{"id":353615,"date":"2025-07-16T18:30:22","date_gmt":"2025-07-16T13:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353615"},"modified":"2025-07-19T09:49:34","modified_gmt":"2025-07-19T04:19:34","slug":"delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants Dynamic Injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho &amp; Others in Reliance trademark suit"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: A suit was filed by Reliance Industries Limited (plaintiff) under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 seeking an ad-interim injunction, restraining the defendant 1 to 21(and such other entities\/ individual during the course of the proceeding to have been engaged in infringing the Plaintiff&#8217;s intellectual property rights) from using the mark \u2018RELIANCE\u2019, \u2018JIO\u2019 and any other mark identical\/ deceptively similar marks, including their variants, as also restraining the said defendants from using any packaging incorporating plaintiff\u2019s artistic work thereby amounting to infringement of the plaintiff\u2019s copyright. Saurabh Banerjee, J., restrained defendant 1 to 21 (and such other entities\/ individuals, their directors, partners, servants, agents, dealers, retailers, distributors and all other persons acting for and on their behalf from manufacturing, offering for sale, selling, marketing\/ advertising, adopting, using and \/ or dealing in any manner with respect to any product and service under the mark \u2018RELIANCE\u2019 and \u2018JIO\u2019 Formative Trademarks or any other identical\/ deceptively similar to mark \u2018RELIANCE\u2019 and \u2018JIO\u2019 including the plaintiff&#8217;s \u2018RELIANCE\u2019 and \u2018JIO\u2019 Formative Trademarks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Plaintiff is a prominent Indian conglomerate and the flagship entity of the Reliance Group. It enjoys a formidable global presence and owns several trademarks including \u201cRELIANCE\u201d and \u201cJIO,\u201d which have been registered across various jurisdictions and in numerous classes of goods and services. The mark \u201cRELIANCE\u201d has been in continuous use since the 1960s, and the mark \u201cJIO\u201d was adopted in 2011 for the Plaintiff\u2019s telecommunications business, which has since expanded into diverse sectors including digital services, cloud computing, retail FMCG, and e-commerce. The Plaintiff emphasized that both marks have been recognized as \u201cwell-known\u201d by the Supreme Court of India and the Bombay High Court, respectively.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The factual backdrop to the present litigation is that in June 2025, the plaintiff discovered multiple online listings offering FMCG goods such as poha, wheat flour, makhana, pulses, lentils, and salt being sold under the \u201cRELIANCE\u201d and \u201cJIO\u201d trademarks on leading e-commerce platforms like Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho, Snapdeal, IndiaMart, and others. Upon further investigation, it was revealed that the source of these infringing listings could be traced back to defendants 1 to 21. These entities were allegedly misusing the plaintiff\u2019s trademarks and copyrighted packaging designs, with the intent of passing off their products as those of the Plaintiff. The plaintiff argued that the infringing goods bore identical logos, color schemes, fonts, and layouts, incorporating distinctive features such as the flame device used by Reliance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff further contended that most of the infringing parties were using fictitious identities, rendering them difficult to trace. This factor, combined with the public interest angle given the products were for human consumption, justified immediate judicial intervention without pre-institution mediation. The plaintiff moved multiple applications seeking exemption from pre-litigation mediation, leave to file additional documents, exemption from advance service, and ad-interim injunctions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court was satisfied with the urgency and gravity of the case, particularly considering the high likelihood of consumer confusion, the deceptive nature of the infringing packaging, and the risk to public health. It acknowledged that the infringing defendants were not only using marks identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiff\u2019s but were also mimicking the overall get-up and trade dress of the plaintiff\u2019s goods. The Court noted that both parties were operating in the same business channels and targeting the same consumer base, including vulnerable and semi-literate consumers in rural markets.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the defendants had no plausible reason for adopting the impugned marks and concluded that their intention was to ride upon the goodwill and reputation of the plaintiff. He emphasized that in cases involving edible products and online commerce, where consumers often rely on brand names and logos to determine the source of goods, even a minor confusion could lead to significant harm. Therefore, the Court underscored the necessity of a stringent standard when assessing the likelihood of confusion in such cases.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining defendant nos. 1 to 21, along with any other infringing entities identified in the course of proceedings, from manufacturing, marketing, offering for sale, or dealing in any manner with goods or services under the marks \u201cRELIANCE,\u201d \u201cJIO,\u201d or any deceptively similar variants. It also restrained them from using packaging that incorporated the Plaintiff\u2019s copyrighted artistic elements or any other visual features that could create confusion or association with the Plaintiff\u2019s goods. Additionally, the Court restrained the use of trading names, domain names, metatags, and other identifiers that could facilitate passing off.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further directed defendant 22 to 28, comprising online platforms such as IndiaMart, Amazon, Flipkart, and others, to delist the infringing listings of the plaint and to furnish complete details such as contact, address, email, and banking information of defendant nos.1 to 21 and other infringing parties operating through their platforms. The platforms were also instructed to remove any future infringing listings upon notification by the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Reliance Industries Limited v. Pawan Kumar Gupta, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8c4IC10Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 4903<\/a>, decided on 10-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Ankit Sahni, Ms. Kritika Sahni, Mr. Chirag Ahluwalia and Mr. Mohit Maru advocates for plaintiff<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Naman Joshi, Ms. Priya Goyal and Mr. Aakash Deep Singh, Advs. for D-22\/ Indiamart. Mr. Akshay Maloo and Mr. Rishabh Rao, Advs. for D-23. Mr. Vivek Ayyagari, Ms. Mishthi Dubey and Mr. Abhay Aren, Advs. for D-25.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The defendants were found to be commercially manufacturing, marketing, and selling various FMCG products. These include Poha, Wheat Flour, Makhana, Pulses, Lentils, Salt, and similar goods. They did so using Reliance&#8217;s well-known and registered &#8216;RELIANCE&#8217; and &#8216;JIO&#8217; trademarks without authorization.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":353621,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32094,72373,80280,85419,35497,5881,85420,61729,78958,50291,72375,74589],"class_list":["post-353615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-amazon","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-dynamicinjunction","tag-ecommercelaw","tag-flipkart","tag-ipr","tag-jiomark","tag-meesho","tag-relianceindustries","tag-snapdeal","tag-trademarkinfringement","tag-trademarklaw"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC grants dynamic injunction in reliance trademark case| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants dynamic injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho and others in a trademark infringement suit filed by Reliance Industries, protecting its &#039;Reliance&#039; and &#039;Jio&#039; marks.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants Dynamic Injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho &amp; Others in Reliance trademark suit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants dynamic injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho and others in a trademark infringement suit filed by Reliance Industries, protecting its &#039;Reliance&#039; and &#039;Jio&#039; marks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-16T13:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-19T04:19:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"890\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"594\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants Dynamic Injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho &amp; Others in Reliance trademark suit\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants dynamic injunction in reliance trademark case| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-16T13:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-19T04:19:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court grants dynamic injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho and others in a trademark infringement suit filed by Reliance Industries, protecting its 'Reliance' and 'Jio' marks.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.webp\",\"width\":890,\"height\":594,\"caption\":\"Reliance Industries Dynamic Injunction\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants Dynamic Injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho &amp; Others in Reliance trademark suit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC grants dynamic injunction in reliance trademark case| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court grants dynamic injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho and others in a trademark infringement suit filed by Reliance Industries, protecting its 'Reliance' and 'Jio' marks.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants Dynamic Injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho & Others in Reliance trademark suit","og_description":"Delhi High Court grants dynamic injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho and others in a trademark infringement suit filed by Reliance Industries, protecting its 'Reliance' and 'Jio' marks.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-16T13:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-19T04:19:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":890,"height":594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants Dynamic Injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho &amp; Others in Reliance trademark suit","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC grants dynamic injunction in reliance trademark case| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-16T13:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-19T04:19:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court grants dynamic injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho and others in a trademark infringement suit filed by Reliance Industries, protecting its 'Reliance' and 'Jio' marks.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.webp","width":890,"height":594,"caption":"Reliance Industries Dynamic Injunction"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-dynamic-injunction-reliance-trademark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants Dynamic Injunction against Amazon, Flipkart, Snapdeal, Meesho &amp; Others in Reliance trademark suit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Reliance-Industries-Dynamic-Injunction.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270256,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/delhi-high-court-refuses-blanket-injunction-against-godaddy-from-registering-snapdeal-trademark-every-infringement-must-be-petitioned-separately\/","url_meta":{"origin":353615,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses blanket injunction against GODADDY from registering SNAPDEAL trademark; Every infringement must be petitioned separately","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Pratibha M Singh, J. rejected to pass a permanent injunction order restraining GODADDY and other Domain Name Registrars (\u2018DNR') from offering any domain name(s) which incorporate SNAPDEAL (\u2018plaintiff's') trademarks amounting to infringement of the registered trademark, passing off and unfair competition. Such a wide order, without identifying\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355782,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/intellectual-property-rights-july-2025-roundup-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":353615,"position":1},"title":"IPR July 2025: A quick recap of the Months\u2019 top Intellectual Property Rights cases","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering all the important IPR cases across various High Courts and the Supreme Court, this roundup provides a quick summary of cases, links to other roundups, latest legal updates in criminal law and a few top stories of the month.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights July 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309474,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/16\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-in-favour-wow-marks-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":353615,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Just looking like a wow!\u2019; Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of Body Cupid Private Limited for its \u2018WOW\u2019 mark","author":"Arunima","date":"December 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The plaintiff\u2019s case is that it uses the brand \u2018WOW\u2019 for many products, including supplements, herbal blends, creams, serums, lotions, shampoos, bath & body products, essential oils, etc.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/delhi-high-court-restrains-flipkart-from-allowing-third-party-sellers-to-latch-on-to-mark-v-tradition-directs-to-ensure-latching-on-feature-is-di\/","url_meta":{"origin":353615,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Flipkart from allowing third-party sellers to \u2018latch on\u2019 to mark \u2018V Tradition\u2019; Directs to ensure \u2018Latching On\u2019 feature is disabled","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Flipkart (\u2018defendant\u2019) was sued by V Traditions (\u2018plaintiff\u2019) for infringing its mark by allowing third party sellers to latch on to the plaintiff product listings featured as best sellers, Prathiba M Singh J. restrains Flipkart from allowing any third-party sellers from \u2018latching on\u2019 to the mark \u2018V\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374314,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/","url_meta":{"origin":353615,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiters from infringing &#8216;Happi Planet&#8217; trademark; directs Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho to take down fake listings","author":"Arunima","date":"January 31, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The dispute arose from the plaintiff\u2019s allegation that Defendants 1 to 7 were engaged in the large-scale sale of counterfeit and sub-standard home care products bearing the trademark \u201cHappi Planet\u201d and copying the plaintiff\u2019s distinctive packaging and trade dress.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Happi Planet trademark","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-mattel-inc-for-word-mark-kickand-play-for-baby-gym-products-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":353615,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC grants permanent injunction to Mattel Inc. for \u2018Rainforest Family\u2019 characters and word mark \u2018KICK AND PLAY\u2019 for its baby gym products","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe plaintiff\u2019s baby gym product is quite a distinctive product which is designed in a particular form along with depiction of characters which are known loosely as a \u2018Rainforest Family\u2019 characters.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353615"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353615\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353621"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}