{"id":355408,"date":"2025-08-02T14:30:21","date_gmt":"2025-08-02T09:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=355408"},"modified":"2025-08-08T15:39:55","modified_gmt":"2025-08-08T10:09:55","slug":"kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/","title":{"rendered":"No Relief for Kangana Ranaut: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC dismisses plea in defamation case linked to farmers\u2019 protest tweet"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by Kangana Ranaut under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (\u2018CrPC\u2019) seeking quashing of criminal complaint filed by the complainant under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561851\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">499<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">500<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019), a Single Judge Bench of Tribhuvan Dahiya J. dismissed the same and stated that she failed to demonstrate how her retweet was made in good faith.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the complainant belonged to an agricultural family, and income from agriculture was their only source of livelihood. Following the enactment of certain new laws by the Central Government concerning agriculturists, farmers in the States of Punjab and Haryana staged widespread protests. The complainant&#8217;s family actively participated in these protests under the banner of various farmers&#8217; unions. Despite her advanced age, the complainant also travelled to Delhi to take part in the agitation. However, Kangana made a retweet consisting of her own comment about the complainant, i.e, \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ha ha ha she is the same dadi who featured in Time magazine for being the most powerful Indian\u2026. And she is available in 100 rupees. Pakistani jurno\u2019s have hijacked international PR for India in an embarrassing way. We need our own people to speak for us internationally<\/span>\u201d. Along with the retweet, she had also shared someone\u2019s tweet carrying the complainant\u2019s photograph.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, a defamation complaint was filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bathinda. The statement of the complainant was recorded in preliminary evidence. The report from the Director, Twitter Communications India Pvt. Ltd. (\u2018TCIPL\u2019) as to whether the alleged tweet has been made by Kangana or not was called for. However, the report wasn\u2019t received. Upon hearing the complainant, she was summoned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Kangana contented that she made the retweet in good faith, without any intention to harm the complainant\u2019s reputation, the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">mens rea<\/span> was absent. Further, she was entitled to the benefit of Ninth and Tenth Exception to Section 499 IPC which was not even looked into by the Magistrate on the ground that it could not be done at the time of issuing process. Further, it was also contended that the summoning order was not sustainable as it was violative of Section 202 of the CrPC. Furthermore, it was contended that the complaint was mala fide as the complainant had chosen to file it only against Kangana and not the person whose tweet she had re-tweeted.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering Section 202 of the CrPC, the Court held that out of the two options available under Section 202 of the CrPC., i.e., either to inquire into the case himself or direct investigation by a police officer or any other person, the Magistrate opted for the former and after due application of mind took cognizance of the offence vide the impugned order. Before calling for a report from the company\u2019s Director, it was not recorded that the preliminary evidence was insufficient to issue process. This makes it apparent that the report was called only to facilitate the inquiry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After examining the Ninth and Tenth Exception to Section 499 of the IPC, the Court held that in the present case, the Magistrate was mandatorily required to consider whether these Exceptions were attracted in her case. However, further stated that there was no explicit bar on the Magistrate precluding him from considering whether any of the Exceptions protected Kangana to be summoned but such non-consideration by itself would not render the order issuing process illegal. The Court observed that it was not a case that the complaint, supporting documents as well as the statements of witnesses before the Magistrate established that Kangana was entitled to the benefit of Ninth and Tenth Exception to Section 499 of the IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that Kangana could not show even <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> as to how imputations in the retweet could be said to have been made by her in good faith for protection of her own interest or of anyone else, nor could it be said for public good.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also said that merely because the Magistrate wrongly mentioned the Kangana\u2019s retweet as tweet in the impugned order, it could not be said that the order was a result of non-application of mind.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, the Court held that just because the complainant had filed a complaint only against Kangana and not against the person to whom the original tweet was attributed to, in itself could not be a ground to contend that the complaint was mala fide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kangana Ranaut v. Mahinder Kaur, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1S0WjmU3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 4861<\/a>, decided on 1-8-2025.<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Abhinav Sood, Advocate, Anmol Gupta, Advocate, Achintaya Soni, Advocate, Mehndi Singhal, Advocate, Dhruv Chowfla, Advocate, and Nitesh Jhajhria, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Complainant:<\/span> G.K. Mann, Senior Advocate, Aditya Dassaur, Advocate, and Armaan Sandhu, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Kangana has not been able to show prima facie as to how imputations in the retweet can be said to have been made by her in good faith for protection of her own interest or of anyone else, nor can it be said to be for public good.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":355415,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[59293,86507,80588,72839,86508,2670,86509],"class_list":["post-355408","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-code-of-criminal-procedure-1973","tag-indian-penal-code-1806","tag-justice-tribhuvan-dahiya","tag-kangana-ranaut","tag-kangana-ranaut-defamation-case","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-twitter-communications-india-farmers-protests"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>P &amp; H HC refuses to quash Kangana Ranaut defamation case Over Farmers\u2019 Protest Tweet | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kangana Ranaut defamation case: Punjab and Haryana HC held that Kangana could not show how her retweet was made in good faith and dismissed her petition to quash defamation case over farmers\u2019 protest tweet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No Relief for Kangana Ranaut: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC dismisses plea in defamation case linked to farmers\u2019 protest tweet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kangana Ranaut defamation case: Punjab and Haryana HC held that Kangana could not show how her retweet was made in good faith and dismissed her petition to quash defamation case over farmers\u2019 protest tweet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-02T09:00:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-08T10:09:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No Relief for Kangana Ranaut: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC dismisses plea in defamation case linked to farmers\u2019 protest tweet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/\",\"name\":\"P & H HC refuses to quash Kangana Ranaut defamation case Over Farmers\u2019 Protest Tweet | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-02T09:00:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-08T10:09:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Kangana Ranaut defamation case: Punjab and Haryana HC held that Kangana could not show how her retweet was made in good faith and dismissed her petition to quash defamation case over farmers\u2019 protest tweet\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Kangana Ranaut defamation case\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No Relief for Kangana Ranaut: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC dismisses plea in defamation case linked to farmers\u2019 protest tweet\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P & H HC refuses to quash Kangana Ranaut defamation case Over Farmers\u2019 Protest Tweet | SCC Times","description":"Kangana Ranaut defamation case: Punjab and Haryana HC held that Kangana could not show how her retweet was made in good faith and dismissed her petition to quash defamation case over farmers\u2019 protest tweet","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No Relief for Kangana Ranaut: Punjab & Haryana HC dismisses plea in defamation case linked to farmers\u2019 protest tweet","og_description":"Kangana Ranaut defamation case: Punjab and Haryana HC held that Kangana could not show how her retweet was made in good faith and dismissed her petition to quash defamation case over farmers\u2019 protest tweet","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-08-02T09:00:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-08T10:09:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No Relief for Kangana Ranaut: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC dismisses plea in defamation case linked to farmers\u2019 protest tweet","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/","name":"P & H HC refuses to quash Kangana Ranaut defamation case Over Farmers\u2019 Protest Tweet | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.webp","datePublished":"2025-08-02T09:00:21+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-08T10:09:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Kangana Ranaut defamation case: Punjab and Haryana HC held that Kangana could not show how her retweet was made in good faith and dismissed her petition to quash defamation case over farmers\u2019 protest tweet","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Kangana Ranaut defamation case"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/02\/kangana-ranaut-defamation-case-ph-hc-dismisses-actorss-petition-to-quash-defamation-case-over-farmers-protest-tweet\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No Relief for Kangana Ranaut: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC dismisses plea in defamation case linked to farmers\u2019 protest tweet"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kangana-Ranaut-defamation-case.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270044,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-trial-court-directed-to-adjourn-the-matter\/","url_meta":{"origin":355408,"position":0},"title":"Punjab &#038; Haryana HC| Relief to actress Kangna Ranaut in &#8216;Shaheen Bagh Dadi&#8217; defamation case; Trial Court directed to adjourn the matter","author":"Editor","date":"July 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: While deciding the instant petition revolving around alleged defamatory tweets concerning the respondent by Bollywood actress Kangna Ranaut; the single-Judge bench of Meenakshi I. Mehta, J. issued a notice of motion and directed the Trial Court to adjourn the proceedings in the criminal complaint beyond\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357120,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/20\/ph-hc-refuses-to-quash-defamation-case-against-tv-today-network\/","url_meta":{"origin":355408,"position":1},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses petition to set aside defamation case against TV Today Network","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"It remains undisputed on record that the complaint filed by Respondent 2 has disclosed commission of non-cognizable offence by the TV Today Network.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"defamation case against TV Today","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/defamation-case-against-TV-Today.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/defamation-case-against-TV-Today.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/defamation-case-against-TV-Today.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/defamation-case-against-TV-Today.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294160,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/08\/punjab-haryana-high-court-refuses-anticipatory-bail-to-ias-vijay-singh-dahiya-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":355408,"position":2},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court refuses grant of anticipatory bail to IAS Vijay Singh Dahiya","author":"Editor","date":"June 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner allegedly took bribe to clear bills of the complainant","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/10\/high-court-weekly-roundup-august-2025-on-godhra-bhopal-gas-tragedy-kangana-ranaut\/","url_meta":{"origin":355408,"position":3},"title":"HIGH COURT AUGUST 2025 WEEKLY ROUNDUP | Acquittal in Godhra Riots Case; Bhopal Gas Tragedy\u2019s Containment Site; Kangana Ranaut\u2019s defamatory tweets; and more","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"High Court Weekly Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/high-10.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/high-10.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/high-10.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/high-10.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/16\/11-additional-judges-appointed-at-punjab-haryana-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":355408,"position":4},"title":"11 Additional Judges appointed at Punjab &#038; Haryana High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The President appoints following as the Additional Judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in that order of seniority, for a period of two years with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices Ms. Nidhi Gupta; Sanjay Vashisth; Tribhuvan Dahiya; Namit Kumar; Harkesh Manuja; Arnan\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359251,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/06\/ed-can-access-information-placed-before-magistrate-by-it-department-for-investigation-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":355408,"position":5},"title":"\u2018ED not restricted to access information placed on record before Magistrate by the IT Department for investigation\u2019: Punjab and Haryana High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018Information regarding the foreign assets has been placed on record in the form of documents before the Magistrate by the IT Department which has been sought by another government Department for the purpose of investigation. It is not a case that the information has been demanded for public dissemination.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ED can access information placed by IT Dept","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ED-can-access-information-placed-by-IT-Dept.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ED-can-access-information-placed-by-IT-Dept.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ED-can-access-information-placed-by-IT-Dept.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ED-can-access-information-placed-by-IT-Dept.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355408","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355408"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355408\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/355415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355408"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355408"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}