{"id":359569,"date":"2025-09-10T09:30:45","date_gmt":"2025-09-10T04:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=359569"},"modified":"2025-09-11T17:06:48","modified_gmt":"2025-09-11T11:36:48","slug":"ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"Can NGT outsource investigation to administrative committees via bypassing statutory provisions? Supreme Court answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the appeals filed against 2 orders by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) holding the appellant guilty for violating environmental norms, directing a Joint Committe to investigate past violations and subsequently directing the appellant to pay compensation of Rs 18 crores at rate of 2%; the Division Bench of Manoj Misra and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ujjal Bhuyan*<\/span>, JJ., pointed out that NGT exercises judicial functions; therefore, it is all the more necessary for it to adhere to a fair procedure which has been statutorily laid down, and of which principles of natural justice, is an inalienable part.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court thus held that rigor of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001538503\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002894882\" target=\"_blank\">National Green Tribunal Act, 2010<\/a> (NGT Act) is <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">qua<\/span> the procedure to be adopted by the NGT in conducting its proceedings. It cannot be stretched to abandon the statutory procedure laid down under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524783\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524784\" target=\"_blank\">22<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002823103\" target=\"_blank\">Water Act<\/a> and by outsourcing investigation to administrative committees by overlooking the statutory provisions and basing its decisions on the recommendation of such administrative committee.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant has been engaged in diverse business activities including manufacture of sugar. In 1952, the appellant under its earlier name, Ganga Sugar Corporation Limited, had acquired the sugar manufacturing unit at village Sheikhpura, Khatauli, Muzaffarnagar District in the State of Uttar Pradesh (sugar mill). It was stated that the sugar mill was a functional unit, having all the necessary permissions as required under the applicable statutes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In 2021, Respondent 2 filed a complaint before the NGT alleging that the sugar mill of the appellant was discharging untreated waste in a particular drain resulting in contamination of ground water in an area of about 1 &frac12; km around the sugar mill having depth upto 50 metres. A Joint Committee of the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) and District Magistrate (DM), Muzaffarnagar was constituted. NGT on perusal of the report declared that it was not satisfied with the stand of the State PCB. NGT was of the view that there was no justification for carrying out inspection when the sugar mill was not functional due to off season. NGT, therefore, directed the joint committee to conduct inspection when the unit was functional.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, a detailed investigation was carried by the Joint Committee and after perusing this report, the NGT passed the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">1<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">st<\/span> impugned order dated 15-02-2022<\/span> observing that the report showed violation of the environmental norms by the appellant. For the past violations, the joint committee was directed to assess the compensation in accordance with law, having regard to the nature of violation, period of violation, cost of remediation and turnover of the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Pursuant to the aforesaid directions, supplementary report was filed by the Joint Committee which mentioned that compensation amounts to Rs. 34,20,000 for 114 days of violation at the rate of Rs. 30,000 per day which works out to Rs. 18 crores at the rate of 2 percent of the annual turnover of Rs. 900 crores. Thereafter, by its <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">nd<\/span> impugned order dated 16-09-2022<\/span>, the NGT directed that the Rs 18 crore compensation recovered may be utilized for restoration of the environment. The appellant was directed to deposit the aforesaid amount with the District Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar within one month.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved with the afore stated orders, the appellant knocked the doors of the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsels for the appellant argued that the impugned orders are <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">non est<\/span> in the eye of law in as much as those orders were passed by the NGT in complete violation of the principles of natural justice. The appellant also questioned methodologies adopted by the Joint Committee in carrying out the inspection and thereafter in submitting the reports. It was further submitted that there was clear infraction of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001538503\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002894882\" target=\"_blank\">NGT Act, 2010<\/a> in the present case which had vitiated the impugned orders.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Per contra<\/span>, the respondents argued that principles of natural justice cannot be applied as a straitjacket formula. NGT was careful enough to direct the joint committee to furnish copies of its reports to the appellant, who was, therefore, very much aware of the contents of the two reports, yet it did not contest the same before the NGT.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Persuing the case, the Court deemed it fit to refer the relevant statutory provisions of the the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002823103\" target=\"_blank\">Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974<\/a> (&#8216;the Water Act&#8217;); the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (&#8216;the Environment Act&#8217;) and the NGT Act in order to examine the way NGT proceeded in this matter.<\/p>\n<p>The Court perused the report of the Joint Committee and impugned NGT orders, the Court pointed out the following:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>NGT constituted a joint committee to carry out inspection of the sugar mill of the appellant vis a vis maintenance of pollution control measures and discharge of effluents. This was an <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ad ho<\/span>c committee when the Water Act, more particularly Sections 21 and 22 thereof, clearly prescribed a statutory procedure to be followed while carrying out such inspection to examine pollution, if any, or the extent of pollution caused by the project proponent and to suggest remedial measures.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The joint committee report dated 11-01-2022 was silent as to whether it has followed the procedure laid down in the Water Act more particularly notice to the occupier or his agent and collection and sealing of samples in the presence of the occupier or his agent having his signature on the sealed containers.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>NGT did not deem it appropriate to get the appellant impleaded as a party respondent.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>No opportunity was granted to the appellant to contest the report of the joint committee and to have its say. Thus, there was a clear violation of the provisions contained in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001538503\" target=\"_blank\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002894882\" target=\"_blank\">NGT Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Appellant had contended that joint committee did not issue any notice to it before carrying out the inspection and it was not served with a copy of the report of the Joint Committee either.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NGT accepted the report of the joint committee without any adjudication on it.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Environmental compensation was quantified without any adjudication and without granting any opportunity of hearing to the appellant. Environmental compensation was imposed on the appellant without giving any opportunity to the appellant to contest the reports of the joint committee and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the appellant.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court then perused relevant precedents on necessity for following the principles of natural justice. The Court thus opined that it was clearly evident that the impugned orders were in complete violation of the procedures laid down in the Water Act, 1974, specifically Sections 21 and 22, the Environment Act, 1986, and the NGT Act, 2010, including Section 19 thereof. Furthermore, the impugned decisions which entail adverse civil consequences upon the appellant were passed without following the due procedure laid down under the statute as well as the elementary principles of natural justice. Therefore, the Court declared impugned orders as illegal and null and void and same was set aside.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;This is a classic case where in the quest for doing justice, NGT has ended up doing just the reverse&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that in a case where there is violation of the principles of natural justice, parties are relegated to the adjudicatory forum to re-do the exercise after following the due process. However, in this case, the entire exercise has been vitiated because of non-conforming to the laid down procedure contemplated under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524783\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524784\" target=\"_blank\">22<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002823103\" target=\"_blank\">Water Act, 1974<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In such circumstances, relegating the parties back to the NGT would serve no useful purpose. However, the Court clarified that it will always be open to the UPPCB to carry out inspection and take remedial measures qua the appellant&#8217;s sugar mill by following the procedure laid down under the Water Act and after complying with the due process statutorily laid down thereunder, including by adhering to the principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd v. State of Uttar Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/W1392XOw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1877<\/a>, decided on 1-9-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Ujjal Bhuyan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant(s):<\/span> Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Prateek Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arshit Anand, Adv. Ms. Vidisha Swarup, Adv. Mr. Naman Gupta, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. Sudeep Kumar, AOR Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The case revolved around 2 orders passed by the National Green Tribunal- one order directed the constitution of a Joint Committee to investigate the appellant&#8217;s environmental transgressions and the 2<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">nd<\/span> order imposed compensation of Rs 18 crores.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":359586,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[62610,47151,37644,7091,2805,5381,47462,88820,43023],"class_list":["post-359569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-administrative-committee","tag-environment-act","tag-justice-ujjal-bhuyan","tag-national-green-tribunal","tag-natural_justice","tag-ngt","tag-ngt-act","tag-outsourcing-investigation","tag-water-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NGT outsourcing investigation if permitted in law? SC answers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"National Green Tribunal outsourcing investigation to administrative committees, whether allowed in law? Explore Supreme Court&#039;s answer.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can NGT outsource investigation to administrative committees via bypassing statutory provisions? Supreme Court answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Green Tribunal outsourcing investigation to administrative committees, whether allowed in law? Explore Supreme Court&#039;s answer.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-10T04:00:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-11T11:36:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Can NGT outsource investigation to administrative committees via bypassing statutory provisions? Supreme Court answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/\",\"name\":\"NGT outsourcing investigation if permitted in law? SC answers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-10T04:00:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-11T11:36:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"National Green Tribunal outsourcing investigation to administrative committees, whether allowed in law? Explore Supreme Court's answer.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"NGT outsourcing investigation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can NGT outsource investigation to administrative committees via bypassing statutory provisions? Supreme Court answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NGT outsourcing investigation if permitted in law? SC answers | SCC Times","description":"National Green Tribunal outsourcing investigation to administrative committees, whether allowed in law? Explore Supreme Court's answer.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can NGT outsource investigation to administrative committees via bypassing statutory provisions? Supreme Court answers","og_description":"National Green Tribunal outsourcing investigation to administrative committees, whether allowed in law? Explore Supreme Court's answer.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-10T04:00:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-11T11:36:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Can NGT outsource investigation to administrative committees via bypassing statutory provisions? Supreme Court answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/","name":"NGT outsourcing investigation if permitted in law? SC answers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-10T04:00:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-11T11:36:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"National Green Tribunal outsourcing investigation to administrative committees, whether allowed in law? Explore Supreme Court's answer.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"NGT outsourcing investigation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/10\/ngt-outsourcing-investigation-if-permitted-supreme-court-answers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can NGT outsource investigation to administrative committees via bypassing statutory provisions? Supreme Court answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/NGT-outsourcing-investigation.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":305310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/sc-stays-ngt-order-directing-prosecution-against-cecb-officials-section-26-of-ngt-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":359569,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court stays NGT order directing prosecution against CECB officials under Section 26 of NGT Act","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NGT had highlighted the serious functional irregularity in efficiency and competence on the part of CECB officials, holding them guilty of offence under Section 26 of NGT Act for failure to comply with NGT order.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 26 of NGT Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Section-26-of-NGT-Act-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Section-26-of-NGT-Act-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Section-26-of-NGT-Act-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Section-26-of-NGT-Act-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374553,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/04\/sc-environmental-compensation-based-on-project-turnover\/","url_meta":{"origin":359569,"position":1},"title":"NGT has power to determine proportionate environmental compensation based on project turnover: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 4, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The NGT is empowered to quantify environmental compensation on the basis of project cost or scale of operations in order to enforce the polluter pays principle where construction is carried out in violation of environmental laws.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"environmental compensation based on project turnover","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/environmental-compensation-based-on-project-turnover.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/environmental-compensation-based-on-project-turnover.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/environmental-compensation-based-on-project-turnover.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/environmental-compensation-based-on-project-turnover.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/25\/mere-disagreement-with-order-or-alternative-view-not-sufficient-for-review-ngt-upholds-envir-compens-of-rs-1000000-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":359569,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Mere disagreement with order or alternative view not sufficient for review\u2019; NGT upholds environmental compensation of \u20b910,00,000","author":"Ritu","date":"October 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NGT reaffirmed that review proceedings are not an appeal in disguise and should be confined to the specific grounds allowed under law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Green Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/National-Green-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/National-Green-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/National-Green-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/National-Green-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/14\/ngt-cannot-rely-solely-on-recommendations-of-expert-committee-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":359569,"position":3},"title":"Judicial Body like NGT cannot simply accept Expert Committee recommendations without complying with Principles of Natural Justice: SC","author":"Editor","date":"July 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that the recommendations made by an Expert Committee are not binding on the NGT, they are only by way of assistance to enable the NGT to arrive at a correct decision in the matter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ngt","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ngt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ngt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ngt.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ngt.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267083,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/19\/ngt-benches-jurisdiction-high-court-low-case-load-constitutionaly-national-green-tribunal-act-supreme-court-direct-appeal-judgments-law-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":359569,"position":4},"title":"Case load on NGT low, No need to set up Benches in every State; High Court&#8217;s jurisdiction unaffected: Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of NGT Act","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association and the District Bar Association, both with their registered offices at Jabalpur, had raised a challenge to the vires of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 on various grounds, the bench of KM Joseph and Hrishikesh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-176.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-176.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-176.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-176.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-176.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/11\/whether-the-national-green-tribunal-has-the-power-to-exercise-suo-motu-jurisdiction-in-the-discharge-of-its-functions-under-the-national-green-tribunal-act-2010\/","url_meta":{"origin":359569,"position":5},"title":"Environmental Watchdog | NGT could act upon a letter written to it but cannot be triggered suo motu on learning about an environmental exigency? Supreme Court Verdict","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Whether the National Green Tribunal has the power to exercise Suo Motu jurisdiction in discharge of its functions under the NGT Act, 2010?","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=359569"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359569\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/359586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=359569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=359569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=359569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}