{"id":356806,"date":"2025-08-17T16:00:35","date_gmt":"2025-08-17T10:30:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=356806"},"modified":"2025-08-21T10:26:43","modified_gmt":"2025-08-21T04:56:43","slug":"pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Pending investigation against co-accused cannot be sole ground to deny bail to accused under Section 132 CGST Act: Punjab & Haryana HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> In the present case, two petitions were filed under Section 483<\/a> of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (\u2018BNSS\u2019) seeking regular bail in the case filed under Sections 132(1)(b)<\/a> and 132(1)(c)<\/a> of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017<\/a> (\u2018CGST Act\u2019). A Single Judge Bench of Harpreet Singh Brar, J.<\/span>, held that an accused in a complaint under Section 132<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a> could not be denied the concession of bail solely on the ground that the investigation remained pending against a co-accused. Thus, the Court released the petitioners on regular bail.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In the present case, an information was received from the Financial Investigation Unit in form of a Suspicious Transaction Report indicating substantial cash withdrawals of Rs 4,938.63 crore, from two branches of the IFSC Bank, i.e., Ambala Cantt and Panchkula. Petitioner 2 withdrew Rs 262.4 crore in cash from 8 bank accounts while Petitioner 1 withdrew Rs 455.02 crore from 11 bank accounts.<\/p>\n

The petitioners had created 27 fake firms, 2 of which were under Petitioner 2 while the remaining 25 were established by fraudulently obtaining IDs of other persons, though connected to his mobile number and email. When a search was conducted under Section 67(2)<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a>, a number of documents pertaining to fake GST billing as well as various electronic devies were recovered. On investigation, it was concluded that the petitioners issued forged and fabricated GST invoices worth approximately Rs 700 crore and availed input tax credit amounting to approximately Rs 107 crore based on the same.<\/p>\n

The petitioners contended that the respondent officials failed to abide by the grounds of arrest as the authorization for arrest under Section 69<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a> had been granted in a mechanical manner, without duly appreciating the material available against them. On the other hand, the respondents contended that the investigation against another co-accused remained pending and therefore, extending the benefit of bail to the petitioners would allow them to influence witnesses and tamper with the evidence.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court considered the departmental tax liability assessment under Sections 73<\/a> and 74<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a> as well as criminal prosecution for tax evasion under Section 132<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a> along with the affidavits submitted by the officers concerned and observed that since the implementation of GST Policy in 2017, in the States of Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory of Chandigarh, notices under Sections 73<\/a> and 74<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a> were served in very few cases. Further, the Court opined that it was understandable that economic offences required sophisticated investigation but the same could not go on indefinitely.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the involvement of the criminal justice system in cases pertaining to the CGST Act commenced at the stage of arrest and ended when bail was secured. Allowing such tendencies to go unchecked would raise serious doubts about the efficacy of investigation, which naturally weakens the faith of the public in the justice dispensation mechanism. Further, the Court stated that slow-paced trials stemming from complaints under Section 132<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a> and the departure from the established procedure in Sections 73<\/a> and 74<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a>, throughout the States of Punjab, Haryana as well as Union Territory of Chandigarh was symptomatic of a systemic problem which showed a concerning deviation from the procedure established by law.<\/p>\n

Further after considering that the petitioners had been in custody for 9 months 18 days while no substantial progress was made in the trial, the Court held that an accused in a complaint under Section 132<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a> could not be denied the concession of bail, solely on the ground that investigation remained pending against a co-accused.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that the respondent could not controvert the fact that the petitioners had clean antecedents and had fully cooperated in the investigation. Moreover, most of the evidence was in documentary and electronic form, which was already in possession of the investigating agency.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, both the petitions were allowed and petitioners were released on regular bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds\/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.<\/p>\n

[Manish Kumar v. GST Intelligence Directorate, 2025 SCC OnLine P&H 5530<\/a>, decided on 28-7-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate, Kashish Sahnia, Advocate, Arnav Ghai, Advocate, Muskaan Gupta, Advocate and Muskan Chauhan, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Sharmila Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel, Sunish Bindlish, Senior Standing Counsel, Pridhi Sandhu, Senior Standing Counsel CGST, Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor, U.T. Chandigarh and Alankrit Bharadwaj, Addl. P.P., U.T. Excise and Tax Department<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The involvement of criminal justice system in cases pertaining to CGST Act begins at the stage of arrest and ends when bail is secured. Allowing such tendencies to go unchecked will raise serious doubts about efficacy of investigation, which naturally weakens the faith of the public in justice dispensation mechanism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":356863,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[87332,68319,44494,76390,87330,2670,87329,87331],"class_list":["post-356806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bail-when-investigation-is-pending","tag-bnss-2023","tag-cgst-act-2017","tag-justice-harpreet-singh-brar","tag-pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-section-132-cgst-act","tag-section-132-cgst-act-bail"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC:Pending investigation no ground to deny bail|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that an accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act cannot be denied bail solely because investigation remained pending against co-accused.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pending investigation against co-accused cannot be sole ground to deny bail to accused under Section 132 CGST Act: Punjab & Haryana HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that an accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act cannot be denied bail solely because investigation remained pending against co-accused.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-17T10:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-21T04:56:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Pending investigation against co-accused cannot be sole ground to deny bail to accused under Section 132 CGST Act: Punjab & Haryana HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC:Pending investigation no ground to deny bail|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-17T10:30:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-21T04:56:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that an accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act cannot be denied bail solely because investigation remained pending against co-accused.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Pending investigation no ground to deny bail\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pending investigation against co-accused cannot be sole ground to deny bail to accused under Section 132 CGST Act: Punjab & Haryana HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC:Pending investigation no ground to deny bail|SCC Times","description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that an accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act cannot be denied bail solely because investigation remained pending against co-accused.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pending investigation against co-accused cannot be sole ground to deny bail to accused under Section 132 CGST Act: Punjab & Haryana HC","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that an accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act cannot be denied bail solely because investigation remained pending against co-accused.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-17T10:30:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-21T04:56:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Pending investigation against co-accused cannot be sole ground to deny bail to accused under Section 132 CGST Act: Punjab & Haryana HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/","name":"P&H HC:Pending investigation no ground to deny bail|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-17T10:30:35+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-21T04:56:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that an accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act cannot be denied bail solely because investigation remained pending against co-accused.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Pending investigation no ground to deny bail"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pending investigation against co-accused cannot be sole ground to deny bail to accused under Section 132 CGST Act: Punjab & Haryana HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":346101,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/19\/calcutta-high-court-grants-bail-gst-itc-arrest-without-adjudication-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":356806,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court grants bail in \u20b937.29 cr GST ITC fraud case involving arrest without adjudication","author":"Arunima","date":"April 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Memo of Arrest Served on the petitioner records that the arrest is based on the alleged wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to \u20b937.29 crores purportedly based on invoices raised without actual supply of goods","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/14\/del-hc-ss-69-and-132-of-cgst-act-valid-power-to-arrest-and-prosecute-ancillary-to-power-to-levy-and-collect-gst-read-hcs-detailed-analysis\/","url_meta":{"origin":356806,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | “Ss. 69 and 132 of CGST Act prima facie valid; Power to arrest and prosecute is prima facie ancillary to power to levy and collect GST”: Read HC’s detailed analysis","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Manmohan and Sanjeev Narula, JJ., upheld the validity of Sections 132 and 69 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and refused any interim relief to the petitioner. Petitioners submitted that Sections 69 and 132 of the Central Goods and Services\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/","url_meta":{"origin":356806,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected","author":"Editor","date":"March 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Narendra Singh Dhaddha rejected bail and dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Criminal Procedure Code i.e. Cr.P.C. relating to offence punishable under Sections 132 (1)(A), (F),(H),(I),(L) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 i.e. CGST\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":367206,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/raj-hc-refers-issue-of-conversion-of-arrest-warrants-into-bailable-warrants-to-larger-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":356806,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court: Can arrest warrants be converted into bailable warrants in economic\/heinous offences? Larger Bench to decide","author":"Editor","date":"November 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cJudicial decorum and legal propriety mandates that where a Single Bench or Division Bench does not agree with the decision of the Bench of co-ordinate jurisdiction, the matter should be referred to a Larger Bench.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Conversion of arrest warrants in bailable warrant","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Conversion-of-arrest-warrants-in-bailable-warrant.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Conversion-of-arrest-warrants-in-bailable-warrant.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Conversion-of-arrest-warrants-in-bailable-warrant.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Conversion-of-arrest-warrants-in-bailable-warrant.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292767,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/22\/punjab-haryana-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-husband-accused-of-making-and-sharing-obscene-video-of-wife-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":356806,"position":4},"title":"Husband accused of sharing wife’s \u2018obscene videos’ with partner in extra-marital affair; Punjab and Haryana High Court grants anticipatory bail","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"the Inquiry Officer found during pre-registration inquiry that the obscene videos were prepared by the complainant herself, but after registration of FIR, the Investigating Officer viewed that the videos and photographs were prepared by the husband on his own mobile in connivance with the co-accused.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220637,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/09\/two-persons-arrested-for-involving-in-fake-invoices-racket-fraudulently-availing-input-tax-credit\/","url_meta":{"origin":356806,"position":5},"title":"Two persons arrested for involving in fake invoices racket & fraudulently availing Input Tax Credit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Gurugram Zonal Unit (GZU), Haryana has arrested two persons who were found involved in fake invoices racket having a taxable value of Rs 931 crore and fraudulently passing\/ availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to Rs 127 crore through a complex web chain of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/356806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=356806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/356806\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/356863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=356806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=356806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=356806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}