{"id":353255,"date":"2025-07-12T14:00:04","date_gmt":"2025-07-12T08:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353255"},"modified":"2025-07-17T18:06:05","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T12:36:05","slug":"kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/","title":{"rendered":"No Strict proof needed for married woman claiming return of gold from In-Laws: Kerala High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Kerala High Court:<\/span> In a matrimonial appeal filed by the husband\u2019s family challenging the Family Court\u2019s order directing the return of 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments to the respondent, the Division Bench of Devan Ramachandran and M.B. Snehalatha*<\/span>, JJ., made significant observations regarding the evidentiary challenges faced by women in such domestic contexts. The Court held that, due to the inherently domestic and informal nature of such transactions, a newly married woman would not be in a position to produce documents or independent witnesses to prove the entrustment of her gold ornaments to her in-laws.<\/p>\n

In such circumstances, the Court noted, insisting on strict proof beyond reasonable doubt, as required in criminal law, would result in injustice. Therefore, the Court emphasised the need to adopt a pragmatic approach and to determine the issue of entrustment based on the principle of preponderance of probabilities, rather than the rigid standards of criminal jurisprudence.<\/p>\n

Further, it concluded that the evidence on record clearly established that the respondent had entrusted 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments to her mother-in-law for safekeeping. The mother-in-law failed to offer any plausible or acceptable explanation as to what happened to the gold, which the respondent had brought to the matrimonial home.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Court held that the respondent was entitled to recover the 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments. The appeal was allowed in part with the following directions:<\/p>\n

a) The judgment and decree passed by the Family Court, Tirur, against the respondent\u2019s brother-in-law were set aside.<\/p>\n

b) The mother-in-law was directed to return 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments to the respondent.<\/p>\n

c) The mother-in-law was also ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The marriage between the respondent and her husband was solemnized on 25-04-2012. At the time of the marriage, the husband was employed abroad. On her wedding day, the respondent was adorned with 81 sovereigns of gold ornaments, including 6 sovereigns that had been gifted by her husband, on the day of the marriage fixation.<\/p>\n

After the marriage, the husband returned to his workplace abroad. The brother-in-law and mother-in-law (appellants) obtained the entire set of gold ornaments from the respondent under the pretext of safekeeping. While residing in the matrimonial home, the respondent was subjected to cruelty by the appellants, who demanded additional gold and cash, and tortured her.<\/p>\n

On 16-01-2013, the husband tragically committed suicide at his workplace abroad. After her husband\u2019s death, the respondent remained in the matrimonial home for 15 days. However, due to pressure from her in-laws, she was forced to leave the matrimonial home. Despite repeated demands, the appellants had not returned the 81 sovereigns of gold ornaments entrusted to them. As a result, the respondent filed the Original Petition seeking the return of the 81 sovereigns of gold ornaments, or their equivalent value.<\/p>\n

After the trial, the Family Court allowed the petition in part, directing the appellants to return 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments to the respondent.<\/p>\n

Assailing the said judgment and decree, the appellants preferred this appeal, contending that the Family Court had erred in appreciating the evidence in its correct perspective. They argued that the father of the respondent had no financial capacity to give 81 sovereigns of gold ornaments. Therefore, the Family Court had gone wrong in directing the appellants to return 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court noted that, to substantiate the respondent\u2019s claim that she was adorned with 81 sovereigns of gold ornaments on her wedding day, she had produced photographs and bills issued by a jewellery shop named ‘Malabar Gold and Diamonds, Tirur.’ The bills revealed that 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments were purchased by the respondent\u2019s father on 24-04-2012. The marriage took place on 25-04-2012. Thus, bills supported the respondent\u2019s version that her father had purchased 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments from Malabar Gold and Diamonds, Tirur.<\/p>\n

The Court highlighted that the evidence on record clearly indicated that 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments had been purchased by the respondent\u2019s father on the day prior to her marriage. The series photographs also showed that the respondent was wearing a substantial amount of gold ornaments on her wedding day.<\/p>\n

According to the respondent, apart from the 53 sovereigns of gold purchased by her parents, her relatives had gifted her 21 sovereigns of gold ornaments. Additionally, she claimed to have worn 6 sovereigns of gold ornaments gifted to her by her husband, on the day of their engagement. However, although the respondent contended that 21 sovereigns had been gifted by her relatives, she failed to produce any reliable evidence to substantiate that claim, as rightly held by the Family Court.<\/p>\n

The specific case of the respondent was that while residing at the matrimonial home, she had entrusted all her gold ornaments, except the thali<\/span> chain to the appellants for safekeeping. The appellants, however, had misappropriated the ornaments for their own use and, despite her repeated demands, failed to return them.<\/p>\n

The Court stressed that, in most Indian households, the entrustment of gold ornaments by a bride to her husband or in-laws typically occurred within a setting of familial trust, behind the four walls of the matrimonial home. A newly wedded woman would not ordinarily be in a position to demand receipts or require the presence of independent witnesses while handing over such jewellery to her husband or in-laws. Due to the domestic and informal nature of these transactions, she would not reasonably be expected to produce documentary evidence or third-party witnesses to prove entrustment.<\/p>\n

The Bench observed that a woman, being a family member, cannot reasonably be expected to anticipate a future legal dispute and create documentary evidence in a household where she is expected to conform, trust, and remain silent, particularly during the early stages of her marriage.<\/p>\n

In view of this, the Court observed that, if a dispute were to arise at a later stage, the woman would be placed in a practically difficult position when attempting to prove the entrustment of her own valuables. In such circumstances, applying the standard of strict proof beyond reasonable doubt, as is required in criminal law, would likely lead to injustice. Therefore, the Court held that a pragmatic approach should be adopted, and the issue of entrustment must be decided on the principle of preponderance of probabilities.<\/p>\n

It was also evidenced that, just prior to her marriage, the respondent had enrolled in an Airport Management Course in Calicut, and after the marriage, she continued the course while residing in the matrimonial home and travelling to Calicut. Given these circumstances, the respondent\u2019s version, that she had entrusted her entire gold ornaments, except the thali<\/span> chain, to her in-laws was found to be more probable and acceptable than the appellants\u2019 claim that she had retained all the gold ornaments with herself.<\/p>\n

The Court concluded that the evidence on record clearly established that the respondent had entrusted her 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments to her mother-in-law for safekeeping. The mother-in-law failed to provide any plausible or acceptable explanation regarding what had happened to the 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments which the respondent had brought to the matrimonial home. Therefore, the Court held that the respondent was entitled to recover the 53 sovereigns of gold ornaments from her.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the appeal was allowed in part.<\/p>\n

[X v Y, 2025 SCC OnLine Ker 4900<\/a>, decided on 02-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For Appellants:<\/span> P.VENUGOPAL, T.J. MARIA GORETTI, FERHA AZEEZ<\/p>\n

For Respondent:<\/span> T. KRISHNANUNNI (SR.), MEENA. A., VINOD RAVINDRANATH, M.R. MINI, ASHWIN SATHYANATH, K.C. KIRAN, M.DEVESH, ANISH ANTONY ANATHAZHATH, THAREEQ ANVER<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“A newly wedded woman would not be in a position to demand receipts or independent witnesses while handing over the jewellery to the husband or in-laws.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":353256,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[85201,85197,85200,85202,85194,85198,85199,85195,85196],"class_list":["post-353255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-family-court-gold-order-kerala","tag-gold-custody-case","tag-gold-dispute-with-in-laws","tag-kerala-gold-recovery-judgment","tag-kerala-hc-gold-entrustment","tag-kerala-high-court-gold-ruling","tag-married-woman-gold-return","tag-matrimonial-gold-dispute-kerala","tag-return-of-gold-ornaments-kerala"],"yoast_head":"\nNo strict proof needed for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from in-laws | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala HC held that courts cannot demand strict proof for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from her in-laws, advocating a pragmatic approach in matrimonial gold disputes.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No Strict proof needed for married woman claiming return of gold from In-Laws: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala HC held that courts cannot demand strict proof for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from her in-laws, advocating a pragmatic approach in matrimonial gold disputes.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-12T08:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T12:36:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No Strict proof needed for married woman claiming return of gold from In-Laws: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/\",\"name\":\"No strict proof needed for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from in-laws | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-12T08:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-17T12:36:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Kerala HC held that courts cannot demand strict proof for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from her in-laws, advocating a pragmatic approach in matrimonial gold disputes.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"married woman’s gold return claim\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No Strict proof needed for married woman claiming return of gold from In-Laws: Kerala High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No strict proof needed for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from in-laws | SCC Times","description":"Kerala HC held that courts cannot demand strict proof for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from her in-laws, advocating a pragmatic approach in matrimonial gold disputes.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No Strict proof needed for married woman claiming return of gold from In-Laws: Kerala High Court","og_description":"Kerala HC held that courts cannot demand strict proof for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from her in-laws, advocating a pragmatic approach in matrimonial gold disputes.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-12T08:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-17T12:36:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No Strict proof needed for married woman claiming return of gold from In-Laws: Kerala High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/","name":"No strict proof needed for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from in-laws | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-12T08:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-17T12:36:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Kerala HC held that courts cannot demand strict proof for married woman\u2019s gold return claim from her in-laws, advocating a pragmatic approach in matrimonial gold disputes.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"married woman’s gold return claim"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/12\/kerala-hc-no-strict-proof-needed-married-womans-gold-return-claim\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No Strict proof needed for married woman claiming return of gold from In-Laws: Kerala High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/married-woman8217s-gold-return-claim.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":346999,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/kerala-hc-stridhan-gold-ornaments-legal-proof\/","url_meta":{"origin":353255,"position":0},"title":"Gold Ornaments given to bride constitute ‘stridhan’; Rigid legal proof not required in claims for its return: Kerala High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe gold given to a bride at the time of marriage is often kept by the husband or his family under the guise of safekeeping of family customs. The woman rarely gets a written record or receipt for such transfers and the woman's access to her own ornaments can be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223845,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/ker-hc-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-the-accused-in-a-case-under-under-s-498-a-ipc-observing-the-matter-is-purely-matrimonial\/","url_meta":{"origin":353255,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Anticipatory bail granted to the accused in a case under under S. 498-A IPC, observing the matter is purely matrimonial","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: N. Anil Kumar, J. allowed this application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The applicant of this bail is the accused in Crime No. 2227 of 2019 of the Sasthamkotta Police Station in Kollam District. The applicant was accused of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/28\/ker-hc-return-of-gold-ornaments-of-wife-allowed-despite-absence-of-specific-details-thereto-in-view-of-husbands-contradictory-statements\/","url_meta":{"origin":353255,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Return of gold ornaments of wife allowed despite absence of specific details thereto, in view of husband\u2019s contradictory statements","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A.M. Shaffique and A.M.Babu, JJ. dismissed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court directing the husband to pay an amount of Rs 2,25,000 to his wife. In the present case, the appellant and respondent were a married couple. The grievance of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":251564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/21\/anticipatory-bail-6\/","url_meta":{"origin":353255,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC |\u00a0Harassment, abuse and torture of wife within seven months of marriage; HC denies anticipatory bail to doctor","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Shircy V., J., rejected the bail application of a doctor and his family accused of dowry demand and cruelty against his wife within seven months of marriage. Calling \u2018matrimonial homes the most dangerous place to live\u2019 due to harassment, abuse and torture, the Bench remarked that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219807,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/21\/ker-hc-accused-wrongfully-charged-of-committing-cheating-and-rape-court-grants-bail-in-light-of-fabrication-of-facts-by-complainant\/","url_meta":{"origin":353255,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | Accused wrongfully charged of committing cheating and rape; Court grants bail in light of fabrication of facts by complainant","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Alexander Thomas, J. disposed of a matter wherein a complaint was lodged against the petitioner accusing of committing rape and cheating. In the present case, the complainant, a married lady whose divorce proceedings were still underway had advertised in the matrimonial column of a newspaper seeking a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":273044,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/05\/early-disposal-of-divorce-court-suggests-for-extra-judicial-divorce-to-avoid-delay-muslim-community-muslim-women-legal-news-legal-updates-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":353255,"position":5},"title":"Why wait at Court\u2019s corridor for prioritized hearing, when you can invoke the right to extra-judicial divorce? Kerala High Court tells a Muslim woman seeking divorce","author":"Editor","date":"September 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: In a divorce case where the Family Court had refused to hear the case on priority for early disposal, the Division Bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque* and Sophy Thomas, JJ. on observing that the woman belonged to Muslim community, suggested her to exercise her right to extra-judicial\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353255"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353255\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}