{"id":357997,"date":"2025-08-27T11:30:14","date_gmt":"2025-08-27T06:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=357997"},"modified":"2025-08-28T18:23:53","modified_gmt":"2025-08-28T12:53:53","slug":"kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/","title":{"rendered":"Kerala HC deprecates State\u2019s Evasive Tactics in Land Acquisition; Orders Fair Compensation to landholders, upholding Article 30(1-A)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> The State, vide a notification, projected a need to widen the access to the bridge by acquiring the land belonging to Sree Venkateswara English Medium School, Thripunithura, (&#8216;school&#8217;) managed by a linguistic minority community in Kerala. The present writ appeal challenged the notification primarily on the ground of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\">30(1-A)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">A. Muhamed Mustaque*<\/span> and Harisankar V. Menon, JJ., while allowing the writ appeal, called out the State&#8217;s attempt to evade the constitutional restriction and ordered fair compensation to be paid to the appellants for their land already in the possession of the school authority.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A notification was issued by the State on 09-06-2006 providing that it needed the land belonging to the Venkateswara School, which was managed by Thulu Brahmana Yogam, a linguistic minority community in Kerala, for widening the access to the bridge. A writ petition was filed where a compromise was arrived at between the school authority and the State that in lieu of land from the school authority, they will be compensated by handing over the land belonging to the adjacent owners through the acquisition. The adjacent owners were the appellants herein. It appeared that the bridge was widened and constructed by using the school&#8217;s land, and to compensate for the land so acquired, a notification dated 19-05-2007 was issued to acquire the appellant&#8217;s land. Thus, the State had adopted an ingenious method to acquire the appellants&#8217; land by invoking the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000027868\" target=\"_blank\">Land Acquisition Act, 1894<\/a> (&#8216;LA Act&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present writ appeal, the appellants questioned the very claim of minority status by the school authority and contended that the acquisition was a colourable exercise of power. The challenge was dismissed by the Single Judge, and an award was passed on 22-03-2010. In the reference under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516985\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000027868\" target=\"_blank\">LA Act<\/a>, the appellants did not participate, and the Reference Court held that the appellants were not entitled to enhanced compensation. An original petition was also filed on the same issue, so the Court decided to pronounce a common judgment for both the writ appeal and the original petition.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Society of<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">St. Joseph&#8217;s College<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9vVs2qea\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(2002) 1 SCC 273<\/span><\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\">30(1-A)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> mandated that a specific law was required to provide for the compulsory acquisition of property belonging to minority educational institutions, and without making a specific law, the State could not acquire the property of such institutions. The Court observed that in the present situation, and in the absence of any specific law enabling the acquisition of property belonging to a minority educational institution, it was not possible for the State to acquire the Venkateswara School&#8217;s land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516999\" target=\"_blank\">3(f)(vi)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000027868\" target=\"_blank\">LA Act<\/a>, land acquisition for educational purposes was permitted only when undertaken by government-established schemes, thereby restricting its scope. Additionally, clause (viii) clarified that land acquisition for companies did not qualify as a &#8216;public purpose&#8217;, and such acquisitions were allowed solely for specific objectives outlined in Section 40(1) under Part VII of the LA Act. Thus, it was evident that the LA Act deliberately provided a limited meaning to &#8216;public purpose&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that to overcome the constitutional restriction of the State&#8217;s failure to address the mandate under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\">30(1-A)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, a compromise was entered into with the school on the promise that the land of adjacent holders would be acquired to compensate for the loss suffered by the school. Such a compromise was regarded as a private arrangement and a private contract, having no backing of law, and rather reflected the deceitful means adopted by the State to get over the constitutional embargo.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the acquisition of land was based on the promise arrived at in a settlement rather than upholding any public purpose related to the school and it could still function, even after the acquisition of land from the school authority. Since it was a private school, there was no public purpose element considering the restricted meaning assigned to public purpose under the LA Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that even in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002763211\" target=\"_blank\">Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013<\/a> (&#8216;2013 Act&#8217;), the applicability of the Act was excluded even for private educational institutions and private hotels. The Court observed that this acquisition was a dubious attempt to wriggle out the constitutional embargo rather than acknowledging any other elements constituting public purpose under the law. The Court opined that the entire land acquisition proceedings must be set aside, including the notification under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001517011\" target=\"_blank\">4(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000027868\" target=\"_blank\">LA Act<\/a> but the appellant&#8217;s counsel admitted that the possession of the land was already taken over, and now it was vested with the school authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, therefore, allowed the appeal and directed the Collector to calculate the compensation in accordance with the 2013 Act and upon payment or deposit of the amount, the appellants must execute a conveyance deed, on meeting the entire expenses by the State, in favour of the Government or its nominee.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sulaiman M.S. v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/M16K1853\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Ker 6391<\/a>, decided on 21-08-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellants:<\/span> Madhu Radhakrishnan, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Kurian George Kannanthanam (SR.), N. Anilkumar, S. Ranjith, Sr. Government Pleader, K.P. Jayachandran, Addl. Advocate General.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;In the absence of any specific law enabling the acquisition of property belonging to a minority educational institution, it was not possible for the State to acquire the Venkateswara School&#8217;s land.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":358071,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[88000,88001,88002,34002,67176,87998,2523,35513,87999,26304,11531,36059,36058],"class_list":["post-357997","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-301a-constitution","tag-compulsory-acquisition-of-property","tag-constitutional-embargo","tag-fair-compensation","tag-justice-a-muhamed-mustaque","tag-justice-harisankar-v-menon","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-land-acquisition-act-1894","tag-linguistic-minority-community","tag-minority-educational-institutions","tag-public-purpose","tag-rehabilitation-and-resettlement-act-2013","tag-right-to-fair-compensation-and-transparency-in-land-acquisition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Slamming State&#039;s evasive land acquisition: Kerala HC orders fair compensation to landholders | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court criticizes State&#039;s evasive land acquisition methods and upholding Article 30(1-A), orders fair compensation to landholders in minority school&#039;s land acquisition\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kerala HC deprecates State\u2019s Evasive Tactics in Land Acquisition; Orders Fair Compensation to landholders, upholding Article 30(1-A)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court criticizes State&#039;s evasive land acquisition methods and upholding Article 30(1-A), orders fair compensation to landholders in minority school&#039;s land acquisition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-27T06:00:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-28T12:53:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Kerala HC deprecates State\u2019s Evasive Tactics in Land Acquisition; Orders Fair Compensation to landholders, upholding Article 30(1-A)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/\",\"name\":\"Slamming State's evasive land acquisition: Kerala HC orders fair compensation to landholders | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-27T06:00:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-28T12:53:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court criticizes State's evasive land acquisition methods and upholding Article 30(1-A), orders fair compensation to landholders in minority school's land acquisition\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Punjab & Haryana HC grants bail in SC\/ST Act case; Questions applicability of Act against accused belonging to deprived scheduled caste\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kerala HC deprecates State\u2019s Evasive Tactics in Land Acquisition; Orders Fair Compensation to landholders, upholding Article 30(1-A)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Slamming State's evasive land acquisition: Kerala HC orders fair compensation to landholders | SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court criticizes State's evasive land acquisition methods and upholding Article 30(1-A), orders fair compensation to landholders in minority school's land acquisition","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kerala HC deprecates State\u2019s Evasive Tactics in Land Acquisition; Orders Fair Compensation to landholders, upholding Article 30(1-A)","og_description":"Kerala High Court criticizes State's evasive land acquisition methods and upholding Article 30(1-A), orders fair compensation to landholders in minority school's land acquisition","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-27T06:00:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-28T12:53:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Kerala HC deprecates State\u2019s Evasive Tactics in Land Acquisition; Orders Fair Compensation to landholders, upholding Article 30(1-A)","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/","name":"Slamming State's evasive land acquisition: Kerala HC orders fair compensation to landholders | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-27T06:00:14+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-28T12:53:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Kerala High Court criticizes State's evasive land acquisition methods and upholding Article 30(1-A), orders fair compensation to landholders in minority school's land acquisition","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Punjab & Haryana HC grants bail in SC\/ST Act case; Questions applicability of Act against accused belonging to deprived scheduled caste"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/kerala-hc-minority-school-land-compensation-article-30\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kerala HC deprecates State\u2019s Evasive Tactics in Land Acquisition; Orders Fair Compensation to landholders, upholding Article 30(1-A)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-72.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214851,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/ker-hc-land-categorized-by-lao-cant-be-included-in-another-category-by-reference-court-to-re-determine-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":357997,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Land categorized by LAO can&#8217;t be included in another category by Reference Court to re-determine compensation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: P.B. Suresh Kumar, J. while allowing a land acquisition appeal, set aside the impugned award and restored the Collector's award. Respondent\u2019s land had been acquired for laying down of railway line pursuant to a notification issued in 1991 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218530,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/mad-hc-article-2542-of-the-constitution-not-applicable-to-repugnant-state-laws-such-already-repugnant-laws-being-void-cannot-be-saved-by-presidential-assent\/","url_meta":{"origin":357997,"position":1},"title":"Mad HC | Article 254 (2) of the Constitution not applicable to repugnant State laws \u2013 such already repugnant laws, being void, cannot be saved by Presidential assent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: A Division Bench of S. Manikumar, and Subramonium Prasad, JJ. allowed a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and held that three land acquisition laws enacted by the Tamil Nadu legislature were repugnant to the Right to Fair Compensation and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":309803,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/despite-substantial-delay-right-to-property-under-article-300a-supports-compensation-claim-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":357997,"position":2},"title":"Right to property| Calcutta High Court directs payment of compensation under Article 300A despite substantial delay","author":"Ritu","date":"December 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the Municipality's possession without proper acquisition procedures is deemed illegal, and the State is directed to initiate proceedings and pay compensation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267539,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/28\/land-acquisition-compensation-interim-order-pendency-of-proceedings-supreme-court-judgments-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":357997,"position":3},"title":"Land Acquisition| Compensation under 2013 Act cannot be claimed if award under 1894 Act couldn&#8217;t be passed due to pendency of proceedings or interim stay: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that in a case where on the date of commencement of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, no award has been declared under Section 11 of the Act, 1894,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201052,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/31\/acquisition-proceedings-deemed-to-have-lapsed-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-2013-on-non-payment-of-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":357997,"position":4},"title":"Acquisition proceedings deemed to have lapsed under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 on non-payment of compensation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed for seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings under which the land of the petitioner was acquired have lapsed. A notification was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":326403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/12\/determination-of-rightful-compensation-entitlement-requires-proper-adjudication-under-section-64-of-right-to-fair-compensation-actmp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":357997,"position":5},"title":"Land Acquisition| Rightful Compensation claim requires proper adjudication under Section 64 of Right to Fair Compensation Act: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"If a person is of the view that the compensation has been paid to a wrong person, then the same can be a ground for making reference under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357997","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=357997"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357997\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/358071"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=357997"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=357997"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=357997"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}