{"id":358752,"date":"2025-09-02T18:00:09","date_gmt":"2025-09-02T12:30:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=358752"},"modified":"2025-09-06T10:23:01","modified_gmt":"2025-09-06T04:53:01","slug":"jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Jethani not part of same family unless residence and kitchen are shared\u2019; Allahabad HC quashes order cancelling Anganbari Worker&#8217;s appointment"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed seeking the quashing of the order passed by the District Programme Officer, Bareilly, which had cancelled the appointment of the petitioner as an Anganbari Worker, the Single Judge Bench of Ajit Kumar, J. said that there was no material on record to establish that the petitioner and her sister-in-law (Jethani) were part of the same household or shared a common kitchen. Therefore, it could not be held that both women belonged to the same family within the meaning of the Government Order dated 21-05-2023, which prohibits the appointment of two women from the same family at the same Anganbari centre.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further held that the impugned order was vitiated not only on merits but also for being in violation of the principles of natural justice, as it had been passed without affording the petitioner any opportunity of hearing.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The order was primarily based on the ground that the petitioner&#8217;s sister-in-law was also employed as an Anganbari Assistant in the same block, and the relevant Government Order does not permit the posting of two women from the same family at the same center, one as an Anganbari Worker and the other as an Anganbari Assistant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner submitted that the impugned order was passed without any notice or opportunity for hearing to the petitioner. Since the order carries adverse civil consequences, it was contended that the petitioner ought to have been given a chance to explain her position in defense of the appointment order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the legal aspect of the bar created under the Government Order dated 21-5-2023, for the petitioner referred to Clause 12(iv) of the said order, which only restricts the appointment of two women from the same family as Anganbari Worker and Anganbari Assistant at the same center. The relevant provisions of the Government Order, as reproduced, it was argued that the petitioner&#8217;s sister-in-law lives in a separate house with a distinct house number. Therefore, it was asserted that she does not fall within the definition of the petitioner&#8217;s family. Though she belongs to her father-in-law&#8217;s family, she does not constitute part of the petitioner&#8217;s family for the purposes of the Government Order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In support of this submission, the petitioner referred to the relevant family register document, which indicates that the petitioner&#8217;s husband resides in house number 126, whereas the petitioner&#8217;s sister-in-law resides in a separate house, numbered 107.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Additionally, the petitioner referred to the definition of &#8216;family&#8217; as outlined in the medical assistance rules for government employees. The family for medical purposes includes the husband, wife, parents, step-son, unmarried\/divorced\/deserted sisters, minor brothers, and step-mother. Thus, the petitioner submitted that, by no stretch of imagination, can the sister-in-law be considered as falling within the definition of &#8220;family&#8221; for the purposes of selection and appointment to the post of Anganbari Worker.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">From the discussion made above, with reference to various service rules and the definition of &#8220;family&#8221; as provided under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;), the Court opined that a sister-in-law cannot, in all circumstances, be treated as a member of the same family as the petitioner. A sister-in-law may be considered a member of the same family only in cases where both brothers are residing together, sharing a common household and kitchen.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the Court noted that there is no material to establish that the petitioner and her sister-in-law are part of the same household or share a common kitchen. Therefore, it cannot be said that both women belong to the same family for the purposes of the Government Order dated 21-05-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In view of the above, the Court held that the impugned order dated 13-06-2025, cancelling the petitioner&#8217;s appointment, is rendered unsustainable not only on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice, having been passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, but also on merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed the District Programme Officer, Bareilly to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Anganbari Worker forthwith and permit her to discharge her duties without any further delay. The petitioner shall be paid her monthly salary regularly from the date of reinstatement. In addition, the petitioner shall be entitled to all consequential benefits, including arrears of salary for the period during which she was denied employment in consequence of the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kumari Sonam v State of UP, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FQEEj1B3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine All 5446<\/a>, decided on 12-08-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for Petitioner:-<\/span> Anil Kumar Prajapati,Kuldeep Kumar Mishra<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for Respondent:-<\/span> C.S.C<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Allahabad HC directed the District Programme Officer to reinstate the petitioner as Anganbari Worker to discharge her duties and to pay her salary month by month.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":358765,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,88454,88455,88453,88457,88451,3081,88456,88452],"class_list":["post-358752","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-anganbari-worker","tag-appointment-cancellation","tag-common-residence","tag-family-definition","tag-jethani","tag-kitchen","tag-quashed-order","tag-same-family"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jethani Not Part of Same Family Unless Residence Shared: Allahabad HC in Anganbari Appointment bar<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC held that \u2018Jethani\u2019 is not part of same family unless share residence and kitchen in Anganbari appointment bar\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jethani Not Part of Same Family Explained\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore the reasons why Jethani not part of same family might resonate with you. Discover insights and perspectives.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-02T12:30:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-06T04:53:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Jethani not part of same family unless residence and kitchen are shared\u2019; Allahabad HC quashes order cancelling Anganbari Worker&#039;s appointment\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/\",\"name\":\"Jethani Not Part of Same Family Unless Residence Shared: Allahabad HC in Anganbari Appointment bar\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-02T12:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-06T04:53:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC held that \u2018Jethani\u2019 is not part of same family unless share residence and kitchen in Anganbari appointment bar\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Jethani not part of same family\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Jethani not part of same family unless residence and kitchen are shared\u2019; Allahabad HC quashes order cancelling Anganbari Worker&#8217;s appointment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jethani Not Part of Same Family Unless Residence Shared: Allahabad HC in Anganbari Appointment bar","description":"Allahabad HC held that \u2018Jethani\u2019 is not part of same family unless share residence and kitchen in Anganbari appointment bar","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jethani Not Part of Same Family Explained","og_description":"Explore the reasons why Jethani not part of same family might resonate with you. Discover insights and perspectives.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-02T12:30:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-06T04:53:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Jethani not part of same family unless residence and kitchen are shared\u2019; Allahabad HC quashes order cancelling Anganbari Worker's appointment","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/","name":"Jethani Not Part of Same Family Unless Residence Shared: Allahabad HC in Anganbari Appointment bar","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-02T12:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-06T04:53:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Allahabad HC held that \u2018Jethani\u2019 is not part of same family unless share residence and kitchen in Anganbari appointment bar","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Jethani not part of same family"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/jethani-not-part-same-family-allahabad-hc-anganbari-appointment-bar\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Jethani not part of same family unless residence and kitchen are shared\u2019; Allahabad HC quashes order cancelling Anganbari Worker&#8217;s appointment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Jethani-not-part-of-same-family.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/allahabad-high-court-rejects-claim-of-compassionate-appointment-after-27-years-delay-of-adopted-son\/","url_meta":{"origin":358752,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court rejects claim of compassionate appointment after 27 years delay of adopted son","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J. dismissed a writ petition filed for claiming compassionate appointment stating that compassionate appointment cannot be claimed or offered after a significant lapse of time and after crisis is over. Petitioner claimed to be the adopted son of late Ram Achal Singh through adoption\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/23\/allahabad-high-court-recruitment-of-dependents-of-government-servants-dying-in-harness-rules-1974-wife-entitled-to-compassionate-appointment-before-sister\/","url_meta":{"origin":358752,"position":1},"title":"Allahabad High Court| [Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974] Wife entitled to compassionate appointment before sister","author":"Editor","date":"August 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Neeraj Tiwari, J. dismissed a writ petition which was filed with prayer for directing the respondents to grant the representation for compassionate appointment of the petitioner holding that sister can't claim benefit of Compassionate Appointment in presence of wife under U.P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/widowed-daughter-still-daughter-falls-within-dependent-family-eligible-for-compassionate-appointment-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":358752,"position":2},"title":"Dependent widowed daughter is still daughter and falls within ambit of \u2018dependent family\u2019, eligible for compassionate appointment: Allahabad HC","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf a married son is eligible for compassionate appointment if he was dependent upon his father at the time of his death unless he had his own means of livelihood, then, there is no reason as to why a married daughter who is similarly placed, i.e., if she was dependent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297879,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/regardless-of-their-marital-status-daughters-may-apply-for-compassionate-appointments-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":358752,"position":3},"title":"Can a married daughter apply for compassionate appointment in State Government Jobs? Allahabad High Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad high Court said that there is no plausible reason why the proposal made by the Institutional Service Board for striking down the word \u2018unmarried\u2019 occurring in Regulation 104 of Regulations 1975 could be turned down by the State Government.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327193,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/allahabad-high-court-upholds-termination-candidate-appointed-class-iv-post-district-judgeship\/","url_meta":{"origin":358752,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Employer may pass order cancelling candidature on suppression of pending criminal case\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds termination of candidate appointed to Class-IV post in District Judgeship","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA candidate seeking an appointment in the District Court judgeship should be of impeccable character and high integrity, and his antecedents should be clean and if a person whose integrity is doubtful or his antecedents are not clean is appointed, that can damage the institution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215061,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/27\/hp-hc-court-finds-a-middle-ground-while-resolving-a-dispute-between-necessity-and-fairness-considering-a-lot-of-water-has-flowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":358752,"position":5},"title":"HP HC | Court finds a middle ground while resolving a dispute between necessity and fairness, considering \u2018a lot of water has flowed\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. disposed of a petition considering the long litigation between the parties and gave directions to the competent authority. In the present matter, the petitioner was an unemployed divorced lady who got selected for the post of Anganwadi worker but an appeal was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358752","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=358752"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358752\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/358765"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=358752"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=358752"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=358752"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}