{"id":359608,"date":"2025-09-10T11:00:41","date_gmt":"2025-09-10T05:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=359608"},"modified":"2025-09-11T17:20:06","modified_gmt":"2025-09-11T11:50:06","slug":"patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/","title":{"rendered":"Patna HC quashes maintenance order of \u2018qualified\u2019 wife who concealed facts about alimony from previous marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Patna High Court:<\/span> In a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner challenging a final order of maintenance passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, a Single-Judge Bench of Bibek Chaudhuri, J., while quashing and setting aside the maintenance order, held that the trial court failed to consider suppression of material facts, income of the parties, their source of income, their assets and liabilities and other similar factors, which are required to be considered for determination of maintenance allowance.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The instant petition was filed by the petitioner challenging an order dated 24-05-2024, which directed him to pay maintenance allowance of Rs. 20,000\/- per month to the respondent. The petitioner and the respondent met through a matrimonial site, and it was the respondent&#8217;s second marriage after her divorce. According to the petitioner, at the time of the dissolution of her first marriage, she had received a final settlement of Rs. 40 lakhs as alimony and had an independent source and sufficient means to maintain herself.<\/p>\n<h3>Contentions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner alleged that the respondent has a habit of duping young men to earn large sums of money through alimony or maintenance. The petitioner further contended that the respondent suppressed her previous marriage and swore an affidavit at the time of her marriage with the petitioner declaring herself to be unmarried, thus marrying him by fraud. It was also alleged that the respondent earns considerable interest per month from the alimony money and is academically qualified, having M.Sc. degree in Botany. She is also a diploma holder in Japanese language and can earn money not only for her livelihood but a decent sum to run a luxurious life. Further, the respondent refused to cohabit with the petitioner, abused his parents and is suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) leading to suicidal tendencies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent in her counter-affidavit, denied the allegations and claimed that she had delivered the entire Rs. 40 lakhs to the petitioner on his demand. She further alleged that the petitioner demanded dowry of Rs. 15 lakhs and subjected her to physical and mental torture, which led to an abortion. She filed an application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519355\" target=\"_blank\">125<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) on 09-03-2021. Subsequently, she lodged a complaint under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561623\" target=\"_blank\">315<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546433\" target=\"_blank\">3<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546434\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\">Dowry Prohibition Act<\/a> on 18-02-2022, after which the petitioner was arrested.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajnesh v. Neha<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Ujyg83Pj\" target=\"_blank\">(2021) 2 SCC 324<\/a>, the Supreme Court had held that maintenance claims require disclosure affidavits of assets and liabilities, balanced assessment of needs and quantum based on factors like parties&#8217; status, reasonable need and income. The Court also noted that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Deb Narayan Halder v. Anushree Halder<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/R7B3n1bQ\" target=\"_blank\">(2003) 11 SCC 303<\/a>, it was held that a wife who deserts her husband without sufficient reason or fails to prove cruelty is not entitled to maintenance. The Court observed that the respondent&#8217;s allegations of torture and dowry demand to lack specificity and credibility due to the unexplained 16-month delay in filing the complaint.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further considered the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jasbir Kaur Sehgal v. Distt. Judge, Dehradun<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NBZ66RCF\" target=\"_blank\">(1997) 7 SCC 7<\/a>, which stressed the importance of considering the wife&#8217;s income or earning capacity in determining the quantum of maintenance. The Court observed that the respondent, despite being qualified, claimed to have no income and suppressed the Rs. 40 lakhs alimony she received from her previous marriage in her marriage affidavit. The trial court&#8217;s disbelief in her claim of handing over the cash to the petitioner suggested she still retained the funds, which would enable her to be self-sufficient.<\/p>\n<p>The Court emphasized that the amount of maintenance fixed should be such that the wife can live in reasonable comfort but also that her own potential earnings and assets should be factored in. The Court referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/tx393nX2\" target=\"_blank\">(1994) 1 SCC 1<\/a>, noted that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;While Section 125 proceedings are summary, courts consider conduct and financial disclosures critically. If a wife conceals her actual income or alimony, it may disentitle her as the court relies on bona fide disclosures to decide maintenance amount.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jaspreet Singh v. Gurleen Kaur<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/om796xj5\" target=\"_blank\">2020 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 55<\/a>, emphasized the importance of following best practices like furnishing affidavits of assets and liabilities to prevent parties from concealing their income and resources.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that before passing a final order of maintenance courts are under statutory obligation to direct the parties to file affidavits of assets and liabilities. Only on due consideration of such affidavits of assets and liabilities, it will be possible for the courts to consider the status of the parties, their assets, respective needs, capability of earning and based on such documents, courts can come to a conclusive decision regarding amount of maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In light of the afore-stated reasons, the Court concluded that the maintenance order dated 24-05-2024 suffers from impropriety and illegality in overlooking suppression of material facts, income of the parties, their source of income, their assets and liabilities and other similar factors, which are required to be considered for determination of maintenance allowance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court set aside the maintenance order and directed the Family Court to re-adjudicate the matter by first directing both parties to file affidavits of their assets and liabilities and then pass a fresh judgment within four weeks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ravi Prakash Saxena v. Priyanka Rani, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wmg86tE8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Pat 2793<\/a>, decided on 04-09-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Amit Mallick, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Shweta Priya, APP<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Maintenance claims require disclosure affidavits of assets and liabilities, balanced assessment of needs and quantum based on factors like parties&#8217; status, reasonable need and income.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":359617,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[16391,88847,67509,3374,10141,88846,2863,7441,88845,12531,47208],"class_list":["post-359608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alimony","tag-concealment-of-alimony","tag-disclosure-of-assets","tag-family_court","tag-fraud","tag-jasbir-kaur-sehgal","tag-maintenance","tag-patna-high-court","tag-rajnish-v-neha","tag-section-125-crpc","tag-suppression-of-facts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No maintenance for wife for concealment of alimony from previous marriage | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Patna High Court quashed maintenance order of Rs. 20,000 holding that concealment of alimony or actual income may disentitle the wife from maintenance claim.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Patna HC quashes maintenance order of \u2018qualified\u2019 wife who concealed facts about alimony from previous marriage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court quashed maintenance order of Rs. 20,000 holding that concealment of alimony or actual income may disentitle the wife from maintenance claim.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-10T05:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-11T11:50:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Patna HC quashes maintenance order of \u2018qualified\u2019 wife who concealed facts about alimony from previous marriage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/\",\"name\":\"No maintenance for wife for concealment of alimony from previous marriage | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-10T05:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-11T11:50:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Patna High Court quashed maintenance order of Rs. 20,000 holding that concealment of alimony or actual income may disentitle the wife from maintenance claim.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"concealment of alimony\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Patna HC quashes maintenance order of \u2018qualified\u2019 wife who concealed facts about alimony from previous marriage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No maintenance for wife for concealment of alimony from previous marriage | SCC Times","description":"Patna High Court quashed maintenance order of Rs. 20,000 holding that concealment of alimony or actual income may disentitle the wife from maintenance claim.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Patna HC quashes maintenance order of \u2018qualified\u2019 wife who concealed facts about alimony from previous marriage","og_description":"Patna High Court quashed maintenance order of Rs. 20,000 holding that concealment of alimony or actual income may disentitle the wife from maintenance claim.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-10T05:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-11T11:50:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Patna HC quashes maintenance order of \u2018qualified\u2019 wife who concealed facts about alimony from previous marriage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/","name":"No maintenance for wife for concealment of alimony from previous marriage | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-10T05:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-11T11:50:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Patna High Court quashed maintenance order of Rs. 20,000 holding that concealment of alimony or actual income may disentitle the wife from maintenance claim.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"concealment of alimony"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/patna-high-court-quashes-maintenance-order-wife-concealment-of-alimony\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Patna HC quashes maintenance order of \u2018qualified\u2019 wife who concealed facts about alimony from previous marriage"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/concealment-of-alimony.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":240638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/14\/bom-hc-if-the-wife-is-earning-something-for-livelihood-can-the-same-be-a-ground-to-refuse-alimony-under-s-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-read-courts-ruling-taking-reiterating-scs-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":359608,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | If the wife is earning something for livelihood, can the same be a ground to refuse alimony under S. 24 of Hindu Marriage Act? Read Court&#8217;s ruling reiterating SC&#8217;s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Mangesh S. Patil, J., in the present application directed the husband to pay an amount of Rs 10,000 towards alimony pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Petitioner-wife has impugned the order passed by the Family Court, Judge wherein her application was rejected in which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211802,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/gau-hc-wife-granted-alimony-under-s-25-hma-in-spite-of-no-claim-agreement-with-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":359608,"position":1},"title":"Gau HC | Wife granted alimony under S. 25 HMA in spite of &#8216;no claim agreement&#8217; with husband","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0A Bench of A.S. Bopanna, CJ and Sanjay Kumar Medhi, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-husband against family court's order granting alimony of Rs 2.5 lakhs to the respondent-wife. Undisputed facts of the case are that the parties were formerly married to each other. Some marital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244210,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/22\/alimony\/","url_meta":{"origin":359608,"position":2},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Wife entitled to increase alimony after an increase in husband\u2019s salary, HC upholds","author":"Editor","date":"February 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: \u00a0In a revision petition filed against the enhanced amount of alimony H.S. Madaan, J., upheld Family Court\u2019s decision that, If salary of the husband increases the wife would be entitled to increased maintenance as well. The Petitioner, one Varun Jagotta had filed the instant revision\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264939,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/02\/alimony-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":359608,"position":3},"title":"Whether husband is entitled to claim alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Bom HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J., held that provision of maintenance\/permanent alimony being a beneficial provision for the indigent spouse, Section 25 can be invoked by either of the spouse, where a decree of any kind governed by Sections 9 to 13 has been passed and marriage tie is broken,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/10\/jharkhand-hc-permanent-alimony-not-absolve-husbands-duty-financial-support\/","url_meta":{"origin":359608,"position":4},"title":"Permanent alimony does not absolve husband&#8217;s sacrosanct duty of financial support: Jharkhand HC upholds Rs 24,000 maintenance under S. 125 CrPC","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 10, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cShe is entitled in law to lead a life in the similar manner as she would have lived in the house of her husband, as that is where the status and strata come into place, and that is where the obligations of the husband, in case of a wife, become\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"husband's duty of financial support","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/husbands-duty-of-financial-support.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/husbands-duty-of-financial-support.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/husbands-duty-of-financial-support.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/husbands-duty-of-financial-support.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362530,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/04\/family-law-roundup-september-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":359608,"position":5},"title":"Family Law September 2025 | Important Case Law and Judicial Updates","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the key family law developments of September 2025, featuring the Supreme Court and various High Courts on adoption, annulment of marriage, custody, divorce, maintenance and much more.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Family Law September 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Family-Law-September-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Family-Law-September-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Family-Law-September-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Family-Law-September-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=359608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359608\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/359617"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=359608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=359608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=359608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}