{"id":355423,"date":"2025-08-02T15:30:07","date_gmt":"2025-08-02T10:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=355423"},"modified":"2025-08-04T17:42:53","modified_gmt":"2025-08-04T12:12:53","slug":"cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> The petitioner approached the Court seeking quashing of criminal proceedings arising from an FIR lodged over alleged workplace harassment, which had resulted in a chargesheet under Section 509<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019). The allegations pertained to incidents between 2016-2017, reported over a year after the complainant\u2019s resignation. A Single Judge Bench of Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee<\/span>, J., while allowing the petition, held that only using the words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d, did not demonstrate the requisite intention or knowledge which could lead to the conclusion that any alleged act of the petitioner constituted an insult to the complainant\u2019s modesty. The Court emphasised that mere harassment at workplace or abusing her at workplace might not constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC, unless essential ingredients were fulfilled.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The complainant filed an FIR in October 2018 alleging that she was subjected to harassment and severe bullying at her workplace by the petitioner and his female crony. Initially registered under Sections 354 and 114 IPC, after completion of investigation, the investigating agency submitted charge sheet under Section 509 IPC. The petitioner argued that the instant FIR was lodged with a view to spite him because of a private and personal grudge such as professional rivalry, strenuous relation and with an oblique motive of implicating him in long and arduous criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n

The complainant also filed a complaint with the Internal Complaints Committee (\u2018ICC\u2019) of her former employer, alleging sexual harassment by the petitioner on her in terms of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013<\/a> (\u2018Act of 2013\u2019). However, although the ICC was time-barred, it conducted a detailed and thorough enquiry into the allegations levelled against the petitioner, but since no evidence could be gathered against him, the ICC exonerated him of all charges.<\/p>\n

The complainant contended that she was publicly abused, humiliated and harassed causing her mental agony that affected her health. She further alleged that the petitioner was a habitual offender, and several instances of the same kind of allegation had been levelled against him. It was argued that if a delinquent had been discharged from the departmental proceeding at the instance of the internal committee, the same discharge could not be a ground for quashing of the criminal proceeding arising out of a same cause of action because two proceedings were separate.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n

The Court examined the ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC and observed that to constitute such an offence, there must be an allegation that the action complained of had insulted the modesty of some particular woman or women and not merely of any class or order or section of women, however small. The Court noted that the FIR, the charge sheet and materials collected during investigation did not suggest any specific details of the words, sounds or gesture by which the petitioner allegedly insulated her modesty, nor it suggested how and when he intruded upon the complainant\u2019s modesty.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the complainant gave no probable explanation for the one-year delay in lodging the FIR. Moreover, the police could not seize documents or collect cogent evidence to support essential ingredients. Also, the FIR and investigation materials, including the statements recorded under Section 161<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> lacked any allegation of sound, gesture, or object exhibition. The Court further noted that the complainant only stated that the petitioner abused her during 2016\u20142017 but did not specify the nature of harassment or abuse, even before the Magistrate, to determine if a prima facie offence under Section 509 IPC was made out.<\/p>\n

The Court emphasised that unless there had been reference to specific words used, contextual details or any gesture, it was hardly possible to demonstrate that the petitioner had criminal intent to insult the modesty and\/or to establish any case against the petitioner. The Court highlighted that mere using the words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d, did not demonstrate the requisite intention or knowledge which could lead to the conclusion that any alleged act of the petitioner constituted an insult to the complainant\u2019s modesty.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on Radheshyam Kejriwal v. State of West Bengal, (2011) 3 SCC 581<\/a>, wherein it was held that in case of exoneration (adjudication proceeding\/departmental proceeding) on merits where allegation was found to be not sustainable and person held innocent, criminal prosecution on the same set of fact and circumstances could not be allowed to continue underlying principle being the higher standard of proof in criminal cases. The Court further emphasised that since it was not disputed that the allegations in both proceedings were identical and the petitioner was exonerated on merit, continuing the trial would be an abuse of the process of the court.<\/p>\n

The Court, while quashing the pending criminal proceeding allowed the petition, holding that to establish mens rea something better than vague statement was to be produced before the Court.<\/p>\n

[X v. State of West Bengal, 2025 SCC OnLine Cal 6172<\/a>, decided on 28-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Ayan Bhattacharjee, Senior Advocate, Md. Zohaib Rauf<\/p>\n

For the Opposite Parties:<\/span> Prasenjit Mukherjee, Saptarshi Chakraborty, Rajdeep Bosu, Debasish Roy, PP, Sreyashee Biswas, Puja Goswami<\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Mere using the words “harassed” or “abused”, in the overall conspectus of the case, does not demonstrate the requisite intention or knowledge which can lead to the conclusion that any alleged act of the petitioner constitutes an insult to the complainant’s modesty.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":355458,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,14131,44522,60251,44974,86514,86515,50918,32964,39728,73565,44393],"class_list":["post-355423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-departmental-enquiry","tag-internal-complaints-committee","tag-justice-ajoy-kumar-mukherjee","tag-mental-harassment","tag-mere-gestures","tag-mere-words","tag-outraging-modesty","tag-section-354-ipc","tag-section-509-ipc","tag-vague-allegations","tag-workplace-harassment"],"yoast_head":"\nCal HC: Mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under S. 509 IPC | SCC Times | SCC times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court explained the ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC and held that mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under Section 509 IPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court explained the ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC and held that mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under Section 509 IPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-02T10:00:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-04T12:12:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-02T10:00:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-04T12:12:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":878,\"commentCount\":11,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Calcutta High Court\",\"Departmental enquiry\",\"Internal Complaints Committee\",\"Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee\",\"Mental Harassment\",\"mere gestures\",\"mere words\",\"Outraging Modesty\",\"Section 354 IPC\",\"Section 509 IPC\",\"vague allegations\",\"workplace harassment\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cal HC: Mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under S. 509 IPC | SCC Times | SCC times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-02T10:00:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-04T12:12:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court explained the ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC and held that mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under Section 509 IPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/02\\\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cal HC: Mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under S. 509 IPC | SCC Times | SCC times","description":"Calcutta High Court explained the ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC and held that mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under Section 509 IPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC","og_description":"Calcutta High Court explained the ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC and held that mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under Section 509 IPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-02T10:00:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-04T12:12:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC","datePublished":"2025-08-02T10:00:07+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-04T12:12:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/"},"wordCount":878,"commentCount":11,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp","keywords":["Calcutta High Court","Departmental enquiry","Internal Complaints Committee","Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee","Mental Harassment","mere gestures","mere words","Outraging Modesty","Section 354 IPC","Section 509 IPC","vague allegations","workplace harassment"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/","name":"Cal HC: Mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under S. 509 IPC | SCC Times | SCC times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-02T10:00:07+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-04T12:12:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Calcutta High Court explained the ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC and held that mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence under Section 509 IPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Mere allegations of workplace harassment not offence"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/cal-hc-mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence-under-section-509-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court: Vague allegations of workplace harassment by merely using words \u201charassed\u201d or \u201cabused\u201d insufficient to constitute offence under Section 509 IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Mere-allegations-of-workplace-harassment-not-offence.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-mere-allegations-of-pressure-or-harassment-at-workplace-will-not-suffice-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-306-ipc-proof-of-instigation-and-abetment-is-necessary\/","url_meta":{"origin":355423,"position":0},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court | Mere allegations of pressure or harassment at workplace will not suffice to attract ingredients of S. 306 IPC; Proof of instigation and abetment is necessary","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Andhra Pradesh High Court: Subba Reddy Satti J. granted anticipatory bail to the Chief Executing Officer (applicant-accused) as on perusal of complaint there was no sign of instigation and abetment and mere allegation of harassment will not attract offence under Section 306 Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') unless such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242338,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/16\/cal-hc-can-a-complaint-under-posh-act-be-filed-against-person-of-same-gender-read-hcs-full-analysis\/","url_meta":{"origin":355423,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | Can a complaint under POSH Act be filed against person of same gender? Read HC’s full analysis","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"[Sexual harassment] can be perpetrated by the members of any gender, even inter se.\" Calcutta High Court: Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J. held that a complaint under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 [\"POSH Act\"], is maintainable even against \"a person\" belonging to the same\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":355423,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment ‘mentally and physically’ not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), a Division Bench of Vibha Kankanwadi and Rajesh S Patil,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225470,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/11\/bom-hc-allegations-of-cruelty-and-harassment-in-absence-of-specific-details-would-not-attract-to-ingredients-of-ss-304b-and-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":355423,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Allegations of Cruelty and Harassment, in absence of specific details, would not attract ingredients of Ss. 304B and 498-A IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and V.G. Bisht, JJ., dismissed the criminal appeal on finding the trial court\u2019s decision which was challenged to be in consonance with evidence on record. A criminal appeal was filed by the deceased\u2019s father (Informant) against the judgment and order that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/17\/priya-ramani\/","url_meta":{"origin":355423,"position":4},"title":"#MeToo | MJ Akbar v. Priya Ramani: Woman has a right to put her grievance at any platform of her choice even after decades || No defamation case against Priya Ramani [Verdict]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Sometimes the victim of sexual abuse herself does not understand what is happening to them or what is happening to them is wrong.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/6A15B324-96D4-4002-BB98-A7E91540FEEE-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/6A15B324-96D4-4002-BB98-A7E91540FEEE-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/6A15B324-96D4-4002-BB98-A7E91540FEEE-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/6A15B324-96D4-4002-BB98-A7E91540FEEE-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/6A15B324-96D4-4002-BB98-A7E91540FEEE-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/misuse-s468a-ipc-has-unleashed-a-new-legal-terrorism-calcutta-hc-quashes-criminal-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":355423,"position":5},"title":"Misuse of Section 498A IPC has unleashed a new \u201clegal Terrorism\u201d: Calcutta High Court quashes criminal proceedings","author":"Ritu","date":"August 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While pointing out the misuse of Section 498A of the IPC, the Calcutta High Court quashed the criminal proceedings on the grounds of insufficient evidence and misuse of the law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355423"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355423\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/355458"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}