{"id":356504,"date":"2025-08-13T11:30:37","date_gmt":"2025-08-13T06:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=356504"},"modified":"2025-08-14T16:41:21","modified_gmt":"2025-08-14T11:11:21","slug":"bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Sexually assaulting minor boys a heinous crime: Bombay HC denies bail"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a case where the applicant, accused of raping two minor boys, sought regular bail in connection with an FIR under Sections 377<\/a> and 506(II)<\/a> read with Section 34<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019), and under Sections 3<\/a>, 4<\/a>, 5(g)<\/a>, 6<\/a>, 7<\/a>, 8<\/a>, 9(g)<\/a>, 10<\/a>, 11(ii)<\/a>, 12<\/a>, 13<\/a>, 14<\/a>, 15<\/a> and 16<\/a> of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (\u2018POCSO Act\u2019), and Section 67-B<\/a> of the Information Technology Act, 2000<\/a> (\u2018IT Act\u2019), a Single Judge Bench of Madhav J. Jamdar<\/span>, J., held that the applicant could not be granted bail due to his active involvement in the serious and heinous crime of raping minors with sufficient material-on-record to establish a prima facie case against him.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

Two minor boys, (\u2018A\u2019 and \u2018B\u2019), aged 12 and 14 years, were allegedly gang raped by the applicant and other accused. An FIR was lodged by A\u2019s father wherein he stated that on 22-12-2021, around 01:00 a.m., police came to his house and showed him a video in which the applicant along with other accused, had forcibly detained his son in a room and had unnatural sex with him.<\/p>\n

A in his statement narrated that he was going to a shop when he was called in the house of an accused and B was already present there. B was beaten and was asked to sexually assault A, and later, A was gang raped. He was then given some money and threatened not to tell anyone about it. Similarly, B stated that he went to that house and was there when A was called in the house. He was forced to assault A and further revealed that A was gang raped.<\/p>\n

The applicant\u2019s counsel contended that the applicant was merely present when the incident took place and he did not play any role in the incident. He further submitted that the applicant was arrested on 22-12-2021 and till date there was no progress in the trial and demanded bail on the ground of long incarceration.<\/p>\n

The respondents\u2019 counsel strongly opposed the bail application and submitted that the material-on-record showed that the applicant had played a major role in the commission of crime and as the offence was very serious and heinous, he should not be enlarged on bail. It was further submitted that as the victims, other witnesses and the accused were staying in the same vicinity, there was a very high possibility of the accused pressurizing the witnesses.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n

The Court noted that this was the second bail application and the first was allowed to be withdrawn vide order dated 11-03-2024, where it was specifically observed that since this Court was not inclined to grant bail, the applicant had withdrawn his application. Thus, in effect the first bail application was dismissed on merits with the liberty to file a fresh application after one year if there was no substantial progress in the trial.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the evidence on record showed that the applicant forcibly brought the minor victims to the place where the incident took place. He threatened the victims and forced them to remove their clothes, compelled the victims to do the act and physically restrained them, thus, establishing his active participation in the incident in question. The Court opined that the offence was very serious and heinous, where victims-boys aged 12 and 14 years were sexually assaulted and subjected to gang rape. The medical report supported the prosecution case and the incident was also video graphed which showed that the applicant was involved in the crime. This was a serious case where three accused had sexually assaulted the minor boys. The Court pointed out that though there was no progress in the trial and even the charge was also not framed and the applicant was incarcerated since 22-12-2021, however, the material-on-record, prima facie, showed the applicant\u2019s involvement in the crime.<\/p>\n

As far as long incarceration is concerned, Section 436A<\/a> of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> provides that if the undertrial prisoner has completed one-half of the maximum period of imprisonment specified for such offence, then he shall be released on bail. The Court cited Hussainara Khatoon (IV)<\/span> v. Home Secy., State of Bihar<\/span>, (1980) 1 SCC 98<\/span><\/a>, where the right to speedy trial was declared a fundamental right of an undertrial prisoner and a part of right to life guaranteed under Article 21<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> and observed that Section 436A<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (\u2018CrPC\u2019), was enacted to ensure the protection of the said fundamental right of the undertrial prisoner.<\/p>\n

However, the Court referred to Vijay Madanlal Choudhary<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, (2023) 12 SCC 1<\/span><\/a>, and observed that as the offence was very serious and heinous and there was likelihood of the applicant pressurising the witnesses and as the minimum punishment which could be imposed on the applicant, if convicted, was 20 years, no case was made out for the grant of benefit under Section 436A<\/a> CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on Allahabad High Court Bar Assn.<\/span> v. State of U.P.<\/span>, (2024) 6 SCC 267<\/span><\/a>, where the Supreme Court had stated that in exceptional circumstances, directions can be issued for time bound disposal of the case, and consequently, issued the directions to the Trial Court to expedite the trial and to make an endeavour to conclude it within a period of one year.<\/p>\n

Further, the Court held that no case was made out for the grant of bail on merits and dismissed the applicant\u2019s bail application.<\/p>\n

[Nilesh Suryakant Netake v. State of Maharashtra, 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2835<\/a>, decided on 05-08-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Applicant:<\/span> Chaitanya Purankar.<\/p>\n

For the Respondents:<\/span> D. J. Haldankar, APP, Shanice Mansukhani.<\/p>\n

Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 \u00a0 HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"protection<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u00a0HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India \u00a0HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Though there was no progress in the trial and even the charge was also not framed and the applicant was incarcerated since 22-12-2021, however, the material on record prima facie showed the applicant’s involvement in the crime.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":356510,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,30131,80007,60142,31421,2572,30934,19501,50544,87132,6191],"class_list":["post-356504","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-gang-rape","tag-justice-madhav-j-jamdar","tag-long-incarceration","tag-protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012","tag-Rape","tag-section-34-ipc","tag-section-377-ipc","tag-section-436a-crpc","tag-section-67-b-information-technology-act-2000","tag-sexual-assault"],"yoast_head":"\nBombay HC: Bail denied in minor boys rape case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bail denied in minor boys rape case; Bombay High Court called the act serious and heinous\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sexually assaulting minor boys a heinous crime: Bombay HC denies bail\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bail denied in minor boys rape case; Bombay High Court called the act serious and heinous\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-13T06:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-14T11:11:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Sexually assaulting minor boys a heinous crime: Bombay HC denies bail\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC: Bail denied in minor boys rape case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-13T06:00:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-14T11:11:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bail denied in minor boys rape case; Bombay High Court called the act serious and heinous\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Bail denied in minor boys rape\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sexually assaulting minor boys a heinous crime: Bombay HC denies bail\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC: Bail denied in minor boys rape case | SCC Times","description":"Bail denied in minor boys rape case; Bombay High Court called the act serious and heinous","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sexually assaulting minor boys a heinous crime: Bombay HC denies bail","og_description":"Bail denied in minor boys rape case; Bombay High Court called the act serious and heinous","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-13T06:00:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-14T11:11:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Sexually assaulting minor boys a heinous crime: Bombay HC denies bail","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/","name":"Bombay HC: Bail denied in minor boys rape case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-13T06:00:37+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-14T11:11:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bail denied in minor boys rape case; Bombay High Court called the act serious and heinous","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Bail denied in minor boys rape"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/bom-hc-bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sexually assaulting minor boys a heinous crime: Bombay HC denies bail"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bail-denied-in-minor-boys-rape.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266935,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/would-kissing-on-lips-and-touching-private-parts-of-a-minor-be-an-offence-under-s-377-penal-code-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":356504,"position":0},"title":"Would kissing on lips and touching private parts of a minor be an offence under S. 377 Penal Code, 1860? Bom HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Anuja Prabhudessai, J., observed that touching private parts and kissing on the lips of a minor would not constitute to be an offence under Section 377 of Penal Code, 1860. An application was filed by the applicant who was facing trial for offences under Sections 377, 384\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253307,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/27\/rape-7\/","url_meta":{"origin":356504,"position":1},"title":"Chh HC | \u201cSexual intercourse by husband would not constitute an offence of rape even if it was by force or against her wish\u201d; Can a wife initiate proceedings against her husband for unnatural sex under S. 377 IPC?","author":"Editor","date":"August 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: N K Chandravanshi, J. partly allowed the revision petition by discharging the applicant of charge under Section 376 Penal Code, 1860 and upheld the charges framed under Sections 377 and 498\/34 Penal Code, 1860. The instant criminal revision was preferred by the applicants against the order dated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235823,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/15\/bom-hc-consent-induced-by-fiduciary-relationship-not-a-free-consent-bom-hc-while-refusing-bail-to-rape-accused-business-partner-of-victims-father\/","url_meta":{"origin":356504,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | “Consent induced by fiduciary relationship not a free consent”: Bom HC while refusing bail to rape accused business partner of victim’s father","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Bharati Dangre, J., while addressing a petition with regard to the rape of a minor girl, made an observation that: \"Rape\" is just not a forcible intercourse, it means to inhabit and destroy everything. A minor victim girl registered a complaint based on which offences for Sections 376,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/09\/bombay-high-court-invokes-repatriation-and-restoration-grants-bail-accused-juvenile-gangrape-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":356504,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC invokes principles of repatriation and restoration, and grants bail to a juvenile accused of gangrape","author":"Editor","date":"September 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In deciding the instant bail application filed by a juvenile applicant by invoking Section 12 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, the Bench of Bharati Dangre, J., while invoking the principles of repatriation and restoration, granted bail to the applicant. It was observed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291291,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/04\/pocso-act-not-to-punish-minors-in-consensual-relationships-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":356504,"position":4},"title":"POCSO Act not enacted to punish minors in romantic, consensual relationships: Bombay High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court allowed the instant application for bail while expressing concern that further detention of the applicant will bring him in the association of hardened criminals, which will be detrimental to his interest.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/04\/gang-rape-bom-hc-mere-fact-that-dna-report-does-not-support-paternity-is-no-ground-for-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":356504,"position":5},"title":"[Gang Rape] Bom HC | Mere fact that DNA report does not support paternity, is no ground for bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Bharati Dangre, J., rejected the bail application in view of the offence of gang rape against the applicant. Applicant was punishable for offences under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3, 4, 5(G), 5(J)(II), 6, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/356504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=356504"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/356504\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/356510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=356504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=356504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=356504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}