{"id":353674,"date":"2025-07-17T14:00:32","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T08:30:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353674"},"modified":"2025-07-21T09:56:53","modified_gmt":"2025-07-21T04:26:53","slug":"rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/","title":{"rendered":"Rajasthan High Court | Appointed on compassionate ground; terminated after 15 years for having 3 children: A travesty of Justice"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a Civil Writ Petition, filed by the son of a martyr appointed on compassionate basis, challenging the termination order on ground of ineligibility for having 3 children at the time of appointment, a single-judge bench of Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.<\/span>, quashed and set aside the termination order, holding that if a person has served the department for fifteen long years, it would be a travesty of justice to terminate his services by treating him ineligible for appointment, particularly when he did not secure employment by unfair means. The Court emphasised that compassionate appointment policies, designed for humanitarian ends, should not be enforced with undue rigidity to cause injustice.<\/p>\n

BACKGROUND<\/h3>\n

The petitioner\u2019s father, serving as a Hawaldar in the Indian Armed Forces, attained martyrdom during Operation Pawan. Pursuant to a notification by the respondent inviting applications for compassionate appointments to the families of martyrs, the petitioner applied for such an appointment. After due verification of his qualifications and family details, the petitioner was appointed on compassionate grounds to the post of Lower Division Clerk (\u2018LDC\u2019) and joined on 25-02-2010. He was confirmed on the said post on 02-03-2012, after satisfactorily completing two years of service. The petitioner duly submitted all family details, including information about his wife and three children, for his service records and State Insurance purposes. In 2019, a complaint was made to the respondent department alleging that the petitioner had three children at the time of appointment. Despite petitioner\u2019s explanation reiterating that his marital status and children\u2019s details were disclosed in 2012, his services were terminated vide order dated 26-12-2024. Aggrieved by this, the petitioner filed the present petition.<\/p>\n

ISSUE<\/h3>\n

Whether the action of the respondents for terminating the petitioner\u2019s services, after more than a decade of continuous service, based on a delayed complaint alleging eligibility issues, can be sustained in law or not?<\/p>\n

COURT\u2019S OBSERVATION<\/h3>\n

The Court reiterated that compassionate appointment, while not a vested right, is a policy-driven exception aimed at providing immediate relief and socio-economic support to families of deceased government employees. The purpose is not to offer long-term employment, but to prevent the family from slipping into financial hardship. This welfare-driven intention must guide the interpretation and implementation of such schemes.<\/p>\n

The Court referring to referred to Umesh Kumar Nagpal<\/span> v. State of Haryana<\/span>, (1994) 4 SCC 138<\/span><\/a>, noted that one of the exceptions to the appointments in public service made strictly based on open invitation of application and merit is compassionate appointment. In certain cases, unless some source of livelihood is provided, the family would not be able to make both ends meet, a provision is made in the rules to provide gainful employment to one of the dependents of the deceased who may be eligible for such employment. The object of compassionate appointment is to enable the family to tide over the immediate crisis, and such matters must be dealt with sensitivity and compassion.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that in Md. Zamil Ahmed<\/span> v. State of Bihar<\/span>, (2016) 12 SCC 342<\/span><\/a>, the Supreme Court held that the State should not terminate services after a lapse of 15 years on grounds of policy violation, especially when the employee was not responsible for any false declaration or suppression of material facts. The Court observed that in the present case, there was nothing on record to suggest that the petitioner suppressed any material fact or procured employment by fraud. The details regarding his children were submitted in 2012 and duly accepted by the department. The complaint surfaced nearly ten years after his appointment and service confirmation.<\/p>\n

The Court emphasized that compassionate appointment policies should not be enforced with undue rigidity.<\/span> Since the petitioner had not suppressed any material facts and the respondent authority, after thorough scrutiny, found him fit for appointment, it would be manifestly unjust and excessively harsh to terminate his services after an uninterrupted period of 15 years.<\/p>\n

Such action would defeat the object of compassionate appointment and cause irreparable harm to the petitioner. The principles of natural justice, legitimate expectation, and equity weighed heavily in favor of the petitioner, especially as no fraud or misrepresentation was attributed to him.<\/span> The Court further stated that the disqualification on the ground of having three children could not override the humanitarian objective of the compassionate appointment scheme, particularly in cases involving martyrdom where a humane and flexible approach is constitutionally expected by the State.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that,<\/p>\n

\u201cThe insistence on technical compliance, especially when there is no allegation of malafide or concealment, defeats the very objective of such schemes. The rules framed to serve humanitarian ends should not be used as instruments of injustice. Even assuming there was a technical breach, the same ought to have been viewed in the light of the petitioner\u2019s unique circumstances and long, blemish-free service.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Court also noted that the Enquiry Officer\u2019s report confirmed that the petitioner had not suppressed any information.<\/p>\n

In light of the afore-stated reasons, the Court quashed the termination order.<\/p>\n

[Sagar Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, 2025 SCC OnLine Raj 3333<\/a>, decided on 08-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Kailash Jangid, Mohan Singh Shekhawat, Kunal Singh Rathore, Abhinav Pareek, Advocates<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Meenal Singhvi for Rajesh Panwar, Sr. Adv. & AAG<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Terminating the services of an employee appointed on compassionate grounds after 15 years, on the basis of ineligibility at the time of appointment, amounts to a travesty of justice, especially when no fraud or suppression of facts is alleged.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":353684,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[5181,10391,85458,2805,2575,85459,32834],"class_list":["post-353674","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compassionate-appointment","tag-humanitarian-grounds","tag-martyrs-son","tag-natural_justice","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-terminated-for-having-3-children","tag-termination-of-service"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC sets aside termination of a compassionate appointee for having 3 children| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court set aside the termination of compassionate appointee for having 3 children, deeming it a travesty of justice.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court | Appointed on compassionate ground; terminated after 15 years for having 3 children: A travesty of Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court set aside the termination of compassionate appointee for having 3 children, deeming it a travesty of justice.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T08:30:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-21T04:26:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court | Appointed on compassionate ground; terminated after 15 years for having 3 children: A travesty of Justice\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC sets aside termination of a compassionate appointee for having 3 children| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T08:30:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-21T04:26:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court set aside the termination of compassionate appointee for having 3 children, deeming it a travesty of justice.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Termination of Compassionate appointee for having 3 children\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court | Appointed on compassionate ground; terminated after 15 years for having 3 children: A travesty of Justice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC sets aside termination of a compassionate appointee for having 3 children| SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court set aside the termination of compassionate appointee for having 3 children, deeming it a travesty of justice.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajasthan High Court | Appointed on compassionate ground; terminated after 15 years for having 3 children: A travesty of Justice","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court set aside the termination of compassionate appointee for having 3 children, deeming it a travesty of justice.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-17T08:30:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-21T04:26:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Rajasthan High Court | Appointed on compassionate ground; terminated after 15 years for having 3 children: A travesty of Justice","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/","name":"Raj HC sets aside termination of a compassionate appointee for having 3 children| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-17T08:30:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-21T04:26:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court set aside the termination of compassionate appointee for having 3 children, deeming it a travesty of justice.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Termination of Compassionate appointee for having 3 children"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-termination-of-compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajasthan High Court | Appointed on compassionate ground; terminated after 15 years for having 3 children: A travesty of Justice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Termination-of-Compassionate-appointee-for-having-3-children.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":207255,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/question-of-compassionate-appointment-does-not-arise-when-a-family-member-already-working-in-a-corporation\/","url_meta":{"origin":353674,"position":0},"title":"Question of compassionate appointment does not arise when a family member already working in a corporation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shivaji Pandey, J. dismissed a petition as the denial of compassionate appointment was justified on the part of the respondents. The petitioners challenged an order wherein their services were terminated on the ground that their family members were already in service\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":358332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/bhc-on-termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":353674,"position":1},"title":"Employee cannot be terminated by \u2018stroke of pen\u2019: Bombay High Court reinstates employee terminated over non-disclosure of trivial gambling offence","author":"Editor","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe employer should take into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances available as to antecedents and keeping in view the objective criteria, while taking appropriate decision. Mere suppression does not mean that employer can arbitrarily terminate the services of employee.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"termination over non-disclosure of gambling offence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/termination-over-non-disclosure-of-gambling-offence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354137,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/rajasthan-hc-termination-questionable-integrity-stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory\/","url_meta":{"origin":353674,"position":2},"title":"Order of termination on ground of questionable integrity is stigmatic; Holding enquiry mandatory: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the present case, since the petitioner was found involved in carrying passengers without tickets and the allegation was that his integrity is questionable, consequently, his services were terminated, therefore, the same can easily be termed as an \u201corder of termination\u201d having been passed with stigma\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Stigmatic order enquiry mandatory","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/14\/rajasthan-high-court-directs-state-to-consider-compassionate-appointment-for-son-born-from-second-wife-of-the-deceased\/","url_meta":{"origin":353674,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court directs State to consider compassionate appointment for son born from second wife of the deceased","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Rajasthan High Court: In a case filed by the second wife (petitioner 1) of deceased who was a class IV employee in the respondent-department, challenging rejection order, rejecting his son (petitioner 2) for compassionate appointment, Kuldeep Mathur, J., held that consideration under Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/rajasthan_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251675,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/23\/compassionate-appointment-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":353674,"position":4},"title":"[Compassionate Appointment] Raj HC | Denial of compassionate appointment on fathering third child? Court analyzes Rules of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J., dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the denial of compassionate appointment by communication dated 07-01-2020, as he had fathered a third child after the cut-off date i.e. 01-06-2002. The petitioner\u2019s father was working with the respondent \u2013 department and had died in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":212459,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/raj-hc-state-directed-to-consider-grant-of-exemption-from-test-to-petitioner-on-basis-of-parity-with-other-employees\/","url_meta":{"origin":353674,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | State directed to consider grant of exemption from test to petitioner on basis of parity with other employees","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Goverdhan Bardhar and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. disposed of a petition filed by the petitioner challenging the order of termination of his services with the direction to the petitioner to submit a representation to the Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel for giving exemption to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353674","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353674"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353674\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353674"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353674"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353674"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}