected pleas of custom in intestacy cases after 1937.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Conspicuously absent from Section 2<a id=\"fnref13\" href=\"#fn13\" title=\"13. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2.\"><sup>13<\/sup><\/a> is any reference to wills or testamentary succession. This omission preserved Khoja testamentary freedom. Unless a Khoja voluntarily opted into the Shariat under Section 3<a id=\"fnref14\" href=\"#fn14\" title=\"14. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 3.\"><sup>14<\/sup><\/a>, his will continue to be governed by the Hindu law custom.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Section 2<a id=\"fnref15\" href=\"#fn15\" title=\"15. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2.\"><sup>15<\/sup><\/a> did, however, include gifts, trusts, and wakfs. Courts later clarified that even testamentary trusts or wakfs created by a will must comply with Muslim law, since these subjects are expressly listed.<a id=\"fnref16\" href=\"#fn16\" title=\"16. Ashrafalli Cassim Ali Jairazbhoy v. Mahomedalli Rajaballi, 1945 SCC OnLine Bom 37.\"><sup>16<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Section 3<a id=\"fnref17\" href=\"#fn17\" title=\"17. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 3.\"><sup>17<\/sup><\/a> of the Shariat Act allows any Muslim to declare, in a prescribed form, that he wishes to be governed by Shariat in all matters, including wills and legacies. Once made, such a declaration bound the person and his descendants.<a id=\"fnref18\" href=\"#fn18\" title=\"18. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 3.\"><sup>18<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">For Khojas, this meant that a testator who wished to forgo the community&#8217;s customary privilege of full testamentary freedom could opt into Shariat and thereby restrict his will to the one-third limit and mandatory shares. In practice, few Khojas made such declarations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The result was a bifurcated system:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">a<\/span>) Intestate succession governed exclusively by Muslim law, with no scope for custom. Widows, daughters, and mothers now received fixed shares.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">b<\/span>) Testamentary succession remained governed by Hindu law custom, unless a testator opted into Shariat. A Khoja could still will away his entire estate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">c<\/span>) If a will disposed of only part of the estate, the undisposed residue devolved intestate under Shariat. This created practical complexity: the same estate could be partly governed by custom and partly by Shariat, depending on the scope and validity of the will.<\/p>\n<h2>Judicial clarification<\/h2>\n<p style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(236, 198, 198));\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ashrafalli Cassim Ali Jairazbhoy<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mahomedalli Rajaballi<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In this 1947 ruling, the Bombay High Court held that the Shariat Act abrogated custom only for matters listed in Section 2<a id=\"fnref19\" href=\"#fn19\" title=\"19. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2.\"><sup>19<\/sup><\/a>. Since wills were not included, Khoja testamentary freedom survived. However, trusts and wakfs created by a will fell within Section 2 and had to comply with Muslim law. The Court struck down a testamentary trust benefiting unborn male heirs as void under Shariat.<a id=\"fnref20\" href=\"#fn20\" title=\"20. Ashrafalli case, 1945 SCC OnLine Bom 37.\"><sup>20<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(236, 198, 198));\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Aliyarkhan Amiyatkhan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rambhau-Motiram<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In this 1948 ruling, the Division Bench reaffirmed that intestacy was governed by Muslim law post-1937, but wills continued under custom. The Court held thus:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">3.<\/span> &#8230; to the extent that the Khoja was governed by Hindu law in matters of intestate succession, the custom was overridden&#8230;. But his customary law qua testate succession remained unaffected.<a id=\"fnref21\" href=\"#fn21\" title=\"21. Aliyarkhan Amiyatkhan v. Rambhau-Motiram, 1947 SCC OnLine Bom 51.\"><sup>21<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court upheld a Khoja&#8217;s will leaving his entire estate to his daughter, excluding the widow. The will was valid under custom, even though under Shariat it would have been invalid beyond one-third.<\/p>\n<p style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(236, 198, 198));\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nina Anwar Merchant<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Karim Ul Haq Meghani<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a recent 2024 judgment, the Bombay High Court reiterated that Khoja intestacy follows Muslim law, but testate succession is governed by Hindu law custom. The Court upheld interim relief in favour of a beneficiary under the will, noting that Khoja wills allow complete testamentary freedom.<a id=\"fnref22\" href=\"#fn22\" title=\"22. Nina Anwar Merchant v. Karim Ul Haq Meghani, 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 3060.\"><sup>22<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Illustrative scenarios<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(1) A Khoja dies intestate in 1940, leaving a widow and a daughter. Under Shariat, the widow receives one-eighth and the daughter one-half. Under pre-1937 custom, both could have been excluded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(2) A Khoja dies in 1948, leaving a will bequeathing all property to his son. The will is valid, even though Shariat would have required fixed shares for the widow and daughter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">(3) A Khoja creates a testamentary trust for unborn descendants. The trust fails, as Shariat prohibits bequests to unborn persons.<\/p>\n<h2>Comparative note: Cutchi Memons<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Cutchi Memons, another community of Hindu converts, faced a different legislative path. The Cutchi Memons Act, 1920<a id=\"fnref23\" href=\"#fn23\" title=\"23. Cutchi Memons Act, 1920.\"><sup>23<\/sup><\/a> allowed optional adoption of Muslim law, but the Cutchi Memons Act, 1938<a id=\"fnref24\" href=\"#fn24\" title=\"24. Cutchi Memons Act, 1938.\"><sup>24<\/sup><\/a> made Muslim law compulsory for them, eliminating testamentary freedom. Khojas, by contrast, retained autonomy in wills. This divergence reflects Parliament&#8217;s nuanced approach to different communities.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">More than 85 years after the Shariat Act<a id=\"fnref25\" href=\"#fn25\" title=\"25. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.\"><sup>25<\/sup><\/a>, the Khoja succession law remains a dual system. Intestacy secures women&#8217;s shares under Shariat. Testamentary succession still preserves Hindu-law based freedom. Courts have consistently upheld this arrangement. From a policy standpoint, the law reflects compromise. It corrected the gross inequities of intestacy while leaving scope for community autonomy in wills. Critics argue this allows patriarchy to persist, as a will can still disinherit daughters. Defenders point to freedom of testation as a valuable right, one that has long-standing cultural resonance for Khojas. Khoja succession law illustrates the tension between reform and continuity. The Shariat Act of 1937 swept away discriminatory customs in intestacy, ensuring women their Quranic shares. Yet, it deliberately left untouched the community&#8217;s customary freedom in wills. The Bombay High Court has consistently affirmed this duality: intestate succession under Shariat, testamentary succession under custom. Unless the Parliament legislates otherwise, or the Supreme Court rules differently, this remains the settled law. The crucial question is whether the deceased Khoja left a will. If yes, the will is construed under Hindu custom, with full testamentary freedom. If no, Shariat governs. The answer to that question determines the entire framework of succession.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Partner, Numen Law Offices.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UpOaoPAm\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l874fXKz\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> (1874) 12 BHC 281 : (1875) 12 BHCR (ACJ) 281.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> (1875) 12 BHC 294 : (1875) 12 BHCR (ACJ) 294.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn5\" href=\"#fnref5\">5.<\/a> Sir Dinshaw Fardunji Mulla, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Principles of Mahomedan Law<\/span> (12th Edn., 1940) p. 19.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn6\" href=\"#fnref6\">6.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hirbai v. Sonabae<\/span>, (1853) Perry&#8217;s Oriental Cases 110<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn7\" href=\"#fnref7\">7.<\/a> 1935 SCC OnLine Bom 103<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn8\" href=\"#fnref8\">8.<\/a> (1903) 29 Bom 133 : 6 Bom LR 601<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn9\" href=\"#fnref9\">9.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UpOaoPAm\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn10\" href=\"#fnref10\">10.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UpOaoPAm\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn11\" href=\"#fnref11\">11.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l874fXKz\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn12\" href=\"#fnref12\">12.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l874fXKz\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn13\" href=\"#fnref13\">13.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l874fXKz\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn14\" href=\"#fnref14\">14.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/j9cWo8kF\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 3<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn15\" href=\"#fnref15\">15.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l874fXKz\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn16\" href=\"#fnref16\">16.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eRcKK54c\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ashrafalli Cassim Ali Jairazbhoy<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mahomedalli Rajaballi<\/span>, 1945 SCC OnLine Bom 37<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn17\" href=\"#fnref17\">17.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/j9cWo8kF\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 3<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn18\" href=\"#fnref18\">18.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/j9cWo8kF\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 3<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn19\" href=\"#fnref19\">19.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l874fXKz\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, S. 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn20\" href=\"#fnref20\">20.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eRcKK54c\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ashrafalli case<\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: none; text-underline-style: none; text-underline-mode: continuous;\">, 1945 SCC OnLine Bom 37<\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn21\" href=\"#fnref21\">21.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zs6vMVrv\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Aliyarkhan Amiyatkhan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rambhau-Motiram<\/span>, 1947 SCC OnLine Bom 51<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn22\" href=\"#fnref22\">22.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002318028\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nina Anwar Merchant<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Karim Ul Haq Meghani<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 3060<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn23\" href=\"#fnref23\">23.<\/a> Cutchi Memons Act, 1920.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn24\" href=\"#fnref24\">24.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/383pm505\" target=\"_blank\">Cutchi Memons Act, 1938<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn25\" href=\"#fnref25\">25.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UpOaoPAm\" target=\"_blank\">Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Chaitanyaa Bhandarkar*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":359682,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20271,77550],"tags":[77882,88879,88881,88880,88877,30173,88878],"class_list":["post-359665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-experts_corner","category-numen-law-offices","tag-customary-law","tag-inheritance-law-india","tag-islamic-succession-laws","tag-khoja-community","tag-khoja-succession","tag-muslim-personal-law","tag-shariat-act-1937"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law vs. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"An analysis of Khoja succession practices in India, examining the role of customary law and the transformative impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law and the Impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"An analysis of Khoja succession practices in India, examining the role of customary law and the transformative impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-10T10:00:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-10T10:28:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law and the Impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/\",\"name\":\"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law vs. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-10T10:00:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-10T10:28:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"An analysis of Khoja succession practices in India, examining the role of customary law and the transformative impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Khoja succession law India\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law and the Impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law vs. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act | SCC Times","description":"An analysis of Khoja succession practices in India, examining the role of customary law and the transformative impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law and the Impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937","og_description":"An analysis of Khoja succession practices in India, examining the role of customary law and the transformative impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-10T10:00:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-10T10:28:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law and the Impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/","name":"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law vs. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-10T10:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-10T10:28:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"An analysis of Khoja succession practices in India, examining the role of customary law and the transformative impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Khoja succession law India"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/khoja-succession-muslim-personal-law-1937\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Khoja Succession in India: Customary Law and the Impact of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khoja-succession-law-India.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282847,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/01\/madras-high-court-open-for-muslim-woman-to-dissolve-marriage-by-khula-recognised-under-shariat-by-approaching-a-family-court-not-before-a-self-declared-body-consisting-of-few-mem\/","url_meta":{"origin":359665,"position":0},"title":"Muslim woman can dissolve marriage by \u2018Khula\u2019 recognised under Shariat; Madras High Court quashes Khula certificate issued by Shariat Council","author":"Editor","date":"February 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court while quashing the Khula certificate issued by the Shariat Council, held that while it is open for a Muslim woman to exercise her inalienable rights to dissolve the marriage by Khula recognised under the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 by approaching a Family Court, it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":267361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/25\/hindu-woman-right-to-maintenance-settled-possession-absolute-ownership-section-14-hindu-succession-act-supreme-court-judgment-india-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":359665,"position":1},"title":"Hindu widow\u2019s pre-existing right to maintenance automatically ripens into full ownership when she is in settled legal possession of the property: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Ajay Rastogi and Bela M. Trivedi*, JJ has held that by virtue of Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the Hindu widow\u2019s limited interest gets automatically enlarged into an absolute right, when such property is possessed by her whether acquired before or after\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-186.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-186.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-186.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-186.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-186.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356650,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/14\/criticism-of-female-intestate-succession-under-the-hindu-succession-act-1956\/","url_meta":{"origin":359665,"position":2},"title":"Criticism of Female Intestate Succession under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Gunjan Jain*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Hindu Succession Act 1956","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Hindu-Succession-Act-1956.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Hindu-Succession-Act-1956.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Hindu-Succession-Act-1956.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Hindu-Succession-Act-1956.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292296,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/sc-issues-notice-in-plea-filed-by-mohammed-shamis-wife-seeking-uniform-laws-for-divorce-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":359665,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court issues notice in plea filed by Mohammed Shami&#8217;s wife seeking Uniform Laws for Divorce","author":"Editor","date":"May 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Mohammed Shami's wife Hasin Jahan filed plea before the Court to declare certain provisions of Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 as unconstitutional.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"uniform laws for divorce","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/uniform-laws-for-divorce.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/uniform-laws-for-divorce.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/uniform-laws-for-divorce.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/uniform-laws-for-divorce.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219633,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/portuguese-civil-code-applicable-to-succession-of-all-the-properties-whether-within-goa-or-outside-goa\/","url_meta":{"origin":359665,"position":4},"title":"Portuguese Civil Code applicable to succession of all the properties whether within Goa or outside Goa","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha Bose, JJ has held that grant of probate has nothing to do with inheritance.\u00a0 It said, \u201cThe jurisdiction of a probate court is limited to decide whether the Will is genuine or not. The Will may be genuine but the grant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362986,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/08\/self-acquired-property-mitakshara-hindu-devolves-male-heir\/","url_meta":{"origin":359665,"position":5},"title":"Self-acquired property of Mitakshara Hindu who died before 1956 devolves solely upon his male heir: Kerala HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBefore the enactment of the Succession Act, succession to the property of Hindus, whether ancestral or self-acquired, was governed by the pristine principles of Hindu law as embodied in the Shastric texts and Smritis.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Mitakshara Hindu's property devolves on male heir","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Mitakshara-Hindus-property-devolves-on-male-heir.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Mitakshara-Hindus-property-devolves-on-male-heir.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Mitakshara-Hindus-property-devolves-on-male-heir.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Mitakshara-Hindus-property-devolves-on-male-heir.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=359665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359665\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/359682"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=359665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=359665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=359665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}