{"id":353304,"date":"2025-07-14T12:00:09","date_gmt":"2025-07-14T06:30:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353304"},"modified":"2025-07-31T08:20:23","modified_gmt":"2025-07-31T02:50:23","slug":"know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Appointed to the Supreme Court in 2023, Justice Aravind Kumar was born on 14-07-1962 in Karnataka. He did his schooling at Bengaluru (then Bangalore) and continued his further studies from National College. Justice Aravind Kumar obtained his Law degree from Bangalore University<a id=\"fnref1\" title=\"1. Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)\" href=\"#fn1\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 16.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Advocacy<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; margin-top: 2%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #ff0000;\">Did you Know?<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">During his college days, Justice Aravind Kumar was active as Students Union Leader and was the Vice President of Bangalore University Students Action Committee<\/span><a id=\"fnref2\" title=\"2. Supra\" href=\"#fn2\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Aravind Kumar enrolled in 1987 as an Advocate. He appeared in Civil Courts, Magistrate Courts, and Appellate Tribunals for about 4 years before shifting practice to the High Courts. He was later appointed as Additional Central Government Standing Counsel at High Court of Karnataka in 1999 and as Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department for 11 years<a id=\"fnref3\" title=\"3. High Court of Gujarat (gujarathighcourt.nic.in); Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)\" href=\"#fn3\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Kumar was also appointed as Member of Regional Direct Taxes Advisory Committee in the year 2002. Justice Aravind Kumar was also appointed as the Assistant Solicitor General of India in the year 2005.<a id=\"fnref4\" title=\"4. Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)\" href=\"#fn4\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Aravind Kumar was one of the founder member and Vice-President of Lahari Advocates Forum, an organization promoted by distinguished Senior Advocates for promoting Legal Education, training young advocates, conducting workshops on various subjects for Advocates, conducting orientation courses to young Advocates seeking appointment as judicial officers. Justice Aravind Kumar acted as a legal advisor to various statutory corporations and companies and had also been appointed as Special Public Prosecutor for the Central Bureau of Investigation till his elevation as Judge of Karnataka High Court.<a id=\"fnref5\" title=\"5. Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)\" href=\"#fn5\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 16.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Judgeship of the High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Aravind Kumar was elevated as Additional Judge of Karnataka High Court on 26-06-2009 and later as Permanent Judge on 07-12-2012<a id=\"fnref6\" title=\"6. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar (kar.nic.in)\" href=\"#fn6\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After serving Karnataka High Court as a Judge for 9 years, Justice Aravind Kumar was appointed as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court on 13-10-2021<a id=\"fnref7\" title=\"7. High Court of Gujarat (gujarathighcourt.nic.in)\" href=\"#fn7\"><sup>7<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 16.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Notable Initiatives taken by Justice Aravind Kumar during his time in the High Courts<\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>During his judgeship in Karnataka High Court, Justice Aravind Kumar along with the then Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court, Abhay S. Oka took significant steps <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/27\/kar-hc%E2%94%82labs-to-give-covid-results-within-24-hours-directions-issued-regarding-dignified-burial-cremation-vaccine-scarcity-and-its-allocaction-and-food-security-kslsa-covid-monitoring-commi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">to tackle Covid-19 pandemic in 2021<\/a>. Chief Justice Oka and Justice Kumar issued several directions to ensure that labs provide COVID results within 24 hours; and that those who have died due to Covid-19 are given dignified burial\/ cremation. The Judges also issued directions to address Covid vaccine scarcity and issues related to food security. Furthermore, Chief Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Aravind Kumar directed the State Government to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/29\/treatment-of-mucormycosis\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ensure availability<\/a> of oxygen cylinders and medicines effective in treatment of mucormycosis.<\/li>\n<li>During his 1.4-year tenure as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court, Justice Aravind Kumar initiated the creation of \u2018<span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Signal Schools<\/span>\u2019. These schools were launched jointly by the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority (GSLSA) and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation to provide basic educational facilities to children engaged in begging jobs, with buses converted into classrooms and stationed near traffic signals<a id=\"fnref8\" title=\"8. Signal school idea came from experience in Karnataka: Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court | Gandhinagar News, The Indian Express\" href=\"#fn8\"><sup>8<\/sup><\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>As Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court, Justice Aravind Kumar was committed to tackle the issue of pending cases; therefore, he set up \u201c<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">justice clocks<\/span>\u201d in each courtroom to track case pendency and displayed them on the Gujarat High Court\u2019s website. During his tenure, the quarterly rate of clearance of cases remained above 85%.<a id=\"fnref9\" title=\"9. Aravind Kumar - Supreme Court Observer (scobserver.in)\" href=\"#fn9\"><sup>9<\/sup><\/a><\/li>\n<li>As Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court and patron-in-chief of GSLSA, Justice Aravind Kumar also conducted Lok Adalats to resolve cases pertaining to traffic challans, electricity and water bills, labour disputes and service matters related to pay, allowances and retiral benefits.<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court, Justice Aravind Kumar also initiated the live streaming of District Courts on pilot basis<a id=\"fnref10\" title=\"10. Centre confirms Gujarat Chief Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s elevation to Supreme Court | Ahmedabad News, The Indian Express\" href=\"#fn10\"><sup>10<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 16.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Elevation to the Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Taking into account Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s seniority, merit, performance and integrity; the Supreme Court Collegium <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/01\/supreme-court-recommends-two-more-names-for-appointment-as-sc-judges-against-the-two-remaining-vacancies-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">recommended<\/a> his elevation as Judge of Supreme Court of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The recommendation was accepted by the Law Ministry and Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s elevation was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/president-gives-nod-to-justice-rajesh-bindal-justice-aravind-kumar-elevation-legal-news-legal-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">confirmed<\/a> via notification dated 10-02-2023 and finally on 13-02-2023, Justice Aravind Kumar took oath of office as Judge of the Supreme Court of India. He is due to retire on 13-07-2027.<a id=\"fnref11\" title=\"11. Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)\" href=\"#fn11\"><sup>11<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 16.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Notable Supreme Court Judgments<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court issues notice in challenge to Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court\u2019s decision on EWS reservation in PPSC Agriculture Development Officer recruitment<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Harpreet Singh v. Sikandar Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d1Y5XtJn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 769<\/a>, filed against the judgment passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning Economically Weaker Section (\u2018EWS\u2019) reservation in Punjab Public Service Commission (\u2018PPSC\u2019) recruitment for Agriculture Development Officer, a division bench of J.K. Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar, JJ. issued notice, with a returnable period of 6 weeks. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/11\/supreme-court-notice-challenge-punjab-haryana-high-court-decision-ews-reservation-ppsc\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court orders Uttarakhand Govt. to pay Rs. 1 crore to family of doctor killed on duty after 9 years of legal battle<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">State of Uttarakhand v. Sarita Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nKC62zfN\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 640<\/a>, concerning the non-compliance of the proposal to pay Rs 50 lakhs compensation to the family of a government doctor, who was tragically shot dead while working at a Community Health Centre in April 2016, the division bench comprising Justices JK Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar held that, in light of the gravity of the incident, the sanction for compensation must be honored, and the amount should be paid along with interest. The total amount, including interest for approximately nine years, was quantified at Rs. 1 crore. Out of this, Rs. 11 lakhs had already been paid. The Court directed that the remaining Rs. 89 lakhs be paid within six weeks, and compliance with this order must be reported to the Registry on affidavit by the next date of listing. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/sc-orders-uttarakhand-govt-to-pay-rs-1-crore-family-doctor-killed-duty-2016\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Road Accident | SC grants interim bail to accused due to his father\u2019s compassionate endeavour towards victim\u2019s orphaned minors<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Jay Chandrahas Gharat v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RY3xQL38\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 498<\/a>, wherein the appellant sought bail for the offences registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">201<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561577\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">279<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304(2)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561650\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">338<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561667\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">353<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> read with Sections 134(A), 134(B) and 184 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988; the Division Bench of J.K. Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar, JJ., granted interim bail to the accused for period of 3 months after taking note of the peculiar facts of the case and the endeavour of the accused person\u2019s father for taking steps towards restorative justice, by which he has shown his concern to maintain the minor children after the demise of their parents on account of the road traffic accident caused by his son. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/road-accident-accused-interim-bail-granted-restorative-justice-for-minor-children-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read more<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">From Death Row to Life: Supreme Court commutes sentence of man convicted for Sexual assault and murder of 4-year-old boy<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Sambhubhai Raisangbhai Padhiyar v. State of Gujarat<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pioNLiXT\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2025) 2 SCC 399<\/a>, filed by the appellant (convict) convicted for the offences of kidnapping, sexual assault and murder of a four-year-old child, the three Judge bench of B.R. Gavai, Aravind Kumar and K. V. Viswanathan*, JJ. while maintaining the conviction under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561684\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">364<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">377<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019) and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">6<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Protection of Children from Sexual offences Act, 2012<\/a> (\u2018POCSO Act\u2019), set aside the sentence of death for the offence under Section 302 and substitute the same with that of rigorous imprisonment for a period of 25 years without remission. Further, the Court ordered that the sentence imposed for offences under Section 364 IPC (10 years S.I. and Rs. 10,000\/- fine) and Section 6 of the POCSO Act (life imprisonment and Rs.10,000\/- fine) to run concurrently with the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for a period of 25 years without remission. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/supreme-court-commutes-death-sentence-seual-assault-murder-4-year-old\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">SC restores bail granted to BJP\u2019s Girraj Singh Malinga in 2022 for offences under IPC and SC\/ST Act<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Girraj Singh Malinga v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/E952Z3nk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 3817<\/a>, while considering the instant appeal filed by BJP leader Girraj Singh Malinga against cancellation of his bail granted for offences punishable under provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and the SC\/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; the Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and Aravind Kumar, JJ., restored the earlier bail order granted by Rajasthan High Court, taking into note that the appellant has already surrendered. The Court directed the appellant\u2019s release on the very same terms and conditions based on which he was granted bail. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bail-granted-girraj-singh-malinga-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court commutes death sentence of father convicted for murdering his pregnant daughter over inter-caste marriage<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Eknath Kisan Kumbharkar v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9waCVvf2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 2879<\/a>, challenging Bombay High Court\u2019s decision confirming death sentence to the appellant for murdering his pregnant daughter, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span> and KV Viswanathan, JJ., took note of the appellant\u2019s lack of criminal antecedents, presence of mitigating factors, medical reports and satisfactory behaviour with the prison inmates and opined that even though the crime committed by the appellant is unquestionably grave and unpardonable, it is not appropriate to affirm the death sentence that was awarded to him. Hence the Court was in favour of converting the death penalty to fixed sentence during which period the appellant would not be entitled to apply for remission. Thus, the Court confirmed the appellant\u2019s conviction, but death penalty imposed under Section 302, IPC, was converted to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment without remission. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/death-sentence-commuted-pregnant-daughter-murder-inter-caste-marriage-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read more<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Improper for Court to grant interim relief in routine situations when a party has been directed to seek relief from High Court: Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Gagan Banga v. State of W.B.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Po7FO1EY\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 2608<\/a>, filed by Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited (\u2018Indiabulls\u2019) praying to lay down appropriate guidelines to be followed by all including the police officials and Judicial Magistrate to desist from initiating or directing initiation of criminal proceedings against the financial institutions, its assignees, management, officers, employees, lawful transferees and purchasers of secured assets at the behest of defaulting borrowers, so as to protect their fundamental rights inter alia guaranteed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a>, 1950, and also prayed for quashing the FIRs, the division bench of Sanjay Kumar and Aravind Kumar, JJ. said that when a party is relegated to the High Court to pursue its remedies, it would not be proper, in the normal course, to bind the said High Court with directions in relation to the proceedings to be impugned before such Court. Thus, when the Supreme Court refuses to entertain a matter and asks the party to approach the High Court, it would be improper to grant interim relief to such party. The Court also noted that such directions can be misconstrued by the High Courts to be observations by this Court on the merits of the matter, thereby influencing the adjudication of the case. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/improper-for-court-grant-interim-relief-routine-situations-when-party-directed-seek-relief-from-hc-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Cause, not length of delay to be examined while considering condonation pleas: Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering the instant appeal titled <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Mool Chandra v. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eNYo9bp1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2025) 1 SCC 625<\/a> revolving around application for condonation of delay of 425 days, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span> and Sandeep Mehta, JJ., stated that it is not the length of delay that would be required to be considered while examining the plea for condonation of delay, it is the cause for delay which has been propounded will have to be examined. If the cause for delay would fall within the four corners of \u201csufficient cause\u201d, irrespective of the length of delay same deserves to be condoned. However, if the cause shown is insufficient, irrespective of the period of delay, same would not be condoned. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/17\/cause-of-delay-examine-condonation-plea-justice-aravind-kumar-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read more<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">SC calls for performance audit of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act; Emphasises on review of implementation of Statute to ensure Rule of Law<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Yash Developers v. Harihar Krupa Coop. Housing Society Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qOLFS1iW\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 606<\/a>, which was an appeal against a decision of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee and the Bombay High Court, upholding the terminating the development agreement was made in exercise of power under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, the Division Bench of PS Narasimha and Aravind Kumar, JJ. dismissed the appeal for being devoid of merits and upheld the impugned decisions. The Court requested the Chief Justice of the High Court to constitute a Bench to undertake the comprehensive statutory audit of the Act. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/supreme-court-performance-audit-of-maharashtra-slum-areas-act-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read more<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Display boards\/Signboards | SC clarifies the definition of \u2018advertisement\u2019 and the law on requirements of levy of tax on advertisements<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of S. Ravindra Bhat and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span>, JJ., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Harsh Automobiles (P) Ltd. v. Indore Municipal Corpn.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NZ0qzNz7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 485<\/a>, held that by mere mentioning the name of the product in which the business establishment is being run would not partake the character of the advertisement until and unless by such display customers are solicited. In the absence of the display of the name board or signboard either by a business establishment or any other establishment including public offices and professionals or schools or colleges, etc. it would drive the potential customer to such a situation where it would be neigh impossible to identify the business establishment from which the potential customer proposes to buy. However, if the signboards so displayed would in any manner promote a particular product or goods or services or in other words it would attract customers to purchase a particular brand of product or goods or services and such display provides information about the product\/services and solicit the customers, it may amount to advertisement while the latter would only be an information to the public.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Supreme Court directs HCs and DGPs of all States to ensure Arnesh Kumar guidelines are issued to lower courts and police authorities to prevent unnecessary arrests<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The division bench of S. Ravindra Bhat and Aravind Kumar in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Mohd. Asfak Alam v. State of Jharkhand<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7w2zTUBX\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 8 SCC 632<\/a>, while setting aside the impugned order, directed all the courts to strictly follow the law laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3Mr99hOC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2014) 8 SCC 469<\/a> and further reiterated the directions contained thereunder. Further, it directed the High Court to frame these directions in the form of notifications and guidelines to be followed by the Sessions Courts and all other Criminal Courts dealing with various offences. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/01\/sc-directs-hc-dgp-arnesh-kumar-guidelines-lower-courts-police-prevent-unnecessary-arrests\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Compulsory acquisition of private property: Supreme Court outlines seven sub-rights of Constitutional Right to Property<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Kolkata Municipal Corpn. v. Bimal Kumar Shah<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/YwiAqumL\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 968<\/a>, filed by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (\u2018Corporation\u2019) against the Calcutta High Court Judgment, wherein the Court held that there is no power of compulsory acquisition of immovable property under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001689624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">352<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000736783\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980<\/a> (\u2018the Act\u2019), the division bench of PS Narasimha and Aravind Kumar, JJ. has upheld the impugned Judgment. Further, while interpreting \u201cauthority of law\u201d in Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575115\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, the Bench has held that a minimum content of a constitutional right to property comprises of seven sub-rights or procedures such as the right to notice, hearing, reasons for the decision, to acquire only for public purpose, fair compensation, efficient conduct of the procedure within timelines and finally the conclusion. These sub-rights have synchronously formed part of our laws and have attained judicial recognition. Therefore, as Section 352 does not provide for these sub-rights or procedures, it can never be a valid power of acquisition. Further, the Bench held that Section 352 is only intended to enable the Municipal Commissioner to decide whether a land is to be acquired for public purpose. The power of acquisition is in fact vested with the State under Section 537 and it will exercise it, in its own discretion, whenever the Municipal Commissioner makes an application to that effect. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/14\/compulsory-acquisition-private-property-supreme-court-outlines-seven-sub-rights-constitutional-right-to-property\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Subordinate legislation ultra vires to Parent Act? Supreme Court summarises principles for deciding cases<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Naresh Chandra Agrawal v. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NxDR32B3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 114<\/a>, which was an appeal filed against the Delhi High Court\u2019s decision, wherein the appellant\u2019s challenge to Rule 9(3)(b) of the Chartered Accountants\u2019 (Procedure of Investigation of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007 as ultra vires of Section 21A (4) of the Chartered Accountants, 1949, the Division Bench of Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span>, JJ. summarised legal principles relevant in adjudicating cases where subordinate legislation is challenged on the ground of being \u2018ultra vires\u2019 to the Parent Act. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/15\/sc-summarises-principles-for-deciding-whether-subordinate-legislation-ultra-vires-to-parent-act-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Supreme Court illuminates on bail under Section 43D (5) of UAPA against general rule of CrPC<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Gurwinder Singh v. State of Punjab<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0845b6hE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 5 SCC 403<\/a>, challenging order passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on 24-04-2023 upholding the rejection of application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519740\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">439<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> for a matter involving offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561381\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">124-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561417\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-B<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">120-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019), Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554030\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">17<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">18<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554034\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808781\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967<\/a> (\u2018UAPA\u2019) and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567304\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">25<\/a> and 54 of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002775593\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arms Act, 1959<\/a>, the Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span>, JJ. refused to grant bail while explaining the rule against bail delineating provisions under UAPA as against general rule under CrPC. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/13\/supreme-court-illuminates-bail-under-section-43d-5-of-uapa-against-crpc\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consumer Dispute| \u2018Eggshell Skull rule\u2019 to be applied in Medical Negligence Cases of victims with pre-existing vulnerability or medical condition: Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Jyoti Devi v. Suket Hospital<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/sLqao603\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 581<\/a>, which was an appeal regarding medical negligence filed by the appellant for enhancement of compensation, the division bench of Sanjay Karol* and Aravind Kumar, JJ. while setting aside the impugned orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (\u2018NCDRC\u2019) and State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (\u2018State Commission\u2019), directed the Hospital to pay a sum of Rs.5 lakhs accompanied by interest at 9% from the date of the award passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (\u2018District Forum\u2019) to the appellant, within a period of four weeks from the date of this judgment. The Court also imposed a cost of Rs.50,000\/- in litigation cost. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/24\/supreme-court-sets-aside-ncdrc-order-egg-shell-skull-rule-applied-medical-negligence-cases-victims-pre-existing-vulnerability-medical-condition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Identification of private forests in Goa| \u2018No uniform criteria due to distinctive geographical features\u2019; SC holds existing criteria valid<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5yloN4Ii\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 3 SCC 438<\/a>, challenging National Green Tribunal\u2019s common order, wherein Goa Foundation\u2019s (\u2018appellant\u2019) application was dismissed on the ground that the issue of determination of criteria for the identification of \u2018forest\u2019 formed part of the proceedings in In Re: TN Godavarman Thirumulpad, the three Judge Bench of B.R Gavai, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span> and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned Order. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/03\/existing-criteria-for-identification-of-private-forest-in-goa-valid-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Explained | Supreme Court verdict on principles relating to presumption and evidential burden under Ss. 138 &amp; 139 of NI Act<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal titled <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Rajesh Jain v. Ajay Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8MYY0Vvk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 10 SCC 148<\/a>, that was filed against the Judgment and order of Punjab and Haryana High Court, wherein the Court upheld the acquittal order of the Trial Court concerning an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> (\u2018NI Act\u2019), the division bench of Aravind Kumar and SVN Bhatti, JJ. while setting aside the impugned judgment, allowed the complaint filed under Section 138 NI Act and convicted the accused with fine of twice the amount of the cheque (Rs.13,90,408\/-) failing which he shall undergo simple imprisonment for one year. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/explained-supreme-court-verdict-principles-of-presumption-evidential-burden-under-ni-act\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">What is the ambit of \u201cCommercial Purpose\u201d defined under Consumer Protection Act?: Supreme Court answers<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal titled <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Rohit Chaudhary v. Vipul Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0f8rf40e\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 1 SCC 8<\/a>, against the order passed by the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (\u2018NCDRC\u2019), wherein the commission held that the commercial space booked by the complainants was for earning profit and not for the purpose of earning a livelihood by self-employment. Thus, the appellants are not consumers as defined under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, the division bench of S. Ravindra Bhat and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span>, JJ. while setting aside the impugned order, said that the expression \u2018for any commercial purpose\u2019 must be understood as covering cases other than those of resale of the goods. The persons buying goods either for resale or for use in large-scale profit-making activity will not be consumers entitled to protection under the Act. However, if commercial use is by purchasers for earning livelihood by self-employment, they will be considered as consumers. Thus, it directed the respondent to refund a sum of Rs.51,10,117\/- with interest at 12% per annum from the date of complaint till date of payment with litigation cost of Rs. 1 lakh to the appellant. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/15\/purchaser-of-goods-for-commercial-purpose-consumer-uses-earning-livelihood-supreme-court-reiterates\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Adherence to Article 14 by State must even while acting in Contractual Realm: Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 2%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. T.N. Electricity Board, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/901ES00K\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 7839<\/a><\/span>, the three Judge Bench of B.R. Gavai, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Karol*<\/span> and Aravind Kumar, JJ., said that the State must abide by Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> even if its action was in the contractual realm. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/12\/state-must-adhere-to-article-14-while-acting-in-contractual-realm-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u201cVoting by secret ballot should not be the rule but clearly an exception\u201d; Supreme Court modifies guidelines for designation of Senior Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the case titled <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Indira Jaising v Supreme Court of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/JP6t425k\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 614<\/a><\/span>, filed by Senior Advocate Indira Jaising against the existing system of designation of Senior Advocates, terming it flawed as it was not objective, fair, and transparent, and thus did not take into account considerations of merit and ability, the 3-Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Kishan Kaul*<\/span>, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, and Aravind Kumar, JJ. has fine-tuned the guidelines laid down in Supreme Court\u2019s 2017 Judgment<a id=\"fnref12\" title=\"12. Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India, (2017) 9 SCC 766\" href=\"#fn12\"><sup>12<\/sup><\/a>, to bring in greater transparency and objectivity in the designation process. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/13\/supreme-court-modifies-guidelines-for-designation-of-senior-advocate-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Courts cannot prescribe qualification or declare equivalency of a course, unless the rule itself prescribes equivalency<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Unnikrishnan CV v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/iH2iYbrU\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 343<\/a><\/span>, wherein the appellants were claiming promotion to the post of Superintendent BR Grade-I and Assistant Engineer as per Column 11 of the General Reserve Engineer Force Group \u2018C\u2019 and Group \u2018D\u2019 Recruitment Rules, 1982 (\u2018GREF Rules, 1982), the Full Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Manoj Misra and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aravind Kumar*<\/span>, JJ. while rejecting the appeal, reiterated that Courts cannot prescribe the qualification and\/or declare the equivalency of a course, until and unless the rule itself prescribes the equivalency. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/04\/courts-cannot-prescribe-qualification-or-declare-the-equivalency-of-a-course-except-the-rule-itself-prescribes-the-equivalency-supreme-court-reiterates-legal-research-legal-news-up\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 16.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Notable High Court Judgments<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gujarat High Court | Delay in appointment of presiding officer of DRT leading to deprivation of legitimate right to speedy justice<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of Aravind Kumar, CJ. and Ashutosh J. Shastri, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Nipun Praveen Singhvi v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/16n6724o\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022 SCC OnLine Guj 828<\/a><\/span>, allowed a writ petition which was filed seeking for a direction to fill up the post of Presiding Officer in Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Ahmedabad contending inter-alia such vacancy violates the legal rights of the petitioner, bankers\/lenders, borrowers, guarantors and other stake holders. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/08\/gujarat-high-court-delay-in-appointment-of-presiding-officer-of-drt-leading-to-deprivation-of-legitimate-right-to-speedy-justice-directions-issued\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gujarat High Court | Show cause notice issued to 9 Judicial officers for disobeying the order of the High Court and not disposing of the case pending since 1977<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While deciding the application, the division bench of Aravind Kumar, CJ., and Ashutosh J. Shastri, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Patel Ambalal Kalidas v. Patel Motibhai Kalidas<sup>11<\/sup>, called upon the Judicial Officers to show cause as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for wilfully disobeying the order and direction issued by this Court. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/22\/legal-update-legal-news-gujarat-high-court-issued-show-cause-notice-to-judicial-officers\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Hemlata Jain v. Padmavati Analkumar Mishra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ffjR15F9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022 SCC OnLine Guj 1787<\/a>, said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 2016 cannot be rejected on the ground that it is vague or bereft of the material particulars as Section 21 of the A&amp;C Act does not remotely suggests that the nature of dispute has to be enumerated or explained in the notice invoking the arbitration clause. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read More<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka HC | No bar for claiming maintenance under S. 24 Hindu Marriage Act, even in the event of application under S. 125 CrPC having been filed<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While passing the order in a writ petition filed under Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Aravind Kumar, J., in <span style=\"color: #171617;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">X <\/span>v.<span style=\"font-style: italic;\"> Y<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><sup>12<\/sup><\/span>, held that the contention of the respondent that the present application for maintenance was not maintainable on account of the petitioner having already filed an application under S. 125 CrPC could not be accepted. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/no-bar-for-claiming-maintenance-under-s-24-hindu-marriage-act-even-in-the-event-of-application-under-s-125-crpc-having-been-filed\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read More<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka HC | Yipee Magic Masala Noodles and Wai Wai Majedaar Masala Noodles copyright infringement battle<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Division Bench of Aravind Kumar and Pradeep Kumar Yerur, JJ., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">ITC Ltd. v. CG Foods (India) (P) Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/SvB2DAND\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2021 SCC OnLine Kar 14700<\/a>, dismissed the appeal and affirmed the order dated 22-06-2021 passed in O.S.No.177\/2021 by LXXXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-85) (Commercial Court), Bengaluru. The Court observed that while deciding the question of copyright infringement it is not necessary that the defendants work must be an exact reproduction of the plaintiff\u2019s work. What is essential is to see whether there is a reproduction of the substantial part of the plaintiff\u2019s work. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/14\/what-is-yipee-magic-masala-noodles-and-wai-wai-majedaar-masala-noodles-copyright-infringement-battle-all-about\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read More<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka HC | Persons with disabilities are entitled to priority in medical treatment in light of S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002338229\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">25<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776237\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Division Bench of Abhay S Oka, CJ and Aravind Kumar, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Mohd. Arif Jameel v. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/OVQnWuVx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2021 SCC OnLine Kar 15714<\/a>, gave a slew of directions regarding vaccine allocation. The Court took stock of the various aspect related to COVID vaccination in the State. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/medical-treatment\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read More<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/chief-justice-judges\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> Supra<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/gujarathighcourt.nic.in\/cjjfull?jid=5044\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">High Court of Gujarat (gujarathighcourt.nic.in)<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/chief-justice-judges\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/chief-justice-judges\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn5\" href=\"#fnref5\">5.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/chief-justice-judges\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn6\" href=\"#fnref6\">6.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic.in\/bio_data\/former_judges\/akj.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar (kar.nic.in)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn7\" href=\"#fnref7\">7.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/gujarathighcourt.nic.in\/cjjfull?jid=5044\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">High Court of Gujarat (gujarathighcourt.nic.in)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn8\" href=\"#fnref8\">8.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/cities\/gandhinagar\/signal-school-karnataka-chief-justice-gujarat-high-court-7991080\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Signal school idea came from experience in Karnataka: Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court | Gandhinagar News, The Indian Express<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn9\" href=\"#fnref9\">9.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/judges\/aravind-kumar\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Aravind Kumar &#8211; Supreme Court Observer (scobserver.in)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn10\" href=\"#fnref10\">10.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/cities\/ahmedabad\/justice-aravind-kumar-gujarat-high-court-supreme-court-8436149\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Centre confirms Gujarat Chief Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s elevation to Supreme Court | Ahmedabad News, The Indian Express<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn11\" href=\"#fnref11\">11.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/chief-justice-judges\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chief Justice &amp; Judges | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (sci.gov.in)<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn12\" href=\"#fnref12\">12.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1N1zKiJy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2017) 9 SCC 766<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prior to his elevation to the Supreme Court, as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court, Justice Aravind Kumar, initiated steps to tackle pendency of cases and initiated conversion of roadways buses into schools for poor children.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":353305,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38347],"tags":[6011,36518,67926,53594,85241,3096,28334,3485,26544,85240,24783,34169,39907,70961],"class_list":["post-353304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-judges-information","tag-advertisements","tag-consumer-disputes","tag-eggshell-skull-rule","tag-ews-reservation","tag-giriraj-malinga","tag-Gujarat_High_Court","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-medical_negligence","tag-persons-with-disabilities","tag-student-unions","tag-supreme-court-judges","tag-supreme-court-of-india","tag-tata-motors","tag-yipee-magic-masala-noodles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Know Thy Judge | Justice Aravind Kumar, Judge Supreme Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"From Student Union to Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"From Student Union to Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-14T06:30:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-31T02:50:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"20 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"headline\":\"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-14T06:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-31T02:50:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4267,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Advertisements\",\"Consumer Disputes\",\"Eggshell Skull rule\",\"EWS reservation\",\"Giriraj Malinga\",\"Gujarat High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\",\"medical negligence\",\"Persons with Disabilities\",\"student unions\",\"supreme court judges\",\"Supreme Court of India\",\"Tata Motors\",\"Yipee Magic Masala Noodles\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Know thy Judge\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | Justice Aravind Kumar, Judge Supreme Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-14T06:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-31T02:50:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"From Student Union to Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey & important judgments.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Justice Aravind Kumar\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/14\\\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/legal_editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice Aravind Kumar, Judge Supreme Court | SCC Times","description":"From Student Union to Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey & important judgments.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey & important judgments","og_description":"From Student Union to Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey & important judgments.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-14T06:30:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-31T02:50:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"20 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/"},"author":{"name":"Sucheta","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"headline":"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments","datePublished":"2025-07-14T06:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-31T02:50:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/"},"wordCount":4267,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp","keywords":["Advertisements","Consumer Disputes","Eggshell Skull rule","EWS reservation","Giriraj Malinga","Gujarat High Court","Karnataka High Court","medical negligence","Persons with Disabilities","student unions","supreme court judges","Supreme Court of India","Tata Motors","Yipee Magic Masala Noodles"],"articleSection":["Know thy Judge"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/","name":"Know Thy Judge | Justice Aravind Kumar, Judge Supreme Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-14T06:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-31T02:50:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"From Student Union to Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey & important judgments.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Justice Aravind Kumar"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-justice-aravind-kumar-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Know Thy Judge | From Student Union to the Supreme Court: Justice Aravind Kumar\u2019s dynamic journey &amp; important judgments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296809,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-of-india-justice-aravind-kumar-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":353304,"position":0},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Aravind Kumar","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Prior to his elevation to the Supreme Court, Justice Aravind Kumar, as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court, took steps to tackle pendency of cases and initiated the conversion of roadways buses into schools for poor children.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice aravind kumar","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-aravind-kumar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-aravind-kumar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-aravind-kumar.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-aravind-kumar.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283875,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/14\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-new-appointment-justice-rajesh-bindal-justice-aravind-kumar-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":353304,"position":1},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judges- Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Aravind Kumar","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"With former High Court Chief Justices Rajesh Bindal and Aravind Kumar swearing in as Supreme Court Judges, read to know about the new appointees and what it means for Supreme Court\u2019s Judges\u2019 strength.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-104.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":283597,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/president-gives-nod-to-justice-rajesh-bindal-justice-aravind-kumar-elevation-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":353304,"position":2},"title":"President gives nod to Justice Rajesh Bindal &amp; Justice Aravind Kumar&#8217;s elevation; Supreme Court achieves sanctioned strength of 34 Judges","author":"Editor","date":"February 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Chief Justices of the High Courts of Allahabad and Gujarat have been elevated thereby paving the way for the Supreme Court to achieve its sanctioned strength of 34 Judges","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-349.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":282914,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/01\/supreme-court-recommends-two-more-names-for-appointment-as-sc-judges-against-the-two-remaining-vacancies-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":353304,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium recommends two more names for appointment as SC Judges, against the two remaining vacancies","author":"Editor","date":"February 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Collegium recommends two more names of Justice Rajesh Bindal, Chief Justice, Allahabad High Court and Justice Aravind Kumar, Chief Justice, Gujarat High Court for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court against the two remaining vacancies. The Collegium comprises of Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, C.J., Sanjay Kishan Kaul, K.M. Joseph,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":326522,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-of-india-justice-aravind-kumar-legal-news-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":353304,"position":4},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Aravind Kumar","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Prior to his elevation to the Supreme Court, Justice Aravind Kumar, as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court initiated steps to tackle pendency of cases and initiated conversion of roadways buses into schools for poor children.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Aravind Kumar","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Justice-Aravind-Kumar.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/04\/courts-cannot-prescribe-qualification-or-declare-the-equivalency-of-a-course-except-the-rule-itself-prescribes-the-equivalency-supreme-court-reiterates-legal-research-legal-news-up\/","url_meta":{"origin":353304,"position":5},"title":"Courts cannot prescribe qualification or declare equivalency of a course, unless the rule itself prescribes equivalency; Supreme Court reiterates","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the denial of promotion was on the ground that candidates do not possess the prescribed requisite qualification namely \u201cDiploma in Civil Engineering\u201d, and not because they possess a two-year diploma not three-year diploma.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"prescribe qualification","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-984-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-984-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-984-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-984-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353304"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353304\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353305"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}