{"id":357035,"date":"2025-08-19T14:30:47","date_gmt":"2025-08-19T09:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=357035"},"modified":"2025-08-23T10:05:50","modified_gmt":"2025-08-23T04:35:50","slug":"person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Person\u2019s right to privacy cannot override right of child to know parentage\u2019: P&amp;H HC dismisses plea challenging order for DNA test"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> In a revision petition filed to set aside the order passed by the Trial Court ordering DNA test of the petitioner, a Single Judge Bench of Archana Puri J. dismissed the same with modification of conducting of the test and held that a child has a right to know his parentage in the context of denial of relationship by the father.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the right of privacy of a person cannot override the right of the child, as in case both come out to be strangers then no injustice would have been done to the person undertaking the DNA test.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the respondent filed a suit for declaration asserting himself to be son of the petitioner. He filed a petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519355\" target=\"_blank\">125<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) through his mother as he was a minor at the time. By the written statement filed to the same, the petitioner denied the parentage and stated that the respondent was not his biological son.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial Court allowed the application for conducting of the DNA test of the petitioner. Further, the Court also stated that the police assistance was found absolutely necessary, then a direction was issued to the police to offer help with reasonable care, in case resistance was made by the petitioner. Aggrieved from the same, the petitioner came before the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner submitted that he couldn&#8217;t undergo a DNA test as it would infringe his right of dignity and privacy. On the other hand, the respondent contended that it was in his best interest that the petitioner went through the DNA test as he had the right to know about his parentage and accruing rights, emanating therefrom.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the very language of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516692\" target=\"_blank\">112<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a> clearly stated that there was a need of existing strong presumption that the husband is the father of the child, borne by his wife during the subsistence of their marriage. However, the object of this principle was to prevent any unwarranted inquiry into the parentage of the child.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court viewed that it was pertinent to mention that it was the child, who is now major, who has come forth to assert paternity upon the petitioner. The Court opined that considering it, balancing of the interest and the eminent need was required to be looked into. The Court further observed that the respondent had a right to know his parentage in the context of denial of relationship by the petitioner. The Court further held that justice to the respondent was a factor, not to be ignored. Rather, his assertion demanded that truth be known, when truth had to be established, as it undoubtedly could be.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering the right to privacy of the petitioner, the Court opined that the right of privacy does not override the right of the child. Further considering that the respondent, being major, was aware of the consequences of the order that it might downsize his and his mother&#8217;s position in society and so was his mother, the court opined that the fact that they still came forward had to be considered.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that DNA test is surer test to affix the paternity and if the petitioner and the respondent are strangers in any manner, no injustice shall be done to the petitioner by conducting this test. Also, if he was the father, his position would be put beyond doubt by the testing and the paternity as pleaded shall be ascertained.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court opined that the evidence was to be led by both the sides, but the question arose, when the paternity could be affixed by surer test, then why decision based on legal presumption or gathering of inference, on the basis of the evidence or any gap, on account of misjudgment, be left.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further held that use of compel, or assistance of the police as ordered by the Trial Court, need not to be carried out, however, the compliance and non-compliance will be recorded by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Anil Kumar Garg v. Sahil Garg, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/EBSX6MBC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine P&#038;H 5711<\/a>, decided on 12-8-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Akshay Jindal and Vijayveer Singh, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Nandan Jindal and Aniket Singla, Advocates<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The evidence is to be led by both the sides, but the question arises, when the paternity can be affixed by surer test, then why decision based on legal presumption or gathering of inference, on the basis of the evidence or any gap, on account of misjudgment, be left.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":357056,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[68320,9161,50592,87455,2670,87456,9871],"class_list":["post-357035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-crpc-1973","tag-dna-test","tag-evidence-act-1872","tag-justice-archana-puri","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-right-to-know-parentage","tag-right-to-privacy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Person&#039;s right to privacy cannot override child&#039;s right to know parentage | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that individual&#039;s right to privacy cannot outweigh a child&#039;s right to know their parentage, stating that if DNA test results reveal no biological link, no harm is caused to the person undergoing the test.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Person\u2019s right to privacy cannot override right of child to know parentage\u2019: P&amp;H HC dismisses plea challenging order for DNA test\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that individual&#039;s right to privacy cannot outweigh a child&#039;s right to know their parentage, stating that if DNA test results reveal no biological link, no harm is caused to the person undergoing the test.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-19T09:00:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-23T04:35:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Person\u2019s right to privacy cannot override right of child to know parentage\u2019: P&amp;H HC dismisses plea challenging order for DNA test\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Person's right to privacy cannot override child's right to know parentage | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-19T09:00:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-23T04:35:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that individual's right to privacy cannot outweigh a child's right to know their parentage, stating that if DNA test results reveal no biological link, no harm is caused to the person undergoing the test.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Right of child to know parentage\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Person\u2019s right to privacy cannot override right of child to know parentage\u2019: P&amp;H HC dismisses plea challenging order for DNA test\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Person's right to privacy cannot override child's right to know parentage | SCC Times","description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that individual's right to privacy cannot outweigh a child's right to know their parentage, stating that if DNA test results reveal no biological link, no harm is caused to the person undergoing the test.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Person\u2019s right to privacy cannot override right of child to know parentage\u2019: P&H HC dismisses plea challenging order for DNA test","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that individual's right to privacy cannot outweigh a child's right to know their parentage, stating that if DNA test results reveal no biological link, no harm is caused to the person undergoing the test.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-19T09:00:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-23T04:35:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Person\u2019s right to privacy cannot override right of child to know parentage\u2019: P&amp;H HC dismisses plea challenging order for DNA test","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/","name":"Person's right to privacy cannot override child's right to know parentage | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-19T09:00:47+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-23T04:35:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that individual's right to privacy cannot outweigh a child's right to know their parentage, stating that if DNA test results reveal no biological link, no harm is caused to the person undergoing the test.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Right of child to know parentage"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/person-right-to-privacy-cannot-override-right-of-childto-know-parentage-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Person\u2019s right to privacy cannot override right of child to know parentage\u2019: P&amp;H HC dismisses plea challenging order for DNA test"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-of-child-to-know-parentage.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255095,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/02\/explained-can-in-a-declaratory-suit-plaintiff-be-subjected-to-dna-test-against-his-will\/","url_meta":{"origin":357035,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Can, in a declaratory suit, plaintiff be subjected to DNA test against his will?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIndian law leans towards legitimacy and frowns upon bastardy. The presumption in law of legitimacy of a child cannot be lightly repelled.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284694,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/21\/paternity-dna-test-adultery-chil-not-pawn-divorce-right-to-privacy-benefit-of-child-supreme-court-section-112-114-evidence-act-adverse-inference-against-wife-legal-updates-knowledge-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":357035,"position":1},"title":"\u201cChild cannot be used as a pawn to prove allegation of adultery against wife\u201d; SC lays down scope of using DNA profiling in divorce cases","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court held that merely because either of the parties have disputed a factum of paternity, it does not mean that the Court should direct DNA test or such other test to resolve the controversy. Only in exceptional and deserving cases, where such a test becomes indispensable to resolve\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"\u201cChild cannot be used as a pawn to prove allegation of adultery against wife\u201d; SC lays down scope of using DNA profiling in divorce cases","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-474.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-474.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-474.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-474.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270914,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-violation-of-individual-privacy-request-for-dna-test-denied-in-property-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":357035,"position":2},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | &#8216;Violation of individual privacy&#8217;; Request for DNA test denied in property dispute","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J. dismissed a petition which was filed against the order passed by Twelfth Civil Judge, Class II by which the application filed by the petitioner for conducting DNA test of Hemlata Yadav had been rejected. Husband of the petitioner had filed a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/12\/dna-paternity-test-can-only-be-permitted-in-exceptional-circumstances-rajasthan-hcreiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":357035,"position":3},"title":"DNA Paternity test cannot be allowed in routine manner, can only be permitted in exceptional circumstances; Rajasthan High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court observed that the DNA Paternity Test requires to be conducted only in exceptional cases, and therefore, the child cannot be used as a weapon to get divorce on ground of adultery, on the strength of outcome of a DNA Paternity Test.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/27\/sc-collegium-elevates-6-judicial-officers-as-judges-of-p-one-case-remitted-back-to-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":357035,"position":4},"title":"SC Collegium elevates 6 Judicial Officers as Judges of P&#038;H HC; One case remitted back to HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Proposal for appointment of following seven Judicial Officers as Judges of the Punjab & Haryana High Court: 1. Shri Satish Kumar Aggarwal, 2. Shri Ashok Kumar Verma, 3. Shri Sant Parkash Phutela, 4. Shri Karamjit Singh, 5. Shri Vivek Puri, 6. Mrs. Meenakshi I. Mehta, and 7. Mrs. Archana Puri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211072,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/pak-sc-a-free-lady-cannot-be-compelled-to-give-sample-for-dna-test-as-it-would-violate-her-liberty-dignity-and-privacy\/","url_meta":{"origin":357035,"position":5},"title":"Pak SC | A free lady cannot be compelled to give sample for DNA test as it would violate her liberty, dignity and privacy","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: The Divison Bench of Mushir Alam and Qazi Faez Isa, JJ. allowed a petition seeking to set aside lower Court\u2019s direction for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) test of a lady. Respondent herein had filed a suit against the petitioner alleging that she was adopted by his father,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357035","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=357035"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357035\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/357056"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=357035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=357035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=357035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}