{"id":355717,"date":"2025-08-05T16:30:22","date_gmt":"2025-08-05T11:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=355717"},"modified":"2025-08-11T17:22:15","modified_gmt":"2025-08-11T11:52:15","slug":"no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"[NDPS Act] Detention solely on presumption that heroin is likely be found in accused\u2019s blood sample not permissible: Himachal Pradesh HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/span> The petitioner filed the present petition seeking regular bail in a first information report (\u2018FIR\u2019) registered for the offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570293\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570304\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">29<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985<\/a> (\u2018NDPS Act\u2019), for being present when the police recovered narcotics from the co-accused&#8217;s house. A Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rakesh Kainthla<\/span>, J., while granting bail to the petitioner, observed that the police must connect the person with the commission of a crime before his detention could be justified and thus, a person could not be detained solely on the assumption that some incriminating substance would be found against him.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 08-07-2025, the police, while on patrolling duty, received a credible information at 04:45 p.m., that two people were selling heroin from their house and if search was conducted, a huge quantity of heroin could be recovered. It was reduced to writing and sent to the Supervisory Officer. The police went to the house where one of the suspects and the petitioner were present. Upon searching the house, a burnt currency note of Rs 10 kept under the mattress, a bundle of currency notes worth Rs 44,000 and a pouch containing 45.350 grams of heroin was recovered. The police arrested the suspect and the petitioner. The substance was sent to FSL, and the report was awaited. The petitioner and the co-accused revealed during the interrogation that they were heroin addicts and used to purchase it from a supplier who could not be located.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner\u2019s counsel submitted that the recovery was affected from the house owned by the co-accused and the petitioner was only a casual visitor, and he had not been connected to the commission of crime. He relied upon this Court\u2019s judgment in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shubham Bitalu<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of H.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FF946931\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">2020 SCC OnLine HP 293<\/span>,<\/a> wherein it was laid down that \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">mere presence in the house, without other evidence implicating the petitioners, or pointing out that they were regular visitors to the said house, would entitle them to a grant of bail<\/span>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Additional Advocate General submitted that the police had taken the blood samples of the petitioner and the co-accused and sent them to FSL for analysis, the result of which was still awaited. The petitioner also had criminal antecedents as an FIR was already registered against him. It was further contended that the petitioner was found in possession of heroin and would indulge in the commission of a similar offence if he was released on bail.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ajwar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Waseem<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3A78lomD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(2024) 10 SCC 768<\/span><\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that \u201cw<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">hile considering whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the manner in which the crime was alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the accused, the criminal antecedents of the accused, the probability of tampering of the witnesses and repeating the offence, if the accused were released on bail, the likelihood of the accused being unavailable in the event bail was granted, the possibility of obstructing the proceedings and evading the courts of justice and the overall desirability of releasing the accused on bail\u201d.<\/span> This position was reiterated in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ramratan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Vg772wmm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 3068<\/span><\/a>, and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shabeen Ahmad<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/r8993C4o\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(2025) 4 SCC 172.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that there was nothing to connect the petitioner with the commission of the crime except his visit to the house and relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shubham Bitalu<\/span> (supra) wherein it was held that a casual visitor to the home could not, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span>, be attributed with the knowledge of the presence of narcotics kept inside the house.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court in relation to the prosecution\u2019s heavy reliance upon the statement made by the petitioner and the co-accused that they had purchased the heroin for their self-consumption from a supplier, referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Surinder Kumar Khanna<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Directorate of Revenue Intelligence<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ryMF0x97\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(2018) 8 SCC 271<\/span><\/a>, where the Supreme Court had observed that a confession made by a co-accused could not be taken as a substantive piece of evidence against another co-accused and could only be utilized to lend assurance to the other evidence. Subsequently, in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Tofan Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of T.N.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DAj7rD02\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(2021) 4 SCC 1<\/span>,<\/a> the Supreme Court held that a confession made to a police officer during the investigation was hit by Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516766\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">25<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>, and was not saved by the provisions of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570358\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NDPS Act<\/a>. Thus, the Court concluded that no advantage could be derived by the prosecution from the confessional statement made by the co-accused implicating the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court stated that it was difficult to appreciate the submission that the blood sample sent to the FSL was likely to indicate the presence of heroin. The Court opined that the police must connect the person with the commission of a crime before his detention could be justified and it was impermissible to detain the petitioner in custody on mere presumption of presence of heroin in the blood sample. Regarding the petitioner\u2019s criminal antecedents, the Court observed that they would have been relevant if the prosecution had established a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> case against the petitioner and since such a case was not made out, the petitioner could not be detained in custody based on mere criminal antecedents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the Court allowed the petition and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs 1,00,000 with one surety of the like amount.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Mahesh Thakur v. State of H.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6f2o9jI8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine HP 3441<\/a>, decided on 29-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Peeyush Verma, Senior Advocate, with Anuj Bali, Advocate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;In the present case, Additional Advocate General contended that the police had taken the blood samples of the petitioner and the co-accused and had sent them to FSL for analysis, the result of which was still awaited.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":355731,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[86689,9841,86688,86690,86686,86685,32360,86687,2929,64495,51407,31118,37694,86410],"class_list":["post-355717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-blood-sample-heroin-presence","tag-criminal-antecedents","tag-detention-on-heroin-in-blood","tag-detention-on-presuming-heroin-in-blood","tag-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-in-blood","tag-fsl-analysis","tag-heroin","tag-heroin-in-blood-sample","tag-Himachal_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-justice-rakesh-kainthla","tag-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985","tag-narcotics","tag-section-21-ndps-act","tag-section-29-ndps-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No detention on presumption of heroin in blood sample: HP HC |SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore the ruling where Himachal Pradesh High Court held that detention on presumption of heroin in blood was impermissible\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[NDPS Act] Detention solely on presumption that heroin is likely be found in accused\u2019s blood sample not permissible: Himachal Pradesh HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore the ruling where Himachal Pradesh High Court held that detention on presumption of heroin in blood was impermissible\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-05T11:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-11T11:52:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[NDPS Act] Detention solely on presumption that heroin is likely be found in accused\u2019s blood sample not permissible: Himachal Pradesh HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/\",\"name\":\"No detention on presumption of heroin in blood sample: HP HC |SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-05T11:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-11T11:52:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Explore the ruling where Himachal Pradesh High Court held that detention on presumption of heroin in blood was impermissible\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"detention on presumption of heroin in blood\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[NDPS Act] Detention solely on presumption that heroin is likely be found in accused\u2019s blood sample not permissible: Himachal Pradesh HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No detention on presumption of heroin in blood sample: HP HC |SCC Times","description":"Explore the ruling where Himachal Pradesh High Court held that detention on presumption of heroin in blood was impermissible","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[NDPS Act] Detention solely on presumption that heroin is likely be found in accused\u2019s blood sample not permissible: Himachal Pradesh HC","og_description":"Explore the ruling where Himachal Pradesh High Court held that detention on presumption of heroin in blood was impermissible","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-05T11:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-11T11:52:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[NDPS Act] Detention solely on presumption that heroin is likely be found in accused\u2019s blood sample not permissible: Himachal Pradesh HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/","name":"No detention on presumption of heroin in blood sample: HP HC |SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-05T11:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-11T11:52:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Explore the ruling where Himachal Pradesh High Court held that detention on presumption of heroin in blood was impermissible","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"detention on presumption of heroin in blood"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/no-detention-on-presumption-of-heroin-presence-in-accuseds-blood-sample-hp-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[NDPS Act] Detention solely on presumption that heroin is likely be found in accused\u2019s blood sample not permissible: Himachal Pradesh HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-1-74.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273645,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/","url_meta":{"origin":355717,"position":0},"title":"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In an appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) r\/w Section 36-B of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985 (\u2018NDPS Act') to set aside the conviction and sentence rendered by the Trial Court, G. Jayachandran, J. has set aside the conviction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219886,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/23\/hp-hc-22-year-old-student-granted-bail-for-offence-committed-under-s-21-ndps-act-as-there-might-be-a-possibility-for-him-to-reform-and-curb-his-drug-addiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":355717,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | 22 year old student granted bail for offence committed under S. 21 NDPS Act as there might be a possibility for him to reform and curb his drug addiction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. granted bail to a 22 year old student for an offence committed under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. As per the averments made by him, the petitioner claimed to be innocent and that he was falsely implicated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310252,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/28\/hp-hc-denies-bail-to-man-accused-of-committing-offence-u-s-14-of-the-foreigners-act-1946-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":355717,"position":2},"title":"No right to remain on Indian soil, if visa expires; Himachal Pradesh HC denies bail to man accused of committing offence u\/s 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946","author":"Editor","date":"December 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAs per the result of the analysis, the substance found in the possession of the petitioner was confirmed to be heroin. Since, the petitioner did not produce passposrt and visa, offence under Foreigners Act, 1946 is added.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378592,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/17\/important-ndps-judgments-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":355717,"position":3},"title":"Top NDPS Judgments of 2025: Bail, Detention, Evidence &amp; Procedural Safeguards","author":"Shriya Singh","date":"March 17, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A consolidated look at how Supreme Court and High Courts interpreted the NDPS Act in 2025 \u2014 from bail and procedural safeguards to detention, evidence standards and evolving issues around possession, quantity, FSL reports, and foreign nationals.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NDPS judgments 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346710,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/29\/mere-assertions-or-absence-of-recovery-from-accused-insufficient-when-nexus-with-narcotic-network-prima-facie-exists-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":355717,"position":4},"title":"Mere assertions or absence of recovery of narcotics from accused insufficient when nexus with narcotic network prima facie exists: Delhi High Court","author":"Arushi","date":"April 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that accused prima facie seems to be involved in organized narcotic network and has been frequently in touch with the main supplier of the contraband and with the receiver of the contraband.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/13\/ndps-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":355717,"position":5},"title":"Unmasking the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Explainer on certain provisions]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Devika Sharma\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/marijuana.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/marijuana.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/marijuana.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/marijuana.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/marijuana.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355717\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/355731"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}