{"id":353104,"date":"2025-07-11T09:30:50","date_gmt":"2025-07-11T04:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353104"},"modified":"2025-07-15T10:02:43","modified_gmt":"2025-07-15T04:32:43","slug":"patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Prosecution failed to prove case beyond all reasonable doubts\u2019; Patna HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Patna High Court:<\/span> In a criminal revision petition filed by the accused against the judgment and order passed by the Fast Track Court upholding the conviction and sentence passed by the Juvenile Justice Board (\u2018JJB\u2019), in a case of alleged penetrative sexual assault, the Single Judge Bench of Jitendra Kumar, J., observing that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, and noting that the purpose of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806293\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Juvenile Justice Act, 2000<\/a>, (\u2018JJ Act\u2019) was reformative and rehabilitative instead of punitive, set aside the order of conviction and sentence passed against the accused.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case originated from the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">fard-e-beyan<\/span> of a minor victim girl, alleging an offence under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hF8R4TLX\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Section 376(2)(g)<\/a> of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hF8R4TLX\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019), against the accused and the co-accused. As per the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">fard-e-beyan<\/span> the victim was alone in the house when both the accused entered her house, put gamcha on her eyes and mouth, and took her to a maize field where they committed penetrative sexual assault on her, causing injury to her private parts. Both accused raised a plea of juvenility, leading to the transfer of their records to the JJB. After investigation, a chargesheet was submitted against the accused, while the co-accused was later summoned under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/414YK00d\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (\u2018CrPC\u2019), with their records being subsequently separated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The JJB found the accused guilty of the offence punishable under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hF8R4TLX\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Section 376 of the IPC<\/a> and was directed to be kept in a Special Home for two years under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568560\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">15(1)(g)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806293\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">JJ Act<\/a>. Aggrieved by this decision, the accused filed an appeal before the Sessions Court, which upheld the JJB\u2019s judgment of conviction and order of sentence. The accused had filed the present criminal revision petition.<\/p>\n<h3>Court\u2019s Analysis and Findings<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the revisional jurisdiction conferred upon the High Court is a kind of paternal or supervisory jurisdiction under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/72Mk5H3P\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Section 397<\/a> read with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/72Mk5H3P\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Section 401 of the CrPC<\/a> to correct the miscarriage of justice arising out of judgment, order, sentence or finding of subordinate Courts by looking into correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order as recorded or passed by subordinate Courts and as to the regularity of any proceeding of such inferior Courts. This is discretionary and is to be applied judiciously in the interest of justice. Further, it is different from appellate jurisdiction as the courts here cannot re-appreciate the evidence, unless there are exceptional situations like glaring error of law or procedure and perversity of finding, causing flagrant miscarriage of justice, brought to the notice of the High Court.<\/p>\n<h3>I. On the Conviction<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that while the victim reiterated her allegations in examination-in-chief, her cross-examination revealed an admitted enmity between her family and the accused\u2019s family. Crucially, the victim did not depose that she had handed over blood-stained clothes to the police. No other prosecution witnesses were direct eyewitnesses, with most being hearsay witnesses or relatives.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the doctor in her deposition had stated that no spermatozoa was found in the victim\u2019s vaginal swab, despite the examination being conducted on the same day of occurrence. The doctor explicitly stated she was \u2018not in a position to decide whether the rape was committed\u2019. Further, the Investigating Officer had admitted to not seizing blood-soaked soil from the alleged place of occurrence or the victim\u2019s blood-stained clothes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted the absence of scientific investigation, such as a DNA test, connecting the accused to the alleged offence. In light of the afore-stated facts, the Court held that it would be unsafe and unjust to find the accused guilty. The Court observed that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt, and hence, the judgment of conviction was not sustainable in the eyes of the law.<\/p>\n<h3>II. On Sentencing Policy under the JJ Act<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the order of sentence passed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568560\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">15<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806293\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">JJ Act<\/a> was not in consonance with the object and spirit of the JJ Act.\u00a0The Court, referring to the Preamble of the JJ Act, emphasised that the JJ Act was founded on the belief that children in conflict with the law should be reformed and rehabilitated, not punished, and that a punitive approach is self-destructive for society.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Referring to Rule 3 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 (\u2018JJ Rules\u2019), the Court highlighted that the principle of best interest should be considered when taking any decision concerning any juvenile in conflict with law. As per the best interest principle, traditional objectives of criminal justice, retribution, and repression, must give way to rehabilitative and restorative objectives of juvenile justice. It also meant seeking to ensure physical, emotional, intellectual, social, and moral development of the juvenile in conflict with the law or child so as to ensure the safety, well-being, and permanence for each child and thus enable each child to survive and reach his or her full potential. The Court further noted that the institutionalization of a child or juvenile in conflict with the law has been contemplated as a last resort after reasonable inquiry, and that too for the minimum possible duration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that from the conjoint reading of Sections 15 and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568561\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">16<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806293\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">JJ Act<\/a> and Rule 3 of JJ Rules, it was clear that any court before passing an order against a juvenile in conflict with the law must take into consideration the social investigation. The Court referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Salil Bali<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/yb4NY5R7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2013) 7 SCC 705<\/a>, and Jitendra Singh v. State of U.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7r6QryDe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2013) 11 SCC 193<\/a>, observed that the purpose of JJ Act was restorative and not retributive providing for rehabilitation and reintegration of children in conflict with law with the mainstream of the society.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant case, the Social Investigation Report indicated no criminal antecedents of the accused, his cooperative nature, and his family\u2019s poor economic background. The Court observed that the J.J. Board and the Appellate Court had failed to consider this report to determine the best interest of the accused, and by sending him to a special home for two years, he was prevented from continuing his studies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In light of the afore-stated facts, the Court held that the judgment of conviction and order of sentence were not sustainable in the eyes of the law and were liable to be set aside.<\/p>\n<h3>III. On Compensation to the Victim<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the JJB had not passed any order regarding compensation payable to the victim, which in the Court\u2019s opinion they were duty bound to pass.\u00a0 The Court noted that the general principles of compensation to victims in a criminal trial had been provided under the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/72Mk5H3P\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sections 357 and 357A<\/a> of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/72Mk5H3P\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> and the Bihar Victims Compensation Scheme, 2014, made by the State of Bihar under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/72Mk5H3P\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Section 357A.<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, referring to its decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sunil Kumar Jha v. State of Bihar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/p8U012Au\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Pat 960<\/a>, reiterated that any court conducting a criminal trial is duty-bound to pass a reasoned order regarding victim compensation, irrespective of conviction, acquittal, or discharge. The Appellate and Revisional Courts are equally bound if proceedings arising out of the crime are pending. The Court noted that general principles of compensation under the afore-stated sections are equally applicable to criminal proceedings before JJBs and Children Courts, as the JJ Act does not provide separate provisions for victim compensation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that it was duty-bound to recommend that the Bihar State Legal Services Authority pay compensation to the victim, as per the Bihar Victim Compensation Scheme 2014, within one month of receipt of this order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In light of the afore-stated reasons, the Court set aside the judgment of conviction, and the order of sentence passed by the JJB, and the Appellate Court, and the accused was acquitted of all charges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Registrar General was directed to circulate a copy of the judgment to Presiding Officers of JJBs and Children Courts of Bihar and the Bihar Judicial Academy for discussion in training programs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. State of Bihar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1DUhJ1D9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Pat 2380<\/a>, decided on 07-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Pankaj Kumar Jha, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Upendra Kumar, APP, Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Amicus Curiae:<\/span> Shashi Priya, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;No society can afford to punish its children. Punitive approach towards children in conflict with the law would be self-destructive for the society.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":353108,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[85110,75471,36042,85111,85112,7441,6191,8541],"class_list":["post-353104","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bihar-victim-compensation-scheme-2014","tag-justice-jitendra-kumar","tag-juvenile-justice-act-2000","tag-juvenile-rehabilitation","tag-jvenile-rape-conviction","tag-patna-high-court","tag-sexual-assault","tag-victim-compensation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pat HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Patna High Court set aside rape conviction against Juvenile, holding that prosecution has not proved case beyond reasonable doubt.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Prosecution failed to prove case beyond all reasonable doubts\u2019; Patna HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court set aside rape conviction against Juvenile, holding that prosecution has not proved case beyond reasonable doubt.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-11T04:00:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-15T04:32:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Prosecution failed to prove case beyond all reasonable doubts\u2019; Patna HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-11T04:00:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-15T04:32:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Patna High Court set aside rape conviction against Juvenile, holding that prosecution has not proved case beyond reasonable doubt.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Rape conviction against Juvenile\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Prosecution failed to prove case beyond all reasonable doubts\u2019; Patna HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile | SCC Times","description":"Patna High Court set aside rape conviction against Juvenile, holding that prosecution has not proved case beyond reasonable doubt.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Prosecution failed to prove case beyond all reasonable doubts\u2019; Patna HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile","og_description":"Patna High Court set aside rape conviction against Juvenile, holding that prosecution has not proved case beyond reasonable doubt.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-11T04:00:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-15T04:32:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Prosecution failed to prove case beyond all reasonable doubts\u2019; Patna HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/","name":"Pat HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-11T04:00:50+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-15T04:32:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Patna High Court set aside rape conviction against Juvenile, holding that prosecution has not proved case beyond reasonable doubt.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Rape conviction against Juvenile"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/11\/patna-high-court-sets-aside-rape-conviction-against-juvenile\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Prosecution failed to prove case beyond all reasonable doubts\u2019; Patna HC sets aside rape conviction against Juvenile"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Rape-conviction-against-Juvenile.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/no-parent-of-any-girl-can-damage-reputation-of-their-daughter-regarding-her-chastity-patnahc-upholds-conviction-u-s-376-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":353104,"position":0},"title":"&#8216;No parent of any girl in our society can damage reputation of their daughter regarding her chastity\u2019; Patna HC upholds conviction u\/s 376 of IPC","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that the parents of the victims were illiterate and that the appellant\u2019s allegations of false implications and extortion on the victim\u2019s family\u2019s part did not inspire any confidence as per evidence on record.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237842,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/22\/pat-hc-seriousness-of-alleged-offence-cannot-be-made-a-ground-for-rejecting-bail-under-juvenile-justice-act-2015\/","url_meta":{"origin":353104,"position":1},"title":"Pat HC | Seriousness of \u201calleged\u201d offence cannot be made a ground for rejecting bail under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015","author":"Editor","date":"October 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: In an application challenging the order of rejection of bail passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ashwani Kumar Singh, J., set it aside enlarging the appellant-accused on bail. The instant application has been filed by the appellant under Section 101(5) of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222297,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/pat-hc-session-courts-order-on-juvenile-being-guilty-of-being-a-part-of-unlawful-assembly-quashed-by-high-court-due-to-improper-evidence-and-being-protected-under-juvenile-justice-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":353104,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Session Court\u2019s order on juvenile being guilty of being a part of unlawful assembly quashed by High Court due to improper evidence and being protected under Juvenile Justice Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. allowed a petition seeking to quash an order of the Sessions court on the ground that the petitioner was juvenile and protected by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The petitioner along with other persons was accused of forming an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204206,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/25\/pakistan-sc-directs-expeditious-disposal-of-juvenile-trials-sets-aside-conviction-of-a-child-wrongly-incarcerated-for-11-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":353104,"position":3},"title":"Pakistan SC directs expeditious disposal of juvenile trials; sets aside conviction of a child wrongly incarcerated for 11 years","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: A 3-Judge Bench comprising of Gulzar Ahmed, Qazi Faez Isa, and Sajjad Ali Shah, JJ. while hearing a criminal appeal against conviction of a minor, pulled up the Trial Court and High Court for indulging the prosecution despite its failure to establish case beyond reasonable doubt.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350011,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/06\/juvenile-conviction-under-arms-act-set-aside-patna-hc-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":353104,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Punishment of juvenile in conflict with law is not the purpose of juvenile justice\u2019; Patna HC sets aside order of conviction against juvenile under Arms Act","author":"Editor","date":"June 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe J.J. Act, 2000 is based on our belief that children are the future of the society and in case they go into conflict with law under some circumstances, they should be reformed and rehabilitated and not punished. No society can afford to punish its children\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291352,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/05\/school-records-not-free-from-doubt-allahabad-hc-age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":353104,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Victim&#8217;s date of birth recorded in school records not free from doubt\u2019; Allahabad High Court acquits POCSO Convict on benefit of doubt","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the admission form has not been filled in by the parents of the victim, but by a stranger, whose credentials are unknown. Thus, the significance of victim's medical age determination will be considered, as per which, she was a major on the date of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353104"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353104\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353108"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}