{"id":352830,"date":"2025-07-08T18:00:34","date_gmt":"2025-07-08T12:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=352830"},"modified":"2025-07-15T09:48:44","modified_gmt":"2025-07-15T04:18:44","slug":"bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/","title":{"rendered":"Know why Bombay HC granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against counterfeit CETAPHIL products"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/span> In an application filed for ad-interim relief, it was alleged by Galderma India Pvt. Ltd. (\u2018plaintiff\u2019) that the defendants sold goods bearing the plaintiff’s trade mark and artistic work and therefore it sought an injunction to restrain the defendants from doing so. A Single Judge Bench of Sharmila U. Deshmukh<\/span>, J., opined that upon comparison of the products of the plaintiff and the defendants, it was prima facie<\/span> evident that the defendants\u2019 products were counterfeit products as it did not contain the barcode, maximum retail price (MRP) etc., which indicated that the same did not originate from the plaintiff and was a slavish copy of the plaintiff\u2019s trade mark and artistic work. Therefore, the Court granted an injunction prohibiting the defendants from infringing on the plaintiff\u2019s products.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The plaintiff was the proprietor of the registered trade mark \u201cCETAPHIL\u201d. It was submitted that the plaintiff’s product was invented in 1947 and for over 70 years, the products bearing the plaintiff’s trade mark were offered for sale in the market. It was further stated that the plaintiff’s trade mark had a global presence and enjoyed an enormous reputation and goodwill. The artistic work in the said trade mark was also unique with a distinct font of writing and the plaintiff had copyright in the artistic work.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff alleged that the Investigation Agency found the infringing goods bearing its trade mark and artistic work, which were counterfeit products, from the defendants who were selling them. The plaintiffs searched on the website of Trade Marks Registry to check if any application was pending for the registration of trade mark similar to that of the plaintiff’s product but failed to find any.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff\u2019s counsel wanted to carry on the proceedings in the nature of John Doe action as the manufacturer of counterfeit products could not be identified. He submitted that the adoption of plaintiff\u2019s artistic work indicated a deliberate attempt to come as close as possible to the plaintiff’s product and use the reputation and goodwill of the plaintiff. He further contended that it was not just a case of deceptive similarity but that of counterfeit goods, and that these goods were likely to be sold as plaintiff’s goods. He alleged that there was a likelihood of causing confusion in the minds of average consumers and of wrongful association with the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n

The Court took note of the active and leading presence of the plaintiff in the market, which was proved by the sales report and promotional expenses. The plaintiff also produced the Registration Certificates, establishing its proprietary rights. The Court inspected the defendants\u2019 product and saw that it did not bear any manufacturing date or batch number. The Court opined that upon comparison of both the products, it was prima facie evident that the defendants\u2019 products were counterfeit. The counterfeit products did not contain the barcode, maximum retail price (MRP), etc., which indicated that the same did not originate from the plaintiff and were a slavish copy of the plaintiff’s trade mark and artistic work.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that it was obvious that the plaintiff’s registered trade mark and artistic work was infringed by the defendants, and it was likely to cause confusion in the minds of the public. The Court further emphasised that unless ad-interim reliefs were granted, the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss, harm and injury and therefore, the balance of convenience tilted in favor of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

The Court allowed the interim application by the plaintiff and directed that pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit, the defendants were restrained by a perpetual order and injunction from using or causing to be used the plaintiff\u2019s artistic works or trade mark, in relation to the impugned goods or any goods, or in any manner from manufacturing, marketing or offering for sale, advertising or dealing in any such goods so as to infringe upon the plaintiff\u2019s copyright or trade mark.<\/p>\n

The Court further ordered that while the suit was pending, a Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay and an Additional Special Receiver at Delhi would be appointed. The defendants were given liberty to apply for variation, modification or recall of this order, after at least seven working days’ notice to the plaintiff\u2019s advocate. The Court listed the matter for 30-7-2025 with the direction that the ad-interim relief would continue till that date.<\/p>\n

[Galderma India (P) Ltd. v. M.K. Cosmetics, 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2590<\/a>, decided on 18-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Applicants\/Plaintiffs<\/span>: Rashmin Khandekar, Smriti Yadav, Shubham Shende, Shubham Singh i\/b Khaitan and Co.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The plaintiff’s registered trade mark and artistic work is infringed by the defendants, and it is likely to cause confusion in the minds of the public, thus, unless ad-interim reliefs are granted, the plaintiff will suffer irreparable loss, harm, and injury.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":352838,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[40353,84953,53068,2569,84901,11391,32271,84952,36595,84950,84951,63716,66917,53386,2616,46158],"class_list":["post-352830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ad-interim-relief","tag-additional-special-receiver","tag-artistic-work","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-cetaphil","tag-copyright-infringement","tag-counterfeit-products","tag-court-receiver","tag-deceptive-similarity","tag-galderma-india-pvt-ltd","tag-john-doe-action","tag-john-doe-injunction","tag-justice-sharmila-u-deshmukh","tag-registered-trade-mark","tag-Trade_Mark","tag-trade-mark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nBom HC on counterfeit of Galderma's CETAPHIL Products|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against the counterfeit CETAPHIL products being sold in the market.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Know why Bombay HC granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against counterfeit CETAPHIL products\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against the counterfeit CETAPHIL products being sold in the market.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-08T12:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-15T04:18:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Know why Bombay HC granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against counterfeit CETAPHIL products\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC on counterfeit of Galderma's CETAPHIL Products|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-08T12:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-15T04:18:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against the counterfeit CETAPHIL products being sold in the market.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"counterfeit galderma cetaphil\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Know why Bombay HC granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against counterfeit CETAPHIL products\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC on counterfeit of Galderma's CETAPHIL Products|SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against the counterfeit CETAPHIL products being sold in the market.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Know why Bombay HC granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against counterfeit CETAPHIL products","og_description":"Bombay High Court granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against the counterfeit CETAPHIL products being sold in the market.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-08T12:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-15T04:18:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Know why Bombay HC granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against counterfeit CETAPHIL products","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/","name":"Bom HC on counterfeit of Galderma's CETAPHIL Products|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-08T12:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-15T04:18:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay High Court granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against the counterfeit CETAPHIL products being sold in the market.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"counterfeit galderma cetaphil"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-grants-injunction-to-galderma-against-counterfeit-cetaphil-products\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Know why Bombay HC granted John Doe injunction to Galderma against counterfeit CETAPHIL products"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/counterfeit-galderma-cetaphil.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355782,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/intellectual-property-rights-july-2025-roundup-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":352830,"position":0},"title":"IPR July 2025: A quick recap of the Months\u2019 top Intellectual Property Rights cases","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering all the important IPR cases across various High Courts and the Supreme Court, this roundup provides a quick summary of cases, links to other roundups, latest legal updates in criminal law and a few top stories of the month.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights July 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364760,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/25\/bom-hc-grants-ex-parte-relief-to-skechers-in-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":352830,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC grants ex-parte injunction to Skechers in trade mark and copyright dispute over counterfeit goods","author":"Editor","date":"October 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court Receiver was directed to visit and search all premises of the defendants, forcibly breaking open locks if necessary and taking police assistance where required to seize and seal all offending goods.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ex-parte relief to Skechers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268855,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/22\/bombay-high-court-directs-removal-of-infringing-links-of-film-janhit-mein-jaari-ad-interim-injunction-granted-in-favour-of-bhanushali-studios-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":352830,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court directs removal of infringing links of film ‘Janhit mein Jaari’ from online platforms; Ad-interim injunction granted in favour of Bhanushali Studios Ltd","author":"Editor","date":"June 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: RI Chagla J. granted an ad-interim injunction in favour of the producers of the film \u201cJanhit Mein Jaari\u201d and directed the defendants to remove infringing links with immediate effect. The Applicants\/Plaintiffs are producers of the cinematography film titled \u201cJanhit Mein Jaari which was released worldwide and in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352739,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/khaitan-galderma-ip-enforcement-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":352830,"position":3},"title":"Khaitan & Co secures favourable orders for Swiss pharma company, Galderma in IP Enforcement case before Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Khaitan & Co successfully represented Galderma Holdings, a Swiss multinational pharmaceutical company, acting in India through its subsidiary Galderma India, before the Bombay High Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Law Firms News"","block_context":{"text":"Law Firms News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/law-firms-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Khaitan & Co Galderma IP enforcement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Khaitan-Co-Galderma-IP-enforcement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Khaitan-Co-Galderma-IP-enforcement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Khaitan-Co-Galderma-IP-enforcement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Khaitan-Co-Galderma-IP-enforcement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":352830,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":352830,"position":5},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352830","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=352830"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352830\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/352838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=352830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=352830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=352830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}