{"id":354404,"date":"2025-07-24T12:30:31","date_gmt":"2025-07-24T07:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=354404"},"modified":"2025-07-30T10:03:12","modified_gmt":"2025-07-30T04:33:12","slug":"karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Century Club a public authority under RTI Act; Karnataka HC rules land grant by Maharaja of Mysore as substantial state funding"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka High Court:<\/span> In writ petition filed by the Century Club (\u2018Club\u2019) challenging the order dated 14-03-2018 passed by the Karnataka Information Commission, which directed the club to furnish information seeking a certified copy of the list of records maintained by the Club, under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760680\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Right to Information Act, 2005<\/a> (\u2018RTI Act\u2019), a Single-Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Suraj Govindaraj, J.<\/span>, dismissed the petition holding that the grant of 7.5 acres of land by the then Maharaja of Mysore in 1913 constituted a substantial contribution of financing by the State, making the Club a public authority subject to the provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760680\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RTI Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Club, a society registered under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001917631\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960<\/a>, was founded by the Maharaja of Mysore Narasimha Raja Wodeyar and M. Visveswaraya. In 1913, the Maharaja of Mysore granted 7.5 acres of land to the club for its activities, which subsequently vested in the Club and has been used for its purposes ever since. Respondent No.1 applied under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, seeking a certified copy of the list of records maintained by the Club as required to be maintained and certified under Section 4(1)(a) and (b) of the Act, respectively. The Club, by letter dated 19-11-2012, informed Respondent No.1 that it was not a public authority as defined under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act and therefore not required to furnish the information.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Following this denial, Respondent No.1 filed a complaint with the Karnataka Information Commission under Section 18(1) of the RTI Act on 26-06-2013. The complaint alleged that the free grant of 7.5 acres of land by the Maharaja of Mysore amounted to substantial indirect finance by the State, thereby bringing the Club under the ambit of a public authority as per Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. The Karnataka Information Commission, in its order dated 14-03-2018, rejected the Club\u2019s contentions and directed it to furnish the requested information. Challenging this order, the Club filed the present writ petition.<\/p>\n<h3>Issue<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the grant of land on which the Club is situated would amount to a substantial contribution of financing by the State, though made by the then Maharaja of Mysore, for making the RTI Act applicable to the Club?<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the Maharaja of Mysore was the patron-in-chief of the Club, granted 7.5 acres of land in 1913 for the Club\u2019s activities, and no payment was made by the Club for this land. The Court noted that the land grant was from the Kingdom of Mysore, not the personal property of the Maharaja, indicating it was a grant made on behalf of the government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the entire Club is situated on this granted land, and its activities, including sports, leisure, and entertainment for its members, are carried out exclusively on these premises. The Court further observed that without this land, the very existence of the Club would fall into doubt because no activities of the Club could be carried out without this land being available to it. The Court noted that even though the day-to-day expenses were met by the contributions made by the members, the fundamental dependence on the granted land remained.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted the decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">D.A.V. College Trust &amp; Management Society<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Director of Public Instructions<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/m8LOEf6m\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2019) 9 SCC 185<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court had held that \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">substantial means a large portion, not necessarily more than 50%, and that a grant of land free of cost or at a heavy discount can itself constitute substantial financing, especially if the institution\u2019s very establishment is dependent on such State largesse. Further, the value of the land should be evaluated not only on the date of allotment but also on the date when the question of substantial financing arises<\/span>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Applying this principle, the Court observed that the current valuation of the 7.5 acres of land, situated in the centre of the city, would run into hundreds of crores if not thousands. The contribution made by the members of the Club, as membership fees or any other head of account, pales into insignificance when compared to the value of the land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In light of the afore-stated reasons, the Court observed that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">there was a substantial contribution made by the State. i.e., the erstwhile Kingdom of Mysore, through the Maharaja of Mysore, granted 7.5 acres of land to the Club in 1913, thereby making the provisions of the RTI Act applicable<\/span>. The Court found no infirmity in the order passed by the Karnataka Information Commission.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court dismissed the petition, holding that the grant of land on which the Club is situated amounted to a substantial contribution of financing by the State, made by the then Maharaja of Mysore, and that the RTI Act was applicable to the Club.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Century Club v. S. Umapathy, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3p3kVi17\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Kar 11651<\/a>, decided on 08-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> M.S. Rajendra, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> S. Umapathy, Party-in-Person for C\/R1; G.B. Sharath Gowda<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Without this land, the very existence of the Club would fall into doubt inasmuch as no activities of the Club could be carried out without this land being available to it.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":354409,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[85885,85888,28334,37470,67133,85886,3609,13821,85887,85884],"class_list":["post-354404","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-century-club","tag-dav-college-trust-case","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-karnataka-information-commission","tag-land-grant","tag-maharaja-of-mysore","tag-public_authority","tag-rti-act","tag-section-2h-rti-act","tag-substantial-state-financing"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC: Century Club is public authority under RTI Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court held that Century Club is a public authority under the RTI Act, observing that the historic land grant by the Maharaja of Mysore constitutes substantial financing by the State.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Century Club a public authority under RTI Act; Karnataka HC rules land grant by Maharaja of Mysore as substantial state funding\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court held that Century Club is a public authority under the RTI Act, observing that the historic land grant by the Maharaja of Mysore constitutes substantial financing by the State.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-24T07:00:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-30T04:33:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Century Club a public authority under RTI Act; Karnataka HC rules land grant by Maharaja of Mysore as substantial state funding\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC: Century Club is public authority under RTI Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-24T07:00:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-30T04:33:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Karnataka High Court held that Century Club is a public authority under the RTI Act, observing that the historic land grant by the Maharaja of Mysore constitutes substantial financing by the State.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Century Club is public authority\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Century Club a public authority under RTI Act; Karnataka HC rules land grant by Maharaja of Mysore as substantial state funding\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC: Century Club is public authority under RTI Act | SCC Times","description":"Karnataka High Court held that Century Club is a public authority under the RTI Act, observing that the historic land grant by the Maharaja of Mysore constitutes substantial financing by the State.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Century Club a public authority under RTI Act; Karnataka HC rules land grant by Maharaja of Mysore as substantial state funding","og_description":"Karnataka High Court held that Century Club is a public authority under the RTI Act, observing that the historic land grant by the Maharaja of Mysore constitutes substantial financing by the State.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-24T07:00:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-30T04:33:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Century Club a public authority under RTI Act; Karnataka HC rules land grant by Maharaja of Mysore as substantial state funding","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/","name":"Kar HC: Century Club is public authority under RTI Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-24T07:00:31+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-30T04:33:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Karnataka High Court held that Century Club is a public authority under the RTI Act, observing that the historic land grant by the Maharaja of Mysore constitutes substantial financing by the State.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Century Club is public authority"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/karnataka-hc-century-club-is-public-authority-under-rti-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Century Club a public authority under RTI Act; Karnataka HC rules land grant by Maharaja of Mysore as substantial state funding"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Century-Club-is-public-authority.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216034,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/24\/kar-hc-mysore-race-club-not-to-be-dispossessed-of-its-land-till-the-application-for-renewal-is-considered\/","url_meta":{"origin":354404,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Mysore Race Club not to be dispossessed of its land till the application for renewal is considered","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Alok Aradhe, J. disposed of the present writ petition directing the competent authority of the State Government to decide upon the application of the petitioner. The facts of the case are that the petitioner, Mysore Race Club Ltd., was incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":356876,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/karnataka-high-court-nirmithi-kendra-public-authority-rti-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":354404,"position":1},"title":"Inside Karnataka High Court\u2019s order holding Nirmithi Kendra a Public Authority under RTI Act","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA perusal of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, would indicate that it is not only funding, but also control, which would have to be considered to determine whether it is a public authority or not.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Nirmithi Kendra","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nirmithi-Kendra.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nirmithi-Kendra.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nirmithi-Kendra.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nirmithi-Kendra.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364883,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/27\/karnataka-high-court-no-rti-disclosure-of-passport-details-loc-personal-privacy-danger\/","url_meta":{"origin":354404,"position":2},"title":"Karnataka High Court rules against disclosure of passport details under RTI citing right to privacy and personal danger","author":"Editor","date":"October 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe exemption under Section 8 of the RTI Act is available to information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"disclosure of passport details","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/disclosure-of-passport-details.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/disclosure-of-passport-details.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/disclosure-of-passport-details.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/disclosure-of-passport-details.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/27\/jagadish-v-state-of-karnataka-ptcl-act-granted-land-analysis-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":354404,"position":3},"title":"Granted Land under PTCL Act: An Analysis of Jagadish v. State of Karnataka","author":"Editor","date":"November 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Pavithra Thammaiah*, Amruthavarshini** and Esha Sanjyot Shah***","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"PTCL Act Granted Land Interpretation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/PTCL-Act-Granted-Land-Interpretation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/PTCL-Act-Granted-Land-Interpretation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/PTCL-Act-Granted-Land-Interpretation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/PTCL-Act-Granted-Land-Interpretation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":31171,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/31\/acquisition-of-land-by-the-mysore-urban-development-authority-for-the-purpose-of-developing-an-engineering-college-held-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":354404,"position":4},"title":"Acquisition of land by the Mysore Urban Development Authority for the purpose of developing an engineering college, held illegal","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 31, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Answering an appeal preferred against the judgement of the High Court of Karnataka, the Division Bench of Ranjan Gogoi and N.V. Ramana, JJ., held the impugned acquisition of land by Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA), for the purpose of developing an engineering college as illegal, as the mandatory\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":123161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/","url_meta":{"origin":354404,"position":5},"title":"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the petition challenging the validity of the conveyance deed of a property situated in Bangalore in favour of the Dewan of Mysore in the year 1900, the Court held that after 104 years of the execution of the original conveyance deed, and after acquiring various lands out\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354404","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=354404"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354404\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/354409"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=354404"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=354404"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=354404"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}