{"id":354113,"date":"2025-07-22T10:00:22","date_gmt":"2025-07-22T04:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=354113"},"modified":"2025-07-23T17:47:40","modified_gmt":"2025-07-23T12:17:40","slug":"supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Service Tax Exemption | Whether collection, processing, & storing umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019? SC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering an appeal against Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) verdict holding that services of enrolment, collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells, provided by the appellant, do not fall within the scope of \u201cHealthcare Services\u201d; the Division Bench of J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan*<\/span>, JJ., found that the appellant\u2019s services fell within the ambit of \u201cHealthcare Services<\/span>\u201d as defined under the exemption Notification No.25\/2012\u2014Service Tax dated 20-06-2012. It was held that these services are preventive and curative in nature and encompass diagnosis, treatment, and care.<\/p>\n

Background and Legal Trajectory:<\/h3>\n

Stemcyte India Therapeutics Ltd. (the appellant) engaged in the collection, processing, testing, and storage of umbilical cord blood units and their therapeutic application and is a member of the Association of Stem Cell Banks of India.<\/p>\n

On 27-12-2011, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, issued notification No. GSR 899(E)<\/span> notifying the Drugs and Cosmetics (3rd<\/span> Amendment) Rules, 2011. Under these rules, cord blood banks were required to obtain registration. Part XIID of the Rules set out detailed requirements relating to the collection, processing, testing, and release of umbilical cord blood-derived stem cells. Subsequently, the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, issued Notification No.25\/2012\u2014Service Tax dated 20-06-2012<\/span>, which provided a consolidated list of services exempt from service tax. Under Serial No. 2 of the said notification, \u201cHealthcare Services<\/span>\u201d were exempted. This notification superseded the earlier Notification No. 12\/2012\u2014Service Tax dated 17-03-2012<\/span>. Accordingly, with effect from 01-07-2012, the negative list regime of service tax was introduced, rendering all services taxable unless specifically included in the negative list or expressly exempted otherwise.<\/p>\n

On 21-09-2012, the Association of Stem Cell Banks of India submitted a representation to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, seeking clarification on whether the services rendered by stem cell banks qualified as \u201cHealthcare Services\u201d. In response, the Ministry, after consultation with the National AIDS Control Organization, issued an Office Memorandum dated 22-05-2013, clarifying that the services rendered by stem cell banks are part of \u201cHealthcare Services\u201d and may be considered for exemption from service tax.<\/p>\n

On 24-10-2013, the appellant obtained Service Tax Registration under the category \u201chealthcare services by clinical establishment, health check-up \/ diagnosis, etc.\u201d from the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The Ministry of Finance issued Notification No. 4\/2014-ST dated 17-02-2014<\/span>, inserting Entry 2A<\/span>, which exempted from service tax the services provided by cord blood banks by way of preservation of stem cells or any other services in relation to such preservation.<\/p>\n

Subsequently, the Commissioner issued summons and letters to the appellant demanding service tax for the period from 01-07-2012 to 16-02-2014. In response, the appellant submitted replies along with the necessary documents and deposited a sum of Rs. 40,00,000, stating that the payment was made under protest, as the services provided by it, were exempt as per Notification dated 20-6-2012. The appellant\u2019s refund claim was also rejected by the Commissioner. Aggrieved, the appellant filed an appeal before CESTAT. Thereafter, the Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Gandhinagar issued a show cause notice demanding service tax of Rs. 2,07,29,576 along with interest for services rendered between 01-07-2012 and 16-02-2014 and proposed imposition of penalties under sections 77(1)(a)<\/a>, 77(1)(d)<\/a>, 77(2)<\/a> and 78<\/a> of the Finance Act, 1994<\/a>. The Commissioner passed Order-in-Original dated 18-05-2018, confirming the demand and penalties. Aggrieved, the appellant filed a statutory appeal before the CESTAT.<\/p>\n

By a common order dated 02-08-2024, the CESTAT confirmed the demand of service tax, interest and penalties imposed, and the rejection of refund claim made by the appellant, which led to the instant appeal before the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

Court\u2019s Assessment:<\/h3>\n

Perusing the facts of the case and materials on record, the Court pointed out that the primary dispute relates to the period between 01-07-2012 and 16-02-2014<\/span> and whether the appellant\u2019s services during this period fell within the ambit of \u201cHealthcare Services\u201d and are therefore, eligible for exemption from payment of service tax.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that show cause notice demanding service tax of Rs. 2,07,29,576 along with interest for services during the afore-stated period was issued only on 28-7-2017. Under section 73(1)<\/a> of the Finance Act, 1994<\/a>, a show cause notice must ordinarily be issued within one year from the relevant date<\/span>. The proviso to section 73(1) allows an extended period of up to five years only<\/span> where the nonpayment or short payment of service tax is due to fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts etc., with an intent to evade payment of service tax.<\/p>\n

Perusing a 2013 communication issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-III; the Court pointed out that department was already aware of the nature<\/span> of the appellant\u2019s operations as early as in 2013. Despite such awareness, the department issued the show cause notice after an inordinate delay, well beyond the ordinary period of limitation, and sought to justify it by invoking the extended period.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the services rendered by the appellant were not exempt from service tax until Notification dated 20-06-2012 was issued. The records revealed that the appellant was under a bona fide belief that the activity of enrolment, collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells fell within the scope of exempted \u201cHealthcare Services\u201d and therefore, was not liable to service tax. Furthermore, there was nothing on record to suggest that the appellant suppressed any material facts. On the contrary, they responded promptly to departmental communications and even deposited a sum of Rs. 40,00,000\/- during the investigation. There was no allegation or evidence of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, or contravention of statutory provisions with intent to evade tax. \u201cIt is a settled principle of law that, for the department to invoke the extended period of limitation, there must be an active and deliberate act on the part of the assessee to evade payment of tax. Mere non-payment of tax, without any element of intent or suppression, is not sufficient to attract the extended limitation period<\/span>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Therefore, in the absence of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts with an intent to evade payment of service tax, the invocation of the extended period of limitation<\/span> under Section 73<\/a> of the Finance Act, 1994<\/a> was wholly unwarranted<\/span>. Therefore, show cause notice issued by the department was clearly time-barred.<\/p>\n

Coming onto the second leg of appellant\u2019s contention regarding the period between 01-07-2012 to 17-02-2014, for the purpose of exemption from the levy of service tax. The services provided by cord blood banks, including preservation of stem cells or any other services related to such preservation, are exempt from service tax. The Court considered whether Notification dated 17-02-2014 was clarificatory as contended by the appellant and therefore, ought to be applied retrospectively with effect from 01-07-2012<\/p>\n

The Court found that that stem cell banking services constitute a healthcare service, which was specifically so stated by the notification dated 17-02-2014, the said notification must necessarily be held to be illustrative and clarificatory to that extent<\/span>. However, the said notification cannot be applied to cases where assessments have already been made, and service tax has been paid without demur. However, in respect of pending claims, ongoing assessments, and existing disputes that are sub judice, it can be said that the notification dated 17-02-2014 is a clarification to the earlier notification dated 01-07-2012. It is a well-settled principle of law that unless a notification or circular explicitly provides for retrospective operation, it must be construed as prospective. Admittedly, the notification dated 17-2-2014 does not contain any express provision indicating retrospective effect<\/span>. Therefore, it can only be applied prospectively.<\/p>\n

The Court further deemed it fit to overrule Madras High Court\u2019s decision in Life Cell International (P) Ltd. v. Union of India<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a>, in principle to the extent it held that amendment introduced by Notification No. 4\/2014-ST dated 17-2-2014 could not be construed as clarificatory.<\/p>\n

Vis-a-vis whether the services rendered by the by the appellant \u2014 relating to enrolment, collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells \u2014 fall within the definition of “Healthcare Services”, so as to qualify for exemption from service tax during the disputed period; the Court pointed out that Notification dated 20-6-2012 provided a consolidated list of services exempt from service tax.<\/p>\n

Perusing the relevant provision about \u2018healthcare services\u2019, the Court pointed out that Clause 2(t) of the said Notification defines \u201chealth care services\u201d broadly<\/span> covering diagnosis, treatment, or care for illness, injury, deformity, abnormality, or pregnancy in any recognised system of medicines in India. use of the phrase \u201cany service\u201d gives an expansive scope to the term<\/span>. Though the terms \u201cdiagnosis\u201d, \u201ctreatment\u201d, and \u201ccare\u201d are not specifically defined under the Finance Act, 1994<\/a>, their ordinary meanings include acts like identifying illness causes, curing diseases or injuries, and ensuring well-being or preventive healthcare.<\/p>\n

The appellant is a clinical establishment under 20-6-2012 Notification, which was not disputed by the Department. The appellant\u2019s core activities \u2014 collection and preservation of umbilical cord blood (UCB) stem cells \u2014 are preventive in nature, with potential curative applications for life-threatening diseases. The processing, testing, cryopreservation, and eventual release for transplantation constitute integral components of healthcare aimed at future diagnosis, treatment, and care. Stem cell transplantation depends on extensive matching and testing conducted by the appellant. Doctors, who have utilised their services have certified the critical role played by the appellant in treating blood-related disorders. Further, the appellant has been actively involved in post-transplant monitoring, clinical trials (including those for spinal cord injuries), and collaborations with international medical experts. Their services also support research on conditions like autism and cerebral palsy. Recognition under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act (post-amendment dated 17-12-2012) reinforced their status as a legitimate healthcare provider<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The Court explained that the insertion of Entry 2A did not curtail the scope of Serial No.2 under Notification No. 25\/2012-ST<\/span>. The absence of express inclusion of cord blood services in earlier notifications does not alter their essential healthcare nature. Therefore, the appellant\u2019s services are well within the ambit of \u201cHealthcare Services\u201d. Furthermore, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, through an Office Memorandum dated 22-05-2013 clarified in consultation with the National AIDS control Organization that stem cell banking is a part of \u201chealth care services\u201d and qualifies for exemption.<\/p>\n

The Court found that the appellant acted under a bona fide belief that their activities were covered under Entry 2 of the Exemption Notification dated 20-06-2012. The records substantiate that the appellant had addressed multiple representations. Their consistent engagement with the authorities further reinforced their bona fide conduct.<\/p>\n

\u201cPenal provisions are meant to deter deliberate contravention of statutory provisions and are not intended to penalize bona fide taxpayers\u201d.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court held that imposition of penalties and interest imposed on the appellant was arbitrary, unjust, and unsustainable in law. Thus, the impugned orders were set aside and the Court directed that the deposit of Rs. 40,00,000 made by the appellant shall be refunded to them.<\/p>\n

[Stemcyte India Therapeutics Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1412<\/a>, decided on 14-7-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice R. Mahadevan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For Appellant(s):<\/span> Krishnamohan K., AOR Ms. Dania Nayyar, Adv. Ms. Meetika Baghel, Adv.<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. V.C. Bharti, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

1.<\/a> (2016) 6 VST-OL 50<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Summons and letters were issued to the appellant demanding service tax for the period from 01-07-2012 to 16-02-2014. Furthermore, a show cause notice demanding service tax of Rs. 2,07,29,576 along with interest for services during the afore-stated period was also issued. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":354125,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[6651,85718,29955,70880,3208,69775,85717,85716,85719],"class_list":["post-354113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-cestat","tag-healthcare-provider","tag-healthcare-services","tag-justice-r-mahadevan","tag-service_tax","tag-service-tax-exemption","tag-stem-cell-banks","tag-stem-cells","tag-stemcyte-india-therapeutics-ltd"],"yoast_head":"\nSC on stem cell banking as \u2018healthcare services\u2019 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Stem cell banking: Supreme Court held that collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019 hence exempt from service tax.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Service Tax Exemption | Whether collection, processing, & storing umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019? SC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Stem cell banking: Supreme Court held that collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019 hence exempt from service tax.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-22T04:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-23T12:17:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Service Tax Exemption | Whether collection, processing, & storing umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019? SC answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"SC on stem cell banking as \u2018healthcare services\u2019 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-22T04:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-23T12:17:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Stem cell banking: Supreme Court held that collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019 hence exempt from service tax.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"stem cell banking\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Service Tax Exemption | Whether collection, processing, & storing umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019? SC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC on stem cell banking as \u2018healthcare services\u2019 | SCC Times","description":"Stem cell banking: Supreme Court held that collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019 hence exempt from service tax.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Service Tax Exemption | Whether collection, processing, & storing umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019? SC answers","og_description":"Stem cell banking: Supreme Court held that collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019 hence exempt from service tax.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-22T04:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-23T12:17:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Service Tax Exemption | Whether collection, processing, & storing umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019? SC answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/","name":"SC on stem cell banking as \u2018healthcare services\u2019 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-22T04:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-23T12:17:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Stem cell banking: Supreme Court held that collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019 hence exempt from service tax.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"stem cell banking"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/supreme-court-on-stem-cell-banking-healthcare-services-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Service Tax Exemption | Whether collection, processing, & storing umbilical cord blood stem cells are \u2018healthcare services\u2019? SC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/stem-cell-banking.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":358919,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/04\/sky-lark-education-exempt-from-service-tax-cestat\/","url_meta":{"origin":354113,"position":0},"title":"SKY Lark Education Welfare Society an educational institution; will be exempted from service tax: CESTAT","author":"Bharti","date":"September 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSKY Lark Education Welfare Society is imparting education to students of Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, enrolled under the distant learning programme, as per its curriculum and it is duly recognized under the laws of the Uttar Pradesh Government\/UGC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SKY Lark Education exempt from service tax","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/SKY-Lark-Education-exempt-from-service-tax.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/SKY-Lark-Education-exempt-from-service-tax.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/SKY-Lark-Education-exempt-from-service-tax.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/SKY-Lark-Education-exempt-from-service-tax.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324296,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/13\/cestat-upholds-order-directing-to-pay-service-tax-for-construction-of-racetrack\/","url_meta":{"origin":354113,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Racetrack not meant for public access as a right, thus not exempted from tax\u2019; CESTAT upholds order directing to pay service tax for construction of racetrack","author":"Arushi","date":"June 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Tribunal stated that for a place to fall within the ambit of a public place, the element of right of access of public was a necessary concomitant.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CESTAT.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273212,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/07\/whether-refund-can-be-claimed-on-the-service-tax-deposited-on-construction-of-individual-independent-residential-houses-cestat-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":354113,"position":2},"title":"Whether refund can be claimed on the service tax deposited on ‘construction’ of individual\/ independent ‘residential’ houses? CESTAT answers","author":"Editor","date":"September 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and Subba Rao (Technical Member) allowed an appeal holding that appellant is entitled to claim refund of the service tax deposited by the appellant on construction of individual\/independent residential houses. The appeal was filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/01\/cestat-when-road-construction-is-exempt-is-every-activity-exempt-relating-to-the-road-construction-including-consulting-engineer-services-tribunal-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":354113,"position":3},"title":"CESTAT | When road construction is exempt; is every activity exempt relating to the road construction including consulting engineer services? Tribunal answers","author":"Editor","date":"October 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal which was filed against the Order-in Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & Central Excise Appeal Commissionerate, Allahabad. Appellants were providing \u2018Consulting Engineer Service\u2019 taxable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254562,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/22\/extended-period-of-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":354113,"position":4},"title":"CESTAT | Even when an assessee has suppressed facts, the extended period of limitation can be invoked only when \u201csuppression\u201f or \u201ccollusion\u201d is wilful with an intent to evade payment of duty; Tribunal decides","author":"Editor","date":"September 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and C.J. Mathew (Technical Member) allowed an appeal which was filed against the order passed by Principal Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi, by which the demand of service tax had been confirmed with interest and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/service-tax-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":354113,"position":5},"title":"CESTAT | Whether the service tax can be demanded on the construction of houses for rehabilitation of poor people under JNNURM? Tribunal answers","author":"Editor","date":"August 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal which was filed with the main issue of as to whether the service tax have been rightly demanded on the appellant who had constructed houses for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354113","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=354113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354113\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/354125"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=354113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=354113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=354113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}