{"id":353025,"date":"2025-07-10T13:00:25","date_gmt":"2025-07-10T07:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=353025"},"modified":"2025-07-17T18:34:26","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T13:04:26","slug":"guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Petty family quarrels do not amount to dowry harassment: Gujarat High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gujarat High Court<\/span>: In a criminal appeal filed against the judgement dated 28-5-2014 passed by the Trial Court, whereby the accused persons were acquitted of the charges under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">306<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304-B<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">114<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) read with Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546433\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546438\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a> (Dowry Act), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Cheekati Manavendranath Roy*<\/span> and D. M. Vyas, JJ, upheld the Trial Court\u2019s order of acquittal and stated that petty quarrels and bickering that are common in family life do not amount to \u2018cruelty\u2019 under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and cannot be called dowry harassment.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The deceased wife and her husband had been married for 4 years and had a one-and-a-half-year-old son from the wedlock; furthermore, she was expecting again. The deceased and her mother-in-law had a strained relationship and often quarreled. It was stated that even on the day of her death, the deceased and her mother-in-law had quarreled, aggrieved by which, the deceased had gone into a room, poured kerosene, and set herself ablaze.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The parents of the deceased had filed an FIR against the accused persons, alleging that the deceased was being constantly harassed for additional dowry and was beaten by her husband at the insistance of her mother-in-law because of which she had been driven to commit suicide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Additionally, the dying declaration given by the deceased stated that she was being harassed by her husband and mother-in-law, and unable to bear the harassment meted out by them, she had poured kerosene and set herself ablaze.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial Court had acquitted the accused persons charged under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">306<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304-B<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">114<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> read with Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546433\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546438\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dowry Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved with the acquittal, the instant appeal was filed challenging the impugned order of the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that a conjoint reading of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516695\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">113-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a> made it clear that to prove the offence of dowry death, it must be shown that the deceased was treated cruelly or harassed within 7 years of marriage and that the cruelty or harassment meted out to her was for, or in connection with, demand for dowry. In the instant case, there was no evidence on the record to show that the deceased had been harassed for dowry by her in-laws.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 1%;\">The Court also noted that, while the deceased\u2019s mother had initially alleged that the accused had harassed the deceased for dowry; however, during the deposition she had turned hostile. Thereafter, the basic requisites under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> could not be proved to establish dowry death.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">\u201cEvery harassment, which is not relating to demand for dowry, will not come within the purview of the offence of dowry death as contemplated under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the dying declaration of the deceased mentioned neither any demand for dowry nor any harassment meted out in connection with any such demand for dowry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> that defines cruelty as any willful conduct that would drive a woman to cause grave injury to herself, or any form of harassment for demand of property or money, and opined that the prosecution had failed to prove any such willful conduct on part of the accused persons. Therefore, it could not be said that the deceased had been treated cruelly because of which she had been driven to commit suicide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that the deceased\u2019s decision to end her life over normal bickering that took place in the house could be due to her sensitive mind or emotional temperament, and the same could not be attributed to the conduct of the accused to hold him guilty for abetment to suicide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that every petty quarrel or disagreement in the house, which is common in any family life, could not be construed as harassment made in connection with demand for dowry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon re-appraisal of the evidence on record, the Court held that the Trial Court had arrived at the correct conclusion and no case had been made out for any of the charges levelled against the accused. Thereafter, the Court dismissed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of Gujarat v. Paresh Shantilal, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/j390877b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Guj 2587<\/a>, decided on 27-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Order by: Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Bhargav Pandya (APP)<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;To prove the offence of dowry death, it must be shown that there was cruelty and harassment within 7 years of marriage and that it was meted out for or in connection with, demand for dowry&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":353033,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2570,6691,33559,48130,52786,7931,3096,84535,84536,36335,2752],"class_list":["post-353025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cruelty","tag-dowry-death","tag-dowry-demand","tag-dowry-harassment","tag-dowry-prohibition-act-1961","tag-dying-declaration","tag-Gujarat_High_Court","tag-justice-cheekati-manavendranath-roy","tag-justice-d-m-vyas","tag-penal-code-1860","tag-Suicide"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Petty family quarrel not dowry harassment: Guj HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court holds that petty family quarrels do not amount to harassment for dowry; upholds Trial Court\u2019s decision of acquittal.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Petty family quarrels do not amount to dowry harassment: Gujarat High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court holds that petty family quarrels do not amount to harassment for dowry; upholds Trial Court\u2019s decision of acquittal.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-10T07:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T13:04:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Petty family quarrels do not amount to dowry harassment: Gujarat High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Petty family quarrel not dowry harassment: Guj HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-10T07:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-17T13:04:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Gujarat High Court holds that petty family quarrels do not amount to harassment for dowry; upholds Trial Court\u2019s decision of acquittal.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"petty family quarrel dowry harassment\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Petty family quarrels do not amount to dowry harassment: Gujarat High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Petty family quarrel not dowry harassment: Guj HC | SCC Times","description":"Gujarat High Court holds that petty family quarrels do not amount to harassment for dowry; upholds Trial Court\u2019s decision of acquittal.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Petty family quarrels do not amount to dowry harassment: Gujarat High Court","og_description":"Gujarat High Court holds that petty family quarrels do not amount to harassment for dowry; upholds Trial Court\u2019s decision of acquittal.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-10T07:30:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-17T13:04:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Petty family quarrels do not amount to dowry harassment: Gujarat High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/","name":"Petty family quarrel not dowry harassment: Guj HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-10T07:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-17T13:04:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Gujarat High Court holds that petty family quarrels do not amount to harassment for dowry; upholds Trial Court\u2019s decision of acquittal.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"petty family quarrel dowry harassment"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Petty family quarrels do not amount to dowry harassment: Gujarat High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":380173,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/04\/madras-hc-presumption-in-dowry-death-cases-needs-proof-of-cruelty-soon-before-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":353025,"position":0},"title":"Presumption in dowry death cases require proof of demand related cruelty soon before death: Madras HC acquits husband","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"April 4, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe trial court failed to note that only when the prosecution proves the foundational facts and there is evidence to show that cruelty was meted out to the deceased in respect of demand of dowry soon before death, the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act would arise.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Presumption in dowry death cases","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Presumption-in-dowry-death-cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Presumption-in-dowry-death-cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Presumption-in-dowry-death-cases.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Presumption-in-dowry-death-cases.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/telangana-hc-for-invoking-s-304-b-ipc-harassment-or-cruelty-caused-to-a-woman-should-have-happened-soon-before-her-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":353025,"position":1},"title":"Telangana HC | For invoking S. 304-B IPC, harassment or cruelty caused to a woman should have happened &#8220;soon before her death&#8221;","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Telangana High Court:\u00a0K. Lakshman, J.,\u00a0 while addressing an issue, observed that, there should be a perceptible nexus between the death of a woman and the dowry-related harassment or cruelty inflicted on her. Deceased and accused 1 were married, wherein at the time of marriage parents of the deceased gave 15\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":319968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/not-providing-food-to-wife-over-dowry-demands-constitutes-physical-mental-harassment-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":353025,"position":2},"title":"Not providing food to married woman over dowry demands constitutes physical &amp; mental harassment: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Regarding the timing of the FIR in relation to the divorce petition, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the pendency of a civil proceeding does not bar criminal proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352129,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/","url_meta":{"origin":353025,"position":3},"title":"Demanding to arrange money to meet legal expense of husband\u2019s bail does not constitute \u2018dowry\u2019; Gujarat HC upholds acquittal in dowry death case","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"It was not the prosecution\u2019s case that any demand for dowry or any valuable security or other property was made by the accused. Rather, it was an admitted case that the only demand was to arrange Rs 50,000 to meet the legal expenses for applying bail of the husband and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"money for husband's bail not dowry","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/06\/dowry-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":353025,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Is it within Court\u2019s power to direct for further investigation on finding defects in the same? Death caused by suicide, Allegations of Dowry Death | Why FIR was registered after 10 months of deceased\u2019s death? [Detailed Report]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., expressed that: \u201cCourts must not close its eyes to the fact that it is the victim who knocks the doors of the Court and seeks justice must not left high and dry with the feeling that the accused have escaped due to the perfunctory\/faulty\/defective\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":307843,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/25\/husband-request-for-money-with-a-promise-to-repay-does-not-come-within-definition-of-dowry-orissa-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":353025,"position":5},"title":"Request for money by husband to arrange job with promise to repay does not amount to \u2018dowry\u2019 u\/s 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act: Orissa HC","author":"Editor","date":"November 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDemand for dowry should be the continuing cause for the death of the married women. Cruelty can be mental, or it can be physical. Every instance of cruelty and related harassment has a different impact on the mind of a woman.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353025\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/353033"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}