{"id":353656,"date":"2025-07-17T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T06:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353656"},"modified":"2025-07-21T10:01:44","modified_gmt":"2025-07-21T04:31:44","slug":"rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Rajasthan High Court: Justice should not be compromised by procedural lapses and negligence attributable to counsel"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a Criminal Revision Petition, filed by the petitioner challenging the Appellate Court\u2019s order dated 23-08-2022 dismissing the petitioner\u2019s appeal for non-prosecution without giving him the opportunity to be heard, a Single-Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Manoj Kumar Garg, J.<\/span>, set aside the order holding it to be mechanical in nature and against the principles of natural justice. The Court held that the party should not suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence and remanded the matter back to the Appellate Court, directing it to pass a detailed, reasoned\/speaking order in accordance with law, after considering all the material evidence available before it and after giving the petitioner the opportunity of being heard.<\/p>\n<h3>BACKGROUND<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was convicted vide order dated 22-07-2021, for an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a>, and sentenced to one year\u2019s simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 8 Lacs. Against this conviction order, the petitioner filed an appeal which was subsequently dismissed on 23-08-2022 on the ground of non-prosecution, without providing the petitioner a proper opportunity of hearing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Following the dismissal of the appeal, an arrest warrant was issued against the petitioner. Feeling aggrieved by the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution and the subsequent arrest warrant, the petitioner had filed the instant criminal revision petition seeking to quash and set aside the order dated 23-08-2022 and to remand the matter for a fresh decision on merits.<\/p>\n<h3>COURT\u2019S OBSERVATION<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reiterated the doctrine of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">audi alteram partem<\/span>, which contemplates that no one should be condemned unheard, embodying a foundational tenet of natural justice ensuring fairness and preventing arbitrary decisions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 1%;\">The Court noted that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">\u201cA party should not be penalized or prejudiced due to the negligence or misconduct of their legal counsel. The rationale is rooted in the recognition that the integrity of judicial proceedings depends on principles of fairness and justice, and allowing a party to suffer consequences solely from counsel\u2019s negligence would undermine these principles, unjustly penalizing an individual for circumstances beyond his control.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">an appeal against an order of conviction cannot be dismissed in default but must be taken up and decided on merits even if the appellant in person or the counsel representing him is not present.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution and without giving a proper opportunity of hearing. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The appellate court had passed the order in a mechanical and cursory manner, without application of mind, without giving any reasons or findings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held the order dated 23-08-2022 to be mechanical in nature and against the principles of natural justice and set it aside. The Court further remanded the case back to the appellate court, with a direction to pass a detailed, reasoned\/speaking order in accordance with law, after considering all the material evidence available before it and after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to remain present for the hearing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Firm Jehtmal &amp; Sons v. State of Rajasthan, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/x45MPtkP\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Raj 3346<\/a>, decided on 11-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Oshin Sharma, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Virkam Singh Rajpurohit, PP<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;An appeal against an order of conviction cannot be dismissed in default but must be taken up and decided on merits even if the appellant in person or the counsel representing him is not present.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":353663,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[21444,85446,2805,17041,2575,23584],"class_list":["post-353656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-audi-alteram-partem","tag-dismissal-for-non-prosecution","tag-natural_justice","tag-negotiable-instruments-act","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-section-138-ni-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC: Party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore the Rajasthan High Court ruling holding that party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Justice should not be compromised by procedural lapses and negligence attributable to counsel\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore the Rajasthan High Court ruling holding that party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T06:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-21T04:31:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Justice should not be compromised by procedural lapses and negligence attributable to counsel\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC: Party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T06:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-21T04:31:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Explore the Rajasthan High Court ruling holding that party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court: Justice should not be compromised by procedural lapses and negligence attributable to counsel\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC: Party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence | SCC Times","description":"Explore the Rajasthan High Court ruling holding that party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajasthan High Court: Justice should not be compromised by procedural lapses and negligence attributable to counsel","og_description":"Explore the Rajasthan High Court ruling holding that party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-17T06:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-21T04:31:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Rajasthan High Court: Justice should not be compromised by procedural lapses and negligence attributable to counsel","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/","name":"Raj HC: Party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-17T06:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-21T04:31:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Explore the Rajasthan High Court ruling holding that party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Party cannot suffer due to counsel\u2019s negligence"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/rajasthan-hc-party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajasthan High Court: Justice should not be compromised by procedural lapses and negligence attributable to counsel"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Party-cannot-suffer-due-to-counsels-negligence.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/14\/know-thy-newly-appointed-supreme-court-judge-justice-sandeep-mehta\/","url_meta":{"origin":353656,"position":0},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge &#8211; Justice Sandeep Mehta","author":"Editor","date":"November 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Dr. Justice D.Y Chandrachud, CJI, administered oath to Justice Sandeep Mehta on 9-11-2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sandeep Mehta","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Sandeep-Mehta.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Sandeep-Mehta.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Sandeep-Mehta.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Sandeep-Mehta.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/04\/juvenile-record-to-be-destroyed-the-same-no-ground-to-deny-appointment-as-a-police-constable-rajasthan-high-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":353656,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan High Court directs to destroy record of conviction of the child in conflict with law; No ground to deny appointment as a police constable","author":"Editor","date":"March 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the employer is prohibited by law from referring to or taking in consideration the judgment of conviction so as to deprive a successful candidate, who was a child in conflict with law at some point of time from being employed in Government service.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-acquits-district-transport-office-clerk-from-charges-of-demanding-bribery-after-38-years-of-conviction-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":353656,"position":2},"title":"Rajasthan High Court acquits District Transport Office clerk from the charges of demanding bribery after 38 years of conviction","author":"Editor","date":"February 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court stated that the prosecution had failed to prove the demand and acceptance of the bribe by the appellant and mere recovery of money could not be a grounds to consider it as a bribe.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290081,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/19\/supreme-court-set-aside-rajasthan-high-court-judgment-directing-summoning-and-recording-of-evidence-of-ips-ajay-pal-lamba-in-asharam-bapu-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":353656,"position":3},"title":"Asharam Bapu Case| Supreme Court sets aside Rajasthan High Court Judgment directing summoning and recording of evidence of IPS Ajay Pal Lamba","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court said that the power to take additional evidence in an appeal is to be exercised to prevent injustice and failure of justice, and thus, it must be exercised for good and valid reasons necessitating the acceptance of the prayer.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"asharam bapu case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/asharam-bapu-case.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/asharam-bapu-case.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/asharam-bapu-case.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/asharam-bapu-case.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/mere-allegation-of-bias-is-not-fatal-to-disciplinary-inquiry-unless-supported-by-materials-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":353656,"position":4},"title":"Mere allegation of bias is not fatal to disciplinary inquiry unless supported by materials: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Ajay Rastogi* and Abhay S. Oka, JJ., held that non-supply of demanded documents is not sufficient to challenge a disciplinary inquiry unless it is showed what prejudice has been caused due to non-supply. Twelve Lakhs Stolen from UCO Bank The respondent delinquent was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350262,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/10\/rajasthan-high-court-dismisses-plea-challenging-adhoc-committees-conduct-of-kdcas-fresh-election-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":353656,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Stay on entire election is last choice, not first reaction\u2019; Rajasthan High Court dismisses plea challenging Adhoc Committee\u2019s conduct of KDCA\u2019s fresh election","author":"Ritu","date":"June 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFree and fair elections are the cornerstone of democratic governance, including elections of all kinds of governing bodies. Elections are usually best conducted in their usual course, i.e., without any interference and interruptions.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353656"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353656\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353663"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}