{"id":355082,"date":"2025-07-31T10:00:29","date_gmt":"2025-07-31T04:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=355082"},"modified":"2025-08-05T10:12:51","modified_gmt":"2025-08-05T04:42:51","slug":"pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Saying \u2018I Love You\u2019 alone not sexual assault in absence of proven sexual intent\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC upholds acquittal of man in POCSO case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Chhattisgarh High Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal filed against the acquittal of the respondent who allegedly yelled \u2018I love you\u2019 at a minor girl, the Single Judge Bench of Sanjay S. Agrawal, JJ., dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the acquittal, since none of the offences stood proved against the respondent.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In 2019, the victim, a 15-year-old girl, lodged a written report with the Police alleging that on the day of the incident, when she was returning home from school along with her friends, the respondent shouted &#8220;(her name) I Love You&#8221; at her. It was alleged further that she had been harassed by his misbehaviour previously as well, for which the Teachers had reprimanded him. However, he did not stop harassing her. Based upon the aforesaid complaint, an FIR was registered against the respondent under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561672\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">354-D<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">509<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019) read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550530\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">8<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (\u2018POCSO Act\u2019) and under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(2)(va)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a> (\u2018the SC\/ST Act\u2019).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial Court acquitted the respondent, holding that he was not involved in the alleged crime. Aggrieved, the State filed the present appeal.<\/p>\n<h3>Issues and Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">1. Whether the victim was a minor at the relevant point in time?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that to establish the \u2018minority\u2019 of the victim, her birth certificate was seized from her father. The certificate was issued by the competent authority under the Janm Mrityu Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1969; therefore, it has its evidentiary value, particularly when its authenticity was undisputed. The Court further noted that since the certificate was issued way before the alleged incident, it could not be presumed that it was obtained with an ulterior motive to implicate the respondent. Thus, the Court held that evidently, the victim was a minor on the day of the incident.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2. Whether the alleged offences were committed by the respondent?<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-left: 18pt;\">a. Sexual Assault under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550530\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">8<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">Regarding commission of sexual assault under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a>, the Court referred to Section 7, which defines sexual assault and Section 8, which provides punishment for the same. Upon perusal of Section 7, the Court noted that \u201cphysical contact\u201d without penetration may not necessarily involve \u201ctouch\u201d. The \u201cother act\u201d involving \u201cphysical contact\u201d may involve direct physical contact by the offender, with any other body part (not mentioned in the first part of Section 7) of the victim; other act, such as use of an object by the offender, engaging physical contact with the victim; or in the given circumstances of the case, even no contact by the offender. The Court added that the most important ingredient for constituting the offence of sexual assault under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550529\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a> was the \u201csexual intent\u201d and not a physical contact with the child. For proving the charge of \u201csexual assault\u201d under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550529\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a>, the prosecution was not required to prove a physical contact of the offender with the child.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">In this regard, the Court placed reliance on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Attorney General v. Satish<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RRK6jwy5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #4a6ee0;\">(2022) 5 SCC 545<\/span><\/a>, wherein, while considering the word \u201ctouch\u201d and \u201cphysical contact\u201d used in the aforesaid provision, it was held that, if the act of touching the sexual part of the body or any other act involving physical contact is done with \u201csexual intent\u201d, then it would fall within the definition of \u201csexual assault\u201d provided under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550529\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">Noting the aforesaid, the Court examined the victim\u2019s testimony under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">164<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a>, and stated that it was his solitary act while showing his \u201cexpression of love\u201d. A scrutiny of her statements, vis-\u00e0-vis the statements of her friends, revealed that the expression was not made with an intention of his \u201csexual desire\u201d. Accordingly, the Court held that his alleged expression alone would not constitute \u201csexual assault\u201d under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550529\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a>, as none of the ingredients provided under Section 7 were established.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">Thus, the Court held that the respondent could not be held guilty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550530\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">8<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-left: 18pt;\">b. Stalking under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561672\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">354-D<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">Upon perusal of the victim\u2019s testimony, the Court noted that the victim deposed that when she was returning home from the School on the day of the incident along with her friends, the respondent came and shouted at her, &#8220;(her name) I Love You&#8221; and when she tried to leave, he started abusing with filthy and obscene words. Further, she stated that when she was in Class 8th, the respondent misbehaved with her, and when she complained to her parents and the teachers, the teachers reprimanded the respondent. However, the Court noted that the allegation of the respondent uttering abusive words was not mentioned in her written complaint (lodged on the said day itself. Further, neither was her disinterest depicted in her testimony, nor was this allegation corroborated by her friends.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">Regarding the respondent\u2019s previous misbehaviour, the Court noted that the same was not corroborated by her friends. Further, the teachers who had reprimanded the respondent for his alleged act were not examined, and no report was ever lodged either by her or her parents for the same. The Court stated that the victim was raising this allegation after a delay of more than two years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">In this regard, the Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Navendu Sudhir Gupta v. Honey Navendu Gupta<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/825X3g4E\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #4a6ee0;\">2024 SCC OnLine Bom 2078<\/span><\/a>, wherein it was held that the offence would not be complete by a mere act of following only as it must be coupled with the attempt by the accused to repeatedly contact such woman with the intent or aim to foster personal interaction. Further, even if the accused was to follow the victim and attempt to repeatedly have personal interaction with her, the offence would be brought home only if there is material to demonstrate that the victim clearly indicated to the accused her disinterest in his advances, aimed at fostering personal interaction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">Thus, the Court held that the essential ingredients of Section 354-D were not established by way of any cogent and reliable evidence against the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-left: 18pt;\">c. Outraging the Modesty of a Woman under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">509<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">The Court stated that, though in her testimony she made the allegation about the respondent uttering filthy and obscene words, she did not mention this in her written complaint. Further, this version was not mentioned by her friends in their testimonies or corroborated by the victim\u2019s parents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">Thus, the Court held that it appeared that, except for the alleged \u2018expression\u2019 of him towards the prosecutrix, she was not insulted with filthy words. Her version of this effect was, therefore, not found to be trustworthy and\/or sufficient to implicate the respondent under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">509<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-left: 18pt;\">d. Section 3(2)(va) of the SC\/ST Act:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">At the outset, the Court noted that the Trial Court failed to give any findings regarding the allegations that the respondent committed the alleged offence under Section 3(2)(va) of the SC\/ST Act despite knowing that the victim belonged to the Scheduled Caste (&#8216;SC&#8217;) community. However, a bare perusal of her written complaint and her testimony would show she did not mention that the respondent committed the alleged offence because of knowing that she was a member of the SC community. Thus, it could not be said that the alleged act was done by the respondent with an intention that the prosecutrix belongs to the SC community, to hold the respondent guilty under Section 3(2)(va) of the SC\/ST Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt;\">In this regard, the Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Khuman Singh v. State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FoLdwj0P\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #4a6ee0;\">(2020) 18 SCC 763<\/span><\/a>, wherein it was held that unless it is shown that the alleged offence was committed only on the ground that the victim was a member of the \u201cScheduled Caste community\u201d, the alleged offence cannot be held to be proved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed for being devoid of merit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of Chhattisgarh v. Rupendra Das Manikpuri, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/fgzBugO6\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Chh 7609<\/a>, decided on 22-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Government Advocate R. N. Pusty<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Shobhit Koshta<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294600\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;It was his solitary act of showing his &#8220;expression of love&#8221;, and a close scrutiny of her statements vis-a-vis the statements of her friends, would reveal that it was not made with an intention of his sexual desire.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":355089,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30591,51527,86329,86330,86326,24024,43121,86327,84590,86328,45603],"class_list":["post-355082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-chhattisgarh-high-court","tag-crimes-against-women","tag-janm-mrityu-registrikaran-adhiniyam","tag-justice-sanjay-s-agrawal","tag-man-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl","tag-minor-girl","tag-outraging-modesty-of-woman","tag-section-32va-sc-st-act","tag-section-7-pocso","tag-sexual-assault-under-pocso","tag-stalking"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Chh HC: Saying &#039;I Love You&#039; alone not sexual assault under POCSO| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh HC upheld acquittal of man and held that Saying &#039;I Love You&#039; alone not sexual assault under POCSO in absence of proven sexual intent&#039;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Saying \u2018I Love You\u2019 alone not sexual assault in absence of proven sexual intent\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC upholds acquittal of man in POCSO case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh HC upheld acquittal of man and held that Saying &#039;I Love You&#039; alone not sexual assault under POCSO in absence of proven sexual intent&#039;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-31T04:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-05T04:42:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Saying \u2018I Love You\u2019 alone not sexual assault in absence of proven sexual intent\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC upholds acquittal of man in POCSO case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/\",\"name\":\"Chh HC: Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault under POCSO| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-31T04:30:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-05T04:42:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Chhattisgarh HC upheld acquittal of man and held that Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault under POCSO in absence of proven sexual intent'\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Saying \u2018I Love You\u2019 alone not sexual assault in absence of proven sexual intent\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC upholds acquittal of man in POCSO case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chh HC: Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault under POCSO| SCC Times","description":"Chhattisgarh HC upheld acquittal of man and held that Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault under POCSO in absence of proven sexual intent'","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Saying \u2018I Love You\u2019 alone not sexual assault in absence of proven sexual intent\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC upholds acquittal of man in POCSO case","og_description":"Chhattisgarh HC upheld acquittal of man and held that Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault under POCSO in absence of proven sexual intent'","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-31T04:30:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-05T04:42:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Saying \u2018I Love You\u2019 alone not sexual assault in absence of proven sexual intent\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC upholds acquittal of man in POCSO case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/","name":"Chh HC: Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault under POCSO| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-31T04:30:29+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-05T04:42:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Chhattisgarh HC upheld acquittal of man and held that Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault under POCSO in absence of proven sexual intent'","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Saying 'I Love You' alone not sexual assault"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/pocso-saying-i-love-you-alone-not-sexual-assault-chh-hc-upholds-acquittal-man-who-yelled-i-love-you-at-minor-girl\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Saying \u2018I Love You\u2019 alone not sexual assault in absence of proven sexual intent\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC upholds acquittal of man in POCSO case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Saying-I-Love-You-alone-not-sexual-assault.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":227156,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/17\/pocso-sikk-hc-delicate-balance-to-be-maintained-between-judicial-perception-of-victims-anguish-and-presumption-of-innocence-of-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":355082,"position":0},"title":"[POCSO] Sikk HC | Delicate balance to be maintained between judicial perception of victim&#8217;s anguish and presumption of innocence of accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Bhaskar Raj Pradhan and Arup Kumar Goswami, JJ. while upholding the Judgment of acquittal passed by Special Judge (POCSO), held that, A delicate balance is required to be maintained between the judicial perception of the anguish of the victim and the presumption of innocence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/30\/rape-9\/","url_meta":{"origin":355082,"position":1},"title":"In view of changed definition of rape under S. 375 (b) of\u00a0 IPC pari materia to S. 3(b) of POCSO Act, whether sexual intercourse is necessary to attract ingredients of offence of rape or penetrative sexual assault? Chh HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Addressing a case wherein a minor girl was subjected to sexual, Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J., held that, In view of the changed definition of rape under Section 375 (b) of the IPC pari materia to Section 3(b) of the POCSO Act, sexual intercourse is not necessary to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":296892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/orissa-hc-set-aside-conviction-for-raping-minor-girl-and-convicts-for-aggravated-sexual-assault\/","url_meta":{"origin":355082,"position":2},"title":"Rape versus \u2018Aggravated sexual assault\u2019 under POCSO: Why Orissa HC set aside Trial Court order convicting Man for Rape","author":"Editor","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court found that none of the acts of the convict would come within the definition of \u2018rape\u2019 under Section 375 of the IPC or \u2018penetrative sexual assault\u2019 under Section 3 of the POCSO Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270746,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/28\/sexual-assault-on-minors-traumatic-destroys-personality-patna-high-courts-upholds-fathers-conviction-for-raping-his-minor-daughters-for-6-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":355082,"position":3},"title":"Sexual assault on minors traumatic, destroys personality: Patna High Courts upholds father&#8217;s conviction for raping his minor daughters for 6 years","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Division Bench of A.M. Badar and Rakesh Kumar Verma, JJ., while dismissing an appeal observed that a sexual assault leaves a traumatic effect on a victim of a minor age which not only affects her physically but also affects her emotionally and psychologically which ultimately leads\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267697,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/action-of-holding-hands-in-public-place-does-not-amount-to-sexual-intent\/","url_meta":{"origin":355082,"position":4},"title":"Megh HC | Action of holding hands in public place does not amount to sexual intent, thus not an act of sexual assault; POCSO Case quashed","author":"Editor","date":"June 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: W. Diengdoh, J. allowed a petition which was filed with a prayer to set aside and quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioner whereby, charges were framed against the petitioner in a Special (POCSO) Case. The FIR alleged that the minor, nine years old, while she was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/28\/pocso-eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-bombay-sessions-court-convicts-man-for-1-5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item\/","url_meta":{"origin":355082,"position":5},"title":"[POCSO] Eve teasing and roadside romeos need to be dealt with heavy hand; Bombay Sessions Court convicts man for 1.5 years for calling a minor girl an \u201citem\u201d","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Sessions Court, Borivali Division, Mumbai: In a case filed by a minor girl against the accused for offences under Sections 354, 354-D, 504 and 506 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and under Section 12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, (POCSO), S. J. Ansari, J., convicted the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355082\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/355089"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}