{"id":354844,"date":"2025-07-29T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2025-07-29T06:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=354844"},"modified":"2025-07-29T12:02:34","modified_gmt":"2025-07-29T06:32:34","slug":"odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/","title":{"rendered":"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India’s Judiciary"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Introduction<\/h2>\n

In the curious case of Ramesh Baghel<\/span> v. State of Chhattisgarh<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a>, where a village panchayat decision barred a man from being buried in their own village, the Supreme Court came out with a split verdict. Justice S.C. Sharma, after meticulously analysing the facts of the case, noted that \u201cpublic order\u201d was not a \u201cruse\u201d and directing the man be buried in a different village. In stark contrast, Justice B.V. Nagarathna held that this was a gross violation of fundamental rights, namely, Articles 142<\/sup><\/a> and 15(1)3<\/sup><\/a> and directed that the man be buried in his own private land in his village. However, the operative order \u2014 deviating from the regular practice of referring such split verdicts to a larger Bench \u2014 favoured Justice Sharma’s stance, leading to the man’s burial in a different village. If it were not for the operative order, the case would have been referred to a larger Bench delaying the matter further while the dead body would have been left in the mortuary for a few more weeks.<\/p>\n

This begs the question, are split verdicts or to be specific, Benches with an even number of Judges a bane to an expedient justice system? This piece aims to argue through various case studies that even-numbered Benches are unnecessarily delaying swift delivery of justice and decisions. Further, a structural overhaul of the system of creating Benches would be proposed in order to remedy this pertinent issue.<\/p>\n

Split verdicts: A procedural impasse to speedy justice<\/h2>\n

Split verdicts in India essentially happen when an equal number of Judges in even-numbered Benches pronouncing differing judgments, thereby no clear and definitive ruling. Generally, this takes place when the Judges\u2019 interpretation of either law or facts is different. The usual course of action after a split verdict is to send the matter to a larger Bench with odd number of Judges. This results in a conclusive judgment as the opinion of the majority of Judges is tilted towards one side. The fundamental concern of the parties involved in these types of cases is the amount of time this process takes throughout. In India, legal processes travel at a snail’s pace4<\/sup><\/a>. It is already a huge ordeal for a case to reach the Supreme Court through appellate routes. Adding to that, when a case is then sent to a larger Bench, the proceedings often effectively start again. Assuming one of the parties is not satisfied with the judgment, they have to file a review or curative petition. Keeping aside further appellate remedies like review or curative petitions, this extra step of reference to a larger Bench creates unnecessary delay for the parties seeking a relief. This is the central contention here. The practice of constituting Benches with an even number of Judges from the onset leading to a split verdict in some cases, is hampering the right to speedy justice, which is an integral part of Article 21<\/a>5<\/sup><\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>.6<\/sup><\/a> In S.P. Gupta<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>7<\/sup><\/a>, the Supreme Court held that:<\/p>\n

741.<\/span> \u2026 Two vital limbs of the justice system are that justice must be within the easy reach of the weaker sections of the society and that it must be attainable within a reasonably short time, in other words, speedily.<\/p>\n

Split verdicts violate both. Firstly, \u201cthe reasonably short amount of time\u201d is increased unnecessarily because by the time a concrete judgment is delivered by a larger Bench referred to by the even Bench, the case would already be sub judice for a considerable period of time. Secondly, the resources that are required to constantly be involved in litigation, especially in the Supreme Court make the whole process (that is already incredibly difficult) virtually impossible.<\/p>\n

Case studies of judicial division:<\/h2>\n

Certain case studies demonstrate the bane of split verdicts by the higher court:<\/p>\n

(1) Tahir Hussain<\/span> v. State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>8<\/sup><\/a>: In this case, the petitioner was a politician and was accused of being involved in the Delhi Riots of 2020 among other crimes. He was languishing in jail for almost 5 years and applied for interim bail before the Supreme Court. The main contentions were that the trial was not even close commencing and his fundamental rights, namely, Article 219<\/sup><\/a> were being violated. Further, he sought bail to campaign for the upcoming Delhi Assembly Elections. The Court delivered a split verdict where Justice Mithal opined that liberty given to an accused in such a heinous crime can potentially lead to detrimental consequences. Whereas, Justice Amanullah held that the petitioner had spent almost 5 years in jail and should be released on bail. There were no operative orders in this case and the case was sent to a larger Bench.<\/p>\n

This case demonstrates how split verdicts can severely cause an impediment to the liberty of a person. The petitioner was left in a limbo even after spending the last half-decade in jail without conviction. In the matters of life and liberty, speedy justice is imperative in a functional democracy, however, this ordeal essentially negates it.<\/p>\n

(2) P. Nallammal<\/span> v. State<\/span>10<\/sup><\/a>: The petitioner here was the wife of the ex-Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. The Madras High Court convicted the petitioner’s husband under Sections 13(1)(e<\/span>)11<\/sup><\/a> and (2)12<\/sup><\/a> (disproportionate assets) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988<\/a> (POC Act)13<\/sup><\/a> and found her guilty of abetment. She appealed to the Supreme Court against the conviction. The Supreme Court delivered a split verdict: Justice Dhulia upheld her conviction, stating that a number of properties were bought in her name throughout the tenure of her husband indicating complete knowledge of all the crimes that were being committed and her tacit involvement in all of them. However, Justice Amanullah dissented and acquitted her by observing the typical dynamics of marriages in India are incredibly complicated, and the properties being in her name do not reflect mens rea on her part. The case was then referred to a larger Bench.<\/p>\n

It is crucial to note that economic crimes in India hold significant weight. They fundamentally hamper the monetary working of the nation and are dealt with severe care and attention. Laws for persons seeking bail accused under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002<\/a>14<\/sup><\/a> and the POC Act are incredibly stringent.15<\/sup><\/a> Hence, in a case where the petitioner has been convicted for disproportionate assets, the final judgment of the Supreme Court becomes extremely important as it gives a definitive end to a series of appeals and provides crucial precedent for the interpretation of economic crime laws.<\/p>\n

(3) Aishat Shifa<\/span> v. State of Karnataka<\/span>16<\/sup><\/a>: In 2022 the Karnataka Government released an order mandating a uniform dress code in government schools and allowed private schools to enforce their own form of dress code \u201cin the interests of unity, equality and public order\u201d. Effectuating this order, the practice of wearing hijab in a particular school was banned. A petition challenging this order was rejected by the Karnataka High Court and the judgment was subsequently appealed in the Supreme Court. It was contended by the petitioners that the practice amounted to an essential religious practice. The Supreme Court delivered a split verdict, where Justice Gupta upheld the government order and observed that the order was well within the Government’s legislative competence. On the contrary, Justice Dhulia struck down the order stating that it violated the fundamental rights of the students, namely, Articles 14<\/a>17<\/sup><\/a> and 1918<\/sup><\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>. The matter was then referred to a larger Bench.<\/p>\n

Here, two things are to be noted: firstly, female children whose education is at stake are getting sacrificed because of an indeterminate delay in the next judgment; secondly, this creates a legal vacuum in the educational-legal sphere of jurisprudence, where it is still not clear where government orders that regulate uniforms stand.<\/p>\n

Instances of judicial expediency<\/h2>\n

In order to remedy this inordinate delay in justice delivery, the Supreme Court has sometimes taken expeditious steps to ensure quick disposal in urgent cases. For example, in Yakub Abdul Razak Memon<\/span> v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>19<\/sup><\/a>, the Supreme Court was divided on his mercy plea on the eve of his hanging. However, the next day a larger Bench confirmed his death sentence the very next day. In another case20<\/sup><\/a>, where a 26-week pregnant woman’s permission to terminate her pregnancy was challenged, the Supreme Court’s verdict stood split. However, just 5 days later, a larger Bench decided on the matter and held that the woman cannot medically terminate her pregnancy at that stage. These cases prove that the Supreme Court in cases of national interest and medical emergencies, has expedited its decisions and delivered a definitive verdict through a larger Bench.<\/p>\n

Therefore, one of the criteria implicitly identified by the courts to create odd-numbered Benches in an expedited manner are matters of \u201curgency\u201d. These cases are generally extensively covered by the media or are of profound public importance, so the process of decision-making has to be quick. It is fair to mention, however, that these types of cases, where the Supreme Court or the High Courts actually create a new Bench and deliver a verdict within a short time span, are few and far between. Moreover, to clarify, expedited verdicts do not necessarily mean well-reasoned judgments and that is certainly not desirable. Nevertheless, the creation of a larger odd-numbered Bench is something that is certainly a dire need for swift justice.<\/p>\n

Way forward<\/h2>\n

The conundrum of split verdict is to be tackled in High Courts and the Supreme Court with different reforms, as both face a different set of challenges.<\/p>\n

High Courts<\/span>: The core proposal to avoid split verdicts is to constitute odd-numbered Benches, such as Single Judge or three Judges instead of two for regular Division Benches, or five\/seven for more complex matters. This will ensure that the chances of a split verdict are eliminated and an odd-numbered Bench will always deliver a definitive judgment, thereby preventing procedural redundancies. However, the primary obstacle to this reform, however, lies in the acute shortage of Judges plaguing almost all High Courts, which would complicate the formation of larger Benches21<\/sup><\/a>. This will again lead to the further burgeoning of cases on an already overburdened judiciary. A fundamental solution to that is an expedited filling of these judicial vacancies, which would necessitate a streamlined appointment process and robust infrastructure development to support and ensure that the courts are well-equipped with judicial strength and can handle necessary matters without getting overburdened. High Courts like the Allahabad High Court, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Gujarat High Court are all grappling with an almost 40% vacancy rate22<\/sup><\/a> and simply filling those will substantially alleviate most of the problems in constituting the proposed larger odd-numbered Benches.<\/p>\n

Supreme Court<\/span>: The same proposal of constituting odd-numbered Benches should be effectuated in the Supreme Court as well. However, implementation of this proposal similarly runs into the same issue of inadequate judicial strength that the High Courts face. Even after generally working at full sanctioned strength, the Supreme Court still has a pendency of around 83,000 cases and constituting an odd-numbered Bench every time would be functionally very difficult23<\/sup><\/a>. A long-term proposal would be to increase the overall strength again; however, that would require the amendment of Article 124<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>24<\/sup><\/a> and that power is vested with the Parliament. This step is certainly desirable, but the onus would be on the Parliament and it is not actionable for immediate relief. Further, the Supreme Court’s practice of only constituting an at least 2-Judge Bench is a big obstacle. To remedy these impediments, matters that result in a split verdict (without an operative order) should be automatically referred to a larger Bench. Ideally, that Bench ought to commence its hearings in a time-bound manner. This reform will ensure that an unresolved case due to a split verdict will be heard again in a short, predictable time span, saving essential resources and, essentially, protecting the fundamental rights of the parties involved.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

In conclusion, split verdicts are a major procedural hurdle in India’s legal system. The process to get justice is generally a very vexatious endeavour. Adding on to an already languid system, this practice causes an unnecessary delay for the parties to get definitive judgments. Cases that deal with personal liberty, economic crimes and constitutional matters especially call for quick procedural steps in order to commence hearings in the courts. Eliminating this additional and redundant practice of referring to a larger Bench after a divided verdict results in a faster judicial process. It not only reinforces the trust and integrity of our sacred judicial institution but also upholds the fundamental rights of the litigants.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

*2nd year student at the Rajiv Gandhi National University of\u00a0Law. Author can be reached at: ammarshahid23086@rgnul.ac.in<\/a>.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine SC 173.<\/a><\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 14.<\/a><\/p>\n

3.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 15(1).<\/a><\/p>\n

4.<\/a> Advay Vora \u201cJanuary 2025 Pendency Increases by Over 2600 Compared to Last January\u201d\u2019, SC Observer (scobserver.in, January 2025).<\/p>\n

5.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 21.<\/a><\/p>\n

6.<\/a> R.S. Nayak<\/span> v. A.R. Antulay<\/span>, (1984) 2 SCC 183.<\/a><\/p>\n

7.<\/a> 1981 Supp SCC 87, 616.<\/a><\/p>\n

8.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine SC 135.<\/a><\/p>\n

9.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 21.<\/a><\/p>\n

10.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1040.<\/a><\/p>\n

11.<\/a> Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, S. 13(1)(e).<\/a><\/p>\n

12.<\/a> Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, S. 13(2).<\/a><\/p>\n

13.<\/a> Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.<\/a><\/p>\n

14.<\/a> Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002.<\/a><\/p>\n

15.<\/a> Roshni Dutta, \u201cAnti-Corruption Laws in India: A Detailed Overview\u201d, (2025) 4(5) Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law 207.<\/p>\n

16.<\/a> (2023) 2 SCC 1.<\/a><\/p>\n

17.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 14.<\/a><\/p>\n

18.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 19.<\/a><\/p>\n

19.<\/a> (2013) 13 SCC 1<\/a>.<\/p>\n

20.<\/a> X<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1338.<\/a><\/p>\n

21.<\/a> Ranking States on the Capacity of Police, Judiciary, Prisons and Legal Aid, India Justice Report (indiajusticereport.org, April 2025).<\/p>\n

22.<\/a> Ranking States on the Capacity of Police, Judiciary, Prisons and Legal Aid, India Justice Report (indiajusticereport.org, April 2025).<\/p>\n

23.<\/a> Advay Vora, \u201cApril 2025: Pendency Increases After Steep Drop in Both Institution and Disposal\u201d, SC Observer (scobserver.in, 28-5-2025).<\/p>\n

24.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 124.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Ammar Shahid*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":354849,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[86175,7601,86177,86174,32084,86176],"class_list":["post-354844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-clear-verdicts","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-indias-judiciary","tag-odd-benches","tag-prevention-of-corruption-act-1988","tag-reform-in-indias-judiciary"],"yoast_head":"\nOdd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India's Judiciary | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the curious case of Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh1, where a village panchayat decision barred a man from being buried\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India's Judiciary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the curious case of Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh1, where a village panchayat decision barred a man from being buried\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-29T06:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-29T06:32:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Odd-Benches.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India's Judiciary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India’s Judiciary\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-29T06:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-29T06:32:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2281,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Odd-Benches.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Clear Verdicts\",\"Constitution of India\",\"India's Judiciary\",\"Odd Benches\",\"Prevention of Corruption Act 1988\",\"Reform in India's Judiciary\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Op Eds\",\"OP. ED.\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/\",\"name\":\"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India's Judiciary | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Odd-Benches.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-29T06:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-29T06:32:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In the curious case of Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh1, where a village panchayat decision barred a man from being buried\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Odd-Benches.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Odd-Benches.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Odd Benches\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/29\\\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India’s Judiciary\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India's Judiciary | SCC Times","description":"In the curious case of Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh1, where a village panchayat decision barred a man from being buried","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India's Judiciary","og_description":"In the curious case of Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh1, where a village panchayat decision barred a man from being buried","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-29T06:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-29T06:32:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Odd-Benches.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India's Judiciary","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India’s Judiciary","datePublished":"2025-07-29T06:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-29T06:32:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/"},"wordCount":2281,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Odd-Benches.webp","keywords":["Clear Verdicts","Constitution of India","India's Judiciary","Odd Benches","Prevention of Corruption Act 1988","Reform in India's Judiciary"],"articleSection":["Op Eds","OP. ED."],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/","name":"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India's Judiciary | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Odd-Benches.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-29T06:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-29T06:32:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In the curious case of Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh1, where a village panchayat decision barred a man from being buried","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Odd-Benches.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Odd-Benches.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Odd Benches"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/29\/odd-benches-clear-verdicts-a-call-for-structural-reform-in-indias-judiciary\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Odd Benches, Clear Verdicts: A Call for Structural Reform in India’s Judiciary"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Odd-Benches.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":297491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/burial-at-non-designated-land-contravenes-tn-village-panchayats-burial-rules-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":354844,"position":0},"title":"Burial at non-designated land contravenes TN Village Panchayats Burial Rules: Madras High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A person who defies the law and refuses to exhume the body cannot take umbrage in the delay of enforcing the law and make the Court 'fait accompli'.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/29\/explained-spilt-verdict-christian-man-burial-father-native-village-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":354844,"position":1},"title":"Explained | Supreme Court\u2019s spilt verdict on a Christian man\u2019s appeal to bury deceased father in his native village","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Given the lack of consensus between the Judges, the Court exercising its power under Article 142 directed the appellant to perform the funeral rites and bury his deceased father at the burial ground at another village.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Christian man's appeal to bury deceased father","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Christian-mans-appeal-to-bury-deceased-father.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Christian-mans-appeal-to-bury-deceased-father.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Christian-mans-appeal-to-bury-deceased-father.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Christian-mans-appeal-to-bury-deceased-father.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":229801,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/18\/dakshadialogues-tribunals-in-india-independent-judicial-bodies-or-extended-executive-arm\/","url_meta":{"origin":354844,"position":2},"title":"#DakshaDialogues | Tribunals in India \u2013 Independent Judicial Bodies or Extended Executive Arm?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Deepak Gupta, former judge of the Supreme Court of India, was part of the 5-judge bench in Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank. In November 2019, the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court came out with its verdict in this case. The constitutional issue involved here goes to the heart of judicial\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Law School News"","block_context":{"text":"Law School News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG-20200518-WA0001.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG-20200518-WA0001.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG-20200518-WA0001.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG-20200518-WA0001.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG-20200518-WA0001.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347445,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/09\/former-cji-nv-ramana-speaks-at-his-book-release-narratives-off-the-bench-a-judge-speaks\/","url_meta":{"origin":354844,"position":3},"title":"\u201cJudiciary is [one of] the last remaining spaces of hope for common man\u201d: Former CJI N.V. Ramana at his book release \u2018Narratives off the Bench: A Judge Speaks\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"May 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On 07-05-2025, EBC organised a book release event for the launch of Former CJI N.V. Ramana\u2019s book titled \u2018Narratives off the Bench: A Judge Speaks\u2019 at the Delhi High Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Events\/Webinars"","block_context":{"text":"Events\/Webinars","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/events-and-webinars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"N.V. Ramana book release","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/N.V.-Ramana-book-release.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/N.V.-Ramana-book-release.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/N.V.-Ramana-book-release.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/N.V.-Ramana-book-release.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/10\/justice-surya-kant-speaks-at-release-former-cji-nv-ramana-book-narratives-off-the-bench-a-judge-speaks\/","url_meta":{"origin":354844,"position":4},"title":"\u201cJustice is a sleeping force which judges must breathe life into and awaken\u201d: Justice Surya Kant speaks at release of Former CJI N.V. Ramana\u2019s book","author":"Editor","date":"May 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On 07-05-2025, EBC organised a book release event for the launch of Former CJI N.V. Ramana\u2019s book titled \u2018Narratives off the Bench: A Judge Speaks\u2019 at the Delhi High Court.","rel":"","context":"In "New releases"","block_context":{"text":"New releases","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/book-releases\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"N.V. Ramana book release","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-10T121657.186.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-10T121657.186.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-10T121657.186.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-10T121657.186.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/constitution-amendment-bill-2026-judicial-diversity-reservation-caste-census\/","url_meta":{"origin":354844,"position":5},"title":"Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2026 Proposes Judicial Diversity, Reservation in Promotion, SC Regional Benches & Caste Census Reform","author":"Kriti","date":"February 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduced in the Rajya Sabha, the Bill proposes sweeping constitutional changes to judicial appointments, reservation in promotions, Supreme Court structure, High Court judges\u2019 retirement age, and caste-based census powers.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constitution Amendment Bill 2026","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Constitution-Amendment-Bill-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Constitution-Amendment-Bill-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Constitution-Amendment-Bill-2026.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Constitution-Amendment-Bill-2026.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=354844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354844\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/354849"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=354844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=354844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=354844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}