{"id":358545,"date":"2025-09-01T11:00:45","date_gmt":"2025-09-01T05:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=358545"},"modified":"2025-09-04T09:35:58","modified_gmt":"2025-09-04T04:05:58","slug":"owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents, party who produced it or the owner? Telangana HC clarifies Order 13 Rule 9 CPC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Telangana High Court:<\/span> In a revision petition against an order dated 22-12-2022 (‘impugned order’) wherein an application filed under Section 151<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (‘CPC’) for return of original documents was dismissed, the Single Judge Bench of Laxmi Narayana Alishetty, J, held that even though the original title deed had been produced before the Court by Respondent 1, petitioner being the rightful owner of the suit property and the title deed in question would be entitled to its return.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In the present case, the petitioner had availed a loan of Rs.35,00,000 from Respondent 1 for which a registered simple mortgage deed was executed. The petitioner had also handed over the original sale deed, which pertained to the suit schedule property, as part of the mortgage transaction. Due to default in repayment, Respondent 1 filed a suit for recovery of Rs.94,24,666 along with a declaration that the agreement of sale dated 15-5-2015 was null and void. During the pendency of the suit, the matter was amicably settled outside the Court. A memo to this effect was filed and the suit was dismissed as not pressed on 24-8-2020.<\/p>\n

Following the dismissal, the petitioner had filed an application seeking return of the original mortgage deed and the original sale deed. The trial Court vide the impugned order had dismissed this application without issuing notice to Respondent 1, observing that as the documents were filed by Respondent 1, only he was entitled to their return under Order 13 Rule 9<\/a> of the CPC<\/a>. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioner filed the present revision.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had argued that since he was the owner of the suit schedule property and had settled the matter fully with Respondent 1, he was entitled to the return of his original title documents. He relied on the case of R Shankar v. E. Rammohan Chowdary 2024 SCC OnLine Kar 12822<\/a><\/span>, which held that ownership of the document was a relevant factor for return, and the provision under Order XIII Rule 9<\/a> CPC<\/a> must be interpreted in that light.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n

The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioner, as the owner of the original documents, could seek their return from the Court, even though they were filed into Court by the opposite party.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that while Order 13 Rule 9<\/a> CPC<\/a> generally provides for the return of documents to the party who produced them, it does not preclude the right of the true owner of the document, particularly when the document has served its purpose and the suit has concluded.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the trial Court erred in dismissing the application without considering that the petitioner was the rightful owner of the documents in question. It further observed that the claim of Respondent 1 had already been settled and he had no further entitlement to the documents.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition was allowed. The trial Court was directed to return the original mortgage deed and sale deed to the petitioner, upon substitution with certified copies.<\/p>\n

[G. Madhusudan Rao v. Ammireddy Srinivas Reddy, 2025 SCC OnLine TS 684<\/a>, decided on 10-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Appellant:<\/span> Sankalp Pissay. Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> K Jagadishwar Reddy, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The petitioner had averred that the intent of Order 13 Rule 9 of the CPC is to ensure that documents, once they have served their purpose in litigation and are no longer required by the Court, should be returned to their rightful owners.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":358550,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[88297,88298,88300,88299,33941,88301],"class_list":["post-358545","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-justice-laxmi-narayana-alishetty","tag-order-13-rule-9-cpc","tag-property-owner-entitled-to-return-of-sale-deed-by-court","tag-return-of-court-document-to-rightful-owner","tag-telangana-high-court","tag-title-deed-return-after-case-settlement"],"yoast_head":"\nWho is entitled to return of Original Documents: Tel HC clarifies Or. 13 R. 9 CPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Telangana HC clarified Who is entitled to return of Original Documents under Order 13 Rule 9 CPC - Party who produced it or the owner?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Return of Original Documents: What You Should Know\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore the return of original documents and how it impacts archival practices and historical records.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-01T05:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-04T04:05:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents, party who produced it or the owner? Telangana HC clarifies Order 13 Rule 9 CPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents: Tel HC clarifies Or. 13 R. 9 CPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-01T05:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-04T04:05:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Telangana HC clarified Who is entitled to return of Original Documents under Order 13 Rule 9 CPC - Party who produced it or the owner?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"return of original documents\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents, party who produced it or the owner? Telangana HC clarifies Order 13 Rule 9 CPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents: Tel HC clarifies Or. 13 R. 9 CPC | SCC Times","description":"Telangana HC clarified Who is entitled to return of Original Documents under Order 13 Rule 9 CPC - Party who produced it or the owner?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Return of Original Documents: What You Should Know","og_description":"Explore the return of original documents and how it impacts archival practices and historical records.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-09-01T05:30:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-04T04:05:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents, party who produced it or the owner? Telangana HC clarifies Order 13 Rule 9 CPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/","name":"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents: Tel HC clarifies Or. 13 R. 9 CPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp","datePublished":"2025-09-01T05:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-04T04:05:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Telangana HC clarified Who is entitled to return of Original Documents under Order 13 Rule 9 CPC - Party who produced it or the owner?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"return of original documents"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents, party who produced it or the owner? Telangana HC clarifies Order 13 Rule 9 CPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":346343,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/madras-hc-lifts-attachment-sivaji-ganesan-property-arbitral-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":358545,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC clears attachment on late actor Sivaji Ganesan\u2019s property amid arbitral award execution against grandson","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"If the intention of the legislature had been to require the recording of oral evidence for adjudicating every application filed under Order 21, Rule 58 CPC, such a requirement would have been explicitly stipulated within the provision itself.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":340586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/collegium-recommends-appointment-permanent-judges-high-court-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":358545,"position":1},"title":"SC Collegium recommends appointment of Permanent Judges for Madras and Telangana High Courts","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Collegium in its meeting on 5-2-2025 recommended the appointment of 5 Permanent Judges.","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Permanent Judges Madras HC Telangana HC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/sc-coll-8.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/sc-coll-8.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/sc-coll-8.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/sc-coll-8.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281767,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/17\/split-verdict-whether-non-production-poa-during-suit-to-prove-sale-deed-which-was-executed-on-strength-of-poa-would-fatal-to-case-of-plaintiff-legal-news-legal-research-updates-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":358545,"position":2},"title":"Whether non-production of Power of Attorney to prove a sale deed would be fatal to the case of the plaintiff?; Supreme Court’s split verdict","author":"Editor","date":"January 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While Justice Shah stated that the plaintiff had not produced the Power of Attorney, Justice Nagarathna opined that non-production of Power of Attorney was not fatal to the case of the original plaintiff.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":301056,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/citizens-shall-not-be-deprived-of-statutory-benefits-on-ground-of-not-having-aadhar-telanaganhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":358545,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Citizens of India shall not be deprived of statutory benefits merely on ground of not having Aadhar Card\u2019; Telangana High Court reiterates","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court directed the State to reconsider the petitioner\u2019s request for issuance of Pattadar Pass Book-cum-Title Deed for agriculture lands without insisting to submit her Aadhar Card or its details.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/28\/is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":358545,"position":4},"title":"Is independent suit questioning a compromise decree maintainable or one has to approach the same Court which recorded the compromise to challenge it? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"February 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf clever drafting of the plaint has created the illusion of a cause of action, the court will nip it in the bud at the earliest so that bogus litigation will end at the earlier stage.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Is-independent-suit-questioning-a-compromise-decree-maintainable-or-one-has-to-approach-the-same-Court-which-recorded-the-compromise-to-challenge-it-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345631,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/11\/rule-55ai-registration-rules-declared-ultra-vires-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":358545,"position":5},"title":"SC declares R. 55A(i) of Registration Rules as ultra vires for being inconsistent with provisions of Registration Act, 1908","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNo provision under the 1908 Act confers power on any authority to refuse registration of a transfer document on the ground that the documents regarding the title of the vendor are not produced, or if his title is not established\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"R. 55A(i) Registration Rules ultra vires","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/R.-55Ai-Registration-Rules-ultra-vires.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/R.-55Ai-Registration-Rules-ultra-vires.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/R.-55Ai-Registration-Rules-ultra-vires.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/R.-55Ai-Registration-Rules-ultra-vires.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358545","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=358545"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358545\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/358550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=358545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=358545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=358545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}