{"id":353650,"date":"2025-07-17T11:30:35","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T06:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353650"},"modified":"2025-07-24T09:29:27","modified_gmt":"2025-07-24T03:59:27","slug":"mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/","title":{"rendered":"Madhya Pradesh HC appoints Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In an application filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544910\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">11(6)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (\u2018the Act\u2019) for the appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties concerning development of the Hukumchand Mill Area, the Single Judge Bench of Deepak Khot, J., allowed the application, holding that the dispute was arbitrable as per the agreement and appointed retired Justice Alok Verma as the arbitrator.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">An agreement (\u2018the agreement\/ contract\u2019) was executed between the parties regarding consulting services to be provided by the applicant, CBRE South Asia Pvt Ltd (\u2018CBRE\u2019), for <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">\u2018Preparation of Detailed Masterplan and Project Report for Hukumchand Mill Area at Shivaji Nagar, Indore, Madhya Pradesh\u2019<\/span>. As per the said agreement, the work assigned to CBRE had to be done as per a prescribed timeline.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Allegedly, due to disputes between the parties, a show cause notice was issued by the respondent, M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board (\u2018MPHIDB\u2019), stating that the agreement obligations must be completed\/remedied within 30 days from the date of issuance of the said notice. CBRE denied the allegations made in the show cause notice but assured that the timeline to complete the project would be adhered to. However, due to the default not being remedied, MPHIDB issued a termination notice for the closure of the contract under Clause 2.9.1(a) (\u2018Termination Clause\u2019) of the General Conditions of Contract(\u2018GCC\u2019).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">CBRE contended that they issued a letter (\u2018first notice\u2019) inviting the attention of MPHIDB towards the Arbitration Clause of the agreement. Upon receipt of no response, CBRE issued a notice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544910\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a> (\u2018second notice\u2019) for referring the matter to the arbitrator. When MPHIDB did not act upon the invocation of the Arbitration Clause, CBRE filed the present application.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the outset, the Court noted that the dispute arose as CBRE could not perform the work assigned under the contract within the stipulated time. Thereafter, as the subject matter of the agreement could not be remedied, the termination notice was issued by MPHIDB, which indicated that there was a serious dispute between the parties regarding the performance of their obligations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon perusal of Clauses 8.1 and 8.2 of the GCC (Arbitration Clauses), the Court noted that in case of dispute regarding any matter under the contract, either party may send a written notice to the other party. The recipient shall consider the notice and respond to it in writing within 30 days, but if they fail to respond within 30 days, or the dispute is not amicably settled within 60 days following the response of the recipient, then Clause 8.2 shall become applicable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As per the facts of the case, the Court noted that CBRE issued the first notice on 28-11-2024; 30 days thereafter would have been 27-12-2024, and 60 days thereafter would have been 17-01-2025, i.e., the date of filing of the present application. The Court further noted that, as per the Termination Clause, in the event of termination due to dispute, the parties may refer the matter within 45 days for settlement under the Arbitration Clause. The termination notice was issued on 14-11-2024, and reference by CBRE was made on 06-12-2024 by invoking the Termination Clause of the agreement. Thus, the Court held that the reference to the Termination Clause was within 45 days from the date of the termination notice, and the dispute was covered as per the Arbitration Clause of the agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under Arbitration, 1996 &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831277\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Stamp Act, 1899<\/a>, In re<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/m024up40\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 6 SCC 1<\/a>, wherein it was held that to decide an application under Section 11(6) of the Act, the only important factor is the existence of a prima facie arbitration agreement and no other issues.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">From a bare perusal of the documents on record, the Court stated that it was crystal clear that there was an arbitration agreement between the parties, and any dispute between the parties was required to be resolved as per the Arbitration Clause of the agreement. The Court further held that, as per the termination clause, the termination notice was received well within the stipulated time of 45 days, and CBRE invoked the Arbitration Clause by issuing the first and second notices, which showed the intention of the parties to refer the matter for settlement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court allowed the application, holding that the dispute being arbitrable between the parties was required to be referred to the arbitrator appointed by the Court under Section 11(6) of the Act. Accordingly, the Court appointed Alok Verma, retired Judge, as the arbitrator.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">CBRE South Asia Pvt Ltd v. M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9SDlbr8w\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine MP 5053<\/a>, decided on 25-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Anurag Gohil<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Abhay Kesharwani<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">A dispute had arisen between the M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board and the applicant regarding non-performance of their consulting services in a given timeline as per their agreement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":353652,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24904,85444,85445,85384,85443,7201,81961,32036],"class_list":["post-353650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appointment-of-arbitrator","tag-cbre-south-asia-pvt-ltd","tag-hukumchand-mill-area-development","tag-justice-deepak-khot","tag-m-p-housing-and-infrastructure-development-board","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-section-116-arbitration-act","tag-termination-of-agreement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP HC appoints arbitrator for dispute on Hukumchand Mill Area development | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh HC appointed Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh HC appoints Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh HC appointed Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T06:00:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-24T03:59:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh HC appoints Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC appoints arbitrator for dispute on Hukumchand Mill Area development | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T06:00:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-24T03:59:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Madhya Pradesh HC appointed Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Hukumchand Mill Area development\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madhya Pradesh HC appoints Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC appoints arbitrator for dispute on Hukumchand Mill Area development | SCC Times","description":"Madhya Pradesh HC appointed Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madhya Pradesh HC appoints Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh HC appointed Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-17T06:00:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-24T03:59:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Madhya Pradesh HC appoints Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/","name":"MP HC appoints arbitrator for dispute on Hukumchand Mill Area development | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-17T06:00:35+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-24T03:59:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Madhya Pradesh HC appointed Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Hukumchand Mill Area development"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madhya Pradesh HC appoints Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":353556,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/one-party-cannot-alone-appoint-arbitrator-of-their-choice-mp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":353650,"position":0},"title":"A party alone cannot decide to appoint an Arbitrator of their choice when 2nd party has not given consent: MP High Court","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"July 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cProviso to Section 12(5) gives a discretion to the parties to waive the applicability of the appointment of an Arbitrator by one party, but the word 'may' has been used\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"appointment of arbitrator","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/appointment-of-arbitrator.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/appointment-of-arbitrator.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/appointment-of-arbitrator.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/appointment-of-arbitrator.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/arbitration-petition-calcutta-high-court-appointment-arbitrator-disqualification-section-12-seventh-schedule-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-legal-research-news-scc-online-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":353650,"position":1},"title":"All unilateral appointments of arbitrators are not invalid: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that all the unilateral appointment of arbitrators is not invalid unless the arbitrator's relationship falls within the Seventh Schedule to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349344,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/02\/himachal-pradesh-hc-appoints-new-arbitrator-violation-section-125-of-arbitration-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":353650,"position":2},"title":"Himachal Pradesh HC intervenes in dispute between State and OASYS Cybernetics; Appoints arbitrator on violation of S. 12(5) of A&amp;C Act","author":"Editor","date":"June 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The adjudication by an arbitrator should be such that neither of the parties would get even an iota of doubt with regard to impartiality of the arbitrator.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259640,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/06\/can-section-125-of-arbitration-amendment-act-2015-be-invoked-retrospectively-supreme-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":353650,"position":3},"title":"Can Section 12(5) of Arbitration Amendment Act, 2015 be invoked retrospectively? Supreme Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"January 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Applying the rule against bias and neutrality of the Arbitrator, the Division Bench of M.R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, jj., reiterated that when the arbitration clause is found to be foul with Section 12 (5), the appointment of the arbitrator would be beyond the pale of the arbitration\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":156334,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/13\/mandate-of-arbitrator-to-be-terminated-if-there-is-undue-delay-in-dispute-resolution-process\/","url_meta":{"origin":353650,"position":4},"title":"Mandate of Arbitrator to be terminated if there is undue delay in dispute resolution process","author":"Saba","date":"September 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: In three separate writ petitions, the termination of the mandate of the Arbitrator and the appointment of a new arbitrator was allowed by the Court. The main question before the Court was whether the mandate of an Arbitrator can be terminated and a new arbitrator be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250101,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/21\/appointment-of-arbitrator\/","url_meta":{"origin":353650,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Can sole arbitrator&#8217;s appointment be disputed if he was consultant\/advisor to one of the parties to dispute? Court examines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: J.R. Midha, J., in view of serious doubts on the independence of sole arbitrator as named in the arbitration agreement, appointed another independent arbitrator. Petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Parties had agreed for reference of disputes to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Alternate Dispute Resolution&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Alternate Dispute Resolution","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/alternate_dispute_resolution\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353650\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}