{"id":353639,"date":"2025-07-17T10:30:17","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T05:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353639"},"modified":"2025-07-21T10:03:46","modified_gmt":"2025-07-21T04:33:46","slug":"kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/","title":{"rendered":"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Kerala High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition praying to set aside the complaint lodged by respondent 1 under Section 138<\/a> of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a>, pending before the First-Class Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara, Kollam, the Single Judge Bench of P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J. observed that a litigant could not dictate to the Court which Judge should or should not hear a case. The roster of cases was prepared by the Chief Justice, and the Judge to whom a case was allotted had the authority to decide whether or not to recuse from the matter, if necessary.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the petitioner had appeared in person through online mode and submitted that this Court ought to refrain from entertaining the present writ petition, as a cost had been imposed on the petitioner in an earlier proceeding. The petitioner declined to make any further submissions. The Court observed that the imposition of cost in one case would not automatically result in the imposition of cost in all subsequent cases filed by the petitioner. Each case, it was noted, would be decided on its own merits.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that a litigant could not dictate to the Court which Judge should or should not hear a case. The roster of cases was prepared by the Chief Justice, and the Judge to whom a case was allotted had the authority to decide whether or not to recuse from the matter, if necessary. However, a litigant had no right to demand that a particular Judge avoid hearing the case assigned to them as per the roster. Allowing such a practice would set a dangerous precedent, enabling litigants to pick and choose Judges, which is impermissible.<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that a Judge is duty-bound to hear matters allocated as per the roster notified by the Chief Justice. In the present instance, the case was, admittedly, assigned to the High Court under the prevailing roster. However, the petitioner was not willing to argue the case before the High Court. The submission made by the petitioner was, in itself, contemptuous. Nevertheless, the Court chose not to initiate any contempt proceedings, considering that the petitioner was appearing in person and might not be fully aware of the decorum expected in a court of law or the nature of appropriate submissions.<\/p>\n

That said, it was also recorded that the petitioner had appeared before the High Court in other matters previously. The Court cautioned that if similar submissions were made in the future, appropriate action would be taken in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n

As regards the present case, no steps had been taken by the petitioner to cure the defects as directed by this Court in the order dated 13-06-2025.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed for default.<\/p>\n

[Asif Azad v. Jaimon baby, 2025 SCC OnLine Ker 5096<\/a>, decided on 08-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For Petitioner:<\/span> ADV ASIF AZAD(PARTY-IN-PERSON)<\/p>\n

For Respondent:<\/span> CS HRITHWIK, SR PP<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The roster is prepared by the Chief Justice. The Judge, who is hearing the case, can decide to avoid the case if necessary. But a litigant cannot dictate to the Court to avoid his case by a Judge who is allotted the jurisdiction by the Chief Justice as per the roster. If such a practice is started, the litigants can pick and choose the judge who has to hear their case.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":353641,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[75042,85434,85436,85435,2523,84971],"class_list":["post-353639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-court-decorum","tag-judge-recusal","tag-judge-selection","tag-judicial-roster","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-litigant-rights"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC: Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their Case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court ruled that Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their case, affirming that case allocation is Chief Justice's prerogative.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court ruled that Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their case, affirming that case allocation is Chief Justice's prerogative.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T05:00:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-21T04:33:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"headline\":\"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T05:00:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-21T04:33:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":505,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"court decorum\",\"judge recusal\",\"judge selection\",\"judicial roster\",\"Kerala High Court\",\"litigant rights\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC: Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their Case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T05:00:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-21T04:33:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court ruled that Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their case, affirming that case allocation is Chief Justice's prerogative.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Litigants cannot choose judge\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/17\\\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC: Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their Case | SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court ruled that Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their case, affirming that case allocation is Chief Justice's prerogative.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case","og_description":"Kerala High Court ruled that Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their case, affirming that case allocation is Chief Justice's prerogative.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-17T05:00:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-21T04:33:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/"},"author":{"name":"Apoorva","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"headline":"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case","datePublished":"2025-07-17T05:00:17+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-21T04:33:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/"},"wordCount":505,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp","keywords":["court decorum","judge recusal","judge selection","judicial roster","Kerala High Court","litigant rights"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/","name":"Ker HC: Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their Case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-17T05:00:17+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-21T04:33:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Kerala High Court ruled that Litigants cannot choose judge to decide their case, affirming that case allocation is Chief Justice's prerogative.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Litigants cannot choose judge"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/kerala-high-court-litigants-cannot-choose-judges\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kerala High Court: Litigants have no right to dictate which Judge should or should not hear their case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Litigants-cannot-choose-judge.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":322922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/25\/kerala-hc-directs-registry-list-matters-per-roster-failing-which-strict-disciplinary-action-taken\/","url_meta":{"origin":353639,"position":0},"title":"Kerala HC directs registry to list matters as per roster, failing which strict disciplinary action will be taken","author":"Editor","date":"May 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Office is duty bound to list matters before the concerned Judge strictly as per the roster, unless otherwise ordered by the Chief Justice. Any deviation from this direction, thereby causing difficulty to the Judges or Advocates appearing in the matter, will invite disciplinary action against the officials concerned.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/21\/forum-shopping-bombay-hc-imposes-cost-litigant-recusal-bribery-allegations\/","url_meta":{"origin":353639,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Forum shopping cannot be allowed to litigants\u2019; Bombay HC imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on litigant who sought recusal of Judges on scurrilous bribery allegations","author":"Editor","date":"August 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA Judge may recuse himself from a case entrusted to him by the Chief Justice with his own choice but recusal at the asking of a litigating party, unless justified must never to be acceded to. This would give the impression of the Judge being scared out of the case,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"forum shopping by litigants","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/forum-shopping-by-litigants.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/forum-shopping-by-litigants.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/forum-shopping-by-litigants.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/forum-shopping-by-litigants.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/06\/litigant-should-not-suffer-due-to-inadvertence-of-the-counsel\/","url_meta":{"origin":353639,"position":2},"title":"Litigant should not suffer due to inadvertence of the counsel","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Arindam Lodh, J. disposed of an appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act 1984 and directed the appellant to file his claim before the LA Judge. The appeal was filed against the decision of the LA Judge who dismissed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":139901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/03\/a-well-educated-litigant-is-expected-to-be-vigilant-in-pursuing-a-case-filed-by-or-against-him-in-a-court-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":353639,"position":3},"title":"A well-educated litigant is expected to be vigilant in pursuing a case filed by or against him in a court of law","author":"Saba","date":"July 3, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In an application filed under the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order of the trial court, \u00a0Vinod Goel, J. held that it was the duty of a litigant to be vigilant of his rights as well as of any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":166244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/30\/kerala-love-jihad-case-hadiya-heard-open-court-nov-27\/","url_meta":{"origin":353639,"position":4},"title":"Kerala Love Jihad Case: Hadiya to be heard in open court on Nov 27","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where Kerala High Court annulled the marriage of a Hindu Girl to a Muslim Boy after her conversion to Islam calling it a case of Love Jihad, the 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and AM Khanwilkar and Dr. DY Chandrachud, JJ directed the presence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/what-does-the-term-competence-under-section-24-of-cpc-refer-to-kerala-hc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":353639,"position":5},"title":"What does the term \u2018competence\u2019 under Section 24 of CPC refer to? Kerala HC explains","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Under Section 24 (1) of the Code, the High Court or District Court may at any stage withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any court subordinate to it; and transfer the same for trial or disposal to any court subordinate to it and competent to try or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353639\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353641"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}