{"id":352914,"date":"2025-07-09T14:30:58","date_gmt":"2025-07-09T09:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=352914"},"modified":"2025-07-11T12:09:59","modified_gmt":"2025-07-11T06:39:59","slug":"bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Under construction flat is not \u2018shared household\u2019 under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> The present writ petition was filed by the petitioner-wife under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560346\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005<\/a> (\u2018DV Act\u2019), seeking to direct the respondent-husband to pay the remaining two instalments for the \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">shared household<\/span>\u201d while the divorce proceeding was undergoing. A Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Manjusha Deshpande, J.<\/span>, while dismissing the petition of the wife, held that since the property\/flat, was still under construction and not in possession of either of the parties, therefore, it would not fall within the purview of \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">shared household<\/span>\u201d, as defined under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560346\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DV Act<\/a> and, further the kind of relief claimed by the wife, unfortunately did not fit under any of the reliefs provided under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560345\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DV Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The couple got married on\u00a011-5-2013. After the marriage, they\u00a0began residing\u00a0in Thane in a rented premises. According to the wife, she\u00a0was subjected to\u00a0physical and emotional domestic violence by the husband. In 2019, the husband\u00a0moved to Seattle\u00a0in the United States of America (\u2018USA\u2019), where he\u00a0worked\u00a0as a Senior Software Development Engineer. It was alleged that during his stay in the USA, the husband\u00a0engaged in\u00a0an adulterous relationship with another woman.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In February 2020, the husband\u00a0returned to Mumbai, and the couple\u00a0attempted to reconcile\u00a0their relationship based on his assurance that he would permanently shift to Mumbai, settle down, and that they would start their own family. As a gesture of commitment, the husband\u00a0executed a registered &#8220;Agreement for Sale&#8221;\u00a0for a flat, for which a loan was availed\u00a0by him. However, in May 2022, the wife\u00a0filed a domestic violence complaint\u00a0against the husband, alleging that he\u00a0would get angry\u00a0and\u00a0threaten to stop making payments\u00a0towards rent, electricity, etc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">An interim order in February 2023 directed the husband to pay interim maintenance from the date of the application. The husband had been paying monthly rent and maintenance until May 2022, but stopped paying rent from June 2022 onwards, following the filing of a domestic violence complaint. The wife was thus constrained to file an application for a distress warrant against the husband, which was served after his continued disobeying of the interim maintenance order. The wife, listed as a joint owner, received a demand letter for the 7th instalment from the developer, while the husband unilaterally and arbitrarily informed the developer of his disinterest in purchasing the flat and instructed them to sell it to someone else.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As a result, the wife filed an application seeking directions to the husband\u2019s employer to pay arrears and future interim maintenance. Meanwhile, the bank from whom the husband had availed a loan approached the wife for pending instalments. Aggrieved by the cancellation of the agreement due to non-payment within 30 days, the wife sought an urgent hearing of the interim application, requesting directions to the husband to pay the remaining two EMIs or direct his employer to pay the balance to the developer and further prayed to restrain him from creating any third-party interest in the shared household.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The wife alleged that there was a \u201cdomestic relationship\u201d between them and since she had no place to reside, she had filed the application seeking directions to the husband to pay the instalments of the house, which was her \u201cshared household\u201d. Moreover, she argued that her case fell under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560345\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DV Act<\/a>, and the broad definition of \u201cshared household\u201d included various domestic arrangements, even a future residence the couple intended to share.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The husband contended that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560346\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DV Act<\/a> required the aggrieved person to have resided in the \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">shared household<\/span>\u201d at any point during the domestic relationship, either alone or with him. Since the subject property was still under construction and had not yet come into his possession, he alleged that it did not fall within the ambit of Section 2(s) of the Act.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that the DV Act is a social welfare legislation intended to protect victims of domestic violence and abuse within the family, wherein the provisions ensured that victims were provided financially, protected from being ousted from their \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">shared household<\/span>\u201d where they resided, and could even seek alternate accommodation or a direction to pay rent for it. The Court further observed that the victim\u2019s right of residence was covered under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560345\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DV Act<\/a>, however, the kind of relief claimed by the wife, unfortunately, did not fit under any of the reliefs provided in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560345\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DV Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that the flat booked by the husband was claimed by the wife to be the \u201cshared household\u201d, however, the right provided under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560345\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DV Act<\/a> was essentially based on the right to reside in a household that was in existence. The Court observed that possession of the alleged \u201cshared household\u201d had not yet been handed over, and the instalments had not been fully paid, therefore, it would be an overreach to direct the husband to pay the remaining instalments or to instruct the employer to deduct the instalments from his salary and remit them to the bank.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court dismissed the petition and held that neither party was occupying the said premises, nor had they ever resided in the flat\/house and not even intended to live there which could be inferred from the fact that the husband had already initiated divorce proceedings against the wife in 2020 and since the property\/flat, was still under construction and not in possession of either of the parties, therefore, it did not fall within the purview of \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shared Household<\/span>\u201d, as defined under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560346\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DV Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/CYh0B5pC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2571<\/a>, decided on 4-7-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Archit Jaykar a\/w. Bhoomi Upadhyay, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Dhanlakshmi S. Krishnaiyar, APP \u2014 Respondent-State;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Raghavendra S. Mehrotra a\/w. Irfan Shaikh, Maddhat Shaikh and Mohini Tekale i\/b. Lawkhart Legal, Advocate and Legal Consultants, Advocate &#8211; Respondent 2 and 4.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Domestic Violence Act, 2005, is a social welfare legislation intended to provide protection to victims of domestic violence and abuse occurring within the family. The provisions ensure that victims are provided financially, as well as protection from being ousted from their &#8216;Shared Household&#8217;&#8221;,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":352923,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,3171,85011,71006,83368,85010,85008,85009,43050,85012],"class_list":["post-352914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-Domestic_Violence","tag-flat-possession","tag-justice-manjusha-deshpande","tag-legal-relief","tag-residence-right","tag-section-19-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005","tag-section-2s-dv-act","tag-shared-household","tag-under-construction-residence-right"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DV Act | Under construction flat not shared household: Bom HC| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Under construction flat did not shared household under Section 2(s) of DV Act: Explore Bombay High Court Ruling\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Under construction flat is not \u2018shared household\u2019 under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Under construction flat did not shared household under Section 2(s) of DV Act: Explore Bombay High Court Ruling\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-09T09:00:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-11T06:39:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Under construction flat is not \u2018shared household\u2019 under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/\",\"name\":\"DV Act | Under construction flat not shared household: Bom HC| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-09T09:00:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-11T06:39:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Under construction flat did not shared household under Section 2(s) of DV Act: Explore Bombay High Court Ruling\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Under construction flats is not shared household\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Under construction flat is not \u2018shared household\u2019 under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DV Act | Under construction flat not shared household: Bom HC| SCC Times","description":"Under construction flat did not shared household under Section 2(s) of DV Act: Explore Bombay High Court Ruling","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Under construction flat is not \u2018shared household\u2019 under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court","og_description":"Under construction flat did not shared household under Section 2(s) of DV Act: Explore Bombay High Court Ruling","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-09T09:00:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-11T06:39:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Under construction flat is not \u2018shared household\u2019 under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/","name":"DV Act | Under construction flat not shared household: Bom HC| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-09T09:00:58+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-11T06:39:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Under construction flat did not shared household under Section 2(s) of DV Act: Explore Bombay High Court Ruling","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Under construction flats is not shared household"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/bom-hc-under-construction-flat-not-shared-household-domestic-violence-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Under construction flat is not \u2018shared household\u2019 under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Under-construction-flats-is-not-shared-household.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/16\/domestic-violence-sc-wife-can-claim-right-to-residence-in-shared-household-belonging-to-not-just-husband-but-also-to-his-relatives-read-conditions\/","url_meta":{"origin":352914,"position":0},"title":"[Domestic Violence] SC| Wife can claim right to residence in shared household belonging to not just husband but also to his relatives. Read conditions","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe progress of any society depends on its ability to protect and promote the rights of its women.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/law-on-domestic-violence-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":352914,"position":1},"title":"Law on Domestic Violence [Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005]","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Shubhodip Chakraborty, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202009,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/20\/right-of-residence-in-shared-household-under-domestic-violence-act-can-be-claimed-only-against-husband-and-not-father-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":352914,"position":2},"title":"Right of residence in \u2018shared household\u2019 under Domestic Violence Act can be claimed only against husband and not father-in-law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. dismissed a petition filed by the petitioner-wife for a right to possession in the house owned by her father-in-law. The wife had filed a suit under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6508,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/10\/14\/decree-of-divorce-does-not-absolve-the-husband-from-liability-under-the-domestic-violence-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":352914,"position":3},"title":"Decree of divorce does not absolve the husband from liability under the Domestic Violence Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 14, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding a case of domestic violence, where the decree of divorce had been obtained subsequently, the Court held that an act of domestic violence once committed, subsequent decree of divorce will not absolve the liability of the respondent from the offence committed or to deny the benefit to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":352914,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act&#8221;: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 held that, legislature in its wisdom has provided for Appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against all \"orders\" and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/27\/bom-hc-order-of-maintenance-under-dv-act-set-aside-in-absence-of-any-act-of-domestic-violence-committed-by-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":352914,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | Order of maintenance under DV Act set aside in absence of any act of domestic violence committed by husband","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court at Goa:\u00a0C.V. Bhadang, J., allowed a petition filed by the husband and quashed trial court's order whereby it had partly allowed the wifes' application filed under Section 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The wife, along with her minor son, filed a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=352914"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352914\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/352923"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=352914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=352914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=352914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}