{"id":354987,"date":"2025-07-30T12:30:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-30T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=354987"},"modified":"2025-07-31T17:58:30","modified_gmt":"2025-07-31T12:28:30","slug":"bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Access to justice cannot be reduced to mere formality\u2019; Bombay High Court directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition seeking to streamline the process of execution of orders passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (\u2018Maha RERA\u2019) and to provide a mechanism for mentioning matters, conduct hearings immediately after filing of execution proceedings and expeditious disposal of execution proceedings, the Division Bench comprising of<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Revati Mohite Dere*<\/span> and Dr. Neela Gokhale, JJ., emphasised that the objective of Real Estate Regulatory Authority (\u2018RERA\u2019) and Maha RERA is to provide speedy, transparent, and effective adjudication of disputes in the real estate sector.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that virtual-only hearings, when coupled with the inability to communicate effectively or mention urgent matters, result in systemic opacity and procedural delays. Thus, the Court issued certain directions to Maha RERA, including direction to restore hybrid hearings, permitting parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearance.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was contended by the petitioners that there was no structured mechanism in place for disposal of execution\/non-compliance of proceedings in respect of the orders passed by the Authority. Further, there was not any mechanism for getting a matter listed on a specified\/certain date, in any proceeding before the Authority, due to which even after the parties got an order in their favour , they were unable to bear the fruits of the order, for want of effective execution of the same, which often resulted in the advantage of the builders\/promoters\/ developers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was also mentioned that if once a matter was listed and the complainant refused conciliation, it was adjourned with a direction to be listed `as per seniority\u2019, which, in some cases, resulted in a delay of over a year before the matter was relisted, thereby frustrating the very object of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was pointed out by the petitioners that prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Authority was functioning physically, and the parties\/ advocates had the opportunity to appear in-person before the Authority. However, post COVID-19, Maha RERA continued to function entirely through virtual hearings only, and if the parties desired to have physical hearing, an application for the same had to be submitted before the respective Bench.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court expressed concerns regarding the Authority\u2019s continued insistence on a virtual-only model and the resistance of Maha RERA to commence hybrid hearing, despite the availability of both physical and virtual infrastructure.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also observed that the Seniority Circular issued by Maha RERA, cannot be the sole basis for determining urgency, and there might be other reasons warranting listing. Matters involving non-compliance, serious prejudice, or impending irreparable harm might require immediate attention, irrespective of their position in the seniority list. A rigid adherence to chronology, without a mechanism for urgent mentioning or timely listing, risks defeating the very objective of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002840159\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016<\/a> (\u2018the Act\u2019), namely, expeditious and effective redressal of grievances.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, it was pointed out by the Court that the unavailability of a hybrid hearing mechanism may lead to slower disposal rates, increased case pendency, and ultimately, defeat the very purpose of the Act, which is the expeditious resolution of disputes. Additionally, the present mode of communication with the Authorities is unilateral, offering little to no opportunity for the parties to effectively present or clarify their case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Relying upon the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sarvesh Mathur<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">High Court of Punjab and Haryana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DR78VWNa\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1293<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">(\u2018Sarvesh Mathur case\u2019)<\/span>, the Court reiterated that access to virtual hearings alone is insufficient; denial of physical hearing, even when facilities exist, amounts to an unreasonable fetter on litigants&#8217; rights. The ability to choose one&#8217;s mode of hearing is integral to access to justice.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the Court gave following directions to Maha RERA:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>To restore the facility of hybrid hearings, permitting parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearance, as per their convenience, within 4 weeks;<\/li>\n<li>To consider revisiting Circular dated 8-4-2025 and its Standard Operating Procedures, particularly with respect to the mechanism for urgent listing of matters; execution of non-compliance orders; mentioning of cases (physically and virtually) and pronouncement and publication of reserved orders.<\/li>\n<li>To implement the guidelines given by the Supreme Court in the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sarvesh Mathur case (supra)<\/span> with respect to the hybrid hearing model of Courts and Tribunals.<\/li>\n<li>Maintain a register of praecipes submitted for circulation, production, or urgent listing, and record the acceptance\/rejection of such applications;<\/li>\n<li>To upload its orders with a timestamp indicating the date and time of upload;<\/li>\n<li>Assign fixed dates for hearings and, in the event of an adjournment, indicate the next date of hearing;<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Maha RERA shall place in the public domain, through its website, the relevant procedures and contact information in a functional and transparent manner.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Mayur L. Desai v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/WLxK0ikq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2736<\/a>, decided on: 24-7-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgement authored by- Justice Revati Mohite Dere<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Advocate for the Petitioners-<\/span> Aseem Naphade, Chitrangada Singh, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Advocate for the Respondents-<\/span> Vaishali Choudhari, Addl. G.P, Madhura Deshmukh, A.G.P, Ravi Adsure, A.K. Saxena, Prakash Sabale, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Procedural fairness includes the right of parties to choose their mode of hearing, especially when both physical and virtual modalities are feasible. Tribunals must not only be accessible in form, but also in substance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":354991,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8511,2569,30129,86256,71597,61746,86257,43111,86258,41470],"class_list":["post-354987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-access-to-justice","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-constitutional-right","tag-hybrid-court-hearings","tag-justice-dr-neela-gokhale","tag-justice-revati-mohite-dere","tag-maharasthra-rera","tag-physical-hearings","tag-restore-hybrid-hearings","tag-virtual-hearings"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bom HC directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court directs the Maharashtra RERA to restore hybrid hearings, permitting parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearance.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Access to justice cannot be reduced to mere formality\u2019; Bombay High Court directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court directs the Maharashtra RERA to restore hybrid hearings, permitting parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearance.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-30T07:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-31T12:28:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Access to justice cannot be reduced to mere formality\u2019; Bombay High Court directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-30T07:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-31T12:28:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court directs the Maharashtra RERA to restore hybrid hearings, permitting parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearance.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Access to justice cannot be reduced to mere formality\u2019; Bombay High Court directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings|SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court directs the Maharashtra RERA to restore hybrid hearings, permitting parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearance.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Access to justice cannot be reduced to mere formality\u2019; Bombay High Court directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings","og_description":"Bombay High Court directs the Maharashtra RERA to restore hybrid hearings, permitting parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearance.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-30T07:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-31T12:28:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Access to justice cannot be reduced to mere formality\u2019; Bombay High Court directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/","name":"Bom HC directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-30T07:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-31T12:28:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay High Court directs the Maharashtra RERA to restore hybrid hearings, permitting parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearance.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bombay-hc-maharasthra-rera-to-restore-hybrid-hearings\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Access to justice cannot be reduced to mere formality\u2019; Bombay High Court directs Maharasthra RERA to restore hybrid hearings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maharasthra-RERA-to-restore-hybrid-hearings.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":353234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/bom-hc-bona-fide-delay-sale-agreement-registration\/","url_meta":{"origin":354987,"position":0},"title":"\u2018A bonafide delay beyond party\u2019s control can be excluded while calculating limitation for registration of documents\u2019: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA legal right accrued to a party to get a document registered as per the provisions of the Registration Act cannot stand defeated when reasons which exists are beyond the control of the party presenting the document for registration.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"document registration delay","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/document-registration-delay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/document-registration-delay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/document-registration-delay.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/document-registration-delay.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/19\/sc-collegium-recommends-appointment-of-cjs-of-5-high-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":354987,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of 5 High Courts","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Collegium recommended appointment of Chief Justices for High Courts of Uttaranchal, Meghalaya, Jharkhand, Sikkim and Patna.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"appointment of CJs of 5 High Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/appointment-of-CJs-of-5-High-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/appointment-of-CJs-of-5-High-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/appointment-of-CJs-of-5-High-Courts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/appointment-of-CJs-of-5-High-Courts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363623,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/claiming-refunds-before-rera-authority-challenges-amid-the-absence-of-a-written-agreement-between-allottees-and-promoters\/","url_meta":{"origin":354987,"position":2},"title":"Claiming Refunds before RERA Authority: Challenges Amid the Absence of a Written Agreement between Allottees and Promoters","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Naman*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"RERA Refund Disputes","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/RERA-Refund-Disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/RERA-Refund-Disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/RERA-Refund-Disputes.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/RERA-Refund-Disputes.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356916,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/between-statute-and-shortcut-how-courts-are-reining-in-reras-expanding-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":354987,"position":3},"title":"Between Statute and Shortcut: How Courts are Reining in RERA&#8217;s Expanding Jurisdiction","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Jaivardhan Goyal*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Real-Estate-Regulation-and-Development-Act-2016.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Real-Estate-Regulation-and-Development-Act-2016.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Real-Estate-Regulation-and-Development-Act-2016.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Real-Estate-Regulation-and-Development-Act-2016.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304157,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/doctrine-of-estoppel-election-inapplicable-section-79-rera-act-ousts-civil-courts-jurisdiction-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":354987,"position":4},"title":"Doctrine of Estoppel by Election inapplicable when Section 79 of the RERA Act clearly ousts civil courts\u2019 jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court opined that there was no contract between the parties due to the lack of a meeting of minds, therefore, the Specific Relief Act, 1963 cannot be invoked.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371583,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/03\/president-appoints-chief-justices-3-hcs\/","url_meta":{"origin":354987,"position":5},"title":"President appoints Chief Justices of 3 High Courts","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 3, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court Collegium on 18-12-2025 had recommended the appointment of Chief Justices for Meghalaya, Patna and Jharkhand High Courts.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chief Justices of 3 High Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Chief-Justices-of-3-High-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Chief-Justices-of-3-High-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Chief-Justices-of-3-High-Courts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Chief-Justices-of-3-High-Courts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=354987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354987\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/354991"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=354987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=354987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=354987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}