{"id":355990,"date":"2025-08-07T16:30:30","date_gmt":"2025-08-07T11:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=355990"},"modified":"2025-08-08T16:12:02","modified_gmt":"2025-08-08T10:42:02","slug":"bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> The present application was filed by the applicant-wife, who sought transfer of matrimonial proceedings initiated by her husband before the Family Court at Pune to the Civil Court, Senior Division, Kalamb, District Osmanabad, citing that she resided there and had no independent source of income. A Single Judge Bench of Kamal Khata, J., dismissed the plea, holding that the Transfer Application was a strategic attempt to delay the proceedings and such misuse of the process could not be permitted. The Court emphasised that the wife was at liberty to seek permission from the Family Court, Pune, to appear via video conferencing, and following the same, the husband should pay Rs 5000 per appearance towards her travel and related expenses.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The inter-caste marriage between the parties was solemnised on 05-04-2016 in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals. The wife contended that she was subjected to mental and physical cruelty by the husband and his parents. She further alleged that he was an alcoholic and had extramarital relations with another woman.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">She sought the transfer of the divorce proceedings initiated by her husband before the Family Court in Pune. Although she had attended a few hearings, she was now unable to continue the same as she was financially dependent on her parents and could not afford to travel to Pune. She submitted that the distance between Osmanabad and Pune was approximately 280 kms and travel was highly inconvenient given her health condition since she suffered from diabetes, hypertension, and piles, for which her doctor had advised her to avoid long-distance travel.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">She alleged that apart from physical hardship, each visit involved substantial financial expense, with one-way travel costing Rs 4000 to 5000, and the total expenses per visit aggregated to around Rs 10,000. It was further submitted that on instructions made, she was still willing to cohabit with her husband.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The husband on contrary argued that the Application was a tactical move intended to delay the proceedings, which were currently fixed for final hearing. He pointed out that he was employed in a private software company, was the sole earning member of his family, and was required to care for his ailing mother (as his father had passed), thereby, making travel to Osmanabad equally inconvenient and could jeopardize his job for being compelled to take leave to attend Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">He also presented the roznama of the Family Court, Pune, to show that the wife\u2019s Advocate had been appearing and that no prejudice would be caused to her if the matter was not transferred. He further submitted that the pendency of this Application had stalled the final adjudication, therefore, it would be entirely unjustifiable to transfer the proceedings at this stage. Moreover, it was alleged that the Family Court had video conferencing facilities she could avail, and whenever her physical presence was needed, he was willing to bear travel expenses of Rs 3000 per appearance. Though the Affidavit-in-Reply initially mentioned Rs 1500 to 2000, he submitted the balance of convenience favoured the husband, as the hardship caused to him far outweighed that of the wife who had no responsibilities to cater to.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the wife had admittedly appeared before the Family Court, Pune on multiple occasions and that the matter was slated for final arguments. The Court observed that the roznama revealed that she and her counsel had been afforded adequate opportunity to be heard and her conduct, as reflected in the record, suggested an intention to delay the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Abhilasha Gupta v. Harimohan Gupta<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5RK9MDAt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2021) 9 SCC 730<\/a>, wherein it was held that where the matter was at an advanced stage of trial, it ought not to be transferred. The Court further noted that the records suggested that the wife had been deliberately delaying the matter for over four years, and the delay in seeking setting aside of the &#8220;no written statement&#8221; order further demonstrated an intention to stall the proceedings despite being represented by counsel.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that she remained absent for nearly seven months thereafter and despite repeated opportunities, she failed to cooperate with the final hearing and her plea of financial hardship was also disbelieved, as it appeared to be a tactic to protract the matter. The Court emphasised that the Transfer Application was a strategic attempt to delay the proceedings, and such misuse of the process could not be permitted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the allegations in the Application were vague, unsupported by particulars, and at times self-contradictory, and, while alleging cruelty and harassment, she simultaneously expressed willingness to cohabit. The Court noted that the reference to \u201cparents\u201d was misleading, as the father-in-law was deceased and the husband resided only with his ailing mother. It was further pointed out that there was no explanation on her part for not seeking transfer earlier or for not availing the video conferencing facility.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court while dismissing her plea, emphasised that the inconvenience to the husband outweighed the inconvenience pleaded by the wife as her averments were unconvincing and lacked credibility. The Court further clarified that the wife was at liberty to seek permission from the Family Court, Pune to appear via video conferencing, and the Family Court should consider such a request on its own merits. The Court directed the husband to pay Rs 5000 towards her travel and related expenses whenever the Family Court required her personal presence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the Court directed the Family Court to conclude the proceedings within three months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Amruta v. Sachin, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lAO778TY\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2808<\/a>, decided on 01-08-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Applicant:<\/span> Abhishek Kulkarni, a\/w Sagar Wakale and R.S. Pere.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Ajinkya Udane, a\/w Vinayak Pandit and S. Mansoori.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The inconvenience to the husband outweighs the inconvenience pleaded by the wife as her averments are unconvincing and lack credibility.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":356002,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,86840,86837,86838,68895,30296,86839],"class_list":["post-355990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-delay-tactics-in-matrimonial-proceedings","tag-divorce-proceeding","tag-divorce-proceeding-transfer-application","tag-justice-kamal-khata","tag-matrimonial-proceedings","tag-unconvincing-averments"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay High Court denies transfer in divorce case over delay tactics | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"wife delay tactics divorce case, divorce proceeding transfer plea rejected, divorce case transfer plea unconvincing averments, delay tactics matrimonial proceedings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court dismissed a wife&#039;s plea to transfer divorce proceeding, citing delay tactics and permitted video conferencing with travel cost reimbursement.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-07T11:00:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-08T10:42:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay High Court denies transfer in divorce case over delay tactics | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-07T11:00:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-08T10:42:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"wife delay tactics divorce case, divorce proceeding transfer plea rejected, divorce case transfer plea unconvincing averments, delay tactics matrimonial proceedings\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay High Court denies transfer in divorce case over delay tactics | SCC Times","description":"wife delay tactics divorce case, divorce proceeding transfer plea rejected, divorce case transfer plea unconvincing averments, delay tactics matrimonial proceedings","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings","og_description":"Bombay High Court dismissed a wife's plea to transfer divorce proceeding, citing delay tactics and permitted video conferencing with travel cost reimbursement.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-07T11:00:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-08T10:42:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/","name":"Bombay High Court denies transfer in divorce case over delay tactics | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-07T11:00:30+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-08T10:42:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"wife delay tactics divorce case, divorce proceeding transfer plea rejected, divorce case transfer plea unconvincing averments, delay tactics matrimonial proceedings","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/07\/bom-hc-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case-over-delay-tactics\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cA delay tactic\u201d; Bombay High Court rejects wife\u2019s transfer plea in divorce proceedings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bombay-HC-denies-transfer-in-divorce-case.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":301921,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/20\/bombay-high-court-allows-transfer-of-divorce-case-for-diabetic-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":355990,"position":0},"title":"Bombay High Court allows transfer of divorce case for diabetic wife required to travel 468 Km","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court also acknowledged the husband\u2019s difficulty taking leave every now and then and allowed him to appear through video conferencing for the days when his physical presence is not required.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/12\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-allows-transfer-of-divorce-petition-based-upon-wifes-inconvenience-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":355990,"position":1},"title":"Explained| Andhra Pradesh HC allows transfer of divorce petition on account of wife&#8217;s inconvenience in a matrimonial proceeding","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife has to be considered than inconvenience of the husband. There are grounds to consider the request of the petitioner to transfer the petition.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246688,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/08\/family-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":355990,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | If a proceeding is pending before Family Court, would this warrant the application under S. 12 Domestic Violence Act to be transferred to Family Court? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., while addressing a matrimonial matter, highlighted the scope of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, PWDV Act provides for a complete mechanism for enforcement of the rights claimed under Section 12 of PWDV Act and merely because the rights as provided under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":130401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/12\/court-considers-irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage-as-a-valid-ground-for-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":355990,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC| &#8220;Delay in disposal of maintenance petitions is human (woman) suffering&#8221;","author":"Saba","date":"May 12, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of P. Devadass, J. directed Family Court Chennai to dispose of the interim petition of maintenance by throwing light on the sufferings that women and children have to undergo during such proceedings and due to the unnecessary delay in disposal. In the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":378045,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/11\/transfer-of-matrimonial-case-at-final-stage-trial-unsustainable-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":355990,"position":4},"title":"\u201cHighly Unjustified and Improper\u201d: Kerala HC sets aside transfer of matrimonial case at advance trial stage","author":"Sunaina","date":"March 11, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe wife stated that it would be serious prejudice to her in participating in the trial at the Kollam court centre, which was her workplace, and that the distance from her residence to Punalur, the court to which transfer was ordered, was 50 kilometres, whereas the distance from the husband\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"transfer of matrimonial case at final stage","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/transfer-of-matrimonial-case-at-final-stage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/transfer-of-matrimonial-case-at-final-stage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/transfer-of-matrimonial-case-at-final-stage.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/transfer-of-matrimonial-case-at-final-stage.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265608,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/19\/bombay-high-court-can-filing-of-a-maintenance-proceeding-a-criminal-case-for-harassment-be-said-to-be-sufficient-to-jump-to-a-conclusion-that-wife-intended-to-harass-husband-and-his-relations\/","url_meta":{"origin":355990,"position":5},"title":"Can filing of a maintenance proceeding, a criminal case for harassment be said to be sufficient to jump to a conclusion that wife intended to harass husband and his relations? Bom HC throws light","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In a matter of matrimonial discord, Mangesh S. Patil, J., expressed that, when admittedly, for whatever reason, there was a marital discord and the wife had started residing with the infant child at her parental house barely within three years of her marriage, it cannot be expected\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355990"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355990\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/356002"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}