{"id":358699,"date":"2025-09-02T13:30:01","date_gmt":"2025-09-02T08:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=358699"},"modified":"2025-09-06T10:37:03","modified_gmt":"2025-09-06T05:07:03","slug":"s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cPowers under S.37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances\u201d: Delhi Court reiterates, refuses relief to Satyam Polyknits"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tis Hazari Court:<\/span> In an arbitration appeal filed by Satyam Polyknits (‘Satyam’) under Section 37(2)(b)<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (‘the Act’) seeking setting aside of order passed by the Arbitrator, Garima Bajaj, whereby Satyam’s application under Section 17(1)(b) of the Act seeking interim directions against Excel Vinyl Coatings Pvt Ltd (‘Excel’) to furnish security in the form of bank guarantee or any other financial instrument equivalent to Rs. 30.22 Lakhs, was rejected, the Single Judge Bench of Ravinder Bedi, J., rejected the appeal, holding that there was no ground for interference. The Court reiterated the guarded and sparing use of the powers under Section 37(2)(b) of the Act in only exceptional circumstances, and especially when the exercise of the Arbitrator’s discretion while passing the Order in question is not seen as arbitrary or perverse in any manner.<\/p>\n

Allegedly, Excel had approached Satyam for the supply of certain fabric material, but disputes arose due to outstanding payments.<\/p>\n

At the outset, the Court reiterated that the Arbitrator is a Judge of the choice of parties and his decision, unless there is an error apparent on the face of the award which makes it unsustainable, is not to be set aside merely, as a Court could come to a different conclusion on the same facts. It is not open to the Court to sit in appeal over the conclusions of the Arbitrator or to reappraise the evidence or to set aside a finding of fact arrived at by an Arbitrator. Where the Arbitrator assigns cogent grounds and sufficient reasons and no error of law or misconduct is cited, the Order does not call for any interference in the exercise of the power vested in the Courts.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that in the present case, the Arbitrator declined to grant the interim relief sought by Excel under Section 17(1)(b) of the Act. The Arbitrator carefully considered the submissions of both parties, deliberated upon and analysed the circumstances considering the material on record, and then observed that the application was largely on alleged apprehensions and conduct of Excel. The Arbitrator duly applied the trinity test, i.e., prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury to pass the impugned order.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the Court noted that, as observed by the Arbitrator, Satyam came up with the application only at the belated stage, i.e., during the pendency of proceedings, when the matter was pending for cross-examination. Thus, in such a situation, it could not be said that the Arbitrator exercised her power in a manner that was palpably arbitrary, irrational, or perverse. Moreover, all other manifold contentions canvassed and agitated by parties were left open for trial and yet to be determined in the arbitration proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Court further stated that it was undisputable that the exercise of jurisdiction by the Arbitrator, under Section 17 of the Act, was fundamentally discretionary in nature. The Judicial interference with the exercise of discretionary power is limited and circumscribed.<\/p>\n

In this regard, the Court referred to Managing Director, Army Welfare Housing Organisation v. Sumangal Services (P) Ltd.<\/span> (2004) 9 SCC 619<\/a>, wherein it was held that the jurisdiction of the Court under Section 37(2)(b) of the Act is even more limited than the jurisdiction which is exercised under Section 37(2)(a) or, for that matter, under Section 34. Such discretionary jurisdiction, as exercised by the Arbitrator, merits interference under Section 37(2)(b) only, where such an exercise is palpably arbitrary or unconscionable.<\/p>\n

Given the settled legal perspective of guarded and sparing use of the powers under Section 37(2)(b) of the Act in only exceptional circumstances; and especially when the exercise of the Arbitrator’s discretion while passing the Order in question is not seen as arbitrary or perverse in any manner, the Court held that there was no ground to interfere with the Order made by the Arbitrator.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed.<\/p>\n

[Satyam Polyknits v. Excel Vinyl Coatings Pvt Ltd, 2025 SCC OnLine Dis Crt (Del) 39<\/a>, decided on 21-08-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the appellant:<\/span> Pankaj Mehta and Shweta Soni<\/p>\n

For the respondent:<\/span> Rakesh Raushan<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Where the Arbitrator assigns the cogent grounds and sufficient reasons and no error of law or misconduct is cited, the Order does not call for any interference in exercise of the power vested in the Courts.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":358711,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4721],"tags":[41455,88410,30215,88407,88409,88408,88406,38202],"class_list":["post-358699","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-district-court","tag-delhi-district-court","tag-excel-vinyl-coatings-pvt-ltd","tag-judicial-interference","tag-justice-ravinder-bedi","tag-satyam-polyknits","tag-section-171b-arbitration-act","tag-section-372b-arbitration-act-powers","tag-tis-hazari-court"],"yoast_head":"\nS. 37(2)(b) Arb Act powers shall be used only in exceptional cases: Delhi Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi Court reiterated that powers under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances; Refused relief to Satyam Polyknits\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cPowers under S.37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances\u201d: Delhi Court reiterates, refuses relief to Satyam Polyknits\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi Court reiterated that powers under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances; Refused relief to Satyam Polyknits\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-02T08:00:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-06T05:07:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cPowers under S.37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances\u201d: Delhi Court reiterates, refuses relief to Satyam Polyknits\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/\",\"name\":\"S. 37(2)(b) Arb Act powers shall be used only in exceptional cases: Delhi Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-02T08:00:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-06T05:07:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Delhi Court reiterated that powers under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances; Refused relief to Satyam Polyknits\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Section 37(2)(b) Arbitration Act Powers\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cPowers under S.37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances\u201d: Delhi Court reiterates, refuses relief to Satyam Polyknits\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S. 37(2)(b) Arb Act powers shall be used only in exceptional cases: Delhi Court | SCC Times","description":"Delhi Court reiterated that powers under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances; Refused relief to Satyam Polyknits","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cPowers under S.37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances\u201d: Delhi Court reiterates, refuses relief to Satyam Polyknits","og_description":"Delhi Court reiterated that powers under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances; Refused relief to Satyam Polyknits","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-02T08:00:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-06T05:07:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cPowers under S.37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances\u201d: Delhi Court reiterates, refuses relief to Satyam Polyknits","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/","name":"S. 37(2)(b) Arb Act powers shall be used only in exceptional cases: Delhi Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-02T08:00:01+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-06T05:07:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Delhi Court reiterated that powers under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances; Refused relief to Satyam Polyknits","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Section 37(2)(b) Arbitration Act Powers"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/s-372b-arb-act-powers-shall-be-used-exceptional-cases-delhi-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cPowers under S.37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act shall be used only in exceptional circumstances\u201d: Delhi Court reiterates, refuses relief to Satyam Polyknits"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-372b-Arbitration-Act-Powers.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/delhi-high-court-upholds-arbitral-award-as-reappreciation-of-evidence-is-beyond-the-scope-of-section-37-arbitration-act-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":358699,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court finds no ground for interference as reappreciation of evidence is beyond the scope of Section 37 Arbitration Act","author":"Editor","date":"February 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The scope of a challenge under Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 is limited to the grounds stipulated in Section 34 Arbitration Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":241542,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/01\/the-conundrum-in-seeking-interim-reliefs-for-foreign-seated-arbitrations-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":358699,"position":1},"title":"The conundrum in seeking Interim reliefs for foreign seated arbitrations in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Sushmita Gandhi*,\u00a0 Anamika Singh** & \u00a0Bhargav Kosuru***","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitraion.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitraion.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitraion.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitraion.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitraion.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":185354,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/01\/impact-fraud-arbitral-award-indian-supreme-court-divergence\/","url_meta":{"origin":358699,"position":2},"title":"Impact of fraud on arbitral award: Indian Supreme Court at divergence","author":"Saba","date":"February 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"by Anchit Oswal*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318538,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/interim-reliefs-arbitration-emerging-judicial-trends-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":358699,"position":3},"title":"Interim Reliefs in Arbitration: Emerging Judicial Trends in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada** Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 24","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Interim reliefs in arbitration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Interim-reliefs-in-arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Interim-reliefs-in-arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Interim-reliefs-in-arbitration.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Interim-reliefs-in-arbitration.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/supreme-court-confirms-pre-balco-foreign-awards-cannot-be-challenged-under-section-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":358699,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court confirms pre-BALCO foreign awards cannot be challenged under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The question before the division bench of Ravindra Bhat and Indira Banerjee, JJ. was whether a foreign award rendered in the pre BALCO[1] era, could be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The facts in brief were that the respondent and another company \u2018Enco\u2019\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328525,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/judicial-jigsaw-never-ending-conflicts-interpretative-challenges-of-section-29-a-arbitration-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":358699,"position":5},"title":"Judicial Jigsaw: Never-Ending Conflicts and Interpretative Challenges of Section 29-A of the Arbitration Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"S. 29-A of Arbitration Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-29-A-of-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-29-A-of-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-29-A-of-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/S.-29-A-of-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358699","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=358699"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358699\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/358711"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=358699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=358699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=358699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}