{"id":355786,"date":"2025-08-06T11:00:03","date_gmt":"2025-08-06T05:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=355786"},"modified":"2025-08-12T09:29:11","modified_gmt":"2025-08-12T03:59:11","slug":"accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution could invite disciplinary action\u2019; Allahabad HC pulls up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a Public Interest Litigation (\u2018PIL\u2019) filed regarding a Gaon Sabha land, the Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">J.J. Munir<\/span>, J., rebuked the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Koil, Aligarh (\u2018SDM\u2019), for adjourning a case due to a Bar resolution whereby Advocates had abstained from their professional duties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">An appeal was filed by respondent 5 against an order passed by the SDM before the Commissioner, Aligarh, under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001677483\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34(4)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862348\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006<\/a> (\u2018the Code\u2019), in the present PIL. Since the appeal was not maintainable, it was dismissed by the Commissioner. Aggrieved, respondent 5 filed a restoration application (\u2018the application\u2019) before the SDM under Section 38(2) of the Code. \u00a0On the day of the hearing for the application, i.e., 25-07-2025, since Advocates were abstaining from work, no Advocate appeared to press the application, and the matter was adjourned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Noting the aforesaid adjournment, the Court reiterated that any kind of abstinence from professional duty on a call by the Bar Association was absolutely illegal and non-est. In this regard, the Court referred to the decisions of the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Harish Uppal (Ex-Capt.) v. Union of India<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7VeM9qzQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2003) 2 SCC 45<\/a>, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Vt5Cj06G\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2006) 9 SCC 295<\/a>, and other landmark cases.<\/p>\n<p>The Court stated that if no one appeared to press the restoration application and there was a resolution by the Bar, the Court could not have sided with the resolution and fallen foul of the law laid down by the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">\u201cAccepting a strike resolution may amount to misconduct on the Presiding Officer&#8217;s part, inviting recommendation for disciplinary action against the concerned officer, who adjourns the case in deference to a resolution of the Bar asking members to abstain from their professional duties in Court.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further added that such office bearers might also be removed from office.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court directed the SDM to show cause via an affidavit regarding why appropriate action may not be taken against her in the matter on account of adjourning the case in deference to a Bar resolution asking their members to abstain from their professional duties. The Court further directed the SDM to furnish particulars of the Bar Association, its President, and Secretary, on whose call the Advocates abstained from their professional duties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ashok Kumar v. State of U.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/dwk4l45G\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine All 4684<\/a>, decided on 28-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Mohd Haleem and Nishi Sengar<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> C.S.C. and Krishna Kant Singh<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Accepting a strike resolution may amount to misconduct on the Presiding Officer&#8217;s part inviting recommendation for disciplinary action against the concerned officer, who adjourns the case in deference to a resolution of the Bar asking members to abstain from their professional duties in Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":355797,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[86726,86727,86725,86728,2822,5061,49391],"class_list":["post-355786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-accepting-advocatess-strike","tag-accepting-bar-councils","tag-accepting-bars","tag-accepting-bars-strike-resolution","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-disciplinary-action","tag-judicial-misconduct"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct: All HC| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC pulled up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike holding that accepting Bar\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution could invite disciplinary action\u2019; Allahabad HC pulls up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC pulled up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike holding that accepting Bar\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-06T05:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-12T03:59:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution could invite disciplinary action\u2019; Allahabad HC pulls up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct: All HC| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-06T05:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-12T03:59:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC pulled up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike holding that accepting Bar\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Accepting Bar\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution could invite disciplinary action\u2019; Allahabad HC pulls up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct: All HC| SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC pulled up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike holding that accepting Bar\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution could invite disciplinary action\u2019; Allahabad HC pulls up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike","og_description":"Allahabad HC pulled up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike holding that accepting Bar\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-06T05:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-12T03:59:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution could invite disciplinary action\u2019; Allahabad HC pulls up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/","name":"Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct: All HC| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-06T05:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-12T03:59:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Allahabad HC pulled up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike holding that accepting Bar\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Accepting Bar\u2019s strike resolution may be judicial misconduct"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/accepting-bar-councils-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct-all-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Accepting Bar Council\u2019s strike resolution could invite disciplinary action\u2019; Allahabad HC pulls up Aligarh SDM over adjourning case due to advocates\u2019 strike"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Accepting-Bars-strike-resolution-may-be-judicial-misconduct.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":301403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/purpose-cases-not-to-provide-livelihood-lawyer-monthly-disposal-quota-judges-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":355786,"position":0},"title":"Purpose of cases is not to provide livelihood for lawyers or monthly disposal quota to Judges; Allahabad HC condemns lawyers&#8217; strike","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that considering the ongoing strike of lawyers for the last several days, despite positive intervention made by this Court, simply passing over this case would add burden to this Court, and it would not be possible to cope up with the situation as the list of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301215,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/11\/allahabad-hc-forms-judicial-committee-up-bar-council-grievances-hapur-lathi-charge\/","url_meta":{"origin":355786,"position":1},"title":"[Hapur lathi charge incident] Allahabad HC forms Judicial Committee to look into UP Bar Council\u2019s grievances","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court also directed SIT, already constituted by the State Government to intimate about the action taken on the first information reports lodged by lawyers in respect of the incident, while submitting its interim report.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/29\/west-bengal-bar-council-resolution-to-observe-black-day-not-to-be-treated-as-mandate-says-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":355786,"position":2},"title":"West Bengal Bar Council Black Day Resolution not a mandate for Advocates to abstain from work: Calcutta High Court","author":"Editor","date":"June 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court said that no coercive measures or disciplinary action would be taken against advocates who appear before courts for the interest of their clients.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259857,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/11\/members-of-the-bar-are-free-to-hold-a-meeting-to-condole-the-demise-of-any-member-or-anyone-else-but-they-do-not-have-the-right-to-obstruct-the-functioning-of-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":355786,"position":3},"title":"Strikes by Advocates | To condole demise of any member or anyone else, can Members of Bar obstruct functioning of Courts? All HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: J.J. Munir, J., expressed that, The Members of the Bar are free to hold a meeting to condole the demise of any member or anyone else, but they do not have the right to obstruct the functioning of Courts. On 17-12-2021, an order was passed requiring the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6326,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/notice-issued-to-the-vice-chancellor-of-aligarh-muslim-university\/","url_meta":{"origin":355786,"position":4},"title":"Notice issued to the Vice Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 19, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: While hearing a PIL instituted by law students of different universities against the decision of Vice Chancellor of the Aligarh Muslim University which disallowed access to undergraduate women students to the main library situated in the campus of the University on the ground that it will be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357193,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/20\/all-hc-expresses-surprise-on-68-adjournments-due-to-bar-council-strikes\/","url_meta":{"origin":355786,"position":5},"title":"\u201cRevenue proceedings pending endlessly, poor litigants only able to file writ petitions\u201d: Allahabad HC expresses surprise over 68 adjournments due to Bar Council strikes","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is surprising that out of the 102 dates fixed in the case, on 68 dates the case was adjourned due to calls for boycott or condolence by the local bar association.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"68 Adjournments","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/68-Adjournments.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/68-Adjournments.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/68-Adjournments.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/68-Adjournments.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355786"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355786\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/355797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355786"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}