{"id":352745,"date":"2025-07-08T11:00:02","date_gmt":"2025-07-08T05:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=352745"},"modified":"2025-07-17T18:24:03","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T12:54:03","slug":"delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: Delhi High Court issues notice in Trademark Suit; Next hearing on August 27"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> Two parallel suit was filed by popular New Delhi-based restaurant chain, Swagath (plaintiff) against a Telangana-based hospitality enterprise operating under the identical name \u2018Swagath\u2019 alleging infringement of its mark and sought cancellation of the rival\u2019s registered trademark. Amit Bansal, J., issued notice in both proceedings and directed that the matter be listed on 27-08-2025 for consideration of interim relief.<\/p>\n

The Plaintiff, operating popular hotels and restaurants under the name \u201cSwagath\u201d in New Delhi and franchise models across North India through a franchise model, approached the Court with two parallel legal remedies, a rectification petition under the Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> seeking cancellation of the Defendant\u2019s registered trademark \u201cSWAGATH\u201d and a civil suit for injunction restraining the Defendants from using the impugned mark. The Defendant, Hotel Swagath, is a Telangana-based hotel group established in 1991, with 11 operational outlets and a registered trademark under Class 43 since 2017. The Defendant also previously ran a hotel under the same name in Dubai.<\/p>\n

The Court directed that the plaint be registered as a suit and issued a summon and notice in the interim injunction application. Counsel for the defendant waived formal summons. In the rectification petition, the Court issued notice and granted time for filing replies and rejoinders. The procedural timelines for filing original documents, affidavits of admission\/denial, and seeking inspection were also set down. At this stage, the Court declined to grant any interim injunction and deferred consideration of interim relief to the next hearing.<\/p>\n

The Court directed to list the case on 27-08-2025 for consideration of the application for an interim injunction.<\/p>\n

[Swagath v. Hotel Swagath, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 4831<\/a>, decided on 04-07-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Mamta Rani Jha, Ms. Anupriya Shyam & Ms. Anjeeta Rani, Advocates for plaintiff<\/p>\n

Mr. Resu Mahender Reddy, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sai Krishna Rajagopal, Mr. Shravanth Shankar, Mr. Rohit Bhardwaj, Ms. Julien George, Ms. Prerna Robin, Ms. Shwetha Bhaskar Dhanturi, Mr. Vikas Dhanturi, Mr. Resu Kaushik Reddy, Ms. Anu Parcha, Mr. Shivnath Sawhney & Ms. Alka Bisht, Advocates for defendants<\/p>\n

Buy Trade Marks Act, 1999 \u00a0 HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"trade<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Plaintiff is operating popular hotels and restaurants under the name “Swagath” in New Delhi and franchise models across North India and the defendant, Hotel Swagath, is a Telangana-based hotel group established in 1991, with 11 operational outlets.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":352753,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[84904,72373,84905,84903,84902,84906,72375,74589],"class_list":["post-352745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-branddispute","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-indiancourts","tag-iprindia","tag-swagathcase","tag-swagathvshotelswagath","tag-trademarkinfringement","tag-trademarklaw"],"yoast_head":"\nSwagath vs Hotel Swagath: DHC issues notice in Trademark Dispute<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi HC issues notice in the uit filed by Swagath against Hotel Swagath over alleged unauthorized use of the 'Swagath' trade mark.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: Delhi High Court issues notice in Trademark Suit; Next hearing on August 27\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court issues notice in the trademark infringement suit filed by Swagath against Hotel Swagath over alleged unauthorized use of the 'Swagath' mark.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-08T05:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T12:54:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: Delhi High Court issues notice in Trademark Suit; Next hearing on August 27\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: DHC issues notice in Trademark Dispute\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-08T05:30:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-17T12:54:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi HC issues notice in the uit filed by Swagath against Hotel Swagath over alleged unauthorized use of the 'Swagath' trade mark.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Hotel Swagath\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: Delhi High Court issues notice in Trademark Suit; Next hearing on August 27\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: DHC issues notice in Trademark Dispute","description":"Delhi HC issues notice in the uit filed by Swagath against Hotel Swagath over alleged unauthorized use of the 'Swagath' trade mark.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: Delhi High Court issues notice in Trademark Suit; Next hearing on August 27","og_description":"Delhi High Court issues notice in the trademark infringement suit filed by Swagath against Hotel Swagath over alleged unauthorized use of the 'Swagath' mark.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-08T05:30:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-17T12:54:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: Delhi High Court issues notice in Trademark Suit; Next hearing on August 27","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/","name":"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: DHC issues notice in Trademark Dispute","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-08T05:30:02+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-17T12:54:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi HC issues notice in the uit filed by Swagath against Hotel Swagath over alleged unauthorized use of the 'Swagath' trade mark.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Hotel Swagath"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-swagath-vs-hotel-swagath-trademark-suit-issues-notice-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Swagath vs Hotel Swagath: Delhi High Court issues notice in Trademark Suit; Next hearing on August 27"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hotel-Swagath.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355782,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/intellectual-property-rights-july-2025-roundup-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":352745,"position":0},"title":"IPR July 2025: A quick recap of the Months\u2019 top Intellectual Property Rights cases","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering all the important IPR cases across various High Courts and the Supreme Court, this roundup provides a quick summary of cases, links to other roundups, latest legal updates in criminal law and a few top stories of the month.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights July 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-July-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/13\/high-court-weekly-roundup-july-2025-on-saif-ali-khan-cetaphil-swagath-asaram\/","url_meta":{"origin":352745,"position":1},"title":"HIGH COURT JULY 2025 WEEKLY ROUNDUP | Saif Ali Khan\u2019s Ancestral Property; Phone Tapping & Right to Privacy; Counterfeit Cetaphil Products; Effect of poor CIBIL score; and more","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"July 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.","rel":"","context":"In "High Court Round Up"","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"High Court Weekly Roundup July 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/High-Court-Weekly-Roundup-July-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/High-Court-Weekly-Roundup-July-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/High-Court-Weekly-Roundup-July-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/High-Court-Weekly-Roundup-July-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322343,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/17\/dhc-restrains-franchisor-to-sell-poor-quality-food-items-under-name-burger-singh-after-termination-franchise-agreement-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":352745,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains franchisor to sell poor quality food items under the name of BURGER SINGH after termination of Franchise Agreement","author":"Editor","date":"May 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Termination of Franchise Agreement will revoke respondent authorization to operate the franchise outlet, as well as obligating the respondent to cease the use of petitioner\u2019s trademark.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/17\/karims-v-karins-delhi-high-court-rules-in-favour-of-karims-trademark-in-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":352745,"position":3},"title":"[Karim\u2019s v. Karin\u2019s] Delhi High Court rules in favour of Karim\u2019s trademark in infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"May 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Defendants have entirely imitated Plaintiff No. 1\u2019s registered trademarks, replicating all aspects such as font of the letters, design of the logo, color scheme, size, style, and placement of letter and the taglines. Both the marks are also used for identical services.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324136,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-fabindia-emporium-trademark-infringement-fabindia-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":352745,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Fab India Emporium for trademark infringement of Fab India marks","author":"Arunima","date":"June 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cInvoices issued by the defendant have also been procured which exhibit that they are selling products not only in their store under the name of \u201cFAB INDIA EMPORIUM\u201d but they are also selling their products under the same tradename.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325045,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/delhi-high-court-restrains-south-infosys-limited-from-using-mark-infosys-in-its-corporate-trade-name-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":352745,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC restrains South Infosys Limited from using mark \u2018INFOSYS\u2019 in its corporate\/trade name","author":"Editor","date":"June 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court restrained Southern Infosys Limited from using the mark \u2018INFOSYS\u2019 as part of their corporate\/trade name or in any other manner amounting to infringement of the Plaintiff\u2019s trademarks.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=352745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352745\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/352753"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=352745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=352745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=352745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}