{"id":354900,"date":"2025-07-29T17:00:03","date_gmt":"2025-07-29T11:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=354900"},"modified":"2025-07-29T17:04:19","modified_gmt":"2025-07-29T11:34:19","slug":"delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/","title":{"rendered":"SAM &amp; Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has restrained MSA Global LLC (Oman) from proceeding with an international arbitration under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), highlighting the importance of transparency and procedural integrity in cross-border dispute resolution. The Delhi High Court observed that the continuation of the arbitration in its present form raised valid concerns due to the non-disclosure of a prior professional association between a co-arbitrator and the defendant\u2019s leadership\u2014warranting judicial intervention to uphold the fairness and impartiality expected in such proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. (EPIL), a Government of India undertaking, was represented by Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas &amp; Co., which successfully argued that the ICC arbitration, seated in Singapore, was oppressive, unconscionable, and contrary to the public policy of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case sets a significant precedent in the context of India\u2019s growing involvement in international commercial arbitrations, where questions around impartiality, transparency, and forum selection are gaining increasing judicial scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Hon\u2019ble Delhi High Court, in a detailed and considered judgment by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, reiterated that while courts ordinarily exercise restraint in arbitral matters, judicial intervention is justified when the foundational principles of natural justice are at risk. The ruling affirms the Indian judiciary\u2019s willingness to step in against cross-border arbitral conduct that borders on abuse of process, particularly when a domestic party is left disadvantaged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The legal team at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas &amp; Co. was led by Partners, Ajit Warrier; Angad Kochhar; Senior Associate, Himanshu Setia; and Associate, Vedant Kashyap.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">This judgment underscores the solemn duty of arbitrators to tender a full and frank disclosure and has industry-wide implications for foreign-seated arbitrations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Engineering Projects (India) Ltd., a Government of India undertaking, was represented by Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas &amp; Co., which successfully argued that the ICC arbitration, seated in Singapore, was oppressive, unconscionable, and contrary to the public policy of India.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":354905,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45282,2],"tags":[86210,86209,2543,86207,63144,30032,86208,58260],"class_list":["post-354900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-law-firms-news","category-news","tag-arbitral-stay","tag-cross-border-dispute","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-epil","tag-icc-arbitration","tag-international-arbitration","tag-procedural-unfairness","tag-sam-co"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Delhi High Court Stays ICC Arbitration; SAM &amp; Co. Represents EPIL in Cross-Border Dispute | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stayed ICC arbitration proceedings amid allegations of procedural unfairness in a cross-border dispute. EPIL was represented by SAM &amp; Co.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SAM &amp; Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stayed ICC arbitration proceedings amid allegations of procedural unfairness in a cross-border dispute. EPIL was represented by SAM &amp; Co.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-29T11:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-29T11:34:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/sam-73.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"SAM &amp; Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"SAM &amp; Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-29T11:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-29T11:34:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":296,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/sam-73.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"arbitral stay\",\"cross-border dispute\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"EPIL\",\"ICC Arbitration\",\"International arbitration\",\"procedural unfairness\",\"SAM &amp; Co\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Law Firms News\",\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court Stays ICC Arbitration; SAM & Co. Represents EPIL in Cross-Border Dispute | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/sam-73.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-29T11:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-29T11:34:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court stayed ICC arbitration proceedings amid allegations of procedural unfairness in a cross-border dispute. EPIL was represented by SAM & Co.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/sam-73.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/sam-73.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court ICC arbitration stay\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SAM &amp; Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court Stays ICC Arbitration; SAM & Co. Represents EPIL in Cross-Border Dispute | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court stayed ICC arbitration proceedings amid allegations of procedural unfairness in a cross-border dispute. EPIL was represented by SAM & Co.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SAM & Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute","og_description":"Delhi High Court stayed ICC arbitration proceedings amid allegations of procedural unfairness in a cross-border dispute. EPIL was represented by SAM & Co.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-29T11:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-29T11:34:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/sam-73.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"SAM &amp; Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"SAM &amp; Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute","datePublished":"2025-07-29T11:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-29T11:34:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/"},"wordCount":296,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/sam-73.webp","keywords":["arbitral stay","cross-border dispute","Delhi High Court","EPIL","ICC Arbitration","International arbitration","procedural unfairness","SAM &amp; Co"],"articleSection":["Law Firms News","News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/","name":"Delhi High Court Stays ICC Arbitration; SAM & Co. Represents EPIL in Cross-Border Dispute | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/sam-73.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-29T11:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-29T11:34:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court stayed ICC arbitration proceedings amid allegations of procedural unfairness in a cross-border dispute. EPIL was represented by SAM & Co.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/sam-73.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/sam-73.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Delhi High Court ICC arbitration stay"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/delhi-high-court-stays-icc-arbitration-sam-represents-epil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SAM &amp; Co. represents EPIL before Delhi High Court, which stays ICC Arbitration proceedings over foundational and procedural unfairness in cross-border dispute"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/sam-73.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=354900"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354900\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/354905"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=354900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=354900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=354900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}