{"id":356886,"date":"2025-08-18T14:30:12","date_gmt":"2025-08-18T09:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=356886"},"modified":"2025-08-22T10:10:20","modified_gmt":"2025-08-22T04:40:20","slug":"bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/","title":{"rendered":"Empty Arrest Form, non- compliance of Section 50 of CrPC by the police; Bombay High Court upholds the arrest as illegal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a habeas corpus writ petition filed by the petitioner, where he was not informed the reasons for his arrest and was kept under custody for over a year, the Division Bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ravindra V. Ghuge*<\/span> and Gautam A. Ankhad, JJ, declared the arrest as illegal and directed the Sessions Court for his immediate release. The Court held that the police authorities have made completely false statement that the grounds of arrest were communicated in writing when no such record could be produced from the station diary, therefore, have committed gross violation of the rights of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The deceased had two bulls, named Sarja and Sundar, which were kept in the custody of the deceased&#8217;s driver. Sarja originally belonged to Accused 1 and was purchased by the deceased for Rs. 61 lakhs, a year ago. These strong bulls were used for bullock racing. Accused 1- the employer of the petitioner, was desirous of purchasing Sundar, who was valued at Rs. 37 lakhs. Accused 1 paid Rs. 5 lakh as earnest money and the balance of Rs. 32 lakhs were agreed to be paid on 27-6-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The dispute arose on 27-6-2024, when the deceased did not part with the bull Sundar, so, Accused 1 got infuriated and shot in the head of the deceased using his pistol. The petitioner was a witness of the crime and hence was interrogated by the police. During the interrogation the police found out that the Accused 3 had directed the petitioner to wash off the blood stains and clean the crime scene. Based on this statement, the police arrested the petitioner on 1-7-2024 on the charge of destruction of evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved by the fact that he was never intimidated of the reasons of arrest, in writing, the petitioner filed the writ petition before the present Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the petitioner was presented before the Magistrate on the day of the arrest itself and this fact was not disputed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the Clause 8 of the Arrest Form where the reasons of arrest are required to be mentioned along with the date, time and place, was entirely left blank. Nothing in that clause was written to indicate that the petitioner was informed of his arrest. The police stated that petitioner was arrested because he washed away the blood stains on the directions of the accused, this amounted to conveying the reasons to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, the Court pointed out that the affidavit filed by the police, states under oath that the reasons for arrest were written on a sheet of paper in his presence and that it was served on the petitioner but the station diary has no record to corroborate the fact that the reasons of arrest were given in writing to the petitioner. Additionally, it was claimed that the reasons were conveyed, by writing it in a piece of paper but again, there was no sheet of paper produced to back this statement rather the police had no record to such communication ever being made to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Based on these observations, the Court opined that the procedure laid down under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519796\" target=\"_blank\">50<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC), which talks about the right of arrested person to be informed of the grounds of arrest, was not followed, nor any record could be produced to show that the reasons of arrest were conveyed to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Court held the arrest as illegal and directed the Sessions Court for immediate release of petitioner for the jail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ajit Kisan More v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Ejm6uD7S\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2899<\/a>, decided on: 11-8-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgement authored by- Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Advocate for the Petitioners-<\/span> Niranjan Mundargi, Keral Mehta, Ranjeet M. Pawar, Bhargav S. Pataskar, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Advocate for the Respondents-<\/span> S.V.Gavand, Addl. PP<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The police under oath stated that the petitioner was informed the reasons of arrest by giving it in writing on a sheet of paper, but the fact that no such sheet of paper was ever served to the petitioner, and a completely false statement was made by the authorities, shocked the conscience of the Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":356921,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,49853,87383,63897,6801,87382,71270,74830,74831],"class_list":["post-356886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-criminal-procedure-code-1973","tag-empty-arrest-form","tag-grounds-of-arrest","tag-illegal-arrest","tag-justice-gautam-a-ankhad","tag-justice-ravindra-v-ghuge","tag-reasons-of-arrest","tag-section-50-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Non-compliance of Sec 50 CrPC; Bom HC holds arrest illegal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court declared the arrest illegal where the police could not show any document to show that they had intimated the reasons of arrest in writing.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Empty Arrest Form, non- compliance of Section 50 of CrPC by the police; Bombay High Court upholds the arrest as illegal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court declared the arrest illegal where the police could not show any document to show that they had intimated the reasons of arrest in writing.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-18T09:00:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-22T04:40:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Empty Arrest Form, non- compliance of Section 50 of CrPC by the police; Bombay High Court upholds the arrest as illegal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/\",\"name\":\"Non-compliance of Sec 50 CrPC; Bom HC holds arrest illegal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-18T09:00:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-22T04:40:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court declared the arrest illegal where the police could not show any document to show that they had intimated the reasons of arrest in writing.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"S. 50 CrPC non-compliance arrest illegal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Empty Arrest Form, non- compliance of Section 50 of CrPC by the police; Bombay High Court upholds the arrest as illegal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Non-compliance of Sec 50 CrPC; Bom HC holds arrest illegal | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court declared the arrest illegal where the police could not show any document to show that they had intimated the reasons of arrest in writing.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Empty Arrest Form, non- compliance of Section 50 of CrPC by the police; Bombay High Court upholds the arrest as illegal","og_description":"Bombay High Court declared the arrest illegal where the police could not show any document to show that they had intimated the reasons of arrest in writing.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-18T09:00:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-22T04:40:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Empty Arrest Form, non- compliance of Section 50 of CrPC by the police; Bombay High Court upholds the arrest as illegal","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/","name":"Non-compliance of Sec 50 CrPC; Bom HC holds arrest illegal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-18T09:00:12+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-22T04:40:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay High Court declared the arrest illegal where the police could not show any document to show that they had intimated the reasons of arrest in writing.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"S. 50 CrPC non-compliance arrest illegal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/bom-hc-non-compiance-of-section-50-crpc-arrest-illegal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Empty Arrest Form, non- compliance of Section 50 of CrPC by the police; Bombay High Court upholds the arrest as illegal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-50-CrPC-non-compliance-arrest-illegal.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/09\/bombay-high-court-grants-interim-bail-chanda-kochhar-deepak-kochhar-reasons-of-arrest-in-arrest-memo-violative-of-mandate-of-section41-section41a-criminal-procedure-code-in-icici-videocon-loan-scam-ca\/","url_meta":{"origin":356886,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Reason to arrest after four years, not spelt out in the arrest memos&#8217;; Bombay High Court grants interim bail to Chanda Kochhar and husband Deepak Kochhar","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The reason given in the arrest memos to arrest the petitioners, having regard to the facts, appears to be casual, mechanical and perfunctory, clearly without application of mind. The grounds for arrest of the petitioners mentioned in the arrest memos clearly breach the mandatory provisions of Sections 41 and 41-A\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":334382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/04\/bomhc-declares-arrest-illegal-as-grounds-of-arrest-were-communicated-to-accuseds-wife-but-not-to-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":356886,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC declares arrest illegal as grounds of arrest were communicated to accused\u2019s wife but not to the accused","author":"Simranjeet","date":"November 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"From the arrest panchnama it is evident that the information is given to his wife on the cell number provided by petitioner-accused and apart from that there are no grounds of arrest mentioned in the arrest surrender form.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/16\/heres-why-gautam-navlakha-was-not-able-to-make-a-case-for-default-bail-before-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":356886,"position":2},"title":"Here&#8217;s why Gautam Navlakha was not able to make a case for default bail before the Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of UU Lalit and KM Joseph*, JJ has dismissed the bail plea of activist Gautam Navlakha arrested in relation to the Bhima Koregoan\u00a0riots\u00a0case. Allegedly,\u00a0some activists, including Navlakha, made inflammatory speeches and provocative statements at the Elgar Parishad meet in Pune on December 31, 2017, leading to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220890,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/15\/bhima-koregaon-case-sc-extends-gautam-navlakhas-interim-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":356886,"position":3},"title":"Bhima Koregaon case: SC extends Gautam Navlakha&#8217;s interim bail","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Court has extended the interim protection from arrest to activist Gautam Navlakha by four more weeks in Bhima Koregaon case. The two-judge bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra allowed him to approach trial court for pre-arrest bail. Navlakha has to apply for pre-arrest bail in the meantime.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296128,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/explained-madras-hc-db-chakravarthy-verdict-habeas-corpus-plea-by-senthil-balaji-wife-against-arrest\/","url_meta":{"origin":356886,"position":4},"title":"Madras HC split verdict in Habeas Corpus plea filed by Senthil Balaji&#8217;s wife against his arrest by ED: Decoding Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy&#8217;s opinion","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This report provides Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy opinion in the Habeas Corpus plea.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/21\/singapore-residents-arrest-illegal-as-detention-based-on-lookout-circular-violates-fundamental-rights-bomhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":356886,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Detention based on Look Out Circular amounts to arrest, violates fundamental rights\u2019; Bombay HC declares Singapore resident\u2019s arrest illegal","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The moment petitioner was intercepted by the Immigration officers around 10:00 pm, on 13-08-2024, allegedly based on a Look Out Circular, he was deprived of his liberty and he ceased to be free.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/356886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=356886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/356886\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/356921"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=356886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=356886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=356886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}